Search (6 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Nicholas, D."
  1. Huntington, P.; Nicholas, D.; Jamali, H.R.: Website usage metrics : a re-assessment of session data (2008) 0.03
    0.02777837 = product of:
      0.08333511 = sum of:
        0.08333511 = product of:
          0.16667022 = sum of:
            0.16667022 = weight(_text_:page in 2040) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.16667022 = score(doc=2040,freq=12.0), product of:
                0.27565226 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.5854197 = idf(docFreq=450, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049352113 = queryNorm
                0.6046394 = fieldWeight in 2040, product of:
                  3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                    12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                  5.5854197 = idf(docFreq=450, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2040)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Metrics derived from user visits or sessions provide a means of evaluating Websites and an important insight into online information seeking behaviour, the most important of them being the duration of sessions and the number of pages viewed in a session, a possible busyness indicator. However, the identification of session (termed often 'sessionization') is fraught with difficulty in that there is no way of determining from a transactional log file that a user has ended their session. No one logs out. Instead a session delimiter has to be applied and this is typically done on the basis of a standard period of inactivity. To date researchers have discussed the issue of a time out delimiter in terms of a single value and if a page view time exceeds the cut-off value the session is deemed to have ended. This approach assumes that page view time is a single distribution and that the cut-off value is one point on that distribution. The authors however argue that page time distribution is composed of a number of quite separate view time distributions because of the marked differences in view times between pages (abstract, contents page, full text). This implies that a number of timeout delimiters should be applied. Employing data from a study of the OhioLINK digital journal library, the authors demonstrate how the setting of a time out delimiter impacts on the estimate of page view time and the number of estimated session. Furthermore, they also show how a number of timeout delimiters might apply and they argue that this gives a better and more robust estimate of the number of sessions, session time and page view time compared to an application of a single timeout delimiter.
  2. Nicholas, D.; Huntington, P.; Williams, P.: ¬The impact of location on the use of information systems : case study - health information kiosks (2002) 0.02
    0.024056775 = product of:
      0.072170325 = sum of:
        0.072170325 = product of:
          0.14434065 = sum of:
            0.14434065 = weight(_text_:page in 3736) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.14434065 = score(doc=3736,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.27565226 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.5854197 = idf(docFreq=450, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049352113 = queryNorm
                0.5236331 = fieldWeight in 3736, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  5.5854197 = idf(docFreq=450, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3736)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Touch-screen kiosks are situated in a variety of locations to provide the public with ready access to health information. This paper examines their use, via the transactional logs, and makes comparisons between the types of organisation in which the kiosks are housed. Twenty-one kiosks were selected and categorised into four groups - pharmacy, hospital, information centre and surgery. A small case study features a supermarket kiosk. Details of nearly 90,000 user sessions and 750,000 page views were used for the comparison. Comparisons between sites were made in terms of number of users, their age and gender, trends over time, the number of sessions conducted, page view time, session duration, pages viewed, site penetration, number of pages printed and health topics viewed. There were considerable differences between the kiosk locations. This early research provides the quantitative foundation for a fuller study of kiosk location and the differences in perceptions of the quality/authority of kiosk data.
  3. Huntington, P.; Nicholas, D.; Jamali, H.R.; Tenopir, C.: Article decay in the digital environment : an analysis of usage of OhioLINK by date of publication, employing deep log methods (2006) 0.01
    0.01417559 = product of:
      0.04252677 = sum of:
        0.04252677 = product of:
          0.08505354 = sum of:
            0.08505354 = weight(_text_:page in 214) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08505354 = score(doc=214,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.27565226 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.5854197 = idf(docFreq=450, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049352113 = queryNorm
                0.30855376 = fieldWeight in 214, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.5854197 = idf(docFreq=450, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=214)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    The article presents the early findings of an exploratory deep log analysis of journal usage on OhioLINK, conducted as part of the MaxData project, funded by the U.S. Institute of Museum and Library Services. OhioLINK, the original Big Deal, provides a single digital platform of nearly 6,000 full-text journals for more than 600,000 people; for the purposes of the analysis, the raw logs were obtained from OhioLINK for the period June 2004 to December 2004. During this period approximately 1,215,000 items were viewed on campus in October 2004 and 1,894,000 items viewed off campus between June and December 2004. This article provides an analysis of the age of material that users consulted. From a methodological point of view OhioLINK offered an attractive platform to conduct age of publication usage studies because it is one of the oldest e-journal libraries and thus offered a relatively long archive and stable platform to conduct the studies. The project sought to determine whether the subject, the search approach adopted, and the type of journal item viewed (contents page, abstract, full-text article, etc.) was a factor in regard to the age of articles used.
  4. Nicholas, D.: Assessing information needs : tools and techniques (1996) 0.01
    0.011144217 = product of:
      0.03343265 = sum of:
        0.03343265 = product of:
          0.0668653 = sum of:
            0.0668653 = weight(_text_:22 in 5941) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0668653 = score(doc=5941,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1728227 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049352113 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5941, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5941)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    26. 2.2008 19:22:51
  5. Nicholas, D.; Huntington, P.; Jamali, H.R.; Rowlands, I.; Fieldhouse, M.: Student digital information-seeking behaviour in context (2009) 0.01
    0.0066865305 = product of:
      0.020059591 = sum of:
        0.020059591 = product of:
          0.040119182 = sum of:
            0.040119182 = weight(_text_:22 in 2680) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.040119182 = score(doc=2680,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1728227 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049352113 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2680, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2680)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    23. 2.2009 17:22:41
  6. Nicholas, D.: LISA Plus on CD-ROM : version 4 (1997) 0.01
    0.0055721086 = product of:
      0.016716326 = sum of:
        0.016716326 = product of:
          0.03343265 = sum of:
            0.03343265 = weight(_text_:22 in 228) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03343265 = score(doc=228,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1728227 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049352113 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 228, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=228)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    9. 2.1997 18:44:22