-
Taniguchi, S.: Recording evidence in bibliographic records and descriptive metadata (2005)
0.07
0.06881314 = product of:
0.13762628 = sum of:
0.13762628 = sum of:
0.09626683 = weight(_text_:notes in 3565) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09626683 = score(doc=3565,freq=2.0), product of:
0.27181563 = queryWeight, product of:
5.3425174 = idf(docFreq=574, maxDocs=44218)
0.050877817 = queryNorm
0.35416222 = fieldWeight in 3565, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.3425174 = idf(docFreq=574, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3565)
0.04135945 = weight(_text_:22 in 3565) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04135945 = score(doc=3565,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17816545 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050877817 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3565, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3565)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- In this article recording evidence for data values in addition to the values themselves in bibliographic records and descriptive metadata is proposed, with the aim of improving the expressiveness and reliability of those records and metadata. Recorded evidence indicates why and how data values are recorded for elements. Recording the history of changes in data values is also proposed, with the aim of reinforcing recorded evidence. First, evidence that can be recorded is categorized into classes: identifiers of rules or tasks, action descriptions of them, and input and output data of them. Dates of recording values and evidence are an additional class. Then, the relative usefulness of evidence classes and also levels (i.e., the record, data element, or data value level) to which an individual evidence class is applied, is examined. Second, examples that can be viewed as recorded evidence in existing bibliographic records and current cataloging rules are shown. Third, some examples of bibliographic records and descriptive metadata with notes of evidence are demonstrated. Fourth, ways of using recorded evidence are addressed.
- Date
- 18. 6.2005 13:16:22
-
Jizba, L.: Reflections on summarizing and abstracting : implications for Internet Web documents, and standardized library cataloging databases (1997)
0.04
0.039708037 = product of:
0.079416074 = sum of:
0.079416074 = product of:
0.15883215 = sum of:
0.15883215 = weight(_text_:notes in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15883215 = score(doc=701,freq=4.0), product of:
0.27181563 = queryWeight, product of:
5.3425174 = idf(docFreq=574, maxDocs=44218)
0.050877817 = queryNorm
0.58433783 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.3425174 = idf(docFreq=574, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Comments on the value of abstracts or summary notes to information available online via the Internet and WWW and concludes that automated abstracting techniques would be highly useful if routinely applied to cataloguing or metadata for Internet documents and documents in other databases. Information seekers need external summary information to assess content and value of retrieved documents. Examines traditional models for writers, in library audiovisual cataloguing, periodical databases and archival work, along with innovative new model databases featuring robust cataloguing summaries. Notes recent developments in automated techniques, computational research, and machine summarization of digital images. Recommendations are made for future designers of cataloguing and metadata standards
-
Corby, O.; Dieng, R.; Hébért, C.: ¬A conceptual graph model for W3C resource description framework (2000)
0.04
0.039708037 = product of:
0.079416074 = sum of:
0.079416074 = product of:
0.15883215 = sum of:
0.15883215 = weight(_text_:notes in 5086) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15883215 = score(doc=5086,freq=4.0), product of:
0.27181563 = queryWeight, product of:
5.3425174 = idf(docFreq=574, maxDocs=44218)
0.050877817 = queryNorm
0.58433783 = fieldWeight in 5086, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.3425174 = idf(docFreq=574, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5086)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Series
- Lecture notes in computer science; vol.1867: Lecture notes on artificial intelligence
-
Lehmann, K.-D.: European national libraries and the CoBRA Forum of the EU Libraries Programme (1996)
0.03
0.034035463 = product of:
0.068070926 = sum of:
0.068070926 = product of:
0.13614185 = sum of:
0.13614185 = weight(_text_:notes in 7162) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13614185 = score(doc=7162,freq=4.0), product of:
0.27181563 = queryWeight, product of:
5.3425174 = idf(docFreq=574, maxDocs=44218)
0.050877817 = queryNorm
0.500861 = fieldWeight in 7162, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.3425174 = idf(docFreq=574, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7162)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Reports the involvement of the Conference of European National Librarians (CENL), and its responsibility both to preserve and to provide access to books and information in an increasingly electronic world. Describes the 2 European Commission programmes, managed by a Forum of 8 national libraries, to serve these ends: CoBRA (Computer and Bibliographic Record Actions), which established 4 task groups to study: improved European bibliographic services; user needs for bibliographic products; networked record distribution and reuse; and promotion of data sharing; and a new programme called CoBRA PLus to continue the work of CoBRA and widen its focus to include collection based services, with emphasis on resource sharing, user needs and the use of communication networks. Notes the 2 main task groups, concerned with: metadata and bibliographic access, and electronic publications and digital resources, including legal deposit and storage. Notes briefly the 8 specific projects ranging from networking name authority files to the development of a new relationship between publishers and national bibliographic agencies for the control of electronic publications
