Search (2552 results, page 1 of 128)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  1. Bookstein, A.: Informetric distributions : II. Resilience to ambiguity (1990) 0.16 
    0.16292886 = product of:
  0.32585773 = sum of:
    0.32585773 = sum of:
      0.22943157 = weight(_text_:ii in 4689) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.22943157 = score(doc=4689,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.2745971 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.4016213 = idf(docFreq=541, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050836053 = queryNorm
          0.8355207 = fieldWeight in 4689, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.4016213 = idf(docFreq=541, maxDocs=44218)
            0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4689)
      0.09642617 = weight(_text_:22 in 4689) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.09642617 = score(doc=4689,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1780192 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050836053 = queryNorm
          0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4689, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4689)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 7.2006 18:55:55
  2. Lipschütz-Yevick, M.: Social influences on quantum mechanics? : II (2001) 0.14 
    0.13965331 = product of:
  0.27930662 = sum of:
    0.27930662 = sum of:
      0.19665563 = weight(_text_:ii in 6886) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.19665563 = score(doc=6886,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.2745971 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.4016213 = idf(docFreq=541, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050836053 = queryNorm
          0.7161606 = fieldWeight in 6886, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.4016213 = idf(docFreq=541, maxDocs=44218)
            0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6886)
      0.082651 = weight(_text_:22 in 6886) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.082651 = score(doc=6886,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1780192 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050836053 = queryNorm
          0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6886, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6886)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Footnote
    Erwiderung auf: Graham, L.R.: Do mathematical equations display social attributes? in: Mathematical intelligencer 22(2000) no.3, S.31-36
  3. Subramanian, S.; Shafer, K.E.: Clustering (2001) 0.14 
    0.13965331 = product of:
  0.27930662 = sum of:
    0.27930662 = sum of:
      0.19665563 = weight(_text_:ii in 1046) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.19665563 = score(doc=1046,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.2745971 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.4016213 = idf(docFreq=541, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050836053 = queryNorm
          0.7161606 = fieldWeight in 1046, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.4016213 = idf(docFreq=541, maxDocs=44218)
            0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1046)
      0.082651 = weight(_text_:22 in 1046) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.082651 = score(doc=1046,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1780192 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050836053 = queryNorm
          0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 1046, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1046)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    5. 5.2003 14:17:22
    Footnote
    Teil eines Themenheftes: OCLC and the Internet: An Historical Overview of Research Activities, 1990-1999 - Part II
  4. Lavoie, B.F.; O'Neill, E.T.: How "World Wide" Is the Web? : Trends in the Internationalization of Web Sites (2001) 0.12 
    0.11637776 = product of:
  0.23275553 = sum of:
    0.23275553 = sum of:
      0.1638797 = weight(_text_:ii in 1066) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.1638797 = score(doc=1066,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.2745971 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.4016213 = idf(docFreq=541, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050836053 = queryNorm
          0.5968005 = fieldWeight in 1066, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.4016213 = idf(docFreq=541, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1066)
      0.068875834 = weight(_text_:22 in 1066) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.068875834 = score(doc=1066,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1780192 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050836053 = queryNorm
          0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1066, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1066)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    7.10.2002 9:22:14
    Footnote
    Teil eines Themenheftes: OCLC and the Internet: An Historical Overview of Research Activities, 1990-1999 - Part II
  5. Asonuma, A.; Fang, Y.; Rousseau, R.: Reflections on the age distribution of Japanese scientists (2006) 0.11 
    0.10581713 = product of:
  0.21163426 = sum of:
    0.21163426 = sum of:
      0.17030877 = weight(_text_:ii in 5270) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.17030877 = score(doc=5270,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.2745971 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.4016213 = idf(docFreq=541, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050836053 = queryNorm
          0.62021327 = fieldWeight in 5270, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            5.4016213 = idf(docFreq=541, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5270)
      0.0413255 = weight(_text_:22 in 5270) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0413255 = score(doc=5270,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1780192 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050836053 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5270, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5270)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The age distribution of a country's scientists is an important element in the study of its research capacity. In this article we investigate the age distribution of Japanese scientists in order to find out whether major events such as World War II had an appreciable effect on its features. Data have been obtained from population censuses taken in Japan from 1970 to 1995. A comparison with the situation in China and the United States has been made. We find that the group of scientific researchers outside academia is dominated by the young: those younger than age 35. The personnel group in higher education, on the other hand, is dominated by the baby boomers: those who were born after World War II. Contrary to the Chinese situation we could not find any influence of major nondemographic events. The only influence we found was the increase in enrollment of university students after World War II caused by the reform of the Japanese university system. Female participation in the scientific and university systems in Japan, though still low, is increasing.
