-
Tay, A.: ¬The next generation discovery citation indexes : a review of the landscape in 2020 (2020)
0.08
0.08146443 = product of:
0.16292886 = sum of:
0.16292886 = sum of:
0.114715785 = weight(_text_:ii in 40) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.114715785 = score(doc=40,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2745971 = queryWeight, product of:
5.4016213 = idf(docFreq=541, maxDocs=44218)
0.050836053 = queryNorm
0.41776034 = fieldWeight in 40, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.4016213 = idf(docFreq=541, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=40)
0.048213083 = weight(_text_:22 in 40) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048213083 = score(doc=40,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1780192 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050836053 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 40, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=40)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Conclusion There is a reason why Google Scholar and Web of Science/Scopus are kings of the hills in their various arenas. They have strong brand recogniton, a head start in development and a mass of eyeballs and users that leads to an almost virtious cycle of improvement. Competing against such well established competitors is not easy even when one has deep pockets (Microsoft) or a killer idea (scite). It will be interesting to see how the landscape will look like in 2030. Stay tuned for part II where I review each particular index.
- Date
- 17.11.2020 12:22:59
-
Rajan, T.N.; Guha, B.; Sayanarayana, R.: Associate relationship of concepts as seen through citations and citation index (1982)
0.05
0.049163908 = product of:
0.098327816 = sum of:
0.098327816 = product of:
0.19665563 = sum of:
0.19665563 = weight(_text_:ii in 58) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.19665563 = score(doc=58,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2745971 = queryWeight, product of:
5.4016213 = idf(docFreq=541, maxDocs=44218)
0.050836053 = queryNorm
0.7161606 = fieldWeight in 58, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.4016213 = idf(docFreq=541, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=58)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Universal classification II: subject analysis and ordering systems. Proc. of the 4th Int. Study Conf. on Classification research, Augsburg, 28.6.-2.7.1982. Ed.: I. Dahlberg
-
Osareh, F.: Bibliometrics, citation analysis and co-citation analysis : a review of literature II (1996)
0.03
0.03277594 = product of:
0.06555188 = sum of:
0.06555188 = product of:
0.13110375 = sum of:
0.13110375 = weight(_text_:ii in 7105) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13110375 = score(doc=7105,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2745971 = queryWeight, product of:
5.4016213 = idf(docFreq=541, maxDocs=44218)
0.050836053 = queryNorm
0.4774404 = fieldWeight in 7105, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.4016213 = idf(docFreq=541, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7105)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Nicolaisen, J.: Citation analysis (2007)
0.03
0.027550334 = product of:
0.05510067 = sum of:
0.05510067 = product of:
0.11020134 = sum of:
0.11020134 = weight(_text_:22 in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11020134 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1780192 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050836053 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 13. 7.2008 19:53:22
-
Døsen, K.: One more reference on self-reference (1992)
0.03
0.027550334 = product of:
0.05510067 = sum of:
0.05510067 = product of:
0.11020134 = sum of:
0.11020134 = weight(_text_:22 in 4604) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11020134 = score(doc=4604,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1780192 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050836053 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4604, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4604)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 7. 2.2005 14:10:22
-
Daquino, M.; Peroni, S.; Shotton, D.; Colavizza, G.; Ghavimi, B.; Lauscher, A.; Mayr, P.; Romanello, M.; Zumstein, P.: ¬The OpenCitations Data Model (2020)
0.02
0.024581954 = product of:
0.049163908 = sum of:
0.049163908 = product of:
0.098327816 = sum of:
0.098327816 = weight(_text_:ii in 38) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.098327816 = score(doc=38,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2745971 = queryWeight, product of:
5.4016213 = idf(docFreq=541, maxDocs=44218)
0.050836053 = queryNorm
0.3580803 = fieldWeight in 38, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.4016213 = idf(docFreq=541, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=38)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- Erschienen in: The Semantic Web - ISWC 2020, 19th International Semantic Web Conference, Athens, Greece, November 2-6, 2020, Proceedings, Part II. Vgl.: DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-62466-8_28.
