Search (1302 results, page 1 of 66)

  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Mundle, K.; Huie, H.; Bangalore, N.S.: ARL Library Catalog Department Web sites : an evaluative study (2006) 0.11 
    0.1113229 = product of:
  0.2226458 = sum of:
    0.2226458 = sum of:
      0.18993863 = weight(_text_:1.5 in 771) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.18993863 = score(doc=771,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.4074348 = queryWeight, product of:
            8.43879 = idf(docFreq=25, maxDocs=44218)
            0.048281185 = queryNorm
          0.4661817 = fieldWeight in 771, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            8.43879 = idf(docFreq=25, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=771)
      0.03270717 = weight(_text_:22 in 771) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03270717 = score(doc=771,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16907248 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.048281185 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 771, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=771)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    User-friendly and content-rich Web sites are indispensable for any knowledge-based organization. Web site evaluation studies point to ways to improve the efficiency and usability of Web sites. Library catalog or technical services department Web sites have proliferated in the past few years, but there is no systematic and accepted method that evaluates the performance of these Web sites. An earlier study by Mundle, Zhao, and Bangalore evaluated catalog department Web sites within the consortium of the Committee on Institutional Cooperation (CIC) libraries, proposed a model to assess these Web sites, and recommended desirable features for them. The present study was undertaken to test the model further and to assess the recommended features. The study evaluated the catalog department Web sites of Association of Research Libraries members. It validated the model proposed, and confirmed the use of the performance index (PI) as an objective measure to assess the usability or workability of a catalog department Web site. The model advocates using a PI of 1.5 as the benchmark for catalog department Web site evaluation by employing the study tool and scoring method suggested in this paper.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  2. Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004) 0.10 
    0.09630763 = sum of:
  0.07668333 = product of:
    0.23004997 = sum of:
      0.23004997 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.23004997 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.40932843 = queryWeight, product of:
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.048281185 = queryNorm
          0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.0196243 = product of:
    0.0392486 = sum of:
      0.0392486 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0392486 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16907248 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.048281185 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
    Date
    8. 1.2013 10:22:32
  3. Broder, A.; Kumar, R.; Maghoul, F.; Raghavan, P.; Rajagopalan, S.; Stata, R.; Tomkins, A.; Wiener, J.: Graph structure in the Web (2000) 0.08 
    0.07597546 = product of:
  0.15195093 = sum of:
    0.15195093 = product of:
      0.30390185 = sum of:
        0.30390185 = weight(_text_:1.5 in 5595) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.30390185 = score(doc=5595,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.4074348 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.43879 = idf(docFreq=25, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048281185 = queryNorm
            0.74589074 = fieldWeight in 5595, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.43879 = idf(docFreq=25, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5595)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The study of the web as a graph is not only fascinating in its own right, but also yields valuable insight into web algorithms for crawling, searching and community discovery, and the sociological phenomena which characterize its evolution. We report on experiments on local and global properties of the web graph using two Altavista crawls each with over 200M pages and 1.5 billion links. Our study indicates that the macroscopic structure of the web is considerably more intricate than suggested by earlier experiments on a smaller scale
  4. Kramer, A.: Datendetektive : Volltextsuchmaschinen trotzen dem Chaos auf der Festplatte (2004) 0.08 
    0.07597546 = product of:
  0.15195093 = sum of:
    0.15195093 = product of:
      0.30390185 = sum of:
        0.30390185 = weight(_text_:1.5 in 2825) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.30390185 = score(doc=2825,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.4074348 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.43879 = idf(docFreq=25, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048281185 = queryNorm
            0.74589074 = fieldWeight in 2825, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.43879 = idf(docFreq=25, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2825)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Object
