-
Johnson, E.H.: Objects for distributed heterogeneous information retrieval (2000)
0.07
0.0666666 = product of:
0.0999999 = sum of:
0.08328357 = weight(_text_:query in 6959) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08328357 = score(doc=6959,freq=4.0), product of:
0.22937049 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6476326 = idf(docFreq=1151, maxDocs=44218)
0.049352113 = queryNorm
0.3630963 = fieldWeight in 6959, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.6476326 = idf(docFreq=1151, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6959)
0.016716326 = product of:
0.03343265 = sum of:
0.03343265 = weight(_text_:22 in 6959) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03343265 = score(doc=6959,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1728227 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049352113 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 6959, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6959)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- The success of the World Wide Web Shows that we can access, search, and retrieve information from globally distributed databases. lf a database, such as a library catalog, has some sort of Web-based front end, we can type its URL into a Web browser and use its HTML-based forms to search for items in that database. Depending an how well the query conforms to the database content, how the search engine interprets the query, and how the server formats the results into HTML, we might actually find something usable. While the first two issues depend an ourselves and the server, an the Web the latter falls to the mercy of HTML, which we all know as a great destroyer of information because it codes for display but not for content description. When looking at an HTML-formatted display, we must depend an our own interpretation to recognize such entities as author names, titles, and subject identifiers. The Web browser can do nothing but display the information. lf we want some other view of the result, such as sorting the records by date (provided it offers such an option to begin with), the server must do it. This makes poor use of the computing power we have at the desktop (or even laptop), which, unless it involves retrieving more records, could easily do the result Set manipulation that we currently send back to the server. Despite having personal computers wich immense computational power, as far as information retrieval goes, we still essentially use them as dumb terminals.
- Date
- 22. 9.1997 19:16:05
-
Xu, J.; Croft, W.B.: Topic-based language models for distributed retrieval (2000)
0.03
0.03331343 = product of:
0.09994029 = sum of:
0.09994029 = weight(_text_:query in 38) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09994029 = score(doc=38,freq=4.0), product of:
0.22937049 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6476326 = idf(docFreq=1151, maxDocs=44218)
0.049352113 = queryNorm
0.43571556 = fieldWeight in 38, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.6476326 = idf(docFreq=1151, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=38)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Effective retrieval in a distributed environment is an important but difficult problem. Lack of effectiveness appears to have two major causes. First, existing collection selection algorithms do not work well on heterogeneous collections. Second, relevant documents are scattered over many collections and searching a few collections misses many relevant documents. We propose a topic-oriented approach to distributed retrieval. With this approach, we structure the document set of a distributed retrieval environment around a set of topics. Retrieval for a query involves first selecting the right topics for the query and then dispatching the search process to collections that contain such topics. The content of a topic is characterized by a language model. In environments where the labeling of documents by topics is unavailable, document clustering is employed for topic identification. Based on these ideas, three methods are proposed to suit different environments. We show that all three methods improve effectiveness of distributed retrieval
-
Hellweg, H.; Krause, J.; Mandl, T.; Marx, J.; Müller, M.N.O.; Mutschke, P.; Strötgen, R.: Treatment of semantic heterogeneity in information retrieval (2001)
0.03
0.031408206 = product of:
0.09422461 = sum of:
0.09422461 = weight(_text_:query in 6560) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09422461 = score(doc=6560,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22937049 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6476326 = idf(docFreq=1151, maxDocs=44218)
0.049352113 = queryNorm
0.41079655 = fieldWeight in 6560, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.6476326 = idf(docFreq=1151, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6560)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Nowadays, users of information services are faced with highly decentralised, heterogeneous document sources with different content analysis. Semantic heterogeneity occurs e.g. when resources using different systems for content description are searched using a simple query system. This report describes several approaches of handling semantic heterogeneity used in projects of the German Social Science Information Centre
-
Crestani, F.; Wu, S.: Testing the cluster hypothesis in distributed information retrieval (2006)
0.03
0.027761191 = product of:
0.08328357 = sum of:
0.08328357 = weight(_text_:query in 984) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08328357 = score(doc=984,freq=4.0), product of:
0.22937049 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6476326 = idf(docFreq=1151, maxDocs=44218)
0.049352113 = queryNorm
0.3630963 = fieldWeight in 984, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.6476326 = idf(docFreq=1151, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=984)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- How to merge and organise query results retrieved from different resources is one of the key issues in distributed information retrieval. Some previous research and experiments suggest that cluster-based document browsing is more effective than a single merged list. Cluster-based retrieval results presentation is based on the cluster hypothesis, which states that documents that cluster together have a similar relevance to a given query. However, while this hypothesis has been demonstrated to hold in classical information retrieval environments, it has never been fully tested in heterogeneous distributed information retrieval environments. Heterogeneous document representations, the presence of document duplicates, and disparate qualities of retrieval results, are major features of an heterogeneous distributed information retrieval environment that might disrupt the effectiveness of the cluster hypothesis. In this paper we report on an experimental investigation into the validity and effectiveness of the cluster hypothesis in highly heterogeneous distributed information retrieval environments. The results show that although clustering is affected by different retrieval results representations and quality, the cluster hypothesis still holds and that generating hierarchical clusters in highly heterogeneous distributed information retrieval environments is still a very effective way of presenting retrieval results to users.