-
Van der Veer Martens, B.: Do citation systems represent theories of truth? (2001)
0.02
0.024351284 = product of:
0.048702568 = sum of:
0.048702568 = product of:
0.097405136 = sum of:
0.097405136 = weight(_text_:22 in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.097405136 = score(doc=3925,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1780192 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050836053 = queryNorm
0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 15:22:28
-
Lai, K.-K.; Wu, S.-J.: Using the patent co-citation approach to establish a new patent classification system (2005)
0.02
0.020484962 = product of:
0.040969923 = sum of:
0.040969923 = product of:
0.08193985 = sum of:
0.08193985 = weight(_text_:ii in 1013) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08193985 = score(doc=1013,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2745971 = queryWeight, product of:
5.4016213 = idf(docFreq=541, maxDocs=44218)
0.050836053 = queryNorm
0.29840025 = fieldWeight in 1013, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.4016213 = idf(docFreq=541, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1013)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The paper proposes a new approach to create a patent classification system to replace the IPC or UPC system for conducting patent analysis and management. The new approach is based on co-citation analysis of bibliometrics. The traditional approach for management of patents, which is based on either the IPC or UPC, is too general to meet the needs of specific industries. In addition, some patents are placed in incorrect categories, making it difficult for enterprises to carry out R&D planning, technology positioning, patent strategy-making and technology forecasting. Therefore, it is essential to develop a patent classification system that is adaptive to the characteristics of a specific industry. The analysis of this approach is divided into three phases. Phase I selects appropriate databases to conduct patent searches according to the subject and objective of this study and then select basic patents. Phase II uses the co-cited frequency of the basic patent pairs to assess their similarity. Phase III uses factor analysis to establish a classification system and assess the efficiency of the proposed approach. The main contribution of this approach is to develop a patent classification system based on patent similarities to assist patent manager in understanding the basic patents for a specific industry, the relationships among categories of technologies and the evolution of a technology category.
-
Garfield, E.; Stock, W.G.: Citation Consciousness : Interview with Eugene Garfiels, chairman emeritus of ISI; Philadelphia (2002)
0.02
0.017218959 = product of:
0.034437917 = sum of:
0.034437917 = product of:
0.068875834 = sum of:
0.068875834 = weight(_text_:22 in 613) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.068875834 = score(doc=613,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1780192 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050836053 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 613, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=613)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Password. 2002, H.6, S.22-25
-
Száva-Kováts, E.: Indirect-collective referencing (ICR) in the elite journal literature of physics : II: a literature science study on the level of communications (2002)
0.02
0.01638797 = product of:
0.03277594 = sum of:
0.03277594 = product of:
0.06555188 = sum of:
0.06555188 = weight(_text_:ii in 180) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06555188 = score(doc=180,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2745971 = queryWeight, product of:
5.4016213 = idf(docFreq=541, maxDocs=44218)
0.050836053 = queryNorm
0.2387202 = fieldWeight in 180, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.4016213 = idf(docFreq=541, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=180)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Larivière, V.; Gingras, Y.; Archambault, E.: ¬The decline in the concentration of citations, 1900-2007 (2009)
0.01
0.014610772 = product of:
0.029221544 = sum of:
0.029221544 = product of:
0.058443088 = sum of:
0.058443088 = weight(_text_:22 in 2763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.058443088 = score(doc=2763,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1780192 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050836053 = queryNorm
0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 2763, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2763)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 3.2009 19:22:35
-
Bensman, S.J.: Eugene Garfield, Francis Narin, and PageRank : the theoretical bases of the Google search engine (2013)
0.01
0.013775167 = product of:
0.027550334 = sum of:
0.027550334 = product of:
0.05510067 = sum of:
0.05510067 = weight(_text_:22 in 1149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05510067 = score(doc=1149,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1780192 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050836053 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1149, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1149)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 17.12.2013 11:02:22
-
Garfield, E.: Recollections of Irving H. Sher 1924-1996 : Polymath/information scientist extraordinaire (2001)
0.01
0.012053271 = product of:
0.024106542 = sum of:
0.024106542 = product of:
0.048213083 = sum of:
0.048213083 = weight(_text_:22 in 6920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048213083 = score(doc=6920,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1780192 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050836053 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 6920, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6920)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 16.12.2001 14:01:22
-
Van der Veer Martens, B.; Goodrum, G.: ¬The diffusion of theories : a functional approach (2006)
0.01
0.012053271 = product of:
0.024106542 = sum of:
0.024106542 = product of:
0.048213083 = sum of:
0.048213083 = weight(_text_:22 in 5269) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048213083 = score(doc=5269,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1780192 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050836053 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5269, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5269)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 15:20:01
-
Campanario, J.M.: Have referees rejected some of the most-cited articles of all times? (1996)
0.01
0.010331375 = product of:
0.02066275 = sum of:
0.02066275 = product of:
0.0413255 = sum of:
0.0413255 = weight(_text_:22 in 4215) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0413255 = score(doc=4215,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1780192 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050836053 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4215, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4215)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- In this article a quantitative study is reported on the resistance that scientists may encounter when they do innovative work or when they attempt to publish articles that later become highly cited. A set of 205 commentaries by authors of some of the most-cited papers of all times have been examined in order to identify those articles whose authors encountered difficulty in getting his or her work published. There are 22 commentaries (10,7%) in which authors mention some difficulty or resistance in doing or publishing the research reported in the article. Three of the articles which had problems in being published are the most cited from their respective journals. According the authors' commentaries, although sometimes referees' negative evaluations can help improve the articles, in other instances referees and editors wrongly rejected the highly cited articles
-
Snyder, H.; Bonzi, S.: Patterns of self-citation across disciplines : 1980-1989 (1998)
0.01
0.010331375 = product of:
0.02066275 = sum of:
0.02066275 = product of:
0.0413255 = sum of:
0.0413255 = weight(_text_:22 in 3692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0413255 = score(doc=3692,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1780192 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050836053 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3692, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3692)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 5.1999 19:33:24
-
wst: Cut-and-paste-Wissenschaft (2003)
0.01
0.010331375 = product of:
0.02066275 = sum of:
0.02066275 = product of:
0.0413255 = sum of:
0.0413255 = weight(_text_:22 in 1270) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0413255 = score(doc=1270,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1780192 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050836053 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1270, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1270)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- "Mikhail Simkin und Vwani Roychowdhury von der University of Califomia, Los Angeles, haben eine in der wissenschaftlichen Gemeinschaft verbreitete Unsitte erstmals quantitativ erfasst. Die Wissenschaftler analysierten die Verbreitung von Druckfehlern in den Literaturlisten wissenschaftlicher Arbeiten (www.arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0212043). 78 Prozent aller zitierten Aufsätze - so schätzen die Forscher - haben die zitierenden Wissenschaftler demnach nicht gelesen, sondern nur per 'cut and paste' von einer Vorlage in ihre eigene Literaturliste übernommen. Das könne man beispielsweise abschätzen aus der Analyse fehlerhafter Seitenangaben in der Literaturliste eines 1973 veröffentlichten Aufsatzes über die Struktur zweidimensionaler Kristalle: Dieser Aufsatz ist rund 4300 mal zitiert worden. In 196 Fällen enthalten die Zitate jedoch Fehler in der Jahreszahl, dem Band der Zeitschrift oder der Seitenzahl, die als Indikatoren für cut and paste genommen werden können, denn man kann, obwohl es Milliarden Möglichkeiten gibt, nur 45 verschiedene Arten von Druckfehlern unterscheiden. In erster Näherung ergibt sich eine Obergrenze für die Zahl der `echten Leser' daher aus der Zahl der unterscheidbaren Druckfehler (45) geteilt durch die Gesamtzahl der Publikationen mit Druckfehler (196), das macht etwa 22 Prozent."
-
Chan, H.C.; Kim, H.-W.; Tan, W.C.: Information systems citation patterns from International Conference on Information Systems articles (2006)
0.01
0.010331375 = product of:
0.02066275 = sum of:
0.02066275 = product of:
0.0413255 = sum of:
0.0413255 = weight(_text_:22 in 201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0413255 = score(doc=201,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1780192 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050836053 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 201, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=201)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 3. 1.2007 17:22:03
-
H-Index auch im Web of Science (2008)
0.01
0.010331375 = product of:
0.02066275 = sum of:
0.02066275 = product of:
0.0413255 = sum of:
0.0413255 = weight(_text_:22 in 590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0413255 = score(doc=590,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1780192 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050836053 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 590, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=590)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 6. 4.2008 19:04:22
-
Mingers, J.; Burrell, Q.L.: Modeling citation behavior in Management Science journals (2006)
0.01
0.010331375 = product of:
0.02066275 = sum of:
0.02066275 = product of:
0.0413255 = sum of:
0.0413255 = weight(_text_:22 in 994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0413255 = score(doc=994,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1780192 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050836053 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 994, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=994)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 26.12.2007 19:22:05
