-
Wan, X.; Yang, J.; Xiao, J.: Incorporating cross-document relationships between sentences for single document summarizations (2006)
0.07
0.06881314 = product of:
0.13762628 = sum of:
0.13762628 = sum of:
0.09626683 = weight(_text_:notes in 2421) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09626683 = score(doc=2421,freq=2.0), product of:
0.27181563 = queryWeight, product of:
5.3425174 = idf(docFreq=574, maxDocs=44218)
0.050877817 = queryNorm
0.35416222 = fieldWeight in 2421, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.3425174 = idf(docFreq=574, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2421)
0.04135945 = weight(_text_:22 in 2421) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04135945 = score(doc=2421,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17816545 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050877817 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2421, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2421)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Series
- Lecture notes in computer science; vol.4172
- Source
- Research and advanced technology for digital libraries : 10th European conference, proceedings / ECDL 2006, Alicante, Spain, September 17 - 22, 2006
-
Jizba, L.: Reflections on summarizing and abstracting : implications for Internet Web documents, and standardized library cataloging databases (1997)
0.04
0.039708037 = product of:
0.079416074 = sum of:
0.079416074 = product of:
0.15883215 = sum of:
0.15883215 = weight(_text_:notes in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15883215 = score(doc=701,freq=4.0), product of:
0.27181563 = queryWeight, product of:
5.3425174 = idf(docFreq=574, maxDocs=44218)
0.050877817 = queryNorm
0.58433783 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.3425174 = idf(docFreq=574, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Comments on the value of abstracts or summary notes to information available online via the Internet and WWW and concludes that automated abstracting techniques would be highly useful if routinely applied to cataloguing or metadata for Internet documents and documents in other databases. Information seekers need external summary information to assess content and value of retrieved documents. Examines traditional models for writers, in library audiovisual cataloguing, periodical databases and archival work, along with innovative new model databases featuring robust cataloguing summaries. Notes recent developments in automated techniques, computational research, and machine summarization of digital images. Recommendations are made for future designers of cataloguing and metadata standards
-
Koltay, T.: ¬A hypertext tutorial on abstracting for library science students (1995)
0.02
0.017233105 = product of:
0.03446621 = sum of:
0.03446621 = product of:
0.06893242 = sum of:
0.06893242 = weight(_text_:22 in 3061) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06893242 = score(doc=3061,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17816545 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050877817 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3061, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3061)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 27. 1.1996 18:22:06
-
Palais, E.S.: Abstracting for reference librarians (1988)
0.01
0.013786484 = product of:
0.027572967 = sum of:
0.027572967 = product of:
0.055145934 = sum of:
0.055145934 = weight(_text_:22 in 2832) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055145934 = score(doc=2832,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17816545 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050877817 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2832, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2832)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Reference librarian. 1988, no.22, S.297-308
-
Hartley, J.; Sydes, M.: Which layout do you prefer? : an analysis of readers' preferences for different typographic layouts of structured abstracts (1996)
0.01
0.010339863 = product of:
0.020679725 = sum of:
0.020679725 = product of:
0.04135945 = sum of:
0.04135945 = weight(_text_:22 in 4411) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04135945 = score(doc=4411,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17816545 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050877817 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4411, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4411)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Journal of information science. 22(1996) no.1, S.27-37
-
Ward, M.L.: ¬The future of the human indexer (1996)
0.01
0.010339863 = product of:
0.020679725 = sum of:
0.020679725 = product of:
0.04135945 = sum of:
0.04135945 = weight(_text_:22 in 7244) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04135945 = score(doc=7244,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17816545 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050877817 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 7244, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7244)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 9. 2.1997 18:44:22
-
Hartley, J.; Sydes, M.; Blurton, A.: Obtaining information accurately and quickly : are structured abstracts more efficient? (1996)
0.01
0.008616553 = product of:
0.017233105 = sum of:
0.017233105 = product of:
0.03446621 = sum of:
0.03446621 = weight(_text_:22 in 7673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03446621 = score(doc=7673,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17816545 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050877817 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 7673, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=7673)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Journal of information science. 22(1996) no.5, S.349-356