    MTLibrarian 1.5
  5. Kramer, A.: Such, Programm! : Elf kostenlose Desktop-Tools schnüffeln um die Wette (2005) 0.08 
    0.07597546 = product of:
  0.15195093 = sum of:
    0.15195093 = product of:
      0.30390185 = sum of:
        0.30390185 = weight(_text_:1.5 in 4560) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.30390185 = score(doc=4560,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.4074348 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.43879 = idf(docFreq=25, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048281185 = queryNorm
            0.74589074 = fieldWeight in 4560, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.43879 = idf(docFreq=25, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4560)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Object
    Enterprise Search 1.5
  6. Stevens, C.F.: ¬An evolutionary scaling law for the primate visuaö system and its basis in cortical function. (2001) 0.06 
    0.056981597 = product of:
  0.113963194 = sum of:
    0.113963194 = product of:
      0.22792639 = sum of:
        0.22792639 = weight(_text_:1.5 in 5832) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.22792639 = score(doc=5832,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.4074348 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.43879 = idf(docFreq=25, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048281185 = queryNorm
            0.5594181 = fieldWeight in 5832, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.43879 = idf(docFreq=25, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5832)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Charles Stevens, of the Salk Institute in La Jolla, California, takes a still different approach, arguing that the number of cells can tell you more than the volumes of different regions. "Our brain is no different from a mouse's," he says, "but we have a lot more of it." Stevens has counted the cells in two regions of the cortex: the lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN), one of the first destinations for nerve signals from the retina, and the primary visual cortex, the next port of call for LGN messages. He found that, in a range of primate species, the number of cells in the primary visual cortex is proportional to the number of cells in the LGN raised to the power of 1.5. So a human uses four times as many neurons to process the input from each LGN neuron as a tarsier, a small Asian primate. Stevens suggests that bigger animals with bigger eyes need proportionally more cortical cells to process the information they receive without sacrificing resolution.
  7. Schrodt, R.: Tiefen und Untiefen im wissenschaftlichen Sprachgebrauch (2008) 0.05 
    0.051122215 = product of:
  0.10224443 = sum of:
    0.10224443 = product of:
      0.30673328 = sum of:
        0.30673328 = weight(_text_:3a in 140) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.30673328 = score(doc=140,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.40932843 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048281185 = queryNorm
            0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 140, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=140)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Vgl. auch: https://studylibde.com/doc/13053640/richard-schrodt. Vgl. auch: http%3A%2F%2Fwww.univie.ac.at%2FGermanistik%2Fschrodt%2Fvorlesung%2Fwissenschaftssprache.doc&usg=AOvVaw1lDLDR6NFf1W0-oC9mEUJf.
  8. Cooper, M.D.: Usage patterns of a Web-based library catalog (2001) 0.05 
    0.04748466 = product of:
  0.09496932 = sum of:
    0.09496932 = product of:
      0.18993863 = sum of:
        0.18993863 = weight(_text_:1.5 in 5584) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18993863 = score(doc=5584,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.4074348 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.43879 = idf(docFreq=25, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048281185 = queryNorm
            0.4661817 = fieldWeight in 5584, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.43879 = idf(docFreq=25, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5584)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    This article reports on a model and patterns of use of a library catalog that can be accessed through the Internet. Three categories of users are identified. individuals who perform a search of the catalog, tourists who look only at opening pages of the library catalog's site, and Web spiders that come to the site to obtain pages for indexing the Web. A number of types of use activities are also identified, and can be grouped with the presearch phase (which takes place before any searching begins): the search phase, the display phase (in which users display the results of their search), and phases in which users make errors, ask the system for help or assistance, and take other actions. An empirical investigation of patterns of use of a university Web-based library catalog was conducted for 479 days. During that period, the characteristics of about 2.5 million sessions were recorded and analyzed, and usage trends were identified. Of the total, 62% of the sessions were for users who performed a search, 27% were from spiders, and 11% were for tourists. During the study period, the average search session lasted about 5 minutes when the study began and had increased to about 10 minutes 16 months later. An average search consisted of about 1.5 presearch actions lasting about 25 seconds, about 5.3 display actions, and 2.5 searches per session. The latter two categories are in the range of 35-37 seconds per session each. There were major differences in usage (number of searches, search time, number of display actions, and display time), depending upon the database accessed
