Search (3901 results, page 1 of 196)

0.21074286 = product of:
  0.42148572 = sum of:
    0.42148572 = sum of:
      0.35326657 = weight(_text_:music in 4591) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.35326657 = score(doc=4591,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.30487663 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.0549803 = idf(docFreq=281, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05035138 = queryNorm
          1.1587198 = fieldWeight in 4591, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            6.0549803 = idf(docFreq=281, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4591)
      0.06821917 = weight(_text_:22 in 4591) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.06821917 = score(doc=4591,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17632195 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05035138 = queryNorm
          0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4591, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4591)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

In this light hearted and practical compilation, Weitz collects and updates music cataloguing questions and answers featured in OCLC's "MOUG Newsletter."

Date

25.11.2005 18:22:29

0.13608885 = product of:
  0.2721777 = sum of:
    0.2721777 = sum of:
      0.20395853 = weight(_text_:music in 3440) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.20395853 = score(doc=3440,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.30487663 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.0549803 = idf(docFreq=281, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05035138 = queryNorm
          0.6689871 = fieldWeight in 3440, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            6.0549803 = idf(docFreq=281, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3440)
      0.06821917 = weight(_text_:22 in 3440) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.06821917 = score(doc=3440,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17632195 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05035138 = queryNorm
          0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3440, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3440)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

17. 7.2002 18:22:44

Footnote

Einheitssacht.: Music, the brain, and ecstasy

0.13608885 = product of:
  0.2721777 = sum of:
    0.2721777 = sum of:
      0.20395853 = weight(_text_:music in 4878) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.20395853 = score(doc=4878,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.30487663 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.0549803 = idf(docFreq=281, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05035138 = queryNorm
          0.6689871 = fieldWeight in 4878, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            6.0549803 = idf(docFreq=281, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4878)
      0.06821917 = weight(_text_:22 in 4878) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.06821917 = score(doc=4878,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17632195 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05035138 = queryNorm
          0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4878, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4878)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Content

Subject gateways zu den Bereichen: Business economics - The virtual music library - clinical information - food science and food technology - energy technology

Date

22. 6.2002 19:41:31

0.13608885 = product of:
  0.2721777 = sum of:
    0.2721777 = sum of:
      0.20395853 = weight(_text_:music in 3282) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.20395853 = score(doc=3282,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.30487663 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.0549803 = idf(docFreq=281, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05035138 = queryNorm
          0.6689871 = fieldWeight in 3282, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            6.0549803 = idf(docFreq=281, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3282)
      0.06821917 = weight(_text_:22 in 3282) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.06821917 = score(doc=3282,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17632195 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05035138 = queryNorm
          0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3282, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3282)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

Metadata and semantics research: 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings. Eds.: E. Garoufallou

0.13601895 = product of:
  0.2720379 = sum of:
    0.2720379 = sum of:
      0.24475023 = weight(_text_:music in 1096) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.24475023 = score(doc=1096,freq=18.0), product of:
          0.30487663 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.0549803 = idf(docFreq=281, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05035138 = queryNorm
          0.8027845 = fieldWeight in 1096, product of:
            4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
              18.0 = termFreq=18.0
            6.0549803 = idf(docFreq=281, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1096)
      0.027287668 = weight(_text_:22 in 1096) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.027287668 = score(doc=1096,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17632195 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05035138 = queryNorm
          0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1096, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1096)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

As a part of a research project aiming to connect library data to the unfamiliar data sets available in the Linked Data (LD) community's CKAN Data Hub (thedatahub.org), this project collected, analyzed, and mapped properties used in describing and accessing music recordings, scores, and music-related information used by selected music LD data sets, library catalogs, and various digital collections created by libraries and other cultural institutions. This article reviews current efforts to connect music data through the Semantic Web, with an emphasis on the Music Ontology (MO) and ontology alignment approaches; it also presents a framework for understanding the life cycle of a musical work, focusing on the central activities of composition, performance, and use. The project studied metadata structures and properties of 11 music-related LD data sets and mapped them to the descriptions commonly used in the library cataloging records for sound recordings and musical scores (including MARC records and their extended schema.org markup), and records from 20 collections of digitized music recordings and scores (featuring a variety of metadata structures). The analysis resulted in a set of crosswalks and a unified crosswalk that aligns these properties. The paper reports on detailed methodologies used and discusses research findings and issues. Topics of particular concern include (a) the challenges of mapping between the overgeneralized descriptions found in library data and the specialized, music-oriented properties present in the LD data sets; (b) the hidden information and access points in library data; and (c) the potential benefits of enriching library data through the mapping of properties found in library catalogs to similar properties used by LD data sets.

