-
Garfield, E.: When to cite (1996)
0.03
0.032088943 = product of:
0.064177886 = sum of:
0.064177886 = product of:
0.12835577 = sum of:
0.12835577 = weight(_text_:notes in 7080) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12835577 = score(doc=7080,freq=2.0), product of:
0.27181563 = queryWeight, product of:
5.3425174 = idf(docFreq=574, maxDocs=44218)
0.050877817 = queryNorm
0.47221628 = fieldWeight in 7080, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.3425174 = idf(docFreq=574, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7080)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- In spite of numerous studies of citation behaviour and the wide recognition by journal editors of the need to acknowledge intellectual debts, authors and referees need explicit reminders as to when formal refrences or acknowledgements are appropriate. Notes a 3 year experiment involving graduate students which demonstrated the varying perceptions of the need for documentation off terminology, ideas and methods. Suggests a tentative tutorial for journal editors that should be modified in each scholarly context
-
Wainer, J.; Valle, E.: What happens to computer science research after it is published? : Tracking CS research lines (2013)
0.03
0.028077822 = product of:
0.056155644 = sum of:
0.056155644 = product of:
0.11231129 = sum of:
0.11231129 = weight(_text_:notes in 948) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11231129 = score(doc=948,freq=2.0), product of:
0.27181563 = queryWeight, product of:
5.3425174 = idf(docFreq=574, maxDocs=44218)
0.050877817 = queryNorm
0.41318923 = fieldWeight in 948, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.3425174 = idf(docFreq=574, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=948)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Are computer science papers extended after they are published? We have surveyed 200 computer science publications, 100 journal articles, and 100 conference papers, using self-citations to identify potential and actual continuations. We are interested in determining the proportion of papers that do indeed continue, how and when the continuation takes place, and whether any distinctions are found between the journal and conference populations. Despite the implicit assumption of a research line behind each paper, manifest in the ubiquitous "future research" notes that close many of them, we find that more than 70% of the papers are never continued.
-
Nicolaisen, J.: Citation analysis (2007)
0.03
0.027572967 = product of:
0.055145934 = sum of:
0.055145934 = product of:
0.11029187 = sum of:
0.11029187 = weight(_text_:22 in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11029187 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17816545 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050877817 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 13. 7.2008 19:53:22
-
Døsen, K.: One more reference on self-reference (1992)
0.03
0.027572967 = product of:
0.055145934 = sum of:
0.055145934 = product of:
0.11029187 = sum of:
0.11029187 = weight(_text_:22 in 4604) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11029187 = score(doc=4604,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17816545 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050877817 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4604, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4604)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 7. 2.2005 14:10:22
-
Van der Veer Martens, B.: Do citation systems represent theories of truth? (2001)
0.02
0.02437129 = product of:
0.04874258 = sum of:
0.04874258 = product of:
0.09748516 = sum of:
0.09748516 = weight(_text_:22 in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09748516 = score(doc=3925,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17816545 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050877817 = queryNorm
0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 15:22:28
-
Baird, L.M.; Oppenheim, C.: Do citations matter? (1994)
0.02
0.024066707 = product of:
0.048133414 = sum of:
0.048133414 = product of:
0.09626683 = sum of:
0.09626683 = weight(_text_:notes in 6896) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09626683 = score(doc=6896,freq=2.0), product of:
0.27181563 = queryWeight, product of:
5.3425174 = idf(docFreq=574, maxDocs=44218)
0.050877817 = queryNorm
0.35416222 = fieldWeight in 6896, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.3425174 = idf(docFreq=574, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6896)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Citation indexes are based on the principle of authors citing previous articles of relevance. The paper demonstrates the long history of citing for precedent and notes how ISI's citation indexes differ from 'Shephards Citations'. The paper analyses some of the criticisms of citations counting, and some of the uses for which citation analysis has been employed. The paper also examines the idea of the development of an Acknowledgement Index, and concludes such an index is unlikely to be commercially viable. The paper describes a citation study of Eugene Garfield, and concludes that he may be the most heavily cited information scientist, that he is a heavy self-citer, and that the reasons why other authors cite Garfield are different from the reasons why he cites himself. The paper concludes that citation studies remain a valid methgod of analysis of individuals', institutions', or journals' impact, but need to be used with caution and in conjunction with other measures
-
White, H.D.: Citation analysis : history (2009)
0.02
0.020055588 = product of:
0.040111177 = sum of:
0.040111177 = product of:
0.08022235 = sum of:
0.08022235 = weight(_text_:notes in 3763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08022235 = score(doc=3763,freq=2.0), product of:
0.27181563 = queryWeight, product of:
5.3425174 = idf(docFreq=574, maxDocs=44218)
0.050877817 = queryNorm
