Search (230 results, page 1 of 12)

0.11468856 = product of:
  0.22937712 = sum of:
    0.22937712 = sum of:
      0.1604447 = weight(_text_:notes in 2635) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.1604447 = score(doc=2635,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.27181563 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.3425174 = idf(docFreq=574, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050877817 = queryNorm
          0.59027034 = fieldWeight in 2635, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.3425174 = idf(docFreq=574, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2635)
      0.06893242 = weight(_text_:22 in 2635) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.06893242 = score(doc=2635,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17816545 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050877817 = queryNorm
          0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2635, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2635)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Describes the process of cataloguing a videotape on OCLC. Considers decisions to make before cataloguing, such as the level of detail required. Describes the OCLC MARC audiovisual format and explains rules for titles and notes

Date

27.11.1995 17:07:22

0.09175085 = product of:
  0.1835017 = sum of:
    0.1835017 = sum of:
      0.12835577 = weight(_text_:notes in 5118) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.12835577 = score(doc=5118,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.27181563 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.3425174 = idf(docFreq=574, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050877817 = queryNorm
          0.47221628 = fieldWeight in 5118, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.3425174 = idf(docFreq=574, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5118)
      0.055145934 = weight(_text_:22 in 5118) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.055145934 = score(doc=5118,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17816545 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050877817 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5118, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5118)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Reviews the consequences of the traditional division of library staff into Technical Services and Reader Services and if decreased interest in cataloguing by library managers. Notes ways in which non cataloguers have had limited involvement in cataloguing. Describes different forms of a holistic approach to library practice and suggests advantages of a holistic work plan. Considers problems of a holistic work plan, advances some solutions and identifies implications for education in cataloguing in library schools

Source

Cataloging and classification quarterly. 24(1997) nos.1/2, S.5-22

0.09175085 = product of:
  0.1835017 = sum of:
    0.1835017 = sum of:
      0.12835577 = weight(_text_:notes in 6732) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.12835577 = score(doc=6732,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.27181563 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.3425174 = idf(docFreq=574, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050877817 = queryNorm
          0.47221628 = fieldWeight in 6732, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.3425174 = idf(docFreq=574, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6732)
      0.055145934 = weight(_text_:22 in 6732) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.055145934 = score(doc=6732,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17816545 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050877817 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6732, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6732)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Considers the problem of applying standard concepts of cataloguing and bibliographic control to electronic media by studying the degree of fit between the Standford Integrated Digital Library Project (SDLP) and both the USMARC format and the Text Encoding Initiative (TEI). Notes the lack of fit of both USMARC and TEI but stresses the advantages of the latter due its lack of dependency on 3 digit tags and its use of SGML conventions

Series

Cataloging and classification quarterly; vol.22, nos.3/4

0.09175085 = product of:
  0.1835017 = sum of:
    0.1835017 = sum of:
      0.12835577 = weight(_text_:notes in 695) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.12835577 = score(doc=695,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.27181563 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.3425174 = idf(docFreq=574, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050877817 = queryNorm
          0.47221628 = fieldWeight in 695, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.3425174 = idf(docFreq=574, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=695)
      0.055145934 = weight(_text_:22 in 695) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.055145934 = score(doc=695,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17816545 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050877817 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 695, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=695)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

One of the most common errors in cataloguing library materials involves miscoding of the nonfiling indicator of title fields. Notes the extent of the problem and its negative effect on searching in the library's online catalogue and surveys how librarians have approached solutions to the problems. Describes how the major library automation system address this problem

Date

6. 3.1997 16:22:15

0.08028199 = product of:
  0.16056398 = sum of:
    0.16056398 = sum of:
      0.11231129 = weight(_text_:notes in 129) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.11231129 = score(doc=129,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.27181563 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.3425174 = idf(docFreq=574, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050877817 = queryNorm
          0.41318923 = fieldWeight in 129, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.3425174 = idf(docFreq=574, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=129)
      0.048252694 = weight(_text_:22 in 129) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.048252694 = score(doc=129,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17816545 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050877817 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 129, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=129)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Papers on the cataloging of electronic resources have focused on electronic journals and Internet resources such as Web sites and not on electronic books. Electronic books are nonserial monographic resources accessed with a computer either directly or remotely. Rules and standards for cataloging electronic resources have changed and continue to change. This article discusses the electronic book as a unique manifestation and provides practical instruction on the application of current cataloging rules. The cataloging elements covered are control fields and variable data fields, including classification, uniform titles, title information, edition information, type and extent of the resource, publication and distribution information, physical description, series statements, notes, and subject analysis.

