Search (20 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Wissensrepräsentation"
  • × type_ss:"el"
  1. Assem, M. van; Menken, M.R.; Schreiber, G.; Wielemaker, J.; Wielinga, B.: ¬A method for converting thesauri to RDF/OWL (2004) 0.03
    0.028077822 = product of:
      0.056155644 = sum of:
        0.056155644 = product of:
          0.11231129 = sum of:
            0.11231129 = weight(_text_:notes in 4644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11231129 = score(doc=4644,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.27181563 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.3425174 = idf(docFreq=574, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050877817 = queryNorm
                0.41318923 = fieldWeight in 4644, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.3425174 = idf(docFreq=574, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4644)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Series
    Lecture notes in computer science; no.3298
  2. Halpin, H.; Hayes, P.J.; McCusker, J.P.; McGuinness, D.L.; Thompson, H.S.: When owl:sameAs isn't the same : an analysis of identity in linked data (2010) 0.02
    0.024066707 = product of:
      0.048133414 = sum of:
        0.048133414 = product of:
          0.09626683 = sum of:
            0.09626683 = weight(_text_:notes in 4703) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09626683 = score(doc=4703,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.27181563 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.3425174 = idf(docFreq=574, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050877817 = queryNorm
                0.35416222 = fieldWeight in 4703, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.3425174 = idf(docFreq=574, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4703)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Series
    Lecture notes in computer science; 6496
  3. SKOS Simple Knowledge Organization System Primer (2009) 0.02
    0.024066707 = product of:
      0.048133414 = sum of:
        0.048133414 = product of:
          0.09626683 = sum of:
            0.09626683 = weight(_text_:notes in 4795) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09626683 = score(doc=4795,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.27181563 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.3425174 = idf(docFreq=574, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050877817 = queryNorm
                0.35416222 = fieldWeight in 4795, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.3425174 = idf(docFreq=574, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4795)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    SKOS (Simple Knowledge Organisation System) provides a model for expressing the basic structure and content of concept schemes such as thesauri, classification schemes, subject heading lists, taxonomies, folksonomies, and other types of controlled vocabulary. As an application of the Resource Description Framework (RDF) SKOS allows concepts to be documented, linked and merged with other data, while still being composed, integrated and published on the World Wide Web. This document is an implementors guide for those who would like to represent their concept scheme using SKOS. In basic SKOS, conceptual resources (concepts) can be identified using URIs, labelled with strings in one or more natural languages, documented with various types of notes, semantically related to each other in informal hierarchies and association networks, and aggregated into distinct concept schemes. In advanced SKOS, conceptual resources can be mapped to conceptual resources in other schemes and grouped into labelled or ordered collections. Concept labels can also be related to each other. Finally, the SKOS vocabulary itself can be extended to suit the needs of particular communities of practice.
  4. Tzitzikas, Y.; Spyratos, N.; Constantopoulos, P.; Analyti, A.: Extended faceted ontologies (2002) 0.02
    0.024066707 = product of:
      0.048133414 = sum of:
        0.048133414 = product of:
          0.09626683 = sum of:
            0.09626683 = weight(_text_:notes in 2280) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09626683 = score(doc=2280,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.27181563 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.3425174 = idf(docFreq=574, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050877817 = queryNorm
                0.35416222 = fieldWeight in 2280, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.3425174 = idf(docFreq=574, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2280)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Series
    Lecture notes in computer science; vol. 2348
  5. Assem, M. van; Rijgersberg, H.; Wigham, M.; Top, J.: Converting and annotating quantitative data tables (2010) 0.02
    0.020055588 = product of:
      0.040111177 = sum of:
        0.040111177 = product of:
          0.08022235 = sum of:
            0.08022235 = weight(_text_:notes in 4705) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08022235 = score(doc=4705,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.27181563 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.3425174 = idf(docFreq=574, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050877817 = queryNorm
                0.29513517 = fieldWeight in 4705, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.3425174 = idf(docFreq=574, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4705)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Series
    Lecture notes in computer science; 6496
  6. Zhang, L.; Liu, Q.L.; Zhang, J.; Wang, H.F.; Pan, Y.; Yu, Y.: Semplore: an IR approach to scalable hybrid query of Semantic Web data (2007) 0.02
    0.020055588 = product of:
      0.040111177 = sum of:
        0.040111177 = product of:
          0.08022235 = sum of:
            0.08022235 = weight(_text_:notes in 231) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08022235 = score(doc=231,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.27181563 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.3425174 = idf(docFreq=574, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050877817 = queryNorm
                0.29513517 = fieldWeight in 231, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.3425174 = idf(docFreq=574, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=231)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Series
    Lecture notes in computer science; 4825
  7. Fischer, D.H.: Converting a thesaurus to OWL : Notes on the paper "The National Cancer Institute's Thesaurus and Ontology" (2004) 0.02
    0.019854018 = product of:
      0.039708037 = sum of:
        0.039708037 = product of:
          0.079416074 = sum of:
            0.079416074 = weight(_text_:notes in 2362) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.079416074 = score(doc=2362,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.27181563 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.3425174 = idf(docFreq=574, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050877817 = queryNorm
                0.29216892 = fieldWeight in 2362, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  5.3425174 = idf(docFreq=574, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2362)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    According to my findings several relations available in the thesaurus query interface as "roles", are not used, i.e. there are not yet any assertions with them. And those which are used do not contribute to complete concept definitions of concepts which represent thesaurus main entries. In other words: The authors claim to already have a "description logic based nomenclature", where there is not yet one which deserves that title by being much more than a thesaurus with strict subsumption and additional inheritable semantic links. In the last section of the paper the authors say: "The most time consuming process in this conversion was making a careful analysis of the Thesaurus to understand the best way to translate it into OWL." "For other conversions, these same types of distinctions and decisions must be made. The expressive power of a proprietary encoding can vary widely from that in OWL or RDF. Understanding the original semantics and engineering a solution that most closely duplicates it is critical for creating a useful and accu-rate ontology." My question is: What decisions were made and are they exemplary, can they be rec-ommended as "the best way"? I raise strong doubts with respect to that, and I miss more profound discussions of the issues at stake. The following notes are dedicated to a critical description and assessment of the results of that conversion activity. They are written in a tutorial style more or less addressing students, but myself being a learner especially in the field of medical knowledge representation I do not speak "ex cathedra".
  8. Drewer, P.; Massion, F; Pulitano, D: Was haben Wissensmodellierung, Wissensstrukturierung, künstliche Intelligenz und Terminologie miteinander zu tun? (2017) 0.02
    0.017233105 = product of:
      0.03446621 = sum of:
        0.03446621 = product of:
          0.06893242 = sum of:
            0.06893242 = weight(_text_:22 in 5576) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06893242 = score(doc=5576,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17816545 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050877817 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5576, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5576)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    13.12.2017 14:17:22
  9. Tudhope, D.; Hodge, G.: Terminology registries (2007) 0.02
    0.017233105 = product of:
      0.03446621 = sum of:
        0.03446621 = product of:
          0.06893242 = sum of:
            0.06893242 = weight(_text_:22 in 539) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06893242 = score(doc=539,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17816545 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050877817 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 539, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=539)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    26.12.2011 13:22:07
  10. OWL Web Ontology Language Test Cases (2004) 0.01
    0.013786484 = product of:
      0.027572967 = sum of:
        0.027572967 = product of:
          0.055145934 = sum of:
            0.055145934 = weight(_text_:22 in 4685) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.055145934 = score(doc=4685,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17816545 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050877817 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4685, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4685)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    14. 8.2011 13:33:22
  11. Hauff-Hartig, S.: Wissensrepräsentation durch RDF: Drei angewandte Forschungsbeispiele : Bitte recht vielfältig: Wie Wissensgraphen, Disco und FaBiO Struktur in Mangas und die Humanities bringen (2021) 0.01
    0.013786484 = product of:
      0.027572967 = sum of:
        0.027572967 = product of:
          0.055145934 = sum of:
            0.055145934 = weight(_text_:22 in 318) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.055145934 = score(doc=318,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17816545 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050877817 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 318, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=318)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 5.2021 12:43:05
  12. Knorz, G.; Rein, B.: Semantische Suche in einer Hochschulontologie : Ontologie-basiertes Information-Filtering und -Retrieval mit relationalen Datenbanken (2005) 0.01
    0.012063174 = product of:
      0.024126347 = sum of:
        0.024126347 = product of:
          0.048252694 = sum of:
            0.048252694 = weight(_text_:22 in 4324) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.048252694 = score(doc=4324,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17816545 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050877817 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4324, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4324)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    11. 2.2011 18:22:25
  13. Mayfield, J.; Finin, T.: Information retrieval on the Semantic Web : integrating inference and retrieval 0.01
    0.012063174 = product of:
      0.024126347 = sum of:
        0.024126347 = product of:
          0.048252694 = sum of:
            0.048252694 = weight(_text_:22 in 4330) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.048252694 = score(doc=4330,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17816545 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050877817 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4330, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4330)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    12. 2.2011 17:35:22
  14. Priss, U.: Faceted knowledge representation (1999) 0.01
    0.012063174 = product of:
      0.024126347 = sum of:
        0.024126347 = product of:
          0.048252694 = sum of:
            0.048252694 = weight(_text_:22 in 2654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.048252694 = score(doc=2654,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17816545 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050877817 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2654, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2654)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2016 17:30:31
  15. Definition of the CIDOC Conceptual Reference Model (2003) 0.01
    0.010339863 = product of:
      0.020679725 = sum of:
        0.020679725 = product of:
          0.04135945 = sum of:
            0.04135945 = weight(_text_:22 in 1652) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04135945 = score(doc=1652,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17816545 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050877817 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1652, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1652)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    6. 8.2010 14:22:28
  16. Hollink, L.; Assem, M. van: Estimating the relevance of search results in the Culture-Web : a study of semantic distance measures (2010) 0.01
    0.010339863 = product of:
      0.020679725 = sum of:
        0.020679725 = product of:
          0.04135945 = sum of:
            0.04135945 = weight(_text_:22 in 4649) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04135945 = score(doc=4649,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17816545 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050877817 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4649, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4649)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    26.12.2011 13:40:22
  17. Bittner, T.; Donnelly, M.; Winter, S.: Ontology and semantic interoperability (2006) 0.01
    0.010339863 = product of:
      0.020679725 = sum of:
        0.020679725 = product of:
          0.04135945 = sum of:
            0.04135945 = weight(_text_:22 in 4820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04135945 = score(doc=4820,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17816545 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050877817 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4820, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4820)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    3.12.2016 18:39:22
  18. Priss, U.: Description logic and faceted knowledge representation (1999) 0.01
    0.010339863 = product of:
      0.020679725 = sum of:
        0.020679725 = product of:
          0.04135945 = sum of:
            0.04135945 = weight(_text_:22 in 2655) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04135945 = score(doc=2655,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17816545 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050877817 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2655, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2655)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2016 17:30:31
  19. Beppler, F.D.; Fonseca, F.T.; Pacheco, R.C.S.: Hermeneus: an architecture for an ontology-enabled information retrieval (2008) 0.01
    0.010339863 = product of:
      0.020679725 = sum of:
        0.020679725 = product of:
          0.04135945 = sum of:
            0.04135945 = weight(_text_:22 in 3261) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04135945 = score(doc=3261,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17816545 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050877817 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3261, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3261)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    28.11.2016 12:43:22
  20. Monireh, E.; Sarker, M.K.; Bianchi, F.; Hitzler, P.; Doran, D.; Xie, N.: Reasoning over RDF knowledge bases using deep learning (2018) 0.01
    0.008616553 = product of:
      0.017233105 = sum of:
        0.017233105 = product of:
          0.03446621 = sum of:
            0.03446621 = weight(_text_:22 in 4553) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03446621 = score(doc=4553,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17816545 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050877817 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4553, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4553)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    16.11.2018 14:22:01