Search (182 results, page 2 of 10)

  • × type_ss:"el"
  1. Koch, T.; Vizine-Goetz, D.: DDC and knowledge organization in the digital library : Research and development. Demonstration pages (1999) 0.03
    0.026838424 = product of:
      0.053676847 = sum of:
        0.053676847 = product of:
          0.107353695 = sum of:
            0.107353695 = weight(_text_:class in 942) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.107353695 = score(doc=942,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.28640816 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.6542544 = idf(docFreq=420, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05065357 = queryNorm
                0.37482765 = fieldWeight in 942, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.6542544 = idf(docFreq=420, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=942)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    http://www.lub.lu.se/tk/demos/class-ws/index.html
  2. Warnick, W.L.; Leberman, A.; Scott, R.L.; Spence, K.J.; Johnsom, L.A.; Allen, V.S.: Searching the deep Web : directed query engine applications at the Department of Energy (2001) 0.03
    0.026838424 = product of:
      0.053676847 = sum of:
        0.053676847 = product of:
          0.107353695 = sum of:
            0.107353695 = weight(_text_:class in 1215) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.107353695 = score(doc=1215,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.28640816 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.6542544 = idf(docFreq=420, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05065357 = queryNorm
                0.37482765 = fieldWeight in 1215, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.6542544 = idf(docFreq=420, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1215)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Directed Query Engines, an emerging class of search engine specifically designed to access distributed resources on the deep web, offer the opportunity to create inexpensive digital libraries. Already, one such engine, Distributed Explorer, has been used to select and assemble high quality information resources and incorporate them into publicly available systems for the physical sciences. By nesting Directed Query Engines so that one query launches several other engines in a cascading fashion, enormous virtual collections may soon be assembled to form a comprehensive information infrastructure for the physical sciences. Once a Directed Query Engine has been configured for a set of information resources, distributed alerts tools can provide patrons with personalized, profile-based notices of recent additions to any of the selected resources. Due to the potentially enormous size and scope of Directed Query Engine applications, consideration must be given to issues surrounding the representation of large quantities of information from multiple, heterogeneous sources.
  3. Assem, M. van; Gangemi, A.; Schreiber, G.: Conversion of WordNet to a standard RDF/OWL representation (2006) 0.03
    0.026838424 = product of:
      0.053676847 = sum of:
        0.053676847 = product of:
          0.107353695 = sum of:
            0.107353695 = weight(_text_:class in 4641) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.107353695 = score(doc=4641,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.28640816 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.6542544 = idf(docFreq=420, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05065357 = queryNorm
                0.37482765 = fieldWeight in 4641, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.6542544 = idf(docFreq=420, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4641)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This paper presents an overview of the work in progress at the W3C to produce a standard conversion of WordNet to the RDF/OWL representation language in use in the SemanticWeb community. Such a standard representation is useful to provide application developers a high-quality resource and to promote interoperability. Important requirements in this conversion process are that it should be complete and should stay close to WordNet's conceptual model. The paper explains the steps taken to produce the conversion and details design decisions such as the composition of the class hierarchy and properties, the addition of suitable OWL semantics and the chosen format of the URIs. Additional topics include a strategy to incorporate OWL and RDFS semantics in one schema such that both RDF(S) infrastructure and OWL infrastructure can interpret the information correctly, problems encountered in understanding the Prolog source files and the description of the two versions that are provided (Basic and Full) to accommodate different usages of WordNet.
  4. Putkey, T.: Using SKOS to express faceted classification on the Semantic Web (2011) 0.03
    0.02530351 = product of:
      0.05060702 = sum of:
        0.05060702 = product of:
          0.10121404 = sum of:
            0.10121404 = weight(_text_:class in 311) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10121404 = score(doc=311,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.28640816 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.6542544 = idf(docFreq=420, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05065357 = queryNorm
                0.3533909 = fieldWeight in 311, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  5.6542544 = idf(docFreq=420, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=311)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Methodology Based on information from research papers, more research was done on SKOS and examples of SKOS and shared faceted classifications in the Semantic Web and about SKOS and how to express SKOS in RDF/XML. Once confident with these ideas, the author used a faceted taxonomy created in a Vocabulary Design class and encoded it using SKOS. Instead of writing RDF in a program such as Notepad, a thesaurus tool was used to create the taxonomy according to SKOS standards and then export the thesaurus in RDF/XML format. These processes and tools are then analyzed. Results The initial statement of the problem was simply an extension of the survey paper done earlier in this class. To continue on with the research, more research was done into SKOS - a standard for expressing thesauri, taxonomies and faceted classifications so they can be shared on the semantic web.