Date

10. 9.2000 17:38:22

0.08028199 = product of:
  0.16056398 = sum of:
    0.16056398 = sum of:
      0.11231129 = weight(_text_:notes in 2425) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.11231129 = score(doc=2425,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.27181563 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.3425174 = idf(docFreq=574, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050877817 = queryNorm
          0.41318923 = fieldWeight in 2425, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.3425174 = idf(docFreq=574, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2425)
      0.048252694 = weight(_text_:22 in 2425) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.048252694 = score(doc=2425,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17816545 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050877817 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2425, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2425)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Series

Lecture notes in computer science; vol.4172

Source

Research and advanced technology for digital libraries : 10th European conference, proceedings / ECDL 2006, Alicante, Spain, September 17 - 22, 2006

0.06881314 = product of:
  0.13762628 = sum of:
    0.13762628 = sum of:
      0.09626683 = weight(_text_:notes in 6734) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.09626683 = score(doc=6734,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.27181563 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.3425174 = idf(docFreq=574, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050877817 = queryNorm
          0.35416222 = fieldWeight in 6734, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.3425174 = idf(docFreq=574, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6734)
      0.04135945 = weight(_text_:22 in 6734) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04135945 = score(doc=6734,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17816545 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050877817 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 6734, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6734)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Describes the origins of the CATaloguing and Retrieval of Information Over Network Applications (CATRIONA) Study in the BUBL Subject Tree service and nots its aims: to investigate the requirements for developing procedures and applications for cataloguing and retrieval of networked resources (particularly via the Internet); and to explore the feasibility of a collaborative project to develop and integrate them with existing library systems. The project established that a distributed catalogue of networked resources integrated with standard Z39.50 library system OPAC interfaces with information on hard copy resources is already a practical proposition at a basic level. Notes that at least one Z30.50 OPAC client can searcg remote Z39.50 OPACs, retrieve USMARC records with URLs in MARC field 856

Series

Cataloging and classification quarterly; vol.22, nos.3/4

0.06881314 = product of:
  0.13762628 = sum of:
    0.13762628 = sum of:
      0.09626683 = weight(_text_:notes in 494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.09626683 = score(doc=494,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.27181563 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.3425174 = idf(docFreq=574, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050877817 = queryNorm
          0.35416222 = fieldWeight in 494, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.3425174 = idf(docFreq=574, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=494)
      0.04135945 = weight(_text_:22 in 494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04135945 = score(doc=494,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17816545 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050877817 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 494, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=494)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Reports results of a questionnaire survey of cataloguers, conducted over the AUTOCAT Internet discussion group, to determine those areas of cataloguing for which the Internet is a valuable tool and those areas for which it is not as useful. Respondents indicated 4 areas in which cataloguers use the Internet: searching the OPACs of other libraries, communicating with colleagues, accessing online cataloguing documentation and publications, and authority work. Cataloguers who found access to other libraries' OPACs did so for the following reasons: assigning call numbers and subject headings; finding full cataloguing copy from other libraries; enriching their local catalogue with notes present in records in other libraries; finding copy for foreign language items that cannot be read by library staff; and resolving difficult problems when important parts of the item are missing ar are in disarray. Some cataloguers also related processes for which they have found the Internet to not be efficient

Date

29. 8.1997 19:46:22

0.06881314 = product of:
  0.13762628 = sum of:
    0.13762628 = sum of:
      0.09626683 = weight(_text_:notes in 5736) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.09626683 = score(doc=5736,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.27181563 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.3425174 = idf(docFreq=574, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050877817 = queryNorm
          0.35416222 = fieldWeight in 5736, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.3425174 = idf(docFreq=574, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5736)
      0.04135945 = weight(_text_:22 in 5736) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04135945 = score(doc=5736,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17816545 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050877817 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5736, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5736)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Reports the work of the ad hoc task force, coordinated by the Scholarly Communications Project (SCP) at Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, to discuss the best means of cataloguing the theses palnned to be produced directly in electronic forms by postgraduate students. The main goals were to determine a process for handling electronic theses so that access would be at least as good as for hard copy and to find a way to derive cataloguing information from the electronic text and avoid rekeying as much as possible. An important part of the study was the application of existing MARC format tagged record structures to the new system. Concludes with brief notes on the concerns of UMI regarding Internet access of electronic theses

