-
Dahlberg, I.: ¬Die gegenstandsbezogene, analytische Begriffstheorie und ihre Definitionsarten (1987)
0.01
0.014611981 = product of:
0.04383594 = sum of:
0.04383594 = product of:
0.08767188 = sum of:
0.08767188 = weight(_text_:22 in 880) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08767188 = score(doc=880,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16185729 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04622078 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 880, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=880)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Pages
- S.9-22
-
Wüster, E.: Begriffs- und Themaklassifikation : Unterschiede in ihrem Wesen und in ihrer Anwendung (1971)
0.01
0.0125245545 = product of:
0.03757366 = sum of:
0.03757366 = product of:
0.07514732 = sum of:
0.07514732 = weight(_text_:22 in 3904) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07514732 = score(doc=3904,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16185729 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04622078 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3904, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3904)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Nachrichten für Dokumentation. 22(1971) H.3, S.98-104 (T.1); H.4, S.143-150 (T.2)
-
Hudon, M.: Preparing terminological definitions for indexing and retrieval thesauri : a model (1996)
0.01
0.012131314 = product of:
0.03639394 = sum of:
0.03639394 = product of:
0.07278788 = sum of:
0.07278788 = weight(_text_:project in 5193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07278788 = score(doc=5193,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19509704 = queryWeight, product of:
4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
0.04622078 = queryNorm
0.37308553 = fieldWeight in 5193, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5193)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- A model for standardizing existing definitions and/or writing new definitions for thesaurus descriptors has been developed, within the framework of a research project concerned with the usefulness of terminological definitions for indexers working with a thesaurus. The proposed model is an expansion of a model presented by Sager and L'Homme in 1994. Examples of its application in a thesaurus describing the field of Adult literacy programming and training are introduced
-
Gnoli, C.: Progress in synthetic classification : towards unique definition of concepts (2007)
0.01
0.010722669 = product of:
0.032168005 = sum of:
0.032168005 = product of:
0.06433601 = sum of:
0.06433601 = weight(_text_:project in 2527) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06433601 = score(doc=2527,freq=4.0), product of:
0.19509704 = queryWeight, product of:
4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
0.04622078 = queryNorm
0.32976416 = fieldWeight in 2527, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2527)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- The evolution of bibliographic classification schemes, from the end of the 19th century to our time, shows a trend of increasing possibilities to combine concepts in a classmark. While the early schemes, like DDC and LCC, were largely enumerative, more and more synthetic devices have appeared with common auxiliaries, facets, and phase relationships. The last editions of UDC and the UDC-derived FATKS project follow this evolution, by introducing more specific phase relationships and more common auxiliaries, like those for general properties and processes. This agrees with the Farradane's principle that each concept should have a place of unique definition, instead of being re-notated in each context where it occurs. This evolution appears to be unfinished, as even in most synthetic schemes many concepts have a different notation according to the disciplinary main classes where they occur. To overcome this limitation, main classes should be defined in terms of phenomena rather than disciplines: the Integrative Level Classification (ILC) research project is currently exploring this possibility. Examples with UDC, FATKS, and ILC notations are discussed.
-
McCray, A.T.; Bodenreider, O.: ¬A conceptual framework for the biomedical domain (2002)
0.01
0.009098486 = product of:
0.027295457 = sum of:
0.027295457 = product of:
0.054590914 = sum of:
0.054590914 = weight(_text_:project in 1207) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054590914 = score(doc=1207,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19509704 = queryWeight, product of:
4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
0.04622078 = queryNorm
0.27981415 = fieldWeight in 1207, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1207)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Specialized domains often come with an extensive terminology, suitable for storing and exchanging information, but not necessarily for knowledge processing. Knowledge structures such as semantic networks, or ontologies, are required to explore the semantics of a domain. The UMLS project at the National Library of Medicine is a research effort to develop knowledge-based resources for the biomedical domain. The Metathesaurus is a large body of knowledge that defines and inter-relates 730,000 biomedical concepts, and the Semantic Network defines the semantic principles that apply to this domain. This chapter presents these two knowledge sources and illustrates through a research study how they can collaborate to further structure the domain. The limits of the approach are discussed.