0.29513517 = fieldWeight in 3763, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.3425174 = idf(docFreq=574, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3763)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- References from publications are at the same time citations to other publications. This entry introduces some of the practical uses of citation data in science and scholarship. At the individual level citations identify and permit the retrieval of specific editions of works, while also suggesting their subject matter, authority, and age. Through citation indexes, retrievals may include not only the earlier items referred to by a given work, but also the later items that cite that given work in turn. Some technical notes on retrieval are included here. Counts of citations received over time, and measures derived from them, reveal the varying impacts of works, authors, journals, organizations, and countries. This has obvious implications for the evaluation of, e.g., library collections, academics, research teams, and science policies. When treated as linkages between pairs of publications, references and citations reveal intellectual ties. Several kinds of links have been defined, such as cocitation, bibliographic coupling, and intercitation. In the aggregate, these links form networks that compactly suggest the intellectual histories of research specialties and disciplines, especially when the networks are visualized through mapping software. Citation analysis is of course not without critics, who have long pointed out imperfections in the data or in analytical techniques. However, the criticisms have generally been met by strong counterarguments from proponents.
-
Garfield, E.; Stock, W.G.: Citation Consciousness : Interview with Eugene Garfiels, chairman emeritus of ISI; Philadelphia (2002)
0.02
0.017233105 = product of:
0.03446621 = sum of:
0.03446621 = product of:
0.06893242 = sum of:
0.06893242 = weight(_text_:22 in 613) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06893242 = score(doc=613,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17816545 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050877817 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 613, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=613)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Password. 2002, H.6, S.22-25
-
Larivière, V.; Gingras, Y.; Archambault, E.: ¬The decline in the concentration of citations, 1900-2007 (2009)
0.01
0.014622775 = product of:
0.02924555 = sum of:
0.02924555 = product of:
0.0584911 = sum of:
0.0584911 = weight(_text_:22 in 2763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0584911 = score(doc=2763,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17816545 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050877817 = queryNorm
0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 2763, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2763)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 3.2009 19:22:35
-
Bensman, S.J.: Eugene Garfield, Francis Narin, and PageRank : the theoretical bases of the Google search engine (2013)
0.01
0.013786484 = product of:
0.027572967 = sum of:
0.027572967 = product of:
0.055145934 = sum of:
0.055145934 = weight(_text_:22 in 1149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055145934 = score(doc=1149,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17816545 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050877817 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1149, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1149)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 17.12.2013 11:02:22
-
Garfield, E.: Recollections of Irving H. Sher 1924-1996 : Polymath/information scientist extraordinaire (2001)
0.01
0.012063174 = product of:
0.024126347 = sum of:
0.024126347 = product of:
0.048252694 = sum of:
0.048252694 = weight(_text_:22 in 6920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048252694 = score(doc=6920,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17816545 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050877817 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 6920, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6920)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 16.12.2001 14:01:22
-
Van der Veer Martens, B.; Goodrum, G.: ¬The diffusion of theories : a functional approach (2006)
0.01
0.012063174 = product of:
0.024126347 = sum of:
0.024126347 = product of:
0.048252694 = sum of:
0.048252694 = weight(_text_:22 in 5269) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048252694 = score(doc=5269,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17816545 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050877817 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5269, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5269)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 15:20:01
-
Tay, A.: ¬The next generation discovery citation indexes : a review of the landscape in 2020 (2020)
0.01
0.012063174 = product of:
0.024126347 = sum of:
0.024126347 = product of:
0.048252694 = sum of:
0.048252694 = weight(_text_:22 in 40) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048252694 = score(doc=40,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17816545 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050877817 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 40, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=40)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 17.11.2020 12:22:59
-
Campanario, J.M.: Have referees rejected some of the most-cited articles of all times? (1996)
0.01
0.010339863 = product of:
0.020679725 = sum of:
0.020679725 = product of:
0.04135945 = sum of:
0.04135945 = weight(_text_:22 in 4215) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04135945 = score(doc=4215,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17816545 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050877817 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4215, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4215)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- In this article a quantitative study is reported on the resistance that scientists may encounter when they do innovative work or when they attempt to publish articles that later become highly cited. A set of 205 commentaries by authors of some of the most-cited papers of all times have been examined in order to identify those articles whose authors encountered difficulty in getting his or her work published. There are 22 commentaries (10,7%) in which authors mention some difficulty or resistance in doing or publishing the research reported in the article. Three of the articles which had problems in being published are the most cited from their respective journals. According the authors' commentaries, although sometimes referees' negative evaluations can help improve the articles, in other instances referees and editors wrongly rejected the highly cited articles
-
Snyder, H.; Bonzi, S.: Patterns of self-citation across disciplines : 1980-1989 (1998)
0.01
0.010339863 = product of:
0.020679725 = sum of:
0.020679725 = product of:
0.04135945 = sum of:
0.04135945 = weight(_text_:22 in 3692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04135945 = score(doc=3692,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17816545 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050877817 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3692, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3692)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 5.1999 19:33:24
-
wst: Cut-and-paste-Wissenschaft (2003)
0.01
0.010339863 = product of:
0.020679725 = sum of:
0.020679725 = product of:
0.04135945 = sum of:
0.04135945 = weight(_text_:22 in 1270) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04135945 = score(doc=1270,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17816545 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050877817 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1270, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1270)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- "Mikhail Simkin und Vwani Roychowdhury von der University of Califomia, Los Angeles, haben eine in der wissenschaftlichen Gemeinschaft verbreitete Unsitte erstmals quantitativ erfasst. Die Wissenschaftler analysierten die Verbreitung von Druckfehlern in den Literaturlisten wissenschaftlicher Arbeiten (www.arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0212043). 78 Prozent aller zitierten Aufsätze - so schätzen die Forscher - haben die zitierenden Wissenschaftler demnach nicht gelesen, sondern nur per 'cut and paste' von einer Vorlage in ihre eigene Literaturliste übernommen. Das könne man beispielsweise abschätzen aus der Analyse fehlerhafter Seitenangaben in der Literaturliste eines 1973 veröffentlichten Aufsatzes über die Struktur zweidimensionaler Kristalle: Dieser Aufsatz ist rund 4300 mal zitiert worden. In 196 Fällen enthalten die Zitate jedoch Fehler in der Jahreszahl, dem Band der Zeitschrift oder der Seitenzahl, die als Indikatoren für cut and paste genommen werden können, denn man kann, obwohl es Milliarden Möglichkeiten gibt, nur 45 verschiedene Arten von Druckfehlern unterscheiden. In erster Näherung ergibt sich eine Obergrenze für die Zahl der `echten Leser' daher aus der Zahl der unterscheidbaren Druckfehler (45) geteilt durch die Gesamtzahl der Publikationen mit Druckfehler (196), das macht etwa 22 Prozent."
-
Chan, H.C.; Kim, H.-W.; Tan, W.C.: Information systems citation patterns from International Conference on Information Systems articles (2006)
0.01
0.010339863 = product of:
0.020679725 = sum of:
0.020679725 = product of:
0.04135945 = sum of:
0.04135945 = weight(_text_:22 in 201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04135945 = score(doc=201,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17816545 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050877817 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 201, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=201)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 3. 1.2007 17:22:03
-
H-Index auch im Web of Science (2008)
0.01
0.010339863 = product of:
0.020679725 = sum of:
0.020679725 = product of:
0.04135945 = sum of:
0.04135945 = weight(_text_:22 in 590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04135945 = score(doc=590,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17816545 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050877817 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 590, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=590)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 6. 4.2008 19:04:22
-
Mingers, J.; Burrell, Q.L.: Modeling citation behavior in Management Science journals (2006)
0.01
0.010339863 = product of:
0.020679725 = sum of:
0.020679725 = product of:
0.04135945 = sum of:
0.04135945 = weight(_text_:22 in 994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04135945 = score(doc=994,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17816545 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050877817 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 994, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=994)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 26.12.2007 19:22:05
-
Ma, N.; Guan, J.; Zhao, Y.: Bringing PageRank to the citation analysis (2008)
0.01
0.010339863 = product of:
0.020679725 = sum of:
0.020679725 = product of:
0.04135945 = sum of:
0.04135945 = weight(_text_:22 in 2064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04135945 = score(doc=2064,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17816545 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050877817 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2064, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2064)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 31. 7.2008 14:22:05