Series

Cataloging and classification quarterly; vol.22, nos.3/4

0.05734428 = product of:
  0.11468856 = sum of:
    0.11468856 = sum of:
      0.08022235 = weight(_text_:notes in 2422) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.08022235 = score(doc=2422,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.27181563 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.3425174 = idf(docFreq=574, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050877817 = queryNorm
          0.29513517 = fieldWeight in 2422, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.3425174 = idf(docFreq=574, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2422)
      0.03446621 = weight(_text_:22 in 2422) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03446621 = score(doc=2422,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17816545 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050877817 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2422, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2422)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Series

Lecture notes in computer science; vol.2769

Source

Research and advanced technology for digital libraries : 7th European Conference, proceedings / ECDL 2003, Trondheim, Norway, August 17-22, 2003

0.056155644 = product of:
  0.11231129 = sum of:
    0.11231129 = product of:
      0.22462258 = sum of:
        0.22462258 = weight(_text_:notes in 1929) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.22462258 = score(doc=1929,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.27181563 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.3425174 = idf(docFreq=574, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050877817 = queryNorm
            0.82637846 = fieldWeight in 1929, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              5.3425174 = idf(docFreq=574, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1929)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

This article analyzes the literature concerning uses of notes in bibliographic records and also certain grammatical conventions used by catalogers to communicate information about the resources they are describing. It shows that these types of data do not aid the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) user tasks in the resource discovery process. It also describes how general notes are addressed in Resource Description Access (RDA), and advocates that cataloging practices involving most general notes and such conventions as bracketing and abbreviations should be discontinued with the widespread use of RDA.

0.048133414 = product of:
  0.09626683 = sum of:
    0.09626683 = product of:
      0.19253366 = sum of:
        0.19253366 = weight(_text_:notes in 2165) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.19253366 = score(doc=2165,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.27181563 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.3425174 = idf(docFreq=574, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050877817 = queryNorm
            0.70832443 = fieldWeight in 2165, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.3425174 = idf(docFreq=574, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2165)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

0.048133414 = product of:
  0.09626683 = sum of:
    0.09626683 = product of:
      0.19253366 = sum of:
        0.19253366 = weight(_text_:notes in 7680) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.19253366 = score(doc=7680,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.27181563 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.3425174 = idf(docFreq=574, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050877817 = queryNorm
            0.70832443 = fieldWeight in 7680, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.3425174 = idf(docFreq=574, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7680)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Discusses new events and concepts which may worsen future prospects for cataloguing and notes factors which may alleviate the situation

0.040140994 = product of:
  0.08028199 = sum of:
    0.08028199 = sum of:
      0.056155644 = weight(_text_:notes in 1475) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.056155644 = score(doc=1475,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.27181563 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.3425174 = idf(docFreq=574, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050877817 = queryNorm
          0.20659462 = fieldWeight in 1475, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.3425174 = idf(docFreq=574, maxDocs=44218)
            0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1475)
      0.024126347 = weight(_text_:22 in 1475) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.024126347 = score(doc=1475,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17816545 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050877817 = queryNorm
          0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 1475, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1475)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Content

Inhalt: 1. Library Catalogue : Its Nature, Factions, and Importance in a Library System 2. History of Modern Library Catalogues 3. Catalogue Codes: Origin, Growth and Development 4. Principles of Planning and Provision of the Library Catalogue 5.Catalogue Entries and their Functions in Achieving the Objectives of the Library Catalogue 6.Descriptive Cataloguing 7. Physical Forms of the Catalogue-I Manual Catalogues 8. Physical Forms of the Catalogues-II Computerised Cataloges 9. Varieties of Catalogues, their Scope and Functions 10. Subject Cataloguing 11. Cataloguing Department: Organization and Administration. 12. Cost Analysis of Cataloguing Procedures and Suggested Economies 13. Co-operation and Centralization in Cataloguing 14. Union Catalogues and Subject Specialisation 15. Cataloguing of Special Material 16. Arrangement, Filing, Guiding of catalogue and Instructions for its Use 17. Education and Training of Cataloguers 18.Documentation : An Extension of Cataloguing and Classification Applied to Isolates 19.Catalogue Cards, Their Style and Reproduction Methods 20. Work of Personal Authors 21. Choice and Entry of Personal Names 22. Works of Corporate Authors 23. Legal Publications 24. Choice of Headings for Corporate Bodies 25. Works of Unknown Authorship : Entry under Uniform Titles 26. Acces Points to Books and Meta- Books by A-ACR2 27. AACR2 1988 revision : Choice of Access Points to Name Headings and Uniform Titles 28. Added Entries Other Than Subject Entries 29. Subject Entries 30. Analytiacal Entries 31. Series Note and Series Entry 32. Contents, Notes and Annotation 33. References 34. Display of Entries Appendix-I Select Aids and Guides for the Cataloguer Appendix-II Definitions of Terms Commonly used in Cataloguing Appendix-III Cataloguing Examination: Select Questions Appendix-IV Implications of the adoption of A-ACR2