-
Dahlberg, I.: Begriffsarbeit in der Wissensorganisation (2010)
0.01
0.008349704 = product of:
0.025049109 = sum of:
0.025049109 = product of:
0.050098218 = sum of:
0.050098218 = weight(_text_:22 in 3726) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.050098218 = score(doc=3726,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16185729 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04622078 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3726, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3726)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Wissensspeicher in digitalen Räumen: Nachhaltigkeit - Verfügbarkeit - semantische Interoperabilität. Proceedings der 11. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Konstanz, 20. bis 22. Februar 2008. Hrsg.: J. Sieglerschmidt u. H.P.Ohly
-
Storms, G.; VanMechelen, I.; DeBoeck, P.: Structural-analysis of the intension and extension of semantic concepts (1994)
0.01
0.0073059904 = product of:
0.02191797 = sum of:
0.02191797 = product of:
0.04383594 = sum of:
0.04383594 = weight(_text_:22 in 2574) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04383594 = score(doc=2574,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16185729 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04622078 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2574, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2574)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 22. 7.2000 19:17:40
-
Bauer, G.: ¬Die vielseitigen Anwendungsmöglichkeiten des Kategorienprinzips bei der Wissensorganisation (2006)
0.01
0.0073059904 = product of:
0.02191797 = sum of:
0.02191797 = product of:
0.04383594 = sum of:
0.04383594 = weight(_text_:22 in 5710) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04383594 = score(doc=5710,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16185729 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04622078 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5710, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5710)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Pages
- S.22-33
-
Treude, L.: ¬Das Problem der Konzeptdefinition in der Wissensorganisation : über einen missglückten Versuch der Klärung (2013)
0.01
0.0062622773 = product of:
0.01878683 = sum of:
0.01878683 = product of:
0.03757366 = sum of:
0.03757366 = weight(_text_:22 in 3060) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03757366 = score(doc=3060,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16185729 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04622078 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3060, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3060)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- LIBREAS: Library ideas. no.22, 2013, S.xx-xx
-
Working with conceptual structures : contributions to ICCS 2000. 8th International Conference on Conceptual Structures: Logical, Linguistic, and Computational Issues. Darmstadt, August 14-18, 2000 (2000)
0.01
0.00530745 = product of:
0.015922349 = sum of:
0.015922349 = product of:
0.031844698 = sum of:
0.031844698 = weight(_text_:project in 5089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031844698 = score(doc=5089,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19509704 = queryWeight, product of:
4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
0.04622078 = queryNorm
0.16322492 = fieldWeight in 5089, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=5089)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Content
- Concepts & Language: Knowledge organization by procedures of natural language processing. A case study using the method GABEK (J. Zelger, J. Gadner) - Computer aided narrative analysis using conceptual graphs (H. Schärfe, P. 0hrstrom) - Pragmatic representation of argumentative text: a challenge for the conceptual graph approach (H. Irandoust, B. Moulin) - Conceptual graphs as a knowledge representation core in a complex language learning environment (G. Angelova, A. Nenkova, S. Boycheva, T. Nikolov) - Conceptual Modeling and Ontologies: Relationships and actions in conceptual categories (Ch. Landauer, K.L. Bellman) - Concept approximations for formal concept analysis (J. Saquer, J.S. Deogun) - Faceted information representation (U. Priß) - Simple concept graphs with universal quantifiers (J. Tappe) - A framework for comparing methods for using or reusing multiple ontologies in an application (J. van ZyI, D. Corbett) - Designing task/method knowledge-based systems with conceptual graphs (M. Leclère, F.Trichet, Ch. Choquet) - A logical ontology (J. Farkas, J. Sarbo) - Algorithms and Tools: Fast concept analysis (Ch. Lindig) - A framework for conceptual graph unification (D. Corbett) - Visual CP representation of knowledge (H.D. Pfeiffer, R.T. Hartley) - Maximal isojoin for representing software textual specifications and detecting semantic anomalies (Th. Charnois) - Troika: using grids, lattices and graphs in knowledge acquisition (H.S. Delugach, B.E. Lampkin) - Open world theorem prover for conceptual graphs (J.E. Heaton, P. Kocura) - NetCare: a practical conceptual graphs software tool (S. Polovina, D. Strang) - CGWorld - a web based workbench for conceptual graphs management and applications (P. Dobrev, K. Toutanova) - Position papers: The edition project: Peirce's existential graphs (R. Mülller) - Mining association rules using formal concept analysis (N. Pasquier) - Contextual logic summary (R Wille) - Information channels and conceptual scaling (K.E. Wolff) - Spatial concepts - a rule exploration (S. Rudolph) - The TEXT-TO-ONTO learning environment (A. Mädche, St. Staab) - Controlling the semantics of metadata on audio-visual documents using ontologies (Th. Dechilly, B. Bachimont) - Building the ontological foundations of a terminology from natural language to conceptual graphs with Ribosome, a knowledge extraction system (Ch. Jacquelinet, A. Burgun) - CharGer: some lessons learned and new directions (H.S. Delugach) - Knowledge management using conceptual graphs (W.K. Pun)
-
Jouis, C.: Logic of relationships (2002)
0.01
0.005218565 = product of:
0.015655695 = sum of:
0.015655695 = product of:
0.03131139 = sum of:
0.03131139 = weight(_text_:22 in 1204) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03131139 = score(doc=1204,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16185729 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04622078 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1204, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1204)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 1.12.2002 11:12:22
-
Marradi, A.: ¬The concept of concept : concepts and terms (2012)
0.01
0.005218565 = product of:
0.015655695 = sum of:
0.015655695 = product of:
0.03131139 = sum of:
0.03131139 = weight(_text_:22 in 33) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03131139 = score(doc=33,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16185729 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04622078 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 33, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=33)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 22. 1.2012 13:11:25
-
Besler, G.; Szulc, J.: Gottlob Frege's theory of definition as useful tool for knowledge organization : definition of 'context' - case study (2014)
0.01
0.005218565 = product of:
0.015655695 = sum of:
0.015655695 = product of:
0.03131139 = sum of:
0.03131139 = weight(_text_:22 in 1440) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03131139 = score(doc=1440,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16185729 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04622078 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1440, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1440)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
-
Olson, H.A.: How we construct subjects : a feminist analysis (2007)
0.01
0.005218565 = product of:
0.015655695 = sum of:
0.015655695 = product of:
0.03131139 = sum of:
0.03131139 = weight(_text_:22 in 5588) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03131139 = score(doc=5588,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16185729 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04622078 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5588, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5588)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 11.12.2019 19:00:22