-
Callan, J.: Distributed information retrieval (2000)
0.03
0.027482178 = product of:
0.08244653 = sum of:
0.08244653 = weight(_text_:query in 31) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08244653 = score(doc=31,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22937049 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6476326 = idf(docFreq=1151, maxDocs=44218)
0.049352113 = queryNorm
0.35944697 = fieldWeight in 31, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.6476326 = idf(docFreq=1151, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=31)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- A multi-database model of distributed information retrieval is presented, in which people are assumed to have access to many searchable text databases. In such an environment, full-text information retrieval consists of discovering database contents, ranking databases by their expected ability to satisfy the query, searching a small number of databases, and merging results returned by different databases. This paper presents algorithms for each task. It also discusses how to reorganize conventional test collections into multi-database testbeds, and evaluation methodologies for multi-database experiments. A broad and diverse group of experimental results is presented to demonstrate that the algorithms are effective, efficient, robust, and scalable
-
Ghiselli, C.; Padula, M.: ¬A unified access to extract knowledge from heterogeneous Web archives (2001)
0.03
0.027482178 = product of:
0.08244653 = sum of:
0.08244653 = weight(_text_:query in 2290) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08244653 = score(doc=2290,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22937049 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6476326 = idf(docFreq=1151, maxDocs=44218)
0.049352113 = queryNorm
0.35944697 = fieldWeight in 2290, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.6476326 = idf(docFreq=1151, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2290)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- This paper proposes the integration of tools to provide unified access to remote and heterogeneous archives, the contents of which can be grouped under the same subject, and which have been integrated to allow the user to navigate and conduct thematic searches. The information sources are locally frequently modified, added to, and removed, therefore attention has been paid to the permanence of their references. Source interoperability is supported at language, protocol and schema levels. The architecture is based on a new common schema of the archives which is defined in new representation and query languages on the basis of an ontology to avoid misunderstanding and ambiguity.
-
SRW/U erleichtert verteilte Datenbankrecherchen (2005)
0.02
0.019630127 = product of:
0.05889038 = sum of:
0.05889038 = weight(_text_:query in 3972) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05889038 = score(doc=3972,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22937049 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6476326 = idf(docFreq=1151, maxDocs=44218)
0.049352113 = queryNorm
0.25674784 = fieldWeight in 3972, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.6476326 = idf(docFreq=1151, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3972)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Content
- "Seit zwei Jahrzehnten nutzen vor allem Bibliotheksverbünde das Protokoll Z39.50, um ihren Benutzern im Internet die simultane Abfrage mehrerer Datenbanken zu ermöglichen. Jetzt gibt es einen Nachfolger dieses Protokolls, der eine einfachere Implementierung verspricht. Damit ist auch eine größere Verbreitung für die Suche in verteilten Datenbeständen anderer Institutionen, wie z.B. Archiven und Museen, wahrscheinlich. SRW/U (Search and Retrieve Web Service bzw. Search and Retrieve URL Service, www.loc.90v/z3950/agency/zing/srw) wurde von einer an der Library of Congress angesiedelten Initiative entwickelt und beruht auf etablierten Standards wie URI und XML. Die mit SRW und SRU möglichen Abfragen und Ergebnisse unterscheiden sich nur in der Art der Übertragung, verwenden aber beide dieselben Prozeduren. Davon gibt es nur drei: explain, scan und searchRetrieve. Die beiden Erstgenannten dienen dazu, allgemeine Informationen über den Datenanbieter bzw. die verfügbaren Indexe zubekommen. Das Herzstück ist die search-Retrieve-Anweisung. Damit werden Anfragen direkt an die Datenbank gesendet und die Parameter des Suchergebnisses definiert. Verwendet wird dafür die Retrievalsprache CQL (Common Query Language), die simple Freitextsuchen, aber auch mit Boolschen Operatoren verknüpfte Recherchen ermöglicht. Bei SRU werden die Suchbefehle mittels einfacher HTTP GET -Anfragen übermittelt, die Ergebnisse in XML zurückgeliefert. Zur Strukturierung der Daten dienen z.B. Dublin Core, MARC oder EAD. Welches Format von der jeweiligen Datenbank bereitgestellt wird, kann durch die explain-Anweisung ermittelt gebracht werden."
-
Cousins, S.; Sanders, A.: Incorporating a virtual union catalogue into the wider information environment through the application of middleware: Interoperability issues in cross-database access (2006)
0.02
0.019630127 = product of:
0.05889038 = sum of:
0.05889038 = weight(_text_:query in 5591) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05889038 = score(doc=5591,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22937049 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6476326 = idf(docFreq=1151, maxDocs=44218)
0.049352113 = queryNorm
0.25674784 = fieldWeight in 5591, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.6476326 = idf(docFreq=1151, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5591)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Purpose - To explore the use of middleware to provide access to a virtual catalogue via Z39.50, allowing its integration with other services. To consider issues arising from the cross-database search process and the problem of interoperability between systems. Design/methodology/approach - Middleware was used to establish a Z39.50 server for an existing virtual union catalogue, InforM25. The Copac physical union catalogue was used to carry out cross-database search tests, investigating the value of query transformation by the middleware and illustrating many of the issues associated with interoperability in cross-database searching. Findings - The test results demonstrate the viability and benefits of using middleware to allow the integration of virtual catalogues with other services. The results also illustrate the range of issues affecting the performance of the virtual catalogue, with supporting evidence from the use of the Copac physical union catalogue for cross-database searching via Z39.50. In particular the discussion highlights the issue of semantic interoperability, as well as emphasising the value of centralised virtual catalogue support. Research limitations/implications - The research was limited to work on a specific virtual union catalogue, that is InforM25, but the results highlight issues with general relevance in the development of any virtual catalogue. The need for more work on response times in the virtual union catalogue is apparent, along with the related issue of result set post processing. Originality/value - This paper provides a practical demonstration of the issues important to those involved in making their local catalogue accessible to services, and individuals, outside their own institution, as well as those working on virtual union catalogue development.
-
Fang, L.: ¬A developing search service : heterogeneous resources integration and retrieval system (2004)
0.02
0.019630127 = product of:
0.05889038 = sum of:
0.05889038 = weight(_text_:query in 1193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05889038 = score(doc=1193,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22937049 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6476326 = idf(docFreq=1151, maxDocs=44218)
0.049352113 = queryNorm
0.25674784 = fieldWeight in 1193, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.6476326 = idf(docFreq=1151, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1193)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- This article describes two approaches for searching heterogeneous resources, which are explained as they are used in two corresponding existing systems-RIRS (Resource Integration Retrieval System) and HRUSP (Heterogeneous Resource Union Search Platform). On analyzing the existing systems, a possible framework-the MUSP (Multimetadata-Based Union Search Platform) is presented. Libraries now face a dilemma. On one hand, libraries subscribe to many types of database retrieval systems that are produced by various providers. The libraries build their data and information systems independently. This results in highly heterogeneous and distributed systems at the technical level (e.g., different operating systems and user interfaces) and at the conceptual level (e.g., the same objects are named using different terms). On the other hand, end users want to access all these heterogeneous data via a union interface, without having to know the structure of each information system or the different retrieval methods used by the systems. Libraries must achieve a harmony between information providers and users. In order to bridge the gap between the service providers and the users, it would seem that all source databases would need to be rebuilt according to a uniform data structure and query language, but this seems impossible. Fortunately, however, libraries and information and technology providers are now making an effort to find a middle course that meets the requirements of both data providers and users. They are doing this through resource integration.
-
Sarinder, K.K.S.; Lim, L.H.S.; Merican, A.F.; Dimyati, K.: Biodiversity information retrieval across networked data sets (2010)
0.02
0.019630127 = product of:
0.05889038 = sum of:
0.05889038 = weight(_text_:query in 3951) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05889038 = score(doc=3951,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22937049 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6476326 = idf(docFreq=1151, maxDocs=44218)
0.049352113 = queryNorm
0.25674784 = fieldWeight in 3951, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.6476326 = idf(docFreq=1151, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3951)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Purpose - Biodiversity resources are inevitably digital and stored in a wide variety of formats by researchers or stakeholders. In Malaysia, although digitizing biodiversity data has long been stressed, the interoperability of the biodiversity data is still an issue that requires attention. This is because, when data are shared, the question of copyright occurs, creating a setback among researchers wanting to promote or share data through online presentations. To solve this, the aim is to present an approach to integrate data through wrapping of datasets stored in relational databases located on networked platforms. Design/methodology/approach - The approach uses tools such as XML, PHP, ASP and HTML to integrate distributed databases in heterogeneous formats. Five current database integration systems were reviewed and all of them have common attributes such as query-oriented, using a mediator-based approach and integrating a structured data model. These common attributes were also adopted in the proposed solution. Distributed Generic Information Retrieval (DiGIR) was used as a model in designing the proposed solution. Findings - A new database integration system was developed, which is user-friendly and simple with common attributes found in current integration systems.
-
Milanesi, C.: Möglichkeiten der Kooperation im Rahmen von Subject Gateways : das Euler-Projekt im Vergleich mit weiteren europäischen Projekten (2001)
0.01
0.013373061 = product of:
0.040119182 = sum of:
0.040119182 = product of:
0.080238365 = sum of:
0.080238365 = weight(_text_:22 in 4865) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.080238365 = score(doc=4865,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1728227 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049352113 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4865, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4865)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 22. 6.2002 19:41:59
-
Dupuis, P.; Lapointe, J.: Developpement d'un outil documentaire à Hydro-Quebec : le Thesaurus HQ (1997)
0.01
0.008915374 = product of:
0.026746122 = sum of:
0.026746122 = product of:
0.053492244 = sum of:
0.053492244 = weight(_text_:22 in 3173) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.053492244 = score(doc=3173,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1728227 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049352113 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3173, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3173)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Argus. 26(1997) no.3, S.16-22
-
Dempsey, L.; Russell, R.; Kirriemur, J.W.: Towards distributed library systems : Z39.50 in a European context (1996)
0.01
0.008915374 = product of:
0.026746122 = sum of:
0.026746122 = product of:
0.053492244 = sum of:
0.053492244 = weight(_text_:22 in 127) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.053492244 = score(doc=127,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1728227 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049352113 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 127, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=127)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Program. 30(1996) no.1, S.1-22
-
Ashton, J.: ONE: the final OPAC frontier (1998)
0.01
0.008915374 = product of:
0.026746122 = sum of:
0.026746122 = product of:
0.053492244 = sum of:
0.053492244 = weight(_text_:22 in 2588) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.053492244 = score(doc=2588,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1728227 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049352113 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2588, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2588)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Select newsletter. 1998, no.22, Spring, S.5-6
-
Lunau, C.D.: Z39.50: a critical component of the Canadian resource sharing infrastructure : implementation activities and results achieved (1997)
0.01
0.008915374 = product of:
0.026746122 = sum of:
0.026746122 = product of:
0.053492244 = sum of:
0.053492244 = weight(_text_:22 in 3193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.053492244 = score(doc=3193,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1728227 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049352113 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3193, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3193)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 3. 3.1999 17:22:57
-
Burrows, T.: ¬The virtual catalogue : bibliographic access for the virtual library (1993)
0.01
0.008915374 = product of:
0.026746122 = sum of:
0.026746122 = product of:
0.053492244 = sum of:
0.053492244 = weight(_text_:22 in 5286) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.053492244 = score(doc=5286,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1728227 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049352113 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5286, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5286)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 8.10.2000 14:47:22
-
Kaizik, A.; Gödert, W.; Milanesi, C.: Erfahrungen und Ergebnisse aus der Evaluierung des EU-Projektes EULER im Rahmen des an der FH Köln angesiedelten Projektes EJECT (Evaluation von Subject Gateways des World Wide Web (2001)
0.01
0.007880151 = product of:
0.023640454 = sum of:
0.023640454 = product of:
0.047280908 = sum of:
0.047280908 = weight(_text_:22 in 5801) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047280908 = score(doc=5801,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1728227 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049352113 = queryNorm
0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 5801, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5801)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 22. 6.2002 19:42:22
-
Heery, R.: Information gateways : collaboration and content (2000)
0.01
0.0078009525 = product of:
0.023402857 = sum of:
0.023402857 = product of:
0.046805713 = sum of:
0.046805713 = weight(_text_:22 in 4866) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046805713 = score(doc=4866,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1728227 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049352113 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4866, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4866)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 22. 6.2002 19:38:54
-
Kochtanek, T.R.; Matthews, J.R.: Library information systems : from library automation to distributed information systems (2002)
0.01
0.007087795 = product of:
0.021263385 = sum of:
0.021263385 = product of:
0.04252677 = sum of:
0.04252677 = weight(_text_:page in 1792) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04252677 = score(doc=1792,freq=2.0), product of:
0.27565226 = queryWeight, product of:
5.5854197 = idf(docFreq=450, maxDocs=44218)
0.049352113 = queryNorm
0.15427688 = fieldWeight in 1792, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.5854197 = idf(docFreq=450, maxDocs=44218)
0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=1792)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: JASIST 54(2003) no.12, S.1166-1167 (Brenda Chawner): "Kochtanek and Matthews have written a welcome addition to the small set of introductory texts an applications of information technology to library and information Services. The book has fourteen chapters grouped into four sections: "The Broader Context," "The Technologies," "Management Issues," and "Future Considerations." Two chapters provide the broad content, with the first giving a historical overview of the development and adoption of "library information systems." Kochtanek and Matthews define this as "a wide array of solutions that previously might have been considered separate industries with distinctly different marketplaces" (p. 3), referring specifically to integrated library systems (ILS, and offen called library management systems in this part of the world), and online databases, plus the more recent developments of Web-based resources, digital libraries, ebooks, and ejournals. They characterize technology adoption patterns in libraries as ranging from "bleeding edge" to "leading edge" to "in the wedge" to "trailing edge"-this is a catchy restatement of adopter categories from Rogers' diffusion of innovation theory, where they are more conventionally known as "early adopters," "early majority," "late majority," and "laggards." This chapter concludes with a look at more general technology trends that have affected library applications, including developments in hardware (moving from mainframes to minicomputers to personal Computers), changes in software development (from in-house to packages), and developments in communications technology (from dedicated host Computers to more open networks to the current distributed environment found with the Internet). This is followed by a chapter describing the ILS and online database industries in some detail. "The Technologies" begins with a chapter an the structure and functionality of integrated library systems, which also includes a brief discussion of precision versus recall, managing access to internal documents, indexing and searching, and catalogue maintenance. This is followed by a chapter an open systems, which concludes with a useful list of questions to consider to determine an organization's readiness to adopt open source solutions. As one world expect, this section also includes a detailed chapter an telecommunications and networking, which includes types of networks, transmission media, network topologies, switching techniques (ranging from dial up and leased lines to ISDN/DSL, frame relay, and ATM). It concludes with a chapter an the role and importance of standards, which covers the need for standards and standards organizations, and gives examples of different types of standards, such as MARC, Dublin Core, Z39.50, and markup standards such as SGML, HTML, and XML. Unicode is also covered but only briefly. This section world be strengthened by a chapter an hardware concepts-the authors assume that their reader is already familiar with these, which may not be true in all cases (for example, the phrase "client-Server" is first used an page 11, but only given a brief definition in the glossary). Burke's Library Technology Companion: A Basic Guide for Library Staff (New York: Neal-Schuman, 2001) might be useful to fill this gap at an introductory level, and Saffady's Introduction to Automation for Librarians, 4th ed. (Chicago: American Library Association, 1999) world be better for those interested in more detail. The final two sections, however, are the book's real strength, with a strong focus an management issues, and this content distinguishes it from other books an this topic such as Ferguson and Hebels Computers for Librarians: an Introduction to Systems and Applications (Waggawagga, NSW: Centre for Information Studies, Charles Sturt University, 1998). ...
-
Neuroth, H.; Lepschy, P.: ¬Das EU-Projekt Renardus (2001)
0.01
0.0066865305 = product of:
0.020059591 = sum of:
0.020059591 = product of:
0.040119182 = sum of:
0.040119182 = weight(_text_:22 in 5589) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040119182 = score(doc=5589,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1728227 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049352113 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5589, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5589)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 22. 6.2002 19:32:15