Date

28.10.2013 17:22:17

0.13107109 = product of:
  0.26214218 = sum of:
    0.26214218 = sum of:
      0.22803259 = weight(_text_:music in 2845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.22803259 = score(doc=2845,freq=10.0), product of:
          0.30487663 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.0549803 = idf(docFreq=281, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05035138 = queryNorm
          0.7479504 = fieldWeight in 2845, product of:
            3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
              10.0 = termFreq=10.0
            6.0549803 = idf(docFreq=281, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2845)
      0.034109585 = weight(_text_:22 in 2845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.034109585 = score(doc=2845,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17632195 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05035138 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2845, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2845)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

The music information retrieval (MIR) community has long understood the role of evaluation as a critical component for successful information retrieval systems. Over the past several years, it has also become evident that user-centered evaluation based on realistic tasks is essential for creating systems that are commercially marketable. Although user-oriented research has been increasing, the MIR field is still lacking in holistic, user-centered approaches to evaluating music services beyond measuring the performance of search or classification algorithms. In light of this need, we conducted a user study exploring how users evaluate their overall experience with existing popular commercial music services, asking about their interactions with the system as well as situational and personal characteristics. In this paper, we present a qualitative heuristic evaluation of commercial music services based on Jakob Nielsen's 10 usability heuristics for user interface design, and also discuss 8 additional criteria that may be used for the holistic evaluation of user experience in MIR systems. Finally, we recommend areas of future user research raised by trends and patterns that surfaced from this user study.

Date

17. 3.2016 19:22:15

0.1289947 = product of:
  0.2579894 = sum of:
    0.2579894 = product of:
      0.5159788 = sum of:
        0.5159788 = weight(_text_:music in 176) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.5159788 = score(doc=176,freq=20.0), product of:
            0.30487663 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.0549803 = idf(docFreq=281, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05035138 = queryNorm
            1.6924185 = fieldWeight in 176, product of:
              4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                20.0 = termFreq=20.0
              6.0549803 = idf(docFreq=281, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=176)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Introduces a framework for formal design and construction of music systems. It is demonsrated using the music structures approach, starting with an ontology of music objects, and ending with symbolic and visual representation frameworks and their implementations. A visual formalism based on the music structures approach is introduced. A systematic development of knowledge-representation frameworks for music is essential for obtaining manageable, reliable, user-friendly music processing tools such as composition systems. It is also essential for deepening our understanding of the capabilities and limitations of a computational account for music

Source

Computer music journal. 20(1996) no.2, S.96-111

0.124831036 = product of:
  0.24966207 = sum of:
    0.24966207 = sum of:
      0.20190865 = weight(_text_:music in 1437) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.20190865 = score(doc=1437,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.30487663 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.0549803 = idf(docFreq=281, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05035138 = queryNorm
          0.66226345 = fieldWeight in 1437, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            6.0549803 = idf(docFreq=281, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1437)
      0.047753416 = weight(_text_:22 in 1437) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.047753416 = score(doc=1437,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17632195 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05035138 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1437, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1437)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

This paper describes to construct faceted ontologies for domain modeling. Building upon the faceted theory of S.R. Ranganathan (1967), the paper intends to address the faceted classification approach applied to build domain ontologies. As classificatory ontologies are employed to represent the relationships of entities and objects on the web, the faceted approach helps to analyze domain representation in an effective way for modeling. Based on this perspective, an ontology of the music domain has been analyzed that would serve as a case study.

Source

Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik

0.124831036 = product of:
  0.24966207 = sum of:
    0.24966207 = sum of:
      0.20190865 = weight(_text_:music in 1438) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.20190865 = score(doc=1438,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.30487663 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.0549803 = idf(docFreq=281, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05035138 = queryNorm
          0.66226345 = fieldWeight in 1438, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            6.0549803 = idf(docFreq=281, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1438)
      0.047753416 = weight(_text_:22 in 1438) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.047753416 = score(doc=1438,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17632195 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05035138 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1438, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1438)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

This paper discusses the classification of popular songs by studying how six online systems for different purposes (a service broadcaster, a library, a guide, an encyclopedia, a radio and an on demand music seller) describe and retrieve this kind of object. It investigates some aspects of faceted classification and proposes a reflection about the path towards a synthetic approach considering the concept of complexity and their implications. These discussions are based on the "That Music" prototype - an ontology-based system built specifically for popular songs.

Source

Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik

0.10887108 = product of:
  0.21774216 = sum of:
    0.21774216 = sum of:
      0.16316682 = weight(_text_:music in 6966) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.16316682 = score(doc=6966,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.30487663 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.0549803 = idf(docFreq=281, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05035138 = queryNorm
          0.5351897 = fieldWeight in 6966, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            6.0549803 = idf(docFreq=281, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6966)
      0.054575335 = weight(_text_:22 in 6966) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.054575335 = score(doc=6966,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17632195 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05035138 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6966, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6966)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Argues the need to provide additional access points in the cataloguing of popular culture materials in libraries which treat such collections as special collections. Provides a list of 8 general principles to apply in enhancing access to such materials through the catalogue (by increasing the number of appropriate headings), and illustrates how these principles might be implemented in two areas: motion pictures, radio and television and popular music

Source

Popular culture in libraries. 1(1993) no.3, S.15-22

0.10887108 = product of:
  0.21774216 = sum of:
    0.21774216 = sum of:
      0.16316682 = weight(_text_:music in 6643) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.16316682 = score(doc=6643,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.30487663 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.0549803 = idf(docFreq=281, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05035138 = queryNorm
          0.5351897 = fieldWeight in 6643, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            6.0549803 = idf(docFreq=281, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6643)
      0.054575335 = weight(_text_:22 in 6643) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.054575335 = score(doc=6643,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17632195 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05035138 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6643, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6643)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

In Dec 95 the RISM database of series A/II: music manuscripts after 1600, appeared on CD-ROM, continuing the microfiches of 1084 and 1986. The CD-ROM covers 160.000 works of over 8.000 composers available for retrieval through manuscript sources in 491 libraries and archives in 22 countries. This is the most comprehensive documentation in this field so far, although there are probably over 1,5 million other manuscripts in existence too

0.10887108 = product of:
  0.21774216 = sum of:
    0.21774216 = sum of:
      0.16316682 = weight(_text_:music in 1834) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.16316682 = score(doc=1834,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.30487663 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.0549803 = idf(docFreq=281, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05035138 = queryNorm
          0.5351897 = fieldWeight in 1834, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            6.0549803 = idf(docFreq=281, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1834)
      0.054575335 = weight(_text_:22 in 1834) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.054575335 = score(doc=1834,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17632195 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05035138 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1834, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1834)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

A Serials Task Force at the University of California, USA, is currently working on merging the MELVYL catalogue and periodicals database. Details its design principles and discusses the major design issues of: name authority control, subject authority files, subsets, long searches, consolidation, sorting, and creation of possible new indexes for keywords, notes, titles, conferences, call numbers, combine author/titles, music, geospatial searching, and form limits

Source

DLA bulletin. 17(1997) no.1, S.18-22

0.10887108 = product of:
  0.21774216 = sum of:
    0.21774216 = sum of:
      0.16316682 = weight(_text_:music in 4642) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.16316682 = score(doc=4642,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.30487663 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.0549803 = idf(docFreq=281, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05035138 = queryNorm
          0.5351897 = fieldWeight in 4642, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            6.0549803 = idf(docFreq=281, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4642)
      0.054575335 = weight(_text_:22 in 4642) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.054575335 = score(doc=4642,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17632195 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05035138 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4642, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4642)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Comments on Douglas Hofstadter's index to his book 'Le ton beau de Marot: in praise of the music of language'. Hofstadter took charge of the book design, typography, typesetting and copy-editing, and also compiled the index which covers 23 pages of 3 columnes and is set in a practically illegible 4-point. Although the index breaks all the rules of indexing, it is a masterly creation showing the author's industry, exhuberance and wit. Summarizes Hofstadter's own remarks on how creating the index gave hin new insights into what his book was essentially about

Source

Indexer. 21(1998) no.1, S.22-23

0.10887108 = product of:
  0.21774216 = sum of:
    0.21774216 = sum of:
      0.16316682 = weight(_text_:music in 2474) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.16316682 = score(doc=2474,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.30487663 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.0549803 = idf(docFreq=281, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05035138 = queryNorm
          0.5351897 = fieldWeight in 2474, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            6.0549803 = idf(docFreq=281, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2474)
      0.054575335 = weight(_text_:22 in 2474) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.054575335 = score(doc=2474,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17632195 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05035138 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2474, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2474)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Van Dijck builds up an example of actual XFML by showing how to organize tourist information about what restaurants in what cities feature which kind of music: <facet id="city">City</facet> and <topic id="ny" facetid="city"><name>New York</name></topic> combine to mean that New York is the name of a city internally represented as "ny". It is written in the usual clear and practical style of articles on xml.com. Highly recommended as an introduction for anyone interested in XFML.