  9. Hyland, K.: Self-citation and self-reference : credibility and promotion in academic publication (2003) 0.05 
    0.04748466 = product of:
  0.09496932 = sum of:
    0.09496932 = product of:
      0.18993863 = sum of:
        0.18993863 = weight(_text_:1.5 in 5156) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18993863 = score(doc=5156,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.4074348 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.43879 = idf(docFreq=25, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048281185 = queryNorm
            0.4661817 = fieldWeight in 5156, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.43879 = idf(docFreq=25, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5156)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Hyland examines self referencing practices by analyzing their textual uses in 240 randomly chosen research papers and 800 abstracts across 80 expert selected journals from 1997 and 1998 in eight disciplines, as a key to their author's assumptions as to their own role in the research process and to the practices of their disciplines. Scanned texts produced a corpus of nearly 1.5 million words which was searched using WordPilot for first person pronouns and all mentions of an author's previous work. There were 6,689 instances of self reference in the papers and 459 in the abstracts; on the average 28 cases per paper, 17% of which were self citations. There was one self mention in every two abstracts. Nearly 70% of self reference and mention occurred in humanities and social science papers, but biologists employed the most self citation overall and 12% of hard science citations were found to be self citations. Interviews indicated that self citation was deemed important in establishing authority by fitting oneself into the research framework. Self mention arises in four main contexts: stating the goal or the structure of the paper, explaining a procedure, stating results or a claim, and elaborating an argument.
  10. Vetere, G.; Lenzerini, M.: Models for semantic interoperability in service-oriented architectures (2005) 0.04 
    0.04473194 = product of:
  0.08946388 = sum of:
    0.08946388 = product of:
      0.26839164 = sum of:
        0.26839164 = weight(_text_:3a in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.26839164 = score(doc=306,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.40932843 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048281185 = queryNorm
            0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Vgl.: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/login.jsp?tp=&arnumber=5386707&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fxpls%2Fabs_all.jsp%3Farnumber%3D5386707.
  11. Mas, S.; Marleau, Y.: Proposition of a faceted classification model to support corporate information organization and digital records management (2009) 0.04 
    0.038341664 = product of:
  0.07668333 = sum of:
    0.07668333 = product of:
      0.23004997 = sum of:
        0.23004997 = weight(_text_:3a in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.23004997 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.40932843 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048281185 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Footnote
    Vgl.: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/Xplore/login.jsp?reload=true&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fiel5%2F4755313%2F4755314%2F04755480.pdf%3Farnumber%3D4755480&authDecision=-203.
  12. RAK-NBM : Interpretationshilfe zu NBM 3b,3 (2000) 0.04 
    0.037003938 = product of:
  0.074007876 = sum of:
    0.074007876 = product of:
      0.14801575 = sum of:
        0.14801575 = weight(_text_:22 in 4362) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14801575 = score(doc=4362,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.16907248 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048281185 = queryNorm
            0.8754574 = fieldWeight in 4362, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4362)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 1.2000 19:22:27
  13. Diederichs, A.: Wissensmanagement ist Macht : Effektiv und kostenbewußt arbeiten im Informationszeitalter (2005) 0.04 
    0.037003938 = product of:
  0.074007876 = sum of:
    0.074007876 = product of:
      0.14801575 = sum of:
        0.14801575 = weight(_text_:22 in 3211) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14801575 = score(doc=3211,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.16907248 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048281185 = queryNorm
            0.8754574 = fieldWeight in 3211, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3211)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 2.2005 9:16:22