  5. Van der Veer Martens, B.: Do citation systems represent theories of truth? (2001) 0.02
    0.024263872 = product of:
      0.048527744 = sum of:
        0.048527744 = product of:
          0.09705549 = sum of:
            0.09705549 = weight(_text_:22 in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09705549 = score(doc=3925,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.17738017 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05065357 = queryNorm
                0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2006 15:22:28
  6. Wolchover, N.: Wie ein Aufsehen erregender Beweis kaum Beachtung fand (2017) 0.02
    0.024263872 = product of:
      0.048527744 = sum of:
        0.048527744 = product of:
          0.09705549 = sum of:
            0.09705549 = weight(_text_:22 in 3582) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09705549 = score(doc=3582,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.17738017 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05065357 = queryNorm
                0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3582, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3582)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 4.2017 10:42:05
    22. 4.2017 10:48:38
  7. Hafner, R.; Schelling, B.: Automatisierung der Sacherschließung mit Semantic Web Technologie (2015) 0.02
    0.024020009 = product of:
      0.048040017 = sum of:
        0.048040017 = product of:
          0.096080035 = sum of:
            0.096080035 = weight(_text_:22 in 8365) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.096080035 = score(doc=8365,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17738017 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05065357 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 8365, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=8365)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 6.2015 16:08:38
  8. Vögel unserer Heimat (1999) 0.02
    0.024020009 = product of:
      0.048040017 = sum of:
        0.048040017 = product of:
          0.096080035 = sum of:
            0.096080035 = weight(_text_:22 in 4084) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.096080035 = score(doc=4084,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17738017 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05065357 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4084, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4084)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    7.11.1999 18:22:54
  9. Dunning, A.: Do we still need search engines? (1999) 0.02
    0.024020009 = product of:
      0.048040017 = sum of:
        0.048040017 = product of:
          0.096080035 = sum of:
            0.096080035 = weight(_text_:22 in 6021) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.096080035 = score(doc=6021,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17738017 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05065357 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6021, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6021)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Ariadne. 1999, no.22
  10. Dextre Clarke, S.G.: Challenges and opportunities for KOS standards (2007) 0.02
    0.024020009 = product of:
      0.048040017 = sum of:
        0.048040017 = product of:
          0.096080035 = sum of:
            0.096080035 = weight(_text_:22 in 4643) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.096080035 = score(doc=4643,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17738017 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05065357 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4643, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4643)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 9.2007 15:41:14
  11. Liu, S.: Decomposing DDC synthesized numbers (1996) 0.02
    0.022365354 = product of:
      0.044730708 = sum of:
        0.044730708 = product of:
          0.089461416 = sum of:
            0.089461416 = weight(_text_:class in 5969) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.089461416 = score(doc=5969,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.28640816 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.6542544 = idf(docFreq=420, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05065357 = queryNorm
                0.31235638 = fieldWeight in 5969, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.6542544 = idf(docFreq=420, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5969)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Much literature has been written speculating upon how classification can be used in online catalogs to improve information retrieval. While some empirical studies have been done exploring whether the direct use of traditional classification schemes designed for a manual environment is effective and efficient in the online environment, none has manipulated these manual classifications in such a w ay as to take full advantage of the power of both the classification and computer. It has been suggested by some authors, such as Wajenberg and Drabenstott, that this power could be realized if the individual components of synthesized DDC numbers could be identified and indexed. This paper looks at the feasibility of automatically decomposing DDC synthesized numbers and the implications of such decomposition for information retrieval. Based on an analysis of the instructions for synthesizing numbers in the main class Arts (700) and all DDC Tables, 17 decomposition rules were defined, 13 covering the Add Notes and four the Standard Subdivisions. 1,701 DDC synthesized numbers were decomposed by a computer system called DND (Dewey Number Decomposer), developed by the author. From the 1,701 numbers, 600 were randomly selected fo r examination by three judges, each evaluating 200 numbers. The decomposition success rate was 100% and it was concluded that synthesized DDC numbers can be accurately decomposed automatically. The study has implications for information retrieval, expert systems for assigning DDC numbers, automatic indexing, switching language development, enhancing classifiers' work, teaching library school students, and providing quality control for DDC number assignments. These implications were explored using a prototype retrieval system.