-
Martin, P.: Conventions and notations for knowledge representation and retrieval (2000)
0.03
0.034035463 = product of:
0.068070926 = sum of:
0.068070926 = product of:
0.13614185 = sum of:
0.13614185 = weight(_text_:notes in 5070) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13614185 = score(doc=5070,freq=4.0), product of:
0.27181563 = queryWeight, product of:
5.3425174 = idf(docFreq=574, maxDocs=44218)
0.050877817 = queryNorm
0.500861 = fieldWeight in 5070, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.3425174 = idf(docFreq=574, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5070)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Series
- Lecture notes in computer science; vol.1867: Lecture notes on artificial intelligence
-
Heery, R.: Review of metadata formats (1996)
0.03
0.032088943 = product of:
0.064177886 = sum of:
0.064177886 = product of:
0.12835577 = sum of:
0.12835577 = weight(_text_:notes in 6605) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12835577 = score(doc=6605,freq=2.0), product of:
0.27181563 = queryWeight, product of:
5.3425174 = idf(docFreq=574, maxDocs=44218)
0.050877817 = queryNorm
0.47221628 = fieldWeight in 6605, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.3425174 = idf(docFreq=574, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6605)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Notes the heightened awareness among information professionals, caused by the increasing use of the Internet, of the need to provide user freindly searching and navigation tools and the potential role of metadata in achieving this end. Concentrates on the specific formats of metadata, reviews a number of metadata formats (IAFA/WHOIS++, MARC, TEI, Dublin Core, URCs) and compares them according to the criteria of: constituency; ease of creation; content; associated Internet protocols; and progress towards international standard status
-
Tennant, R.: 21st century cataloguing (1998)
0.03
0.032088943 = product of:
0.064177886 = sum of:
0.064177886 = product of:
0.12835577 = sum of:
0.12835577 = weight(_text_:notes in 2584) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12835577 = score(doc=2584,freq=2.0), product of:
0.27181563 = queryWeight, product of:
5.3425174 = idf(docFreq=574, maxDocs=44218)
0.050877817 = queryNorm
0.47221628 = fieldWeight in 2584, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.3425174 = idf(docFreq=574, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2584)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Observes how traditional cataloguing differs from the use of metadata to describe the materials in a digital library. Introduces the 3 categories of metadata that have been identified: descriptive (also called intellectual), structural, and administrative. Notes that MARC only deals well with intellectual metadata. Discusses some emerging standards that may be to digital libraries what MARC was to print libraries, the best of these being the Dublin Core
-
Jimenez, V.O.R.: Nuevas perspectivas para la catalogacion : metadatos ver MARC (1999)
0.03
0.02924555 = product of:
0.0584911 = sum of:
0.0584911 = product of:
0.1169822 = sum of:
0.1169822 = weight(_text_:22 in 5743) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1169822 = score(doc=5743,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17816545 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050877817 = queryNorm
0.6565931 = fieldWeight in 5743, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5743)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 30. 3.2002 19:45:22
- Source
- Revista Española de Documentaçion Cientifica. 22(1999) no.2, S.198-219
-
Sowa, J.F.: Ontology, metadata, and semiotics (2000)
0.03
0.028362885 = product of:
0.05672577 = sum of:
0.05672577 = product of:
0.11345154 = sum of:
0.11345154 = weight(_text_:notes in 5071) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11345154 = score(doc=5071,freq=4.0), product of:
0.27181563 = queryWeight, product of:
5.3425174 = idf(docFreq=574, maxDocs=44218)
0.050877817 = queryNorm
0.41738418 = fieldWeight in 5071, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.3425174 = idf(docFreq=574, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5071)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Series
- Lecture notes in computer science; vol.1867: Lecture notes on artificial intelligence
-
Metadata practices on the cutting edge (2004)
0.03
0.028077822 = product of:
0.056155644 = sum of:
0.056155644 = product of:
0.11231129 = sum of:
0.11231129 = weight(_text_:notes in 2335) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11231129 = score(doc=2335,freq=2.0), product of:
0.27181563 = queryWeight, product of:
5.3425174 = idf(docFreq=574, maxDocs=44218)
0.050877817 = queryNorm
0.41318923 = fieldWeight in 2335, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.3425174 = idf(docFreq=574, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2335)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The PowerPoint presentations from this one-day workshop on emerging metadata practices are available at this web site. Topics include metadata quality, interoperability, linking metadata, metadata for image collections, RSS, MODS, METS, and MPEG-21. Contributors include representatives from OCLC, CrossRef, the Library of Congress, universities and the private sector. Given the wide range of presentations, if you're interested in metadata you can likely find something of interest here, but no single topic is explored in much depth, and you are sometimes left wondering what the speaker said about a particular slide if there are no accompanying notes.
-
Andresen, L.: Metadata in Denmark (2000)
0.03
0.027572967 = product of:
0.055145934 = sum of:
0.055145934 = product of:
0.11029187 = sum of:
0.11029187 = weight(_text_:22 in 4899) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11029187 = score(doc=4899,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17816545 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050877817 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4899, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4899)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 16. 7.2000 20:58:22
-
MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications (2004)
0.03
0.027572967 = product of:
0.055145934 = sum of:
0.055145934 = product of:
0.11029187 = sum of:
0.11029187 = weight(_text_:22 in 2840) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11029187 = score(doc=2840,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17816545 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050877817 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 2840, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2840)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1
-
Moen, W.E.: ¬The metadata approach to accessing government information (2001)
0.02
0.024126347 = product of:
0.048252694 = sum of:
0.048252694 = product of:
0.09650539 = sum of:
0.09650539 = weight(_text_:22 in 4407) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09650539 = score(doc=4407,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17816545 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050877817 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4407, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4407)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 28. 3.2002 9:22:34
-
MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications (2004)
0.02
0.024126347 = product of:
0.048252694 = sum of:
0.048252694 = product of:
0.09650539 = sum of:
0.09650539 = weight(_text_:22 in 7196) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09650539 = score(doc=7196,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17816545 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050877817 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 7196, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7196)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1
-
MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications part 2 (2004)
0.02
0.024126347 = product of:
0.048252694 = sum of:
0.048252694 = product of:
0.09650539 = sum of:
0.09650539 = weight(_text_:22 in 2841) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09650539 = score(doc=2841,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17816545 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050877817 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2841, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2841)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2
-
Park, J.-r.; Tosaka, Y.; Lu, C.: Locally added homegrown metadata semantics : issues and implications
0.02
0.024066707 = product of:
0.048133414 = sum of:
0.048133414 = product of:
0.09626683 = sum of:
0.09626683 = weight(_text_:notes in 3543) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09626683 = score(doc=3543,freq=2.0), product of:
0.27181563 = queryWeight, product of:
5.3425174 = idf(docFreq=574, maxDocs=44218)
0.050877817 = queryNorm
0.35416222 = fieldWeight in 3543, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.3425174 = idf(docFreq=574, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3543)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Using the data collected from a nationwide study drawn from the community of cataloging and metadata professionals, this study aims to assess the current state of locally added metadata elements used across digital repositories. Addition of locally created metadata elements is a fairly common practice adopted by over one-third of the survey participants. Homegrown elements for descriptive metadata comprising local notes and description, local personal and place names, and local subjects are added most frequently, followed by administrative, technical, and preservation metadata. The major reason for extending metadata is to accommodate the perceived needs of local collections and their users. Yet, there are currently few open mechanisms for finding and sharing documented information about such localized metadata practices.
-
Greenberg, J.: Metadata and digital information (2009)
0.02
0.024066707 = product of:
0.048133414 = sum of:
0.048133414 = product of:
0.09626683 = sum of:
0.09626683 = weight(_text_:notes in 4697) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09626683 = score(doc=4697,freq=2.0), product of:
0.27181563 = queryWeight, product of:
5.3425174 = idf(docFreq=574, maxDocs=44218)
0.050877817 = queryNorm
0.35416222 = fieldWeight in 4697, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.3425174 = idf(docFreq=574, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4697)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The range of metadata activity over this last decade is both extensive and astonishing, and substantiates metadata as an integral part of our digital information infrastructure. This entry begins with a brief history of metadata relating to digital information, followed by an overview of different metadata types, functions, and domain-specific definitions. Next, the family of standards comprising a metadata architecture are defined, followed by an overview of metadata generation processes, applications, and people: this latter section gives particular attention to automatic metadata generation approaches. The following section explores four key metadata models. The conclusion summarizes the entry, highlights a number of significant metadata challenges, and notes efforts underway to address metadata challenges in the new millennium.
-
Broughton, V.: Automatic metadata generation : Digital resource description without human intervention (2007)
0.02
0.020679725 = product of:
0.04135945 = sum of:
0.04135945 = product of:
0.0827189 = sum of:
0.0827189 = weight(_text_:22 in 6048) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0827189 = score(doc=6048,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17816545 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050877817 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6048, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6048)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 9.2007 15:41:14
-
Caplan, P.; Guenther, R.: Metadata for Internet resources : the Dublin Core Metadata Elements Set and its mapping to USMARC (1996)
0.02
0.019497033 = product of:
0.038994066 = sum of:
0.038994066 = product of:
0.07798813 = sum of:
0.07798813 = weight(_text_:22 in 2408) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07798813 = score(doc=2408,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17816545 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050877817 = queryNorm
0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2408, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2408)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 13. 1.2007 18:31:22
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.43-58
-
Tennant, R.: ¬A bibliographic metadata infrastructure for the twenty-first century (2004)
0.02
0.019497033 = product of:
0.038994066 = sum of:
0.038994066 = product of:
0.07798813 = sum of:
0.07798813 = weight(_text_:22 in 2845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07798813 = score(doc=2845,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17816545 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050877817 = queryNorm
0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2845, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2845)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 9.12.2005 19:22:38
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.175-181
