Search (655 results, page 1 of 33)

0.10226524 = product of:
  0.2556631 = sum of:
    0.21623175 = weight(_text_:theorem in 1449) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.21623175 = score(doc=1449,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.39776745 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.200379 = idf(docFreq=32, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04850598 = queryNorm
        0.5436135 = fieldWeight in 1449, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.200379 = idf(docFreq=32, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1449)
    0.03943134 = weight(_text_:22 in 1449) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03943134 = score(doc=1449,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16985968 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04850598 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1449, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1449)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)

Abstract

In most search systems, mapping queries with documents employs techniques such as vector space model, naïve Bayes, Bayesian theorem etc. to classify resulting documents. In this research studies, we are proposing the use of the concept of basic categories to representing the user's level of knowledge based on the concepts he employed during his search activities, so that the system could propose adapted results based on the observed user's level of knowledge. Our hypothesis is that this approach will enhance the decision support system for solving decisional problems in which information retrieval constitutes the backbone technical problem.

Source

Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik

0.09244842 = product of:
  0.4622421 = sum of:
    0.4622421 = weight(_text_:3a in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.4622421 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.41123423 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04850598 = queryNorm
        1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Content

Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fcreativechoice.org%2Fdoc%2FHansJonas.pdf&usg=AOvVaw1TM3teaYKgABL5H9yoIifA&opi=89978449.

0.08738903 = product of:
  0.43694514 = sum of:
    0.43694514 = weight(_text_:theorem in 3432) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.43694514 = score(doc=3432,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.39776745 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.200379 = idf(docFreq=32, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04850598 = queryNorm
        1.0984939 = fieldWeight in 3432, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          8.200379 = idf(docFreq=32, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3432)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Abstract

Naranan's important theorem, published in Nature in 1970, states that if the number of journals grows exponentially and if the number of articles in each journal grows exponentially (at the same rate for each journal), then the system satisfies Lotka's law and a formula for the Lotka's exponent is given in function of the growth rates of the journals and the articles. This brief communication re-proves this result by showing that the system satisfies Zipf's law, which is equivalent with Lotka's law. The proof is short and algebraic and does not use infinitesimal arguments.

Object

Naranan-Theorem

0.07704036 = product of:
  0.38520178 = sum of:
    0.38520178 = weight(_text_:3a in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.38520178 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.41123423 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04850598 = queryNorm
        0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Source

http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=5&ved=0CDQQFjAE&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F3131107&ei=HzFWVYvGMsiNsgGTyoFI&usg=AFQjCNE2FHUeR9oQTQlNC4TPedv4Mo3DaQ&sig2=Rlzpr7a3BLZZkqZCXXN_IA&bvm=bv.93564037,d.bGg&cad=rja

0.07207725 = product of:
  0.36038625 = sum of:
    0.36038625 = weight(_text_:theorem in 808) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.36038625 = score(doc=808,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.39776745 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.200379 = idf(docFreq=32, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04850598 = queryNorm
        0.9060225 = fieldWeight in 808, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.200379 = idf(docFreq=32, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=808)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Abstract

Historischer Beitrag zum Bayes-Theorem über bedingte Wahrscheinlichkeiten.

0.061159577 = product of:
  0.30579787 = sum of:
    0.30579787 = weight(_text_:theorem in 4352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.30579787 = score(doc=4352,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.39776745 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.200379 = idf(docFreq=32, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04850598 = queryNorm
        0.7687856 = fieldWeight in 4352, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          8.200379 = idf(docFreq=32, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4352)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Abstract

The digital divide continues to challenge political and academic circles worldwide. A range of policy solutions is briefly evaluated, from laissez-faire on the right to "arithmetic" egalitarianism on the left. The article recasts the digital divide as a problem for the social distribution of presumptively important information (e.g., electoral data, news, science) within postindustrial society. Endorsing in general terms the left-liberal approach of differential or "geometric" egalitarianism, it seeks to invest this with greater precision, and therefore utility, by means of a possibly original synthesis of the ideas of John Rawls and R. H. Tawney. It is argued that, once certain categories of information are accorded the status of "primary goods," their distribution must then comply with principles of justice as articulated by those major 20th century exponents of ethical social democracy. The resultant Rawls-Tawney theorem, if valid, might augment the portfolio of options for interventionist information policy in the 21st century.

