Search (4271 results, page 1 of 214)

  • × type_ss:"a"
  1. Nicholson, S.; Sierra, T.; Eseryel, U.Y.; Park, J.-H.; Barkow, P.; Pozo, E.J.; Ward, J.: How much of it is real? : analysis of paid placement in Web search engine results (2006) 0.19
    0.1896001 = product of:
      0.28440014 = sum of:
        0.09994029 = weight(_text_:query in 5278) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09994029 = score(doc=5278,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.22937049 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6476326 = idf(docFreq=1151, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049352113 = queryNorm
            0.43571556 = fieldWeight in 5278, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.6476326 = idf(docFreq=1151, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5278)
        0.18445984 = sum of:
          0.14434065 = weight(_text_:page in 5278) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.14434065 = score(doc=5278,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.27565226 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.5854197 = idf(docFreq=450, maxDocs=44218)
                0.049352113 = queryNorm
              0.5236331 = fieldWeight in 5278, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                5.5854197 = idf(docFreq=450, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5278)
          0.040119182 = weight(_text_:22 in 5278) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.040119182 = score(doc=5278,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1728227 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.049352113 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5278, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5278)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Most Web search tools integrate sponsored results with results from their internal editorial database in providing results to users. The goal of this research is to get a better idea of how much of the screen real estate displays real editorial results as compared to sponsored results. The overall average results are that 40% of all results presented on the first screen are real results, and when the entire first Web page is considered, 67% of the results are nonsponsored results. For general search tools such as Google, 56% of the first screen and 82% of the first Web page contain nonsponsored results. Other results include that query structure makes a significant difference in the percentage of nonsponsored results returned by a search. Similarly, the topic of the query also can have a significant effect on the percentage of sponsored results displayed by most Web search tools.
    Date
    22. 7.2006 16:32:57
  2. O'Kane, K.C.: World Wide Web-based information storage and retrieval (1996) 0.17
    0.16555148 = product of:
      0.24832721 = sum of:
        0.08244653 = weight(_text_:query in 4737) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08244653 = score(doc=4737,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22937049 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6476326 = idf(docFreq=1151, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049352113 = queryNorm
            0.35944697 = fieldWeight in 4737, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.6476326 = idf(docFreq=1151, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4737)
        0.16588068 = sum of:
          0.11907496 = weight(_text_:page in 4737) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.11907496 = score(doc=4737,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.27565226 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.5854197 = idf(docFreq=450, maxDocs=44218)
                0.049352113 = queryNorm
              0.43197528 = fieldWeight in 4737, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.5854197 = idf(docFreq=450, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4737)
          0.046805713 = weight(_text_:22 in 4737) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.046805713 = score(doc=4737,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1728227 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.049352113 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4737, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4737)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Describes the design and implementation of a system for computer generation of linked HTML documents to support information retrieval and hypertext applications on the WWW. The system does not require text query input, nor any client or host processing other than hypertext linkage. The goal is to construct a fully automatic system in which original text documents are read and processed by a computer program that generates HTML files, which can be used immediately by Web browsers to search and retrieve the original documents. A user with a large collection of information: for instance, newspaper articles; can feed these documents to this program and produce directly the necessary files to establish WWW home page and related pages, to support interactive retrieval and distribution of the original documents
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:13:07
  3. Bian, G.-W.; Chen, H.-H.: Cross-language information access to multilingual collections on the Internet (2000) 0.16
    0.16141582 = product of:
      0.24212372 = sum of:
        0.09994029 = weight(_text_:query in 4436) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09994029 = score(doc=4436,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.22937049 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6476326 = idf(docFreq=1151, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049352113 = queryNorm
            0.43571556 = fieldWeight in 4436, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.6476326 = idf(docFreq=1151, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4436)
        0.14218344 = sum of:
          0.10206425 = weight(_text_:page in 4436) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.10206425 = score(doc=4436,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.27565226 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.5854197 = idf(docFreq=450, maxDocs=44218)
                0.049352113 = queryNorm
              0.37026453 = fieldWeight in 4436, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.5854197 = idf(docFreq=450, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4436)
          0.040119182 = weight(_text_:22 in 4436) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.040119182 = score(doc=4436,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1728227 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.049352113 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4436, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4436)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Language barrier is the major problem that people face in searching for, retrieving, and understanding multilingual collections on the Internet. This paper deals with query translation and document translation in a Chinese-English information retrieval system called MTIR. Bilingual dictionary and monolingual corpus-based approaches are adopted to select suitable tranlated query terms. A machine transliteration algorithm is introduced to resolve proper name searching. We consider several design issues for document translation, including which material is translated, what roles the HTML tags play in translation, what the tradeoff is between the speed performance and the translation performance, and what from the translated result is presented in. About 100.000 Web pages translated in the last 4 months of 1997 are used for quantitative study of online and real-time Web page translation
    Date
    16. 2.2000 14:22:39
  4. Seo, H.-C.; Kim, S.-B.; Rim, H.-C.; Myaeng, S.-H.: lmproving query translation in English-Korean Cross-language information retrieval (2005) 0.15
    0.15470998 = product of:
      0.23206496 = sum of:
        0.21200538 = weight(_text_:query in 1023) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.21200538 = score(doc=1023,freq=18.0), product of:
            0.22937049 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6476326 = idf(docFreq=1151, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049352113 = queryNorm
            0.92429227 = fieldWeight in 1023, product of:
              4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                18.0 = termFreq=18.0
              4.6476326 = idf(docFreq=1151, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1023)
        0.020059591 = product of:
          0.040119182 = sum of:
            0.040119182 = weight(_text_:22 in 1023) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.040119182 = score(doc=1023,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1728227 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049352113 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1023, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1023)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Query translation is a viable method for cross-language information retrieval (CLIR), but it suffers from translation ambiguities caused by multiple translations of individual query terms. Previous research has employed various methods for disambiguation, including the method of selecting an individual target query term from multiple candidates by comparing their statistical associations with the candidate translations of other query terms. This paper proposes a new method where we examine all combinations of target query term translations corresponding to the source query terms, instead of looking at the candidates for each query term and selecting the best one at a time. The goodness value for a combination of target query terms is computed based on the association value between each pair of the terms in the combination. We tested our method using the NTCIR-3 English-Korean CLIR test collection. The results show some improvements regardless of the association measures we used.
    Date
    26.12.2007 20:22:38
  5. Sachse, J.: ¬The influence of snippet length on user behavior in mobile web search (2019) 0.14
    0.14173794 = product of:
      0.2126069 = sum of:
        0.05889038 = weight(_text_:query in 5493) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05889038 = score(doc=5493,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22937049 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6476326 = idf(docFreq=1151, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049352113 = queryNorm
            0.25674784 = fieldWeight in 5493, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.6476326 = idf(docFreq=1151, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5493)
        0.15371652 = sum of:
          0.120283864 = weight(_text_:page in 5493) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.120283864 = score(doc=5493,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.27565226 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.5854197 = idf(docFreq=450, maxDocs=44218)
                0.049352113 = queryNorm
              0.4363609 = fieldWeight in 5493, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                5.5854197 = idf(docFreq=450, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5493)
          0.03343265 = weight(_text_:22 in 5493) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03343265 = score(doc=5493,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1728227 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.049352113 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5493, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5493)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose Web search is more and more moving into mobile contexts. However, screen size of mobile devices is limited and search engine result pages face a trade-off between offering informative snippets and optimal use of space. One factor clearly influencing this trade-off is snippet length. The purpose of this paper is to find out what snippet size to use in mobile web search. Design/methodology/approach For this purpose, an eye-tracking experiment was conducted showing participants search interfaces with snippets of one, three or five lines on a mobile device to analyze 17 dependent variables. In total, 31 participants took part in the study. Each of the participants solved informational and navigational tasks. Findings Results indicate a strong influence of page fold on scrolling behavior and attention distribution across search results. Regardless of query type, short snippets seem to provide too little information about the result, so that search performance and subjective measures are negatively affected. Long snippets of five lines lead to better performance than medium snippets for navigational queries, but to worse performance for informational queries. Originality/value Although space in mobile search is limited, this study shows that longer snippets improve usability and user experience. It further emphasizes that page fold plays a stronger role in mobile than in desktop search for attention distribution.
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  6. Smeaton, A.F.; Rijsbergen, C.J. van: ¬The retrieval effects of query expansion on a feedback document retrieval system (1983) 0.14
    0.14113252 = product of:
      0.21169877 = sum of:
        0.16489306 = weight(_text_:query in 2134) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16489306 = score(doc=2134,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22937049 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6476326 = idf(docFreq=1151, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049352113 = queryNorm
            0.71889395 = fieldWeight in 2134, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.6476326 = idf(docFreq=1151, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2134)
        0.046805713 = product of:
          0.09361143 = sum of:
            0.09361143 = weight(_text_:22 in 2134) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09361143 = score(doc=2134,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1728227 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049352113 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2134, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2134)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Date
    30. 3.2001 13:32:22
  7. Makris, C.; Plegas, Y.; Stamou, S.: Web query disambiguation using PageRank (2012) 0.14
    0.13936773 = product of:
      0.2090516 = sum of:
        0.15801947 = weight(_text_:query in 378) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15801947 = score(doc=378,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.22937049 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6476326 = idf(docFreq=1151, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049352113 = queryNorm
            0.68892676 = fieldWeight in 378, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              4.6476326 = idf(docFreq=1151, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=378)
        0.051032126 = product of:
          0.10206425 = sum of:
            0.10206425 = weight(_text_:page in 378) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10206425 = score(doc=378,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.27565226 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.5854197 = idf(docFreq=450, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049352113 = queryNorm
                0.37026453 = fieldWeight in 378, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.5854197 = idf(docFreq=450, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=378)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    In this article, we propose new word sense disambiguation strategies for resolving the senses of polysemous query terms issued to Web search engines, and we explore the application of those strategies when used in a query expansion framework. The novelty of our approach lies in the exploitation of the Web page PageRank values as indicators of the significance the different senses of a term carry when employed in search queries. We also aim at scalable query sense resolution techniques that can be applied without loss of efficiency to large data sets such as those on the Web. Our experimental findings validate that the proposed techniques perform more accurately than do the traditional disambiguation strategies and improve the quality of the search results, when involved in query expansion.
  8. Li, W.-S.; Shim, J.: Facilitating complex Web queries through visual user interfaces and query relaxation (1998) 0.14
    0.13850594 = product of:
      0.2077589 = sum of:
        0.18435605 = weight(_text_:query in 3602) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18435605 = score(doc=3602,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.22937049 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6476326 = idf(docFreq=1151, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049352113 = queryNorm
            0.8037479 = fieldWeight in 3602, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              4.6476326 = idf(docFreq=1151, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3602)
        0.023402857 = product of:
          0.046805713 = sum of:
            0.046805713 = weight(_text_:22 in 3602) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.046805713 = score(doc=3602,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1728227 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049352113 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3602, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3602)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Describes a novel visual user interface, WebIFQ (Web-In-Frame-Query), to assist users in specifying queries and visualising query criteria including document metadata, strucutres, and linkage information. WebIFQ automatically generates corresponding query statements for WebDB. As a result, users are not required to be aware of underlying complex schema design and language syntax. WebDB supports automated query relaxation to include additional terms related by semantic or co-occurence relationship. WebIFQ can facilitate users to reformulate queries perpetually in an interactive mode
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:08:06
  9. Li, X.; Schijvenaars, B.J.A.; Rijke, M.de: Investigating queries and search failures in academic search (2017) 0.14
    0.13592485 = product of:
      0.20388725 = sum of:
        0.16986583 = weight(_text_:query in 5033) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16986583 = score(doc=5033,freq=26.0), product of:
            0.22937049 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6476326 = idf(docFreq=1151, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049352113 = queryNorm
            0.74057406 = fieldWeight in 5033, product of:
              5.0990195 = tf(freq=26.0), with freq of:
                26.0 = termFreq=26.0
              4.6476326 = idf(docFreq=1151, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5033)
        0.03402142 = product of:
          0.06804284 = sum of:
            0.06804284 = weight(_text_:page in 5033) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06804284 = score(doc=5033,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.27565226 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.5854197 = idf(docFreq=450, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049352113 = queryNorm
                0.24684301 = fieldWeight in 5033, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.5854197 = idf(docFreq=450, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5033)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Academic search concerns the retrieval and profiling of information objects in the domain of academic research. In this paper we reveal important observations of academic search queries, and provide an algorithmic solution to address a type of failure during search sessions: null queries. We start by providing a general characterization of academic search queries, by analyzing a large-scale transaction log of a leading academic search engine. Unlike previous small-scale analyses of academic search queries, we find important differences with query characteristics known from web search. E.g., in academic search there is a substantially bigger proportion of entity queries, and a heavier tail in query length distribution. We then focus on search failures and, in particular, on null queries that lead to an empty search engine result page, on null sessions that contain such null queries, and on users who are prone to issue null queries. In academic search approximately 1 in 10 queries is a null query, and 25% of the sessions contain a null query. They appear in different types of search sessions, and prevent users from achieving their search goal. To address the high rate of null queries in academic search, we consider the task of providing query suggestions. Specifically we focus on a highly frequent query type: non-boolean informational queries. To this end we need to overcome query sparsity and make effective use of session information. We find that using entities helps to surface more relevant query suggestions in the face of query sparsity. We also find that query suggestions should be conditioned on the type of session in which they are offered to be more effective. After casting the session classification problem as a multi-label classification problem, we generate session-conditional query suggestions based on predicted session type. We find that this session-conditional method leads to significant improvements over a generic query suggestion method. Personalization yields very little further improvements over session-conditional query suggestions.
  10. Lee, W.M.; Sanderson, M.: Analyzing URL queries (2010) 0.13
    0.12824604 = product of:
      0.19236904 = sum of:
        0.14133692 = weight(_text_:query in 4105) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14133692 = score(doc=4105,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.22937049 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6476326 = idf(docFreq=1151, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049352113 = queryNorm
            0.61619484 = fieldWeight in 4105, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              4.6476326 = idf(docFreq=1151, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4105)
        0.051032126 = product of:
          0.10206425 = sum of:
            0.10206425 = weight(_text_:page in 4105) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10206425 = score(doc=4105,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.27565226 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.5854197 = idf(docFreq=450, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049352113 = queryNorm
                0.37026453 = fieldWeight in 4105, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.5854197 = idf(docFreq=450, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4105)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    This study investigated a relatively unexamined query type, queries composed of URLs. The extent, variation, and user click-through behavior was examined to determine the intent behind URL queries. The study made use of a search log from which URL queries were identified and selected for both qualitative and quantitative analyses. It was found that URL queries accounted for ?17% of the sample. There were statistically significant differences between URL queries and non-URL queries in the following attributes: mean query length; mean number of tokens per query; and mean number of clicks per query. Users issuing such queries clicked on fewer result list items higher up the ranking compared to non-URL queries. Classification indicated that nearly 86% of queries were navigational in intent with informational and transactional queries representing about 7% of URL queries each. This is in contrast to past research that suggested that URL queries were 100% navigational. The conclusions of this study are that URL queries are relatively common and that simply returning the page that matches a user's URL is not an optimal strategy.
  11. White, R.W.; Jose, J.M.; Ruthven, I.: ¬A task-oriented study on the influencing effects of query-biased summarisation in web searching (2003) 0.13
    0.12788323 = product of:
      0.19182482 = sum of:
        0.13168289 = weight(_text_:query in 1081) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13168289 = score(doc=1081,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.22937049 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6476326 = idf(docFreq=1151, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049352113 = queryNorm
            0.5741056 = fieldWeight in 1081, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              4.6476326 = idf(docFreq=1151, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1081)
        0.060141932 = product of:
          0.120283864 = sum of:
            0.120283864 = weight(_text_:page in 1081) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.120283864 = score(doc=1081,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.27565226 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.5854197 = idf(docFreq=450, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049352113 = queryNorm
                0.4363609 = fieldWeight in 1081, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  5.5854197 = idf(docFreq=450, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1081)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    The aim of the work described in this paper is to evaluate the influencing effects of query-biased summaries in web searching. For this purpose, a summarisation system has been developed, and a summary tailored to the user's query is generated automatically for each document retrieved. The system aims to provide both a better means of assessing document relevance than titles or abstracts typical of many web search result lists. Through visiting each result page at retrieval-time, the system provides the user with an idea of the current page content and thus deals with the dynamic nature of the web. To examine the effectiveness of this approach, a task-oriented, comparative evaluation between four different web retrieval systems was performed; two that use query-biased summarisation, and two that use the standard ranked titles/abstracts approach. The results from the evaluation indicate that query-biased summarisation techniques appear to be more useful and effective in helping users gauge document relevance than the traditional ranked titles/abstracts approach. The same methodology was used to compare the effectiveness of two of the web's major search engines; AltaVista and Google.
  12. Efthimiadis, E.N.: End-users' understanding of thesaural knowledge structures in interactive query expansion (1994) 0.13
    0.12663198 = product of:
      0.18994795 = sum of:
        0.16320182 = weight(_text_:query in 5693) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16320182 = score(doc=5693,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.22937049 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6476326 = idf(docFreq=1151, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049352113 = queryNorm
            0.71152055 = fieldWeight in 5693, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              4.6476326 = idf(docFreq=1151, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5693)
        0.026746122 = product of:
          0.053492244 = sum of:
            0.053492244 = weight(_text_:22 in 5693) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.053492244 = score(doc=5693,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1728227 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049352113 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5693, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5693)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    The process of term selection for query expansion by end-users is discussed within the context of a study of interactive query expansion in a relevance feedback environment. This user study focuses on how users' perceive and understand term relationships, such as hierarchical and associative relationships, in their searches
    Date
    30. 3.2001 13:35:22
  13. Keister, T.B.: User types and queries : impact on image access systems (1994) 0.13
    0.12553062 = product of:
      0.18829592 = sum of:
        0.16489306 = weight(_text_:query in 2977) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16489306 = score(doc=2977,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.22937049 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6476326 = idf(docFreq=1151, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049352113 = queryNorm
            0.71889395 = fieldWeight in 2977, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              4.6476326 = idf(docFreq=1151, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2977)
        0.023402857 = product of:
          0.046805713 = sum of:
            0.046805713 = weight(_text_:22 in 2977) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.046805713 = score(doc=2977,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1728227 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049352113 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2977, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2977)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    User query data played an important role in the development of an automated still picture retrieval system at the National Library of Medicine. Describes backgroun information about the NLM collection and its users, describes typical user queries, and portrays representative queries. It identifies a particular picture query type, called the 'image construct query', based on an analysis of user query data. Describes difficulties in handling image construct queries by existing conventional access systems, and it proposes improves cataloging strategy combined with picture surrogates as the most effective way to generate better image retrieval
    Pages
    S.7-22
  14. Bar-Ilan, J.: Web links and search engine ranking : the case of Google and the query "Jew" (2006) 0.12
    0.124703124 = product of:
      0.18705468 = sum of:
        0.10200114 = weight(_text_:query in 6104) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10200114 = score(doc=6104,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.22937049 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6476326 = idf(docFreq=1151, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049352113 = queryNorm
            0.44470036 = fieldWeight in 6104, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              4.6476326 = idf(docFreq=1151, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6104)
        0.08505354 = product of:
          0.17010708 = sum of:
            0.17010708 = weight(_text_:page in 6104) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.17010708 = score(doc=6104,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.27565226 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.5854197 = idf(docFreq=450, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049352113 = queryNorm
                0.6171075 = fieldWeight in 6104, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  5.5854197 = idf(docFreq=450, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6104)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    The World Wide Web has become one of our more important information sources, and commercial search engines are the major tools for locating information; however, it is not enough for a Web page to be indexed by the search engines-it also must rank high on relevant queries. One of the parameters involved in ranking is the number and quality of links pointing to the page, based on the assumption that links convey appreciation for a page. This article presents the results of a content analysis of the links to two top pages retrieved by Google for the query "jew" as of July 2004: the "jew" entry on the free online encyclopedia Wikipedia, and the home page of "Jew Watch," a highly anti-Semitic site. The top results for the query "jew" gained public attention in April 2004, when it was noticed that the "Jew Watch" homepage ranked number 1. From this point on, both sides engaged in "Googlebombing" (i.e., increasing the number of links pointing to these pages). The results of the study show that most of the links to these pages come from blogs and discussion links, and the number of links pointing to these pages in appreciation of their content is extremely small. These findings have implications for ranking algorithms based on link counts, and emphasize the huge difference between Web links and citations in the scientific community.
  15. Carrière, S.J.; Kazman, R.: Webquery : searching and visualising the Web through connectivity (1997) 0.12
    0.11871937 = product of:
      0.17807905 = sum of:
        0.15801947 = weight(_text_:query in 2674) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15801947 = score(doc=2674,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.22937049 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6476326 = idf(docFreq=1151, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049352113 = queryNorm
            0.68892676 = fieldWeight in 2674, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              4.6476326 = idf(docFreq=1151, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2674)
        0.020059591 = product of:
          0.040119182 = sum of:
            0.040119182 = weight(_text_:22 in 2674) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.040119182 = score(doc=2674,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1728227 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049352113 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2674, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2674)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    The WebQuery system offers a powerful new method for searching the Web based on connectivity and content. Examines links among the nodes returned in a keyword-based query. Rankes the nodes, giving the highest rank to the most highly connected nodes. By doing so, finds hot spots on the Web that contain information germane to a user's query. WebQuery not only ranks and filters the results of a Web query; it also extends the result set beyond what the search engine retrieves, by finding interesting sites that are highly connected to those sites returned by the original query. Even with WebQuery filering and ranking query results, the result set can be enormous. Explores techniques for visualizing the returned information and discusses the criteria for using each of the technique
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:08:06
  16. Ozcan, R.; Altingovde, I.S.; Ulusoy, O.: Exploiting navigational queries for result presentation and caching in Web search engines (2011) 0.12
    0.11710644 = product of:
      0.17565966 = sum of:
        0.10200114 = weight(_text_:query in 4364) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10200114 = score(doc=4364,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.22937049 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6476326 = idf(docFreq=1151, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049352113 = queryNorm
            0.44470036 = fieldWeight in 4364, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              4.6476326 = idf(docFreq=1151, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4364)
        0.073658526 = product of:
          0.14731705 = sum of:
            0.14731705 = weight(_text_:page in 4364) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.14731705 = score(doc=4364,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.27565226 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.5854197 = idf(docFreq=450, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049352113 = queryNorm
                0.5344308 = fieldWeight in 4364, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  5.5854197 = idf(docFreq=450, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4364)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Caching of query results is an important mechanism for efficiency and scalability of web search engines. Query results are cached and presented in terms of pages, which typically include 10 results each. In navigational queries, users seek a particular website, which would be typically listed at the top ranks (maybe, first or second) by the search engine, if found. For this type of query, caching and presenting results in the 10-per-page manner may waste cache space and network bandwidth. In this article, we propose nonuniform result page models with varying numbers of results for navigational queries. The experimental results show that our approach reduces the cache miss count by up to 9.17% (because of better utilization of cache space). Furthermore, bandwidth usage, which is measured in terms of number of snippets sent, is also reduced by 71% for navigational queries. This means a considerable reduction in the number of transmitted network packets, i.e., a crucial gain especially for mobile-search scenarios. A user study reveals that users easily adapt to the proposed result page model and that the efficiency gains observed in the experiments can be carried over to real-life situations.
  17. Losee, R.M.: Determining information retrieval and filtering performance without experimentation (1995) 0.11
    0.11080296 = product of:
      0.16620444 = sum of:
        0.14280158 = weight(_text_:query in 3368) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14280158 = score(doc=3368,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.22937049 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6476326 = idf(docFreq=1151, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049352113 = queryNorm
            0.62258047 = fieldWeight in 3368, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              4.6476326 = idf(docFreq=1151, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3368)
        0.023402857 = product of:
          0.046805713 = sum of:
            0.046805713 = weight(_text_:22 in 3368) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.046805713 = score(doc=3368,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1728227 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049352113 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3368, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3368)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    The performance of an information retrieval or text and media filtering system may be determined through analytic methods as well as by traditional simulation or experimental methods. These analytic methods can provide precise statements about expected performance. They can thus determine which of 2 similarly performing systems is superior. For both a single query terms and for a multiple query term retrieval model, a model for comparing the performance of different probabilistic retrieval methods is developed. This method may be used in computing the average search length for a query, given only knowledge of database parameter values. Describes predictive models for inverse document frequency, binary independence, and relevance feedback based retrieval and filtering. Simulation illustrate how the single term model performs and sample performance predictions are given for single term and multiple term problems
    Date
    22. 2.1996 13:14:10
  18. Chang, C.-H.; Hsu, C.-C.: Integrating query expansion and conceptual relevance feedback for personalized Web information retrieval (1998) 0.11
    0.11080296 = product of:
      0.16620444 = sum of:
        0.14280158 = weight(_text_:query in 1319) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14280158 = score(doc=1319,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.22937049 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6476326 = idf(docFreq=1151, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049352113 = queryNorm
            0.62258047 = fieldWeight in 1319, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              4.6476326 = idf(docFreq=1151, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1319)
        0.023402857 = product of:
          0.046805713 = sum of:
            0.046805713 = weight(_text_:22 in 1319) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.046805713 = score(doc=1319,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1728227 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049352113 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1319, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1319)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Keyword based querying has been an immediate and efficient way to specify and retrieve related information that the user inquired. However, conventional document ranking based on an automatic assessment of document relevance to the query may not be the best approach when little information is given. Proposes an idea to integrate 2 existing techniques, query expansion and relevance feedback to achieve a concept-based information search for the Web
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:08:06
  19. Hofstede, A.H.M. ter; Proper, H.A.; Van der Weide, T.P.: Exploiting fact verbalisation in conceptual information modelling (1997) 0.11
    0.11080296 = product of:
      0.16620444 = sum of:
        0.14280158 = weight(_text_:query in 2908) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14280158 = score(doc=2908,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.22937049 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6476326 = idf(docFreq=1151, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049352113 = queryNorm
            0.62258047 = fieldWeight in 2908, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              4.6476326 = idf(docFreq=1151, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2908)
        0.023402857 = product of:
          0.046805713 = sum of:
            0.046805713 = weight(_text_:22 in 2908) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.046805713 = score(doc=2908,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1728227 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049352113 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2908, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2908)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Focuses on the information modelling side of conceptual modelling. Deals with the exploitation of fact verbalisations after finishing the actual information system. Verbalisations are used as input for the design of the so-called information model. Exploits these verbalisation in 4 directions: considers their use for a conceptual query language, the verbalisation of instances, the description of the contents of a database and for the verbalisation of queries in a computer supported query environment. Provides an example session with an envisioned tool for end user query formulations that exploits the verbalisation
    Source
    Information systems. 22(1997) nos.5/6, S.349-385
  20. Pasicznyuk, R.W.: Searching for the information on the Net : new wine into new wine skins (1995) 0.11
    0.1081783 = product of:
      0.16226745 = sum of:
        0.09422461 = weight(_text_:query in 5785) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09422461 = score(doc=5785,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22937049 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6476326 = idf(docFreq=1151, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049352113 = queryNorm
            0.41079655 = fieldWeight in 5785, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.6476326 = idf(docFreq=1151, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5785)
        0.06804284 = product of:
          0.13608567 = sum of:
            0.13608567 = weight(_text_:page in 5785) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.13608567 = score(doc=5785,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.27565226 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.5854197 = idf(docFreq=450, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049352113 = queryNorm
                0.49368602 = fieldWeight in 5785, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.5854197 = idf(docFreq=450, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5785)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Provides a glossary of Internet search terms. Outlines a number of network retrieval tools and directories: Netscape's Internet search page, W3 search engines, Lycos, WebCrawler, InfoSeek, Yahoo, and CERN's Net Directory. Gices an example of how the Internet can be used to answer a reference query and the types of materials that can be retrieved

Languages

Types

  • el 157
  • b 34
  • p 1
  • x 1
  • More… Less…

Themes