  12. Frické, M.: Logical division (2016) 0.02
    0.022365354 = product of:
      0.044730708 = sum of:
        0.044730708 = product of:
          0.089461416 = sum of:
            0.089461416 = weight(_text_:class in 3183) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.089461416 = score(doc=3183,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.28640816 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.6542544 = idf(docFreq=420, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05065357 = queryNorm
                0.31235638 = fieldWeight in 3183, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.6542544 = idf(docFreq=420, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3183)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Division is obviously important to Knowledge Organization. Typically, an organizational infrastructure might acknowledge three types of connecting relationships: class hierarchies, where some classes are subclasses of others, partitive hierarchies, where some items are parts of others, and instantiation, where some items are members of some classes (see Z39.19 ANSI/NISO 2005 as an example). The first two of these involve division (the third, instantiation, does not involve division). Logical division would usually be a part of hierarchical classification systems, which, in turn, are central to shelving in libraries, to subject classification schemes, to controlled vocabularies, and to thesauri. Partitive hierarchies, and partitive division, are often essential to controlled vocabularies, thesauri, and subject tagging systems. Partitive hierarchies also relate to the bearers of information; for example, a journal would typically have its component articles as parts and, in turn, they might have sections as their parts, and, of course, components might be arrived at by partitive division (see Tillett 2009 as an illustration). Finally, verbal division, disambiguating homographs, is basic to controlled vocabularies. Thus Division is a broad and relevant topic. This article, though, is going to focus on Logical Division.
  13. Strobel, S.: ¬The complete Linux kit : fully configured LINUX system kernel (1997) 0.02
    0.020588579 = product of:
      0.041177157 = sum of:
        0.041177157 = product of:
          0.082354315 = sum of:
            0.082354315 = weight(_text_:22 in 8959) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.082354315 = score(doc=8959,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17738017 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05065357 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 8959, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=8959)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    16. 7.2002 20:22:55
  14. Birmingham, J.: Internet search engines (1996) 0.02
    0.020588579 = product of:
      0.041177157 = sum of:
        0.041177157 = product of:
          0.082354315 = sum of:
            0.082354315 = weight(_text_:22 in 5664) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.082354315 = score(doc=5664,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17738017 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05065357 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 5664, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5664)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    10.11.1996 16:36:22
  15. Zumer, M.; Clavel, G.: EDLproject : one more step towards the European digtial library (2007) 0.02
    0.020588579 = product of:
      0.041177157 = sum of:
        0.041177157 = product of:
          0.082354315 = sum of:
            0.082354315 = weight(_text_:22 in 3184) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.082354315 = score(doc=3184,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17738017 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05065357 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3184, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3184)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Vortrag anläasslich des Workshops: "Extending the multilingual capacity of The European Library in the EDL project Stockholm, Swedish National Library, 22-23 November 2007".
  16. Boleda, G.; Evert, S.: Multiword expressions : a pain in the neck of lexical semantics (2009) 0.02
    0.020588579 = product of:
      0.041177157 = sum of:
        0.041177157 = product of:
          0.082354315 = sum of:
            0.082354315 = weight(_text_:22 in 4888) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.082354315 = score(doc=4888,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17738017 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05065357 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4888, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4888)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    1. 3.2013 14:56:22
  17. Bourdon, F.: Funktionale Anforderungen an bibliographische Datensätze und ein internationales Nummernsystem für Normdaten : wie weit kann Normierung durch Technik unterstützt werden? (2001) 0.02
    0.020588579 = product of:
      0.041177157 = sum of:
        0.041177157 = product of:
          0.082354315 = sum of:
            0.082354315 = weight(_text_:22 in 6888) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.082354315 = score(doc=6888,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17738017 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05065357 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6888, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6888)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    26.12.2011 12:30:22
  18. Qin, J.; Paling, S.: Converting a controlled vocabulary into an ontology : the case of GEM (2001) 0.02
    0.020588579 = product of:
      0.041177157 = sum of:
        0.041177157 = product of:
          0.082354315 = sum of:
            0.082354315 = weight(_text_:22 in 3895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.082354315 = score(doc=3895,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17738017 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05065357 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3895, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3895)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    24. 8.2005 19:20:22
  19. Broughton, V.: Automatic metadata generation : Digital resource description without human intervention (2007) 0.02
    0.020588579 = product of:
      0.041177157 = sum of:
        0.041177157 = product of:
          0.082354315 = sum of:
            0.082354315 = weight(_text_:22 in 6048) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.082354315 = score(doc=6048,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17738017 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05065357 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6048, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6048)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 9.2007 15:41:14
  20. Tudhope, D.: Knowledge Organization System Services : brief review of NKOS activities and possibility of KOS registries (2007) 0.02
    0.020588579 = product of:
      0.041177157 = sum of:
        0.041177157 = product of:
          0.082354315 = sum of:
            0.082354315 = weight(_text_:22 in 100) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.082354315 = score(doc=100,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17738017 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05065357 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 100, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=100)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 9.2007 15:41:14

Years

Languages

  • e 90
  • d 86
  • el 2
  • a 1
  • nl 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 83
  • i 10
  • m 5
  • b 2
  • r 2
  • s 2
  • n 1
  • x 1
  • More… Less…