Search (119 results, page 1 of 6)

  • × theme_ss:"Informetrie"
  1. Hyland, K.: Self-citation and self-reference : credibility and promotion in academic publication (2003) 0.05 
    0.04748466 = product of:
  0.09496932 = sum of:
    0.09496932 = product of:
      0.18993863 = sum of:
        0.18993863 = weight(_text_:1.5 in 5156) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18993863 = score(doc=5156,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.4074348 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.43879 = idf(docFreq=25, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048281185 = queryNorm
            0.4661817 = fieldWeight in 5156, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.43879 = idf(docFreq=25, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5156)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Hyland examines self referencing practices by analyzing their textual uses in 240 randomly chosen research papers and 800 abstracts across 80 expert selected journals from 1997 and 1998 in eight disciplines, as a key to their author's assumptions as to their own role in the research process and to the practices of their disciplines. Scanned texts produced a corpus of nearly 1.5 million words which was searched using WordPilot for first person pronouns and all mentions of an author's previous work. There were 6,689 instances of self reference in the papers and 459 in the abstracts; on the average 28 cases per paper, 17% of which were self citations. There was one self mention in every two abstracts. Nearly 70% of self reference and mention occurred in humanities and social science papers, but biologists employed the most self citation overall and 12% of hard science citations were found to be self citations. Interviews indicated that self citation was deemed important in establishing authority by fitting oneself into the research framework. Self mention arises in four main contexts: stating the goal or the structure of the paper, explaining a procedure, stating results or a claim, and elaborating an argument.
  2. Kousha, K.; Thelwall, M.: News stories as evidence for research? : BBC citations from articles, Books, and Wikipedia (2017) 0.05 
    0.04748466 = product of:
  0.09496932 = sum of:
    0.09496932 = product of:
      0.18993863 = sum of:
        0.18993863 = weight(_text_:1.5 in 3760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18993863 = score(doc=3760,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.4074348 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.43879 = idf(docFreq=25, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048281185 = queryNorm
            0.4661817 = fieldWeight in 3760, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.43879 = idf(docFreq=25, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3760)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Although news stories target the general public and are sometimes inaccurate, they can serve as sources of real-world information for researchers. This article investigates the extent to which academics exploit journalism using content and citation analyses of online BBC News stories cited by Scopus articles. A total of 27,234 Scopus-indexed publications have cited at least one BBC News story, with a steady annual increase. Citations from the arts and humanities (2.8% of publications in 2015) and social sciences (1.5%) were more likely than citations from medicine (0.1%) and science (<0.1%). Surprisingly, half of the sampled Scopus-cited science and technology (53%) and medicine and health (47%) stories were based on academic research, rather than otherwise unpublished information, suggesting that researchers have chosen a lower-quality secondary source for their citations. Nevertheless, the BBC News stories that were most frequently cited by Scopus, Google Books, and Wikipedia introduced new information from many different topics, including politics, business, economics, statistics, and reports about events. Thus, news stories are mediating real-world knowledge into the academic domain, a potential cause for concern.
  3. Nicholls, P.T.: Empirical validation of Lotka's law (1986) 0.03 
    0.026165735 = product of:
  0.05233147 = sum of:
    0.05233147 = product of:
      0.10466294 = sum of:
        0.10466294 = weight(_text_:22 in 5509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10466294 = score(doc=5509,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16907248 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048281185 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 5509, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5509)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Information processing and management. 22(1986), S.417-419
  4. Nicolaisen, J.: Citation analysis (2007) 0.03 
    0.026165735 = product of:
  0.05233147 = sum of:
    0.05233147 = product of:
      0.10466294 = sum of:
        0.10466294 = weight(_text_:22 in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10466294 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16907248 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048281185 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    13. 7.2008 19:53:22
  5. Fiala, J.: Information flood : fiction and reality (1987) 0.03 
    0.026165735 = product of:
  0.05233147 = sum of:
    0.05233147 = product of:
      0.10466294 = sum of:
        0.10466294 = weight(_text_:22 in 1080) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10466294 = score(doc=1080,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16907248 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048281185 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 1080, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1080)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Thermochimica acta. 110(1987), S.11-22
  6. Su, Y.; Han, L.-F.: ¬A new literature growth model : variable exponential growth law of literature (1998) 0.02 
    0.02312746 = product of:
  0.04625492 = sum of:
    0.04625492 = product of:
      0.09250984 = sum of:
        0.09250984 = weight(_text_:22 in 3690) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09250984 = score(doc=3690,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.16907248 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048281185 = queryNorm
            0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3690, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3690)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 5.1999 19:22:35
  7. Van der Veer Martens, B.: Do citation systems represent theories of truth? (2001) 0.02 
    0.02312746 = product of:
  0.04625492 = sum of:
    0.04625492 = product of:
      0.09250984 = sum of:
        0.09250984 = weight(_text_:22 in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09250984 = score(doc=3925,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.16907248 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048281185 = queryNorm
            0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 7.2006 15:22:28
  8. Diodato, V.: Dictionary of bibliometrics (1994) 0.02 
    0.022895018 = product of:
  0.045790035 = sum of:
    0.045790035 = product of:
      0.09158007 = sum of:
        0.09158007 = weight(_text_:22 in 5666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09158007 = score(doc=5666,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16907248 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048281185 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 5666, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5666)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Journal of library and information science 22(1996) no.2, S.116-117 (L.C. Smith)
  9. Bookstein, A.: Informetric distributions : I. Unified overview (1990) 0.02 
    0.022895018 = product of:
  0.045790035 = sum of:
    0.045790035 = product of:
      0.09158007 = sum of:
        0.09158007 = weight(_text_:22 in 6902) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09158007 = score(doc=6902,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16907248 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048281185 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6902, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6902)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 7.2006 18:55:29