0.040111177 = product of:
  0.08022235 = sum of:
    0.08022235 = product of:
      0.1604447 = sum of:
        0.1604447 = weight(_text_:notes in 8703) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1604447 = score(doc=8703,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.27181563 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.3425174 = idf(docFreq=574, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050877817 = queryNorm
            0.59027034 = fieldWeight in 8703, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.3425174 = idf(docFreq=574, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=8703)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Footnote

Notes arising from discussions 1991-1993 within the Standig Committee on Cataloguing of the IFLA, Division of Biliographic Control

0.040111177 = product of:
  0.08022235 = sum of:
    0.08022235 = product of:
      0.1604447 = sum of:
        0.1604447 = weight(_text_:notes in 736) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1604447 = score(doc=736,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.27181563 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.3425174 = idf(docFreq=574, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050877817 = queryNorm
            0.59027034 = fieldWeight in 736, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.3425174 = idf(docFreq=574, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=736)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Discusses the unique or troublesome aspects of cataloguing serials published on CD-ROMs. Considers how to find helpful information for preparing the bibliographic record; assigning standardized call numbers and subject tracing; use of notes to explain the library's holdings to catalogue users; describing system requirements; and indicating location

0.039708037 = product of:
  0.079416074 = sum of:
    0.079416074 = product of:
      0.15883215 = sum of:
        0.15883215 = weight(_text_:notes in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15883215 = score(doc=701,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.27181563 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.3425174 = idf(docFreq=574, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050877817 = queryNorm
            0.58433783 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.3425174 = idf(docFreq=574, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Comments on the value of abstracts or summary notes to information available online via the Internet and WWW and concludes that automated abstracting techniques would be highly useful if routinely applied to cataloguing or metadata for Internet documents and documents in other databases. Information seekers need external summary information to assess content and value of retrieved documents. Examines traditional models for writers, in library audiovisual cataloguing, periodical databases and archival work, along with innovative new model databases featuring robust cataloguing summaries. Notes recent developments in automated techniques, computational research, and machine summarization of digital images. Recommendations are made for future designers of cataloguing and metadata standards

0.039708037 = product of:
  0.079416074 = sum of:
    0.079416074 = product of:
      0.15883215 = sum of:
        0.15883215 = weight(_text_:notes in 5186) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15883215 = score(doc=5186,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.27181563 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.3425174 = idf(docFreq=574, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050877817 = queryNorm
            0.58433783 = fieldWeight in 5186, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.3425174 = idf(docFreq=574, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5186)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

When an item catalogued in a library's bibliographic database consists of more than a sole work, it may be difficult to link the works to the item. For the retrieval of such works, online catalogues currently rely on contents notes and added entry fields. Suggests 4 criteria for analytic catalogues: a search for a specific work should retrieve all units of that work; it should retrieve only that work without false drops; the search should require only one pass; and the resulting display should clearly collocate all retrieved works. Suggests that 'In' analytics as described in AACR2 rule 13.5A promise better results than analytic entries based on contents notes and added entries

0.038994066 = product of:
  0.07798813 = sum of:
    0.07798813 = product of:
      0.15597627 = sum of:
        0.15597627 = weight(_text_:22 in 4362) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15597627 = score(doc=4362,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17816545 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050877817 = queryNorm
            0.8754574 = fieldWeight in 4362, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4362)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

22. 1.2000 19:22:27

0.034035463 = product of:
  0.068070926 = sum of:
    0.068070926 = product of:
      0.13614185 = sum of:
        0.13614185 = weight(_text_:notes in 2276) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13614185 = score(doc=2276,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.27181563 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.3425174 = idf(docFreq=574, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050877817 = queryNorm
            0.500861 = fieldWeight in 2276, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.3425174 = idf(docFreq=574, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2276)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

WorldCat records are clustered into works, and within works, into content and manifestation clusters. A recent project revisited the clustering of collected works that had been previously sidelined because of the challenges posed by their complexity. Attention was given to both the identification of collected works and to the determination of the component works within them. By extensively analysing cast-list information, performance notes, contents notes, titles, uniform titles and added entries, the contents of collected works could be identified and differentiated so that correct clustering was achieved. Further work is envisaged in the form of refining the tests and weights and also in the creation and use of name/title authority records and other knowledge cards in clustering. There is a requirement to link collected works with their component works for use in search and retrieval.