-
Saracevic, T.: Relevance: a review of and a framework for the thinking on the notion in information science (1975)
0.03
0.03277594 = product of:
0.06555188 = sum of:
0.06555188 = product of:
0.13110375 = sum of:
0.13110375 = weight(_text_:ii in 626) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13110375 = score(doc=626,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2745971 = queryWeight, product of:
5.4016213 = idf(docFreq=541, maxDocs=44218)
0.050836053 = queryNorm
0.4774404 = fieldWeight in 626, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.4016213 = idf(docFreq=541, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=626)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Footnote
- Vg. auch die Beiträge in: Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 58(2007) no.13, S.1915-1933 (Relevance: A review of the literature and a framework for thinking on the notion in information science. Part II: nature and manifestations of relevance) und S.2126 - 2144 (Relevance: A review of the literature and a framework for thinking on the notion in information science. Part III: Behavior and effects of relevance).
-
Saracevic, T.: Relevance: a review of the literature and a framework for thinking on the notion in information science. Part III : behavior and effects of relevance (2007)
0.03
0.02897011 = product of:
0.05794022 = sum of:
0.05794022 = product of:
0.11588044 = sum of:
0.11588044 = weight(_text_:ii in 798) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11588044 = score(doc=798,freq=4.0), product of:
0.2745971 = queryWeight, product of:
5.4016213 = idf(docFreq=541, maxDocs=44218)
0.050836053 = queryNorm
0.42200166 = fieldWeight in 798, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.4016213 = idf(docFreq=541, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=798)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Relevance is a, if not even the, key notion in information science in general and information retrieval in particular. This two-part critical review traces and synthesizes the scholarship on relevance over the past 30 years or so and provides an updated framework within which the still widely dissonant ideas and works about relevance might be interpreted and related. It is a continuation and update of a similar review that appeared in 1975 under the same title, considered here as being Part I. The present review is organized in two parts: Part II addresses the questions related to nature and manifestations of relevance, and Part III addresses questions related to relevance behavior and effects. In Part II, the nature of relevance is discussed in terms of meaning ascribed to relevance, theories used or proposed, and models that have been developed. The manifestations of relevance are classified as to several kinds of relevance that form an interdependent system of relevancies. In Part III, relevance behavior and effects are synthesized using experimental and observational works that incorporated data. In both parts, each section concludes with a summary that in effect provides an interpretation and synthesis of contemporary thinking on the topic treated or suggests hypotheses for future research. Analyses of some of the major trends that shape relevance work are offered in conclusions.
-
Saracevic, T.: Relevance: a review of the literature and a framework for thinking on the notion in information science. Part II : nature and manifestations of relevance (2007)
0.03
0.028384795 = product of:
0.05676959 = sum of:
0.05676959 = product of:
0.11353918 = sum of:
0.11353918 = weight(_text_:ii in 612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11353918 = score(doc=612,freq=6.0), product of:
0.2745971 = queryWeight, product of:
5.4016213 = idf(docFreq=541, maxDocs=44218)
0.050836053 = queryNorm
0.4134755 = fieldWeight in 612, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
5.4016213 = idf(docFreq=541, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=612)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Relevance is a, if not even the, key notion in information science in general and information retrieval in particular. This two-part critical review traces and synthesizes the scholarship on relevance over the past 30 years and provides an updated framework within which the still widely dissonant ideas and works about relevance might be interpreted and related. It is a continuation and update of a similar review that appeared in 1975 under the same title, considered here as being Part I. The present review is organized into two parts: Part II addresses the questions related to nature and manifestations of relevance, and Part III addresses questions related to relevance behavior and effects. In Part II, the nature of relevance is discussed in terms of meaning ascribed to relevance, theories used or proposed, and models that have been developed. The manifestations of relevance are classified as to several kinds of relevance that form an interdependent system of relevances. In Part III, relevance behavior and effects are synthesized using experimental and observational works that incorporate data. In both parts, each section concludes with a summary that in effect provides an interpretation and synthesis of contemporary thinking on the topic treated or suggests hypotheses for future research. Analyses of some of the major trends that shape relevance work are offered in conclusions.
-
Saracevic, T.; Kantor, P.B.: Studying the value of library and information services : Part II: Methodology and taxonomy (1997)
0.02
0.024581954 = product of:
0.049163908 = sum of:
0.049163908 = product of:
0.098327816 = sum of:
0.098327816 = weight(_text_:ii in 353) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.098327816 = score(doc=353,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2745971 = queryWeight, product of:
5.4016213 = idf(docFreq=541, maxDocs=44218)
0.050836053 = queryNorm
0.3580803 = fieldWeight in 353, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.4016213 = idf(docFreq=541, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=353)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Saracevic, T.; Kantor, P.; Chamis, A.Y.: ¬A study of information seeking and retrieving : pt.1: Background and methodology (1988)
0.02
0.024581954 = product of:
0.049163908 = sum of:
0.049163908 = product of:
0.098327816 = sum of:
0.098327816 = weight(_text_:ii in 1963) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.098327816 = score(doc=1963,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2745971 = queryWeight, product of:
5.4016213 = idf(docFreq=541, maxDocs=44218)
0.050836053 = queryNorm
0.3580803 = fieldWeight in 1963, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.4016213 = idf(docFreq=541, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1963)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The objectives of the study were to conduct a series of observations and experiments under as real-life a situation as possible related to: (i) user context of questions in information retrieval; (ii) the structure and classification of questions; (iii) cognitive traits and decision making of searchers; and (iv) different searches of the same question. The study is presented in three parts: part 1 presents the background of the study and describes the models, measures, methods, procedures and statistical analyses used. Pt.2 is devoted to results related to users, questions, and effectiveness measures, and pt.3 to results related to searchers, searches, and overlap studies. A concluding summary of all results is presented in pt.3
-
Saracevic, T.: On a method for studying the structure and nature of requests in information retrieval (1983)
0.02
0.017218959 = product of:
0.034437917 = sum of:
0.034437917 = product of:
0.068875834 = sum of:
0.068875834 = weight(_text_:22 in 2417) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.068875834 = score(doc=2417,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1780192 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050836053 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2417, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2417)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Pages
- S.22-25
