-
Smiraglia, R.P.: Facets as discourse in knowledge organization : a case study in LISTA (2017)
0.01
0.0075820712 = product of:
0.022746213 = sum of:
0.022746213 = product of:
0.045492426 = sum of:
0.045492426 = weight(_text_:project in 3855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.045492426 = score(doc=3855,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19509704 = queryWeight, product of:
4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
0.04622078 = queryNorm
0.23317845 = fieldWeight in 3855, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3855)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Knowledge Organization Systems (KOSs) use arrays of related concepts to capture the ontological content of a domain; hierarchical structures are typical of such systems. Some KOSs also employ sets of crossconceptual descriptors that express different dimensions within a domain-facets. The recent increase in the prominence of facets and faceted systems has had major impact on the intension of the KO domain and this is visible in the domain's literature. An interesting question is how the discourse surrounding facets in KO and in related domains such as information science might be described. The present paper reports one case study in an ongoing research project to investigate the discourse of facets in KO. In this particular case, the formal current research literature represented by inclusion in the "Library, Information Science & Technology Abstracts, Full Text" (LISTA) database is analyzed to discover aspects of the research front and its ongoing discourse concerning facets. A datasets of 1682 citations was analyzed. Results show thinking concerning information retrieval and the semantic web resides alongside implementation of faceted searching and the growth of faceted thesauri. Faceted classification remains important to the discourse, but the use of facet analysis is linked directly to applied aspects of information science.
-
Coen, G.; Smiraglia, R.P.: Toward better interoperability of the NARCIS classification (2019)
0.01
0.0075820712 = product of:
0.022746213 = sum of:
0.022746213 = product of:
0.045492426 = sum of:
0.045492426 = weight(_text_:project in 5399) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.045492426 = score(doc=5399,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19509704 = queryWeight, product of:
4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
0.04622078 = queryNorm
0.23317845 = fieldWeight in 5399, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5399)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Research information can be useful to science stake-holders for discovering, evaluating and planning research activities. In the Netherlands, the institute tasked with the stewardship of national research information is DANS (Data Archiving and Networked Services). DANS is the home of NARCIS, the national portal for research information, which uses a similarly named national research classification. The NARCIS Classification assigns symbols to represent the knowledge bases of contributing scholars. A recent research stream in knowledge organization known as comparative classification uses two or more classifications experimentally to generate empirical evidence about coverage of conceptual content, population of the classes, and economy of classification. This paper builds on that research in order to further understand the comparative impact of the NARCIS Classification alongside a classification designed specifically for information resources. Our six cases come from the DANS project Knowledge Organization System Observatory (KOSo), which itself is classified using the Information Coding Classification (ICC) created in 1982 by Ingetraut Dahlberg. ICC is considered to have the merits of universality, faceting, and a top-down approach. Results are exploratory, indicating that both classifications provide fairly precise coverage. The inflexibility of the NARCIS Classification makes it difficult to express complex concepts. The meta-ontological, epistemic stance of the ICC is apparent in all aspects of this study. Using the two together in the DANS KOS Observatory will provide users with both clarity of scientific positioning and ontological relativity.
-
Beak, J.; Smiraglia, R.P.: Contours of knowledge : core and granularity in the evolution of the DCMI domain (2014)
0.01
0.0062622773 = product of:
0.01878683 = sum of:
0.01878683 = product of:
0.03757366 = sum of:
0.03757366 = weight(_text_:22 in 1415) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03757366 = score(doc=1415,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16185729 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04622078 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1415, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1415)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
-
Smiraglia, R.P.: Classification interaction demonstrated empirically (2014)
0.01
0.0062622773 = product of:
0.01878683 = sum of:
0.01878683 = product of:
0.03757366 = sum of:
0.03757366 = weight(_text_:22 in 1420) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03757366 = score(doc=1420,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16185729 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04622078 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1420, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1420)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
-
Smiraglia, R.P.: Curating and virtual shelves : an editorial (2006)
0.01
0.0053613344 = product of:
0.016084002 = sum of:
0.016084002 = product of:
0.032168005 = sum of:
0.032168005 = weight(_text_:project in 409) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032168005 = score(doc=409,freq=4.0), product of:
0.19509704 = queryWeight, product of:
4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
0.04622078 = queryNorm
0.16488208 = fieldWeight in 409, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=409)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Content
- Librarianship incorporates the tools of knowledge organization as part of its role as cultural disseminator. Subject headings and classification were both intended by their 19`h century promulgators - perhaps most notably Dewey and Cutter - to facilitate learning by grouping materials of high quality together. We might call this enhanced serendipity if we think it happens by accident or act of fate, or we might call it curatorship if we realize the responsibility inherent in our social role. The cataloger's job always has been to place each work sensitively among other works related to it, and to make the relationships explicit to facilitate and even encourage selection (see Miksa 1983). Schallier (2004) reported on the use of classification in an online catalog to enhance just such a curatorial purpose. UDC classification codes were exploded into linguistic strings to allow users to search, not just for a given term, but for the terms that occur around it - that is, terms that are adjacent in the classification. These displays are used alongside LCSH to provide enhanced-serendipity for users. What caught my attention was the intention of the project (p. 271): UDC permits librarians to build virtual library shelves, where a document's subjects can be described in thematic categories rather than in detailed verbal terms. And: It is our experience that most end users are not familiar with large controlled vocabularies. UDC could be an answer to this, since its alphanumeric makeup could be used to build a tree structure of terms, which would guide end users in their searchers. There are other implications from this project, including background linkage from UDC codes that drive the "virtual shelves" to subject terms that drive the initial classification. Knowledge organization has consequences in both theory and application."
-
Leazer, G.H.; Smiraglia, R.P.: Bibliographic families in the library catalog : a qualitative analysis and grounded theory (1999)
0.01
0.005218565 = product of:
0.015655695 = sum of:
0.015655695 = product of:
0.03131139 = sum of:
0.03131139 = weight(_text_:22 in 107) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03131139 = score(doc=107,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16185729 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04622078 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 107, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=107)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Smiraglia, R.P.: Shifting intension in knowledge organization : an editorial (2012)
0.01
0.005218565 = product of:
0.015655695 = sum of:
0.015655695 = product of:
0.03131139 = sum of:
0.03131139 = weight(_text_:22 in 630) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03131139 = score(doc=630,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16185729 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04622078 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 630, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=630)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 22. 2.2013 11:09:49
-
Smiraglia, R.P.: ISKO 12's bookshelf - evolving intension : an editorial (2013)
0.01
0.005218565 = product of:
0.015655695 = sum of:
0.015655695 = product of:
0.03131139 = sum of:
0.03131139 = weight(_text_:22 in 636) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03131139 = score(doc=636,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16185729 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04622078 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 636, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=636)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 22. 2.2013 11:43:34
-
Graf, A.M.; Smiraglia, R.P.: Race & ethnicity in the Encyclopedia of Milwaukee : a case study in the use of domain analysis (2014)
0.01
0.005218565 = product of:
0.015655695 = sum of:
0.015655695 = product of:
0.03131139 = sum of:
0.03131139 = weight(_text_:22 in 1412) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03131139 = score(doc=1412,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16185729 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04622078 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1412, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1412)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
-
Friedman, A.; Smiraglia, R.P.: Nodes and arcs : concept map, semiotics, and knowledge organization (2013)
0.00
0.004174852 = product of:
0.0125245545 = sum of:
0.0125245545 = product of:
0.025049109 = sum of:
0.025049109 = weight(_text_:22 in 770) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025049109 = score(doc=770,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16185729 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04622078 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 770, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=770)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Content
- Vgl. auch den Beitrag: Treude, L.: Das Problem der Konzeptdefinition in der Wissensorganisation: über einen missglückten Versuch der Klärung. In: LIBREAS: Library ideas. no.22, 2013, S.xx-xx.
-
Smiraglia, R.P.: On sameness and difference : an editorial (2008)
0.00
0.0026092825 = product of:
0.007827847 = sum of:
0.007827847 = product of:
0.015655695 = sum of:
0.015655695 = weight(_text_:22 in 1919) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015655695 = score(doc=1919,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16185729 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04622078 = queryNorm
0.09672529 = fieldWeight in 1919, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=1919)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 12. 6.2008 20:18:22
