Search (35 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Automatisches Indexieren"
  1. Salton, G.: Another look at automatic text-retrieval systems (1986) 0.04
    0.044730708 = product of:
      0.089461416 = sum of:
        0.089461416 = product of:
          0.17892283 = sum of:
            0.17892283 = weight(_text_:class in 1356) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.17892283 = score(doc=1356,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.28640816 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.6542544 = idf(docFreq=420, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05065357 = queryNorm
                0.62471277 = fieldWeight in 1356, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.6542544 = idf(docFreq=420, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1356)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Bezugnahme auf: Blair, D.C.: An evaluation of retrieval effectiveness for a full-text document-retrieval system. Comm. ACM 28(1985) S.280-299. - Vgl. auch: Blair, D.C.: Full text retrieval ... Int. Class. 13(1986) S.18-23; Blair, D.C., M.E. Maron: full-text information retrieval ... Inf. Proc. Man. 26(1990) S.437-447.
  2. Voorhees, E.M.: Implementing agglomerative hierarchic clustering algorithms for use in document retrieval (1986) 0.03
    0.027451439 = product of:
      0.054902878 = sum of:
        0.054902878 = product of:
          0.109805755 = sum of:
            0.109805755 = weight(_text_:22 in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.109805755 = score(doc=402,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17738017 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05065357 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 22(1986) no.6, S.465-476
  3. Fuhr, N.; Niewelt, B.: ¬Ein Retrievaltest mit automatisch indexierten Dokumenten (1984) 0.02
    0.024020009 = product of:
      0.048040017 = sum of:
        0.048040017 = product of:
          0.096080035 = sum of:
            0.096080035 = weight(_text_:22 in 262) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.096080035 = score(doc=262,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17738017 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05065357 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 262, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=262)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    20.10.2000 12:22:23
  4. Hlava, M.M.K.: Automatic indexing : comparing rule-based and statistics-based indexing systems (2005) 0.02
    0.024020009 = product of:
      0.048040017 = sum of:
        0.048040017 = product of:
          0.096080035 = sum of:
            0.096080035 = weight(_text_:22 in 6265) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.096080035 = score(doc=6265,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17738017 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05065357 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6265, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6265)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Information outlook. 9(2005) no.8, S.22-23
  5. Needham, R.M.; Sparck Jones, K.: Keywords and clumps (1985) 0.02
    0.02214057 = product of:
      0.04428114 = sum of:
        0.04428114 = product of:
          0.08856228 = sum of:
            0.08856228 = weight(_text_:class in 3645) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08856228 = score(doc=3645,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.28640816 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.6542544 = idf(docFreq=420, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05065357 = queryNorm
                0.30921704 = fieldWeight in 3645, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  5.6542544 = idf(docFreq=420, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3645)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The selection that follows was chosen as it represents "a very early paper an the possibilities allowed by computers an documentation." In the early 1960s computers were being used to provide simple automatic indexing systems wherein keywords were extracted from documents. The problem with such systems was that they lacked vocabulary control, thus documents related in subject matter were not always collocated in retrieval. To improve retrieval by improving recall is the raison d'être of vocabulary control tools such as classifications and thesauri. The question arose whether it was possible by automatic means to construct classes of terms, which when substituted, one for another, could be used to improve retrieval performance? One of the first theoretical approaches to this question was initiated by R. M. Needham and Karen Sparck Jones at the Cambridge Language Research Institute in England.t The question was later pursued using experimental methodologies by Sparck Jones, who, as a Senior Research Associate in the Computer Laboratory at the University of Cambridge, has devoted her life's work to research in information retrieval and automatic naturai language processing. Based an the principles of numerical taxonomy, automatic classification techniques start from the premise that two objects are similar to the degree that they share attributes in common. When these two objects are keywords, their similarity is measured in terms of the number of documents they index in common. Step 1 in automatic classification is to compute mathematically the degree to which two terms are similar. Step 2 is to group together those terms that are "most similar" to each other, forming equivalence classes of intersubstitutable terms. The technique for forming such classes varies and is the factor that characteristically distinguishes different approaches to automatic classification. The technique used by Needham and Sparck Jones, that of clumping, is described in the selection that follows. Questions that must be asked are whether the use of automatically generated classes really does improve retrieval performance and whether there is a true eco nomic advantage in substituting mechanical for manual labor. Several years after her work with clumping, Sparck Jones was to observe that while it was not wholly satisfactory in itself, it was valuable in that it stimulated research into automatic classification. To this it might be added that it was valuable in that it introduced to libraryl information science the methods of numerical taxonomy, thus stimulating us to think again about the fundamental nature and purpose of classification. In this connection it might be useful to review how automatically derived classes differ from those of manually constructed classifications: 1) the manner of their derivation is purely a posteriori, the ultimate operationalization of the principle of literary warrant; 2) the relationship between members forming such classes is essentially statistical; the members of a given class are similar to each other not because they possess the class-defining characteristic but by virtue of sharing a family resemblance; and finally, 3) automatically derived classes are not related meaningfully one to another, that is, they are not ordered in traditional hierarchical and precedence relationships.
  6. Fuhr, N.: Ranking-Experimente mit gewichteter Indexierung (1986) 0.02
    0.020588579 = product of:
      0.041177157 = sum of:
        0.041177157 = product of:
          0.082354315 = sum of:
            0.082354315 = weight(_text_:22 in 58) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.082354315 = score(doc=58,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17738017 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05065357 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 58, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=58)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    14. 6.2015 22:12:44
  7. Hauer, M.: Automatische Indexierung (2000) 0.02
    0.020588579 = product of:
      0.041177157 = sum of:
        0.041177157 = product of:
          0.082354315 = sum of:
            0.082354315 = weight(_text_:22 in 5887) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.082354315 = score(doc=5887,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17738017 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05065357 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 5887, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5887)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Wissen in Aktion: Wege des Knowledge Managements. 22. Online-Tagung der DGI, Frankfurt am Main, 2.-4.5.2000. Proceedings. Hrsg.: R. Schmidt
  8. Fuhr, N.: Rankingexperimente mit gewichteter Indexierung (1986) 0.02
    0.020588579 = product of:
      0.041177157 = sum of:
        0.041177157 = product of:
          0.082354315 = sum of:
            0.082354315 = weight(_text_:22 in 2051) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.082354315 = score(doc=2051,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17738017 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05065357 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 2051, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2051)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    14. 6.2015 22:12:56
  9. Hauer, M.: Tiefenindexierung im Bibliothekskatalog : 17 Jahre intelligentCAPTURE (2019) 0.02
    0.020588579 = product of:
      0.041177157 = sum of:
        0.041177157 = product of:
          0.082354315 = sum of:
            0.082354315 = weight(_text_:22 in 5629) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.082354315 = score(doc=5629,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17738017 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05065357 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 5629, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5629)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    B.I.T.online. 22(2019) H.2, S.163-166
  10. Biebricher, N.; Fuhr, N.; Lustig, G.; Schwantner, M.; Knorz, G.: ¬The automatic indexing system AIR/PHYS : from research to application (1988) 0.02
    0.017157149 = product of:
      0.034314297 = sum of:
        0.034314297 = product of:
          0.068628594 = sum of:
            0.068628594 = weight(_text_:22 in 1952) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.068628594 = score(doc=1952,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17738017 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05065357 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1952, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1952)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    16. 8.1998 12:51:22
  11. Kutschekmanesch, S.; Lutes, B.; Moelle, K.; Thiel, U.; Tzeras, K.: Automated multilingual indexing : a synthesis of rule-based and thesaurus-based methods (1998) 0.02
    0.017157149 = product of:
      0.034314297 = sum of:
        0.034314297 = product of:
          0.068628594 = sum of:
            0.068628594 = weight(_text_:22 in 4157) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.068628594 = score(doc=4157,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17738017 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05065357 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4157, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4157)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Information und Märkte: 50. Deutscher Dokumentartag 1998, Kongreß der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Dokumentation e.V. (DGD), Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, 22.-24. September 1998. Hrsg. von Marlies Ockenfeld u. Gerhard J. Mantwill
  12. Tsareva, P.V.: Algoritmy dlya raspoznavaniya pozitivnykh i negativnykh vkhozdenii deskriptorov v tekst i protsedura avtomaticheskoi klassifikatsii tekstov (1999) 0.02
    0.017157149 = product of:
      0.034314297 = sum of:
        0.034314297 = product of:
          0.068628594 = sum of:
            0.068628594 = weight(_text_:22 in 374) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.068628594 = score(doc=374,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17738017 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05065357 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 374, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=374)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    1. 4.2002 10:22:41
  13. Stankovic, R. et al.: Indexing of textual databases based on lexical resources : a case study for Serbian (2016) 0.02
    0.017157149 = product of:
      0.034314297 = sum of:
        0.034314297 = product of:
          0.068628594 = sum of:
            0.068628594 = weight(_text_:22 in 2759) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.068628594 = score(doc=2759,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17738017 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05065357 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2759, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2759)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    1. 2.2016 18:25:22
  14. Tsujii, J.-I.: Automatic acquisition of semantic collocation from corpora (1995) 0.01
    0.013725719 = product of:
      0.027451439 = sum of:
        0.027451439 = product of:
          0.054902878 = sum of:
            0.054902878 = weight(_text_:22 in 4709) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054902878 = score(doc=4709,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17738017 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05065357 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4709, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4709)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    31. 7.1996 9:22:19
  15. Riloff, E.: ¬An empirical study of automated dictionary construction for information extraction in three domains (1996) 0.01
    0.013725719 = product of:
      0.027451439 = sum of:
        0.027451439 = product of:
          0.054902878 = sum of:
            0.054902878 = weight(_text_:22 in 6752) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054902878 = score(doc=6752,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17738017 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05065357 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6752, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6752)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    6. 3.1997 16:22:15
  16. Lepsky, K.; Vorhauer, J.: Lingo - ein open source System für die Automatische Indexierung deutschsprachiger Dokumente (2006) 0.01
    0.013725719 = product of:
      0.027451439 = sum of:
        0.027451439 = product of:
          0.054902878 = sum of:
            0.054902878 = weight(_text_:22 in 3581) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054902878 = score(doc=3581,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17738017 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05065357 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3581, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3581)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    24. 3.2006 12:22:02
  17. Probst, M.; Mittelbach, J.: Maschinelle Indexierung in der Sacherschließung wissenschaftlicher Bibliotheken (2006) 0.01
    0.013725719 = product of:
      0.027451439 = sum of:
        0.027451439 = product of:
          0.054902878 = sum of:
            0.054902878 = weight(_text_:22 in 1755) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054902878 = score(doc=1755,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17738017 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05065357 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1755, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1755)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2008 12:35:19
  18. Glaesener, L.: Automatisches Indexieren einer informationswissenschaftlichen Datenbank mit Mehrwortgruppen (2012) 0.01
    0.013725719 = product of:
      0.027451439 = sum of:
        0.027451439 = product of:
          0.054902878 = sum of:
            0.054902878 = weight(_text_:22 in 401) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054902878 = score(doc=401,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17738017 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05065357 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 401, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=401)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    11. 9.2012 19:43:22
  19. Hodges, P.R.: Keyword in title indexes : effectiveness of retrieval in computer searches (1983) 0.01
    0.012010004 = product of:
      0.024020009 = sum of:
        0.024020009 = product of:
          0.048040017 = sum of:
            0.048040017 = weight(_text_:22 in 5001) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.048040017 = score(doc=5001,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17738017 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05065357 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5001, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5001)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    14. 3.1996 13:22:21
  20. Bordoni, L.; Pazienza, M.T.: Documents automatic indexing in an environmental domain (1997) 0.01
    0.012010004 = product of:
      0.024020009 = sum of:
        0.024020009 = product of:
          0.048040017 = sum of:
            0.048040017 = weight(_text_:22 in 530) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.048040017 = score(doc=530,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17738017 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05065357 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 530, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=530)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    International forum on information and documentation. 22(1997) no.1, S.17-28