  14. Hawking, D.; Robertson, S.: On collection size and retrieval effectiveness (2003) 0.04 
    0.037003938 = product of:
  0.074007876 = sum of:
    0.074007876 = product of:
      0.14801575 = sum of:
        0.14801575 = weight(_text_:22 in 4109) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14801575 = score(doc=4109,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.16907248 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048281185 = queryNorm
            0.8754574 = fieldWeight in 4109, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4109)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    14. 8.2005 14:22:22
  15. Buzydlowski, J.W.; White, H.D.; Lin, X.: Term Co-occurrence Analysis as an Interface for Digital Libraries (2002) 0.03 
    0.03399029 = product of:
  0.06798058 = sum of:
    0.06798058 = product of:
      0.13596116 = sum of:
        0.13596116 = weight(_text_:22 in 1339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13596116 = score(doc=1339,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.16907248 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048281185 = queryNorm
            0.804159 = fieldWeight in 1339, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1339)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 2.2003 17:25:39
    22. 2.2003 18:16:22
  16. Pesch, K.: ¬Eine gigantische Informationsfülle : "Brockhaus multimedial 2004" kann jedoch nicht rundum überzeugen (2003) 0.03 
    0.032378446 = product of:
  0.06475689 = sum of:
    0.06475689 = product of:
      0.12951379 = sum of:
        0.12951379 = weight(_text_:22 in 502) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12951379 = score(doc=502,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.16907248 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048281185 = queryNorm
            0.76602525 = fieldWeight in 502, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=502)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    3. 5.1997 8:44:22
    22. 9.2003 10:02:00
  17. Hemminger, B.M.: Introduction to the special issue on bioinformatics (2005) 0.03 
    0.032378446 = product of:
  0.06475689 = sum of:
    0.06475689 = product of:
      0.12951379 = sum of:
        0.12951379 = weight(_text_:22 in 4189) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12951379 = score(doc=4189,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.16907248 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048281185 = queryNorm
            0.76602525 = fieldWeight in 4189, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4189)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 7.2006 14:19:22
  18. Donsbach, W.: Wahrheit in den Medien : über den Sinn eines methodischen Objektivitätsbegriffes (2001) 0.03 
    0.031951386 = product of:
  0.06390277 = sum of:
    0.06390277 = product of:
      0.19170831 = sum of:
        0.19170831 = weight(_text_:3a in 5895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.19170831 = score(doc=5895,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.40932843 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048281185 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 5895, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5895)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Politische Meinung. 381(2001) Nr.1, S.65-74 [https%3A%2F%2Fwww.dgfe.de%2Ffileadmin%2FOrdnerRedakteure%2FSektionen%2FSek02_AEW%2FKWF%2FPublikationen_Reihe_1989-2003%2FBand_17%2FBd_17_1994_355-406_A.pdf&usg=AOvVaw2KcbRsHy5UQ9QRIUyuOLNi]
  19. Ackermann, E.: Piaget's constructivism, Papert's constructionism : what's the difference? (2001) 0.03 
    0.031951386 = product of:
  0.06390277 = sum of:
    0.06390277 = product of:
      0.19170831 = sum of:
        0.19170831 = weight(_text_:3a in 692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.19170831 = score(doc=692,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.40932843 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048281185 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 692, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=692)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Vgl.: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Piaget-%E2%80%99-s-Constructivism-%2C-Papert-%E2%80%99-s-%3A-What-%E2%80%99-s-Ackermann/89cbcc1e740a4591443ff4765a6ae8df0fdf5554. Darunter weitere Hinweise auf verwandte Beiträge. Auch unter: Learning Group Publication 5(2001) no.3, S.438.
  20. dpa: Struktur des Denkorgans wird bald entschlüsselt sein (2000) 0.03 
    0.027752955 = product of:
  0.05550591 = sum of:
    0.05550591 = product of:
      0.11101182 = sum of:
        0.11101182 = weight(_text_:22 in 3952) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11101182 = score(doc=3952,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.16907248 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048281185 = queryNorm
            0.6565931 = fieldWeight in 3952, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3952)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    17. 7.1996 9:33:22
    22. 7.2000 19:05:41

Authors

Languages

Types

  • a 1094
  • m 142
  • el 64
  • s 50
  • b 26
  • x 13
  • i 8
  • n 2
  • r 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications