-
Taniguchi, S.: Recording evidence in bibliographic records and descriptive metadata (2005)
0.07
0.06881314 = product of:
0.13762628 = sum of:
0.13762628 = sum of:
0.09626683 = weight(_text_:notes in 3565) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09626683 = score(doc=3565,freq=2.0), product of:
0.27181563 = queryWeight, product of:
5.3425174 = idf(docFreq=574, maxDocs=44218)
0.050877817 = queryNorm
0.35416222 = fieldWeight in 3565, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.3425174 = idf(docFreq=574, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3565)
0.04135945 = weight(_text_:22 in 3565) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04135945 = score(doc=3565,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17816545 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050877817 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3565, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3565)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- In this article recording evidence for data values in addition to the values themselves in bibliographic records and descriptive metadata is proposed, with the aim of improving the expressiveness and reliability of those records and metadata. Recorded evidence indicates why and how data values are recorded for elements. Recording the history of changes in data values is also proposed, with the aim of reinforcing recorded evidence. First, evidence that can be recorded is categorized into classes: identifiers of rules or tasks, action descriptions of them, and input and output data of them. Dates of recording values and evidence are an additional class. Then, the relative usefulness of evidence classes and also levels (i.e., the record, data element, or data value level) to which an individual evidence class is applied, is examined. Second, examples that can be viewed as recorded evidence in existing bibliographic records and current cataloging rules are shown. Third, some examples of bibliographic records and descriptive metadata with notes of evidence are demonstrated. Fourth, ways of using recorded evidence are addressed.
- Date
- 18. 6.2005 13:16:22
-
Connell, T.H.: Use of the LCSH system : realities (1996)
0.03
0.028077822 = product of:
0.056155644 = sum of:
0.056155644 = product of:
0.11231129 = sum of:
0.11231129 = weight(_text_:notes in 6941) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11231129 = score(doc=6941,freq=2.0), product of:
0.27181563 = queryWeight, product of:
5.3425174 = idf(docFreq=574, maxDocs=44218)
0.050877817 = queryNorm
0.41318923 = fieldWeight in 6941, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.3425174 = idf(docFreq=574, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6941)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Explores the question of whether academic libraries keep up with the changes in the LCSH system. Analysis of the handling of 15 subject headings in 50 academic library catalogues available via the Internet found that libraries are not consistently maintaining subject authority control, or making syndetic references and scope notes in their catalogues. Discusses the results from the perspective of the libraries' performance, performance on the headings overall, performance on references, performance on the type of change made to the headings,a nd performance within 3 widely used onlien catalogue systems (DRA, INNOPAC and NOTIS). Discusses the implications of the findings in relationship to expressions of dissatisfaction with the effectiveness of subject cataloguing expressed by discussion groups on the Internet
-
Cleverdon, C.W.: ASLIB Cranfield Research Project : Report on the first stage of an investigation into the comparative efficiency of indexing systems (1960)
0.02
0.020679725 = product of:
0.04135945 = sum of:
0.04135945 = product of:
0.0827189 = sum of:
0.0827189 = weight(_text_:22 in 6158) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0827189 = score(doc=6158,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17816545 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050877817 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6158, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6158)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: College and research libraries 22(1961) no.3, S.228 (G. Jahoda)
-
Shoham, S.; Kedar, R.: ¬The subject cataloging of monographs with the use of keywords (2001)
0.02
0.016044471 = product of:
0.032088943 = sum of:
0.032088943 = product of:
0.064177886 = sum of:
0.064177886 = weight(_text_:notes in 5442) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.064177886 = score(doc=5442,freq=2.0), product of:
0.27181563 = queryWeight, product of:
5.3425174 = idf(docFreq=574, maxDocs=44218)
0.050877817 = queryNorm
0.23610814 = fieldWeight in 5442, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.3425174 = idf(docFreq=574, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5442)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- The overall objective of this study was to examine the implementation of a different approach to the expression of the subject content of monographs in the cataloging record, i.e., the use of a post-coordinate, thesaurus of keywords, using inter-indexer consistency testing and in-depth analysis of mistakes in indexing. A sample of 50 non-fiction monographs was subject cataloged by 16 library science students (non-experienced indexers) using the new Hebrew Thesaurus of Indexing Terms (1996). The 800 indexing records of the non-experienced indexers were compared to the "correct indexing records" (prepared by a panel of three experienced indexers). Indexing consistency was measured using two different formulas used in previous inter-indexer studies. A medium level of inter-indexer consistency was found. In the analysis of mistakes, it was found that the most frequent mistake was the assignment of indexing terms to minor subject matter (i.e., subjects that were less than 20% of the content of the book). Among possible explanations offered for these finding are: sparseness of scope notes in the thesaurus, the priority given by Israeli public libraries to Hebrew language materials in the development of their non-fiction collection, and the size of the output of the Israeli publishing industry of non-fiction materials in Hebrew. The results of the consistency tests and the mistakes analysis were also examined in light of several factors: (1) the number of indexing terms assigned; (2) the length of the monographs (number of pages); and (3) subject area of each monograph. The same examinations were carried out for the subject cataloging records prepared by the Israeli Center for Libraries (ICL) for these monographs.
-
Veenema, F.: To index or not to index (1996)
0.01
0.013786484 = product of:
0.027572967 = sum of:
0.027572967 = product of:
0.055145934 = sum of:
0.055145934 = weight(_text_:22 in 7247) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055145934 = score(doc=7247,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17816545 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050877817 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7247, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7247)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Canadian journal of information and library science. 21(1996) no.2, S.1-22
-
Booth, A.: How consistent is MEDLINE indexing? (1990)
0.01
0.012063174 = product of:
0.024126347 = sum of:
0.024126347 = product of:
0.048252694 = sum of:
0.048252694 = weight(_text_:22 in 3510) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048252694 = score(doc=3510,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17816545 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050877817 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3510, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3510)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Health libraries review. 7(1990) no.1, S.22-26
-
Neshat, N.; Horri, A.: ¬A study of subject indexing consistency between the National Library of Iran and Humanities Libraries in the area of Iranian studies (2006)
0.01
0.012063174 = product of:
0.024126347 = sum of:
0.024126347 = product of:
0.048252694 = sum of:
0.048252694 = weight(_text_:22 in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048252694 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17816545 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050877817 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 4. 1.2007 10:22:26
-
Leininger, K.: Interindexer consistency in PsychINFO (2000)
0.01
0.010339863 = product of:
0.020679725 = sum of:
0.020679725 = product of:
0.04135945 = sum of:
0.04135945 = weight(_text_:22 in 2552) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04135945 = score(doc=2552,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17816545 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050877817 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2552, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2552)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 9. 2.1997 18:44:22
-
Subrahmanyam, B.: Library of Congress Classification numbers : issues of consistency and their implications for union catalogs (2006)
0.01
0.008616553 = product of:
0.017233105 = sum of:
0.017233105 = product of:
0.03446621 = sum of:
0.03446621 = weight(_text_:22 in 5784) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03446621 = score(doc=5784,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17816545 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050877817 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5784, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5784)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
White, H.; Willis, C.; Greenberg, J.: HIVEing : the effect of a semantic web technology on inter-indexer consistency (2014)
0.01
0.008616553 = product of:
0.017233105 = sum of:
0.017233105 = product of:
0.03446621 = sum of:
0.03446621 = weight(_text_:22 in 1781) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03446621 = score(doc=1781,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17816545 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050877817 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1781, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1781)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to examine the effect of the Helping Interdisciplinary Vocabulary Engineering (HIVE) system on the inter-indexer consistency of information professionals when assigning keywords to a scientific abstract. This study examined first, the inter-indexer consistency of potential HIVE users; second, the impact HIVE had on consistency; and third, challenges associated with using HIVE. Design/methodology/approach - A within-subjects quasi-experimental research design was used for this study. Data were collected using a task-scenario based questionnaire. Analysis was performed on consistency results using Hooper's and Rolling's inter-indexer consistency measures. A series of t-tests was used to judge the significance between consistency measure results. Findings - Results suggest that HIVE improves inter-indexing consistency. Working with HIVE increased consistency rates by 22 percent (Rolling's) and 25 percent (Hooper's) when selecting relevant terms from all vocabularies. A statistically significant difference exists between the assignment of free-text keywords and machine-aided keywords. Issues with homographs, disambiguation, vocabulary choice, and document structure were all identified as potential challenges. Research limitations/implications - Research limitations for this study can be found in the small number of vocabularies used for the study. Future research will include implementing HIVE into the Dryad Repository and studying its application in a repository system. Originality/value - This paper showcases several features used in HIVE system. By using traditional consistency measures to evaluate a semantic web technology, this paper emphasizes the link between traditional indexing and next generation machine-aided indexing (MAI) tools.
-
Bade, D.: ¬The creation and persistence of misinformation in shared library catalogs : language and subject knowledge in a technological era (2002)
0.00
0.003446621 = product of:
0.006893242 = sum of:
0.006893242 = product of:
0.013786484 = sum of:
0.013786484 = weight(_text_:22 in 1858) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.013786484 = score(doc=1858,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17816545 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050877817 = queryNorm
0.07738023 = fieldWeight in 1858, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=1858)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 9.1997 19:16:05