Source

http://www.xml.com/lpt/a/2003/01/22/xfml.html

0.107924715 = product of:
  0.21584943 = sum of:
    0.21584943 = product of:
      0.43169886 = sum of:
        0.43169886 = weight(_text_:music in 5620) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.43169886 = score(doc=5620,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.30487663 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.0549803 = idf(docFreq=281, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05035138 = queryNorm
            1.4159789 = fieldWeight in 5620, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              6.0549803 = idf(docFreq=281, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5620)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

The development of LC music headings is traced by reviewing the contributions and practices of the LC Music Division, the NYPL Music Division, and individual members of the Music Library Association. Cooperative efforts between LC and the Music Library Association are a hallmark of this development. Prospects for continuing and expanding this partnership continue today in the foundation provided by the Music Thesaurus Project

0.10197926 = product of:
  0.20395853 = sum of:
    0.20395853 = product of:
      0.40791705 = sum of:
        0.40791705 = weight(_text_:music in 4246) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.40791705 = score(doc=4246,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.30487663 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.0549803 = idf(docFreq=281, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05035138 = queryNorm
            1.3379742 = fieldWeight in 4246, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              6.0549803 = idf(docFreq=281, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4246)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Discusses the need for changes in the LCSH for music and the role that music librarians can play in promoting the estabilshment of a detailed, comprehensive all purpose theoretical subject heading code similar to AACR for descriptive cataloguing

Source

Music reference services quarterly. 1(1992) no.1, S.73-75

0.10197926 = product of:
  0.20395853 = sum of:
    0.20395853 = product of:
      0.40791705 = sum of:
        0.40791705 = weight(_text_:music in 1868) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.40791705 = score(doc=1868,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.30487663 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.0549803 = idf(docFreq=281, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05035138 = queryNorm
            1.3379742 = fieldWeight in 1868, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              6.0549803 = idf(docFreq=281, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1868)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Briefly reports the project, begun in 1991 at the Music Library, Rutgers University, to develop a thesaurus of music terms. The thesaurus is seen as being a discipline specific supplement to the LCSH

Object

Music thesaurus

0.10197926 = product of:
  0.20395853 = sum of:
    0.20395853 = product of:
      0.40791705 = sum of:
        0.40791705 = weight(_text_:music in 3345) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.40791705 = score(doc=3345,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.30487663 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.0549803 = idf(docFreq=281, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05035138 = queryNorm
            1.3379742 = fieldWeight in 3345, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              6.0549803 = idf(docFreq=281, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3345)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

0.10146809 = product of:
  0.20293619 = sum of:
    0.20293619 = product of:
      0.40587237 = sum of:
        0.40587237 = weight(_text_:music in 5241) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.40587237 = score(doc=5241,freq=22.0), product of:
            0.30487663 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.0549803 = idf(docFreq=281, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05035138 = queryNorm
            1.3312676 = fieldWeight in 5241, product of:
              4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
                22.0 = termFreq=22.0
              6.0549803 = idf(docFreq=281, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5241)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

The intentionally ambiguous expression "Popular Music Browser" reflects the two main goals of this project, which started in 1998, at Sony Computer Science Laboratories. First, we are interested in human-centered issues related to browsing "Popular Music." Popular here means that the music accessed is distributed widely and known to many listeners. Second, we consider "popular browsing" of music, i.e., making music accessible to nonspecialists (music lovers) and allowing sharing of musical tastes and information within communities, departing from the usual, single-user view of digital libraries. This research project covers all areas of the musicto-listener chain, from music description, descriptor extraction from the music signal, or data mining techniques, similarity-based access, and novel music retrieval methods such as automatic sequence generation, and to user interface issues. This article describes the scientific and technical issues at stake and the results obtained, and is illustrated by prototypes developed within the European IST project Cuidado.

0.10043709 = sum of:
  0.07997134 = product of:
    0.23991403 = sum of:
      0.23991403 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.23991403 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.42687958 = queryWeight, product of:
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05035138 = queryNorm
          0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.02046575 = product of:
    0.0409315 = sum of:
      0.0409315 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0409315 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17632195 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05035138 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Content

Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.

Date

8. 1.2013 10:22:32