Search (5 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Connaway, L.S."
  1. Connaway, L.S.; Johnson, D.W.; Searing, S.E.: Online catalogs from the users' perspective : the use of focus group interviews (1997) 0.02 
    0.019733394 = product of:
  0.039466787 = sum of:
    0.039466787 = product of:
      0.078933574 = sum of:
        0.078933574 = weight(_text_:network in 602) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.078933574 = score(doc=602,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22917621 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05146125 = queryNorm
            0.3444231 = fieldWeight in 602, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=602)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Reports results of a study to elicit information from the users of the Wisconsin University at Madison online catalogue (Network Library System (NLS)). The General Library System (GLS) conducted focus group interviews with undergraduate students, graduate students, and faculty. Undergraduate students tend to utilize subject searching capabilities. Graduate students and faculty utilize subject searching only as a last resort; they typically search by known author or title. A significant number of the participants reported experience with library online catalogues other than NLS, although the majority of faculty reported very little experience with other online catalogues. All the focus group participants, but particularly the undergraduate students, evidenced confusion between keyword searching and searching controlled vocabulary. Inclusion of circulation status in the bibliographic records was identified as an important feature of the catalogue
  2. O'Neill, E.T.; Connaway, L.S.; Dickey, T.J.: Estimating the audience level for library resources (2008) 0.01 
    0.013944578 = product of:
  0.027889157 = sum of:
    0.027889157 = product of:
      0.055778313 = sum of:
        0.055778313 = weight(_text_:22 in 6654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.055778313 = score(doc=6654,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18020853 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05146125 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6654, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6654)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    8.11.2008 19:22:53
  3. Connaway, L.S.; Sievert, M.C.: Comparison of three classification systems for information on health insurance (1996) 0.01 
    0.013944578 = product of:
  0.027889157 = sum of:
    0.027889157 = product of:
      0.055778313 = sum of:
        0.055778313 = weight(_text_:22 in 7242) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.055778313 = score(doc=7242,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18020853 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05146125 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7242, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7242)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 4.1997 21:10:19
  4. Lavoie, B.F.; Connaway, L.S.; O'Neill, E.T.: Mapping WorldCat's digital landscape (2007) 0.01 
    0.010458433 = product of:
  0.020916866 = sum of:
    0.020916866 = product of:
      0.041833732 = sum of:
        0.041833732 = weight(_text_:22 in 2292) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041833732 = score(doc=2292,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18020853 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05146125 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2292, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2292)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  5. Lavoie, B.; Connaway, L.S.; Dempsey, L.: Anatomy of aggregate collections : the example of Google print for libraries (2005) 0.01 
    0.0052292165 = product of:
  0.010458433 = sum of:
    0.010458433 = product of:
      0.020916866 = sum of:
        0.020916866 = weight(_text_:22 in 1184) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020916866 = score(doc=1184,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18020853 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05146125 = queryNorm
            0.116070345 = fieldWeight in 1184, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1184)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    26.12.2011 14:08:22

Authors

Years

Types

Themes