    Date
    22. 7.2006 15:26:24
  6. Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004) 0.10 
    0.10140387 = sum of:
  0.08074112 = product of:
    0.24222337 = sum of:
      0.24222337 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.24222337 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.4309886 = queryWeight, product of:
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050836053 = queryNorm
          0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.02066275 = product of:
    0.0413255 = sum of:
      0.0413255 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0413255 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1780192 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050836053 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
    Date
    8. 1.2013 10:22:32
  7. Luchner, B.: ¬The DBV-OSI 2 project : open communication between library and information retrieval systems (1994) 0.09 
    0.09310221 = product of:
  0.18620442 = sum of:
    0.18620442 = sum of:
      0.13110375 = weight(_text_:ii in 835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.13110375 = score(doc=835,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.2745971 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.4016213 = idf(docFreq=541, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050836053 = queryNorm
          0.4774404 = fieldWeight in 835, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.4016213 = idf(docFreq=541, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=835)
      0.05510067 = weight(_text_:22 in 835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.05510067 = score(doc=835,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1780192 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050836053 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 835, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=835)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    20.10.2000 14:22:28
    Object
    DBV/OSI II
  8. Green, E.; Head, A.J.: Web-based catalogs : is their design language anything to talk about? (1998) 0.09 
    0.09310221 = product of:
  0.18620442 = sum of:
    0.18620442 = sum of:
      0.13110375 = weight(_text_:ii in 5185) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.13110375 = score(doc=5185,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.2745971 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.4016213 = idf(docFreq=541, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050836053 = queryNorm
          0.4774404 = fieldWeight in 5185, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.4016213 = idf(docFreq=541, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5185)
      0.05510067 = weight(_text_:22 in 5185) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.05510067 = score(doc=5185,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1780192 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050836053 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5185, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5185)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Stanford University's Socrates II and University of California at Berkeley's Pathfinder are 2 USA World Wide Web based online publication access catalogues under development. They differ in their design language (how an interface functionally and visually communicates to the users). Evaluates each system's interface design and their ability to communicate functionality to users: analyzes design in terms of: colour, buttons, metaphors, layout, and basic and advanced search modes. Concludes that the design languages of both systems have the right directive and have the potential to evolve
    Source
    Online. 22(1998) no.4, S.98-105
  9. Iivonen, M.: Consistency in the selection of search concepts and search terms (1995) 0.09 
    0.090191014 = product of:
  0.18038203 = sum of:
    0.18038203 = sum of:
      0.13905653 = weight(_text_:ii in 1757) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.13905653 = score(doc=1757,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.2745971 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.4016213 = idf(docFreq=541, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050836053 = queryNorm
          0.506402 = fieldWeight in 1757, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            5.4016213 = idf(docFreq=541, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1757)
      0.0413255 = weight(_text_:22 in 1757) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0413255 = score(doc=1757,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1780192 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050836053 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1757, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1757)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Considers intersearcher and intrasearcher consistency in the selection of search terms. Based on an empirical study where 22 searchers from 4 different types of search environments analyzed altogether 12 search requests of 4 different types in 2 separate test situations between which 2 months elapsed. Statistically very significant differences in consistency were found according to the types of search environments and search requests. Consistency was also considered according to the extent of the scope of search concept. At level I search terms were compared character by character. At level II different search terms were accepted as the same search concept with a rather simple evaluation of linguistic expressions. At level III, in addition to level II, the hierarchical approach of the search request was also controlled. At level IV different search terms were accepted as the same search concept with a broad interpretation of the search concept. Both intersearcher and intrasearcher consistency grew most immediately after a rather simple evaluation of linguistic impressions
  10. Lee, S.-S.; Theng, Y.-L.; Goh, D.H.-L.: Creative information seeking : part II: empirical verification (2007) 0.09 
    0.090191014 = product of:
  0.18038203 = sum of:
    0.18038203 = sum of:
      0.13905653 = weight(_text_:ii in 813) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.13905653 = score(doc=813,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.2745971 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.4016213 = idf(docFreq=541, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050836053 = queryNorm
          0.506402 = fieldWeight in 813, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            5.4016213 = idf(docFreq=541, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=813)
      0.0413255 = weight(_text_:22 in 813) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0413255 = score(doc=813,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1780192 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050836053 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 813, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=813)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Purpose - This is part II of on-going research, the purpose being to establish a creative information-seeking model. Design/methodology/approach - Two studies were conducted to examine the subjects' creative information seeking behaviours and the extent to which they exhibited the proposed stages in creative information seeking when accomplishing a directed and an open-ended information-seeking task respectively. Findings - Findings seemed to indicate that all the subjects underwent the proposed stages although they seemed to embrace characteristics of these stages in varying degrees. Findings also showed that if subjects performed the proposed stages more iteratively or non-sequentially, then a greater amount of creativity was needed to accomplish the information-seeking task. Originality/value - The paper offers a discussion on the relationships between creativity, complexity of tasks, and levels of expertise in domain knowledge.
    Date
    23.12.2007 12:22:16
  11. Tay, A.: ¬The next generation discovery citation indexes : a review of the landscape in 2020 (2020) 0.08 
    0.08146443 = product of:
  0.16292886 = sum of:
    0.16292886 = sum of:
      0.114715785 = weight(_text_:ii in 40) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.114715785 = score(doc=40,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.2745971 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.4016213 = idf(docFreq=541, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050836053 = queryNorm
          0.41776034 = fieldWeight in 40, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.4016213 = idf(docFreq=541, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=40)
      0.048213083 = weight(_text_:22 in 40) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.048213083 = score(doc=40,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1780192 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050836053 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 40, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=40)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Conclusion There is a reason why Google Scholar and Web of Science/Scopus are kings of the hills in their various arenas. They have strong brand recogniton, a head start in development and a mass of eyeballs and users that leads to an almost virtious cycle of improvement. Competing against such well established competitors is not easy even when one has deep pockets (Microsoft) or a killer idea (scite). It will be interesting to see how the landscape will look like in 2030. Stay tuned for part II where I review each particular index.
    Date
    17.11.2020 12:22:59
  12. Chen, C.: CiteSpace II : detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature (2006) 0.08 
    0.07515918 = product of:
  0.15031835 = sum of:
    0.15031835 = sum of:
      0.11588044 = weight(_text_:ii in 5272) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.11588044 = score(doc=5272,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.2745971 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.4016213 = idf(docFreq=541, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050836053 = queryNorm
          0.42200166 = fieldWeight in 5272, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            5.4016213 = idf(docFreq=541, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5272)
      0.034437917 = weight(_text_:22 in 5272) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.034437917 = score(doc=5272,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1780192 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050836053 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5272, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5272)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    This article describes the latest development of a generic approach to detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature. The work makes substantial theoretical and methodological contributions to progressive knowledge domain visualization. A specialty is conceptualized and visualized as a time-variant duality between two fundamental concepts in information science: research fronts and intellectual bases. A research front is defined as an emergent and transient grouping of concepts and underlying research issues. The intellectual base of a research front is its citation and co-citation footprint in scientific literature - an evolving network of scientific publications cited by research-front concepts. Kleinberg's (2002) burst-detection algorithm is adapted to identify emergent research-front concepts. Freeman's (1979) betweenness centrality metric is used to highlight potential pivotal points of paradigm shift over time. Two complementary visualization views are designed and implemented: cluster views and time-zone views. The contributions of the approach are that (a) the nature of an intellectual base is algorithmically and temporally identified by emergent research-front terms, (b) the value of a co-citation cluster is explicitly interpreted in terms of research-front concepts, and (c) visually prominent and algorithmically detected pivotal points substantially reduce the complexity of a visualized network. The modeling and visualization process is implemented in CiteSpace II, a Java application, and applied to the analysis of two research fields: mass extinction (1981-2004) and terrorism (1990-2003). Prominent trends and pivotal points in visualized networks were verified in collaboration with domain experts, who are the authors of pivotal-point articles. Practical implications of the work are discussed. A number of challenges and opportunities for future studies are identified.
    Date
    22. 7.2006 16:11:05
  13. Bossmeyer, C.; Luchner, B.: DBV OSI II : open communication between library and information retrieval systems (1995) 0.07 
    0.07096199 = product of:
  0.14192398 = sum of:
    0.14192398 = product of:
      0.28384796 = sum of:
        0.28384796 = weight(_text_:ii in 1673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.28384796 = score(doc=1673,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.2745971 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.4016213 = idf(docFreq=541, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050836053 = queryNorm
            1.0336888 = fieldWeight in 1673, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              5.4016213 = idf(docFreq=541, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1673)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The paper describes the DBV-OSI II project on the background of today's library networking scenery in Germany.
    Object
    DBV-OSI II
  14. Lee-Smeltzer, K.-H. (Janet): Cataloging in three academic libraries: operations, trends, and perspectives (2000) 0.07 
    0.069826655 = product of:
  0.13965331 = sum of:
    0.13965331 = sum of:
      0.098327816 = weight(_text_:ii in 5386) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.098327816 = score(doc=5386,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.2745971 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.4016213 = idf(docFreq=541, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050836053 = queryNorm
          0.3580803 = fieldWeight in 5386, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.4016213 = idf(docFreq=541, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5386)
      0.0413255 = weight(_text_:22 in 5386) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0413255 = score(doc=5386,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1780192 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050836053 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5386, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5386)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    27. 7.2006 18:22:11
    Footnote
    Beitrag eines Themenheftes "Managing cataloging and the organization of information: philosophies, practices and challenges at the onset of the 21st century. Part II: Specialized and academic libraries in the United States"
  15. Renear, A.H.; Wickett, K.M.; Urban, R.J.; Dubin, D.; Shreeves, S.L.: Collection/item metadata relationships (2008) 0.07 
    0.069826655 = product of:
  0.13965331 = sum of:
    0.13965331 = sum of:
      0.098327816 = weight(_text_:ii in 2623) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.098327816 = score(doc=2623,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.2745971 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.4016213 = idf(docFreq=541, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050836053 = queryNorm
          0.3580803 = fieldWeight in 2623, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.4016213 = idf(docFreq=541, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2623)
      0.0413255 = weight(_text_:22 in 2623) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0413255 = score(doc=2623,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1780192 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050836053 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2623, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2623)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Contemporary retrieval systems, which search across collections, usually ignore collection-level metadata. Alternative approaches, exploiting collection-level information, will require an understanding of the various kinds of relationships that can obtain between collection-level and item-level metadata. This paper outlines the problem and describes a project that is developing a logic-based framework for classifying collection/item metadata relationships. This framework will support (i) metadata specification developers defining metadata elements, (ii) metadata creators describing objects, and (iii) system designers implementing systems that take advantage of collection-level metadata. We present three examples of collection/item metadata relationship categories, attribute/value-propagation, value-propagation, and value-constraint and show that even in these simple cases a precise formulation requires modal notions in addition to first-order logic. These formulations are related to recent work in information retrieval and ontology evaluation.
    Source
    Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
  16. Kleineberg, M.: Context analysis and context indexing : formal pragmatics in knowledge organization (2014) 0.07 
    0.06728427 = product of:
  0.13456854 = sum of:
    0.13456854 = product of:
      0.40370563 = sum of:
        0.40370563 = weight(_text_:3a in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.40370563 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.4309886 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050836053 = queryNorm
            0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=5&ved=0CDQQFjAE&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F3131107&ei=HzFWVYvGMsiNsgGTyoFI&usg=AFQjCNE2FHUeR9oQTQlNC4TPedv4Mo3DaQ&sig2=Rlzpr7a3BLZZkqZCXXN_IA&bvm=bv.93564037,d.bGg&cad=rja
  17. Stonier, T.: Towards a general theory of information II : information and entropy (1989) 0.07 
    0.06555188 = product of:
  0.13110375 = sum of:
    0.13110375 = product of:
      0.2622075 = sum of:
        0.2622075 = weight(_text_:ii in 2494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.2622075 = score(doc=2494,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2745971 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.4016213 = idf(docFreq=541, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050836053 = queryNorm
            0.9548808 = fieldWeight in 2494, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.4016213 = idf(docFreq=541, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2494)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  18. Harter, S.P.: ¬The Cranfield II relevance assessments : a critical evaluation (1971) 0.07 
    0.06555188 = product of:
  0.13110375 = sum of:
    0.13110375 = product of:
      0.2622075 = sum of:
        0.2622075 = weight(_text_:ii in 5364) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.2622075 = score(doc=5364,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2745971 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.4016213 = idf(docFreq=541, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050836053 = queryNorm
            0.9548808 = fieldWeight in 5364, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.4016213 = idf(docFreq=541, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5364)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  19. Vizine-Goetz, D.: Cataloging productivity tool : II. Subject headings for children (1994) 0.07 
    0.06555188 = product of:
  0.13110375 = sum of:
    0.13110375 = product of:
      0.2622075 = sum of:
        0.2622075 = weight(_text_:ii in 6817) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.2622075 = score(doc=6817,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2745971 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.4016213 = idf(docFreq=541, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050836053 = queryNorm
            0.9548808 = fieldWeight in 6817, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.4016213 = idf(docFreq=541, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6817)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  20. Chianese, A.; Cantone, F.; Caropreso, M.; Moscato, V.: ARCHAEOLOGY 2.0 : Cultural E-Learning tools and distributed repositories supported by SEMANTICA, a System for Learning Object Retrieval and Adaptive Courseware Generation for e-learning environments. (2010) 0.06 
    0.05818888 = product of:
  0.11637776 = sum of:
    0.11637776 = sum of:
      0.08193985 = weight(_text_:ii in 3733) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.08193985 = score(doc=3733,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.2745971 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.4016213 = idf(docFreq=541, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050836053 = queryNorm
          0.29840025 = fieldWeight in 3733, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.4016213 = idf(docFreq=541, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3733)
      0.034437917 = weight(_text_:22 in 3733) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.034437917 = score(doc=3733,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1780192 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050836053 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3733, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3733)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The focus of the present research has been the development and the application to Virtual Archaeology of a Web-Based framework for Learning Objects indexing and retrieval. The paper presents the main outcomes of a experimentation carried out by an interdisciplinary group of Federico II University of Naples. Our equipe is composed by researchers both in ICT and in Humanities disciplines, in particular in the domain of Virtual Archaeology and Cultural Heritage Informatics in order to develop specific ICT methodological approaches to Virtual Archaeology. The methodological background is the progressive diffusion of Web 2.0 technologies and the attempt to analyze their impact and perspectives in the Cultural Heritage field. In particular, we approached the specific requirements of the so called Learning 2.0, and the possibility to improve the automation of modular courseware generation in Virtual Archaeology Didactics. The developed framework was called SEMANTICA, and it was applied to Virtual Archaeology Domain Ontologies in order to generate a didactic course in a semi-automated way. The main results of this test and the first students feedback on the course fruition will be presented and discussed..
    Source
    Wissensspeicher in digitalen Räumen: Nachhaltigkeit - Verfügbarkeit - semantische Interoperabilität. Proceedings der 11. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Konstanz, 20. bis 22. Februar 2008. Hrsg.: J. Sieglerschmidt u. H.P.Ohly

Authors

Years

Languages

Types

  • a 2218
  • m 202
  • s 117
  • el 92
  • b 31
  • r 12
  • x 8
  • i 5
  • n 2
  • p 2
  • h 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications