-
Bornmann, L.; Moya Anegón, F. de; Mutz, R.: Do universities or research institutions with a specific subject profile have an advantage or a disadvantage in institutional rankings? (2013)
0.03
0.026838424 = product of:
0.053676847 = sum of:
0.053676847 = product of:
0.107353695 = sum of:
0.107353695 = weight(_text_:class in 1109) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.107353695 = score(doc=1109,freq=2.0), product of:
0.28640816 = queryWeight, product of:
5.6542544 = idf(docFreq=420, maxDocs=44218)
0.05065357 = queryNorm
0.37482765 = fieldWeight in 1109, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.6542544 = idf(docFreq=420, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1109)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Using data compiled for the SCImago Institutions Ranking, we look at whether the subject area type an institution (university or research-focused institution) belongs to (in terms of the fields researched) has an influence on its ranking position. We used latent class analysis to categorize institutions based on their publications in certain subject areas. Even though this categorization does not relate directly to scientific performance, our results show that it exercises an important influence on the outcome of a performance measurement: Certain subject area types of institutions have an advantage in the ranking positions when compared with others. This advantage manifests itself not only when performance is measured with an indicator that is not field-normalized but also for indicators that are field-normalized.
-
Bornmann, L.; Wagner, C.; Leydesdorff, L.: BRICS countries and scientific excellence : a bibliometric analysis of most frequently cited papers (2015)
0.02
0.022365354 = product of:
0.044730708 = sum of:
0.044730708 = product of:
0.089461416 = sum of:
0.089461416 = weight(_text_:class in 2047) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.089461416 = score(doc=2047,freq=2.0), product of:
0.28640816 = queryWeight, product of:
5.6542544 = idf(docFreq=420, maxDocs=44218)
0.05065357 = queryNorm
0.31235638 = fieldWeight in 2047, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.6542544 = idf(docFreq=420, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2047)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The BRICS countries (Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa) are notable for their increasing participation in science and technology. The governments of these countries have been boosting their investments in research and development to become part of the group of nations doing research at a world-class level. This study investigates the development of the BRICS countries in the domain of top-cited papers (top 10% and 1% most frequently cited papers) between 1990 and 2010. To assess the extent to which these countries have become important players at the top level, we compare the BRICS countries with the top-performing countries worldwide. As the analyses of the (annual) growth rates show, with the exception of Russia, the BRICS countries have increased their output in terms of most frequently cited papers at a higher rate than the top-cited countries worldwide. By way of additional analysis, we generate coauthorship networks among authors of highly cited papers for 4 time points to view changes in BRICS participation (1995, 2000, 2005, and 2010). Here, the results show that all BRICS countries succeeded in becoming part of this network, whereby the Chinese collaboration activities focus on the US.
-
Marx, W.; Bornmann, L.: On the problems of dealing with bibliometric data (2014)
0.02
0.020588579 = product of:
0.041177157 = sum of:
0.041177157 = product of:
0.082354315 = sum of:
0.082354315 = weight(_text_:22 in 1239) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.082354315 = score(doc=1239,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17738017 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05065357 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 1239, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1239)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 18. 3.2014 19:13:22
-
Bornmann, L.; Mutz, R.: From P100 to P100' : a new citation-rank approach (2014)
0.01
0.013725719 = product of:
0.027451439 = sum of:
0.027451439 = product of:
0.054902878 = sum of:
0.054902878 = weight(_text_:22 in 1431) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054902878 = score(doc=1431,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17738017 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05065357 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1431, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1431)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 8.2014 17:05:18
-
Bornmann, L.: How to analyze percentile citation impact data meaningfully in bibliometrics : the statistical analysis of distributions, percentile rank classes, and top-cited papers (2013)
0.01
0.010294289 = product of:
0.020588579 = sum of:
0.020588579 = product of:
0.041177157 = sum of:
0.041177157 = weight(_text_:22 in 656) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041177157 = score(doc=656,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17738017 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05065357 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 656, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=656)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 3.2013 19:44:17
-
Leydesdorff, L.; Bornmann, L.; Wagner, C.S.: ¬The relative influences of government funding and international collaboration on citation impact (2019)
0.01
0.010294289 = product of:
0.020588579 = sum of:
0.020588579 = product of:
0.041177157 = sum of:
0.041177157 = weight(_text_:22 in 4681) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041177157 = score(doc=4681,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17738017 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05065357 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4681, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4681)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 8. 1.2019 18:22:45
-
Leydesdorff, L.; Bornmann, L.: How fractional counting of citations affects the impact factor : normalization in terms of differences in citation potentials among fields of science (2011)
0.01
0.008578574 = product of:
0.017157149 = sum of:
0.017157149 = product of:
0.034314297 = sum of:
0.034314297 = weight(_text_:22 in 4186) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034314297 = score(doc=4186,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17738017 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05065357 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4186, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4186)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 1.2011 12:51:07