  10. Bookstein, A.: Informetric distributions : II. Resilience to ambiguity (1990) 0.02 
    0.022895018 = product of:
  0.045790035 = sum of:
    0.045790035 = product of:
      0.09158007 = sum of:
        0.09158007 = weight(_text_:22 in 4689) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09158007 = score(doc=4689,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16907248 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048281185 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4689, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4689)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 7.2006 18:55:55
  11. Lewison, G.: ¬The work of the Bibliometrics Research Group (City University) and associates (2005) 0.02 
    0.0196243 = product of:
  0.0392486 = sum of:
    0.0392486 = product of:
      0.0784972 = sum of:
        0.0784972 = weight(_text_:22 in 4890) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0784972 = score(doc=4890,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16907248 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048281185 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4890, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4890)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    20. 1.2007 17:02:22
  12. Marx, W.; Bornmann, L.: On the problems of dealing with bibliometric data (2014) 0.02 
    0.0196243 = product of:
  0.0392486 = sum of:
    0.0392486 = product of:
      0.0784972 = sum of:
        0.0784972 = weight(_text_:22 in 1239) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0784972 = score(doc=1239,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16907248 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048281185 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 1239, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1239)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    18. 3.2014 19:13:22
  13. Raan, A.F.J. van: Statistical properties of bibliometric indicators : research group indicator distributions and correlations (2006) 0.01 
    0.013876477 = product of:
  0.027752955 = sum of:
    0.027752955 = product of:
      0.05550591 = sum of:
        0.05550591 = weight(_text_:22 in 5275) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05550591 = score(doc=5275,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.16907248 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048281185 = queryNorm
            0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 5275, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5275)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 7.2006 16:20:22
  14. Larivière, V.; Gingras, Y.; Archambault, E.: ¬The decline in the concentration of citations, 1900-2007 (2009) 0.01 
    0.013876477 = product of:
  0.027752955 = sum of:
    0.027752955 = product of:
      0.05550591 = sum of:
        0.05550591 = weight(_text_:22 in 2763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05550591 = score(doc=2763,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.16907248 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048281185 = queryNorm
            0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 2763, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2763)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 3.2009 19:22:35
  15. Li, T.-C.: Reference sources in periodicals : research note (1995) 0.01 
    0.0130828675 = product of:
  0.026165735 = sum of:
    0.026165735 = product of:
      0.05233147 = sum of:
        0.05233147 = weight(_text_:22 in 5092) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05233147 = score(doc=5092,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16907248 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048281185 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5092, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5092)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Presents a list of 53 periodicals in 22 subject fields which regularly provide bibliographies of theses, research in progress and patents in their particular subject field. The fields of business, economics, history and literature have most periodical listings of dissertations and theses. Also lists 63 periodicals in 25 sub-disciplines which provide rankings or ratings. Rankings and ratings information predominates in the fields of business, sports and games, finance and banking, and library and information science
  16. Pichappan, P.; Sangaranachiyar, S.: Ageing approach to scientific eponyms (1996) 0.01 
    0.0130828675 = product of:
  0.026165735 = sum of:
    0.026165735 = product of:
      0.05233147 = sum of:
        0.05233147 = weight(_text_:22 in 80) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05233147 = score(doc=80,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16907248 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048281185 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 80, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=80)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Footnote
    Report presented at the 16th National Indian Association of Special Libraries and Information Centres Seminar Special Interest Group Meeting on Informatrics in Bombay, 19-22 Dec 94
  17. Mommoh, O.M.: Subject analysis of post-graduate theses in library, archival and information science at Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria (1995/96) 0.01 
    0.0130828675 = product of:
  0.026165735 = sum of:
    0.026165735 = product of:
      0.05233147 = sum of:
        0.05233147 = weight(_text_:22 in 673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05233147 = score(doc=673,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16907248 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048281185 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 673, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=673)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Library focus. 13/14(1995/96), S.22-25
  18. Chongde, W.; Zhe, W.: Evaluation of the models for Bradford's law (1998) 0.01 
    0.0130828675 = product of:
  0.026165735 = sum of:
    0.026165735 = product of:
      0.05233147 = sum of:
        0.05233147 = weight(_text_:22 in 3688) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05233147 = score(doc=3688,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16907248 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048281185 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3688, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3688)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 5.1999 19:12:28
  19. Tijssen, R.J.W.; Wijk, E. van: ¬The global science base of information and communication technologies : bibliometric analysis of ICT research papers (1998) 0.01 
    0.0130828675 = product of:
  0.026165735 = sum of:
    0.026165735 = product of:
      0.05233147 = sum of:
        0.05233147 = weight(_text_:22 in 3691) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05233147 = score(doc=3691,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16907248 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048281185 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3691, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3691)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 5.1999 19:26:54
  20. Thelwall, M.; Ruschenburg, T.: Grundlagen und Forschungsfelder der Webometrie (2006) 0.01 
    0.0130828675 = product of:
  0.026165735 = sum of:
    0.026165735 = product of:
      0.05233147 = sum of:
        0.05233147 = weight(_text_:22 in 77) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05233147 = score(doc=77,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16907248 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048281185 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 77, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=77)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    4.12.2006 12:12:22

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 110
  • d 8
  • ro 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 117
  • m 2
  • el 1
  • s 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications