Search (4 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Spink, A."
  1. Spink, A.; Goodrum, A.: ¬A study of search intermediary working notes : implications for IR system design (1996) 0.07
    0.06877634 = product of:
      0.13755268 = sum of:
        0.13755268 = product of:
          0.27510536 = sum of:
            0.27510536 = weight(_text_:notes in 6981) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.27510536 = score(doc=6981,freq=12.0), product of:
                0.27181563 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.3425174 = idf(docFreq=574, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050877817 = queryNorm
                1.0121028 = fieldWeight in 6981, product of:
                  3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                    12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                  5.3425174 = idf(docFreq=574, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6981)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Reports findings from an explanatory study investigating working notes created during encoding and external storage (EES) processes, by human search intermediaries using a Boolean information retrieval systems. Analysis of 221 sets of working notes created by human search intermediaries revealed extensive use of EES processes and the creation of working notes of textual, numerical and graphical entities. Nearly 70% of recorded working noted were textual/numerical entities, nearly 30 were graphical entities and 0,73% were indiscernible. Segmentation devices were also used in 48% of the working notes. The creation of working notes during the EES processes was a fundamental element within the mediated, interactive information retrieval process. Discusses implications for the design of interfaces to support users' EES processes and further research
  2. Spink, A.; Saracevic, T.: Search term selection during mediated online searching (1993) 0.03
    0.028077822 = product of:
      0.056155644 = sum of:
        0.056155644 = product of:
          0.11231129 = sum of:
            0.11231129 = weight(_text_:notes in 7824) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11231129 = score(doc=7824,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.27181563 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.3425174 = idf(docFreq=574, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050877817 = queryNorm
                0.41318923 = fieldWeight in 7824, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.3425174 = idf(docFreq=574, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7824)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Reports selected results from a large study, conducted at Rutgers University, NJ, which observed, under real life conditions the interactions between users, intermediaries and information retrieval systems before and during online searching. Examines the stages of the search process at which search terms from different sources were selected and how the search terms selected at different stages of the search process contributed to the retrieval of relevant items as judged by users. Notes the sequences in which terms were selected and analyzes the sequences to determine the types and frequencies of changes that occur in such sequences. Results indicate that there are regular patterns in search term selection during the online search process. Discusses the implications of these findings
  3. Zhang, Y.; Jansen, B.J.; Spink, A.: Identification of factors predicting clickthrough in Web searching using neural network analysis (2009) 0.01
    0.010339863 = product of:
      0.020679725 = sum of:
        0.020679725 = product of:
          0.04135945 = sum of:
            0.04135945 = weight(_text_:22 in 2742) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04135945 = score(doc=2742,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17816545 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050877817 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2742, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2742)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2009 17:49:11
  4. Spink, A.; Cole, C.: ¬A multitasking framework for cognitive information retrieval (2005) 0.01
    0.006893242 = product of:
      0.013786484 = sum of:
        0.013786484 = product of:
          0.027572967 = sum of:
            0.027572967 = weight(_text_:22 in 642) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027572967 = score(doc=642,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17816545 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050877817 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 642, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=642)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    19. 1.2007 12:55:22