0.053928252 = product of:
  0.26964125 = sum of:
    0.26964125 = weight(_text_:3a in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.26964125 = score(doc=5955,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.41123423 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04850598 = queryNorm
        0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Footnote

Rez. in: Philosophisch-ethische Rezensionen vom 09.11.2019 (Jürgen Czogalla), Unter: https://philosophisch-ethische-rezensionen.de/rezension/Goedert1.html. In: B.I.T. online 23(2020) H.3, S.345-347 (W. Sühl-Strohmenger) [Unter: https%3A%2F%2Fwww.b-i-t-online.de%2Fheft%2F2020-03-rezensionen.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0iY3f_zNcvEjeZ6inHVnOK]. In: Open Password Nr. 805 vom 14.08.2020 (H.-C. Hobohm) [Unter: https://www.password-online.de/?mailpoet_router&endpoint=view_in_browser&action=view&data=WzE0MywiOGI3NjZkZmNkZjQ1IiwwLDAsMTMxLDFd].

0.05113262 = product of:
  0.12783155 = sum of:
    0.108115874 = weight(_text_:theorem in 3034) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.108115874 = score(doc=3034,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.39776745 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.200379 = idf(docFreq=32, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04850598 = queryNorm
        0.27180675 = fieldWeight in 3034, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.200379 = idf(docFreq=32, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3034)
    0.01971567 = weight(_text_:22 in 3034) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01971567 = score(doc=3034,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16985968 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04850598 = queryNorm
        0.116070345 = fieldWeight in 3034, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3034)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)

Date

22. 6.2016 16:08:54

Footnote

Rez. in: Economist vom Jun 18.06.2016 [http://www.economist.com/news/books-and-arts/21700611-circle-circle]: "Everyone by nature desires to know," wrote Aristotle more than 2,000 years ago. But are there limits to what human beings can know? This is the question that Marcus du Sautoy, the British mathematician who succeeeded Richard Dawkins as the Simonyi professor for the public understanding of science at Oxford University, explores in "What We Cannot Know", his fascinating book on the limits of scientific knowledge. As Mr du Sautoy argues, this is a golden age of scientific knowledge. Remarkable achievements stretch across the sciences, from the Large Hadron Collider and the sequencing of the human genome to the proof of Fermat's Last Theorem. And the rate of progress is accelerating: the number of scientific publications has doubled every nine years since the second world war. But even bigger challenges await. Can cancer be cured? Ageing beaten? Is there a "Theory of Everything" that will include all of physics? Can we know it all? One limit to people's knowledge is practical. In theory, if you throw a die, Newton's laws of motion make it possible to predict what number will come up. But the calculations are too long to be practicable. What is more, many natural systems, such as the weather, are "chaotic" or sensitive to small changes: a tiny nudge now can lead to vastly different behaviour later. Since people cannot measure with complete accuracy, they can't forecast far into the future. The problem was memorably articulated by Edward Lorenz, an American scientist, in 1972 in a famous paper called "Does the Flap of a Butterfly's Wings in Brazil Set Off a Tornado in Texas?"

0.04622421 = product of:
  0.23112105 = sum of:
    0.23112105 = weight(_text_:3a in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.23112105 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.41123423 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04850598 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Content

Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Faclanthology.org%2FD19-5317.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0ZZFyq5wWTtNTvNkrvjlGA.

0.04622421 = product of:
  0.23112105 = sum of:
    0.23112105 = weight(_text_:3a in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.23112105 = score(doc=484,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.41123423 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04850598 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Footnote

https%3A%2F%2Fjournals.univie.ac.at%2Findex.php%2Fvoebm%2Farticle%2Fdownload%2F5332%2F5271%2F&usg=AOvVaw2yQdFGHlmOwVls7ANCpTii.

0.04324635 = product of:
  0.21623175 = sum of:
    0.21623175 = weight(_text_:theorem in 2802) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.21623175 = score(doc=2802,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.39776745 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.200379 = idf(docFreq=32, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04850598 = queryNorm
        0.5436135 = fieldWeight in 2802, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.200379 = idf(docFreq=32, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2802)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

0.04261052 = product of:
  0.10652629 = sum of:
    0.09009656 = weight(_text_:theorem in 3976) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09009656 = score(doc=3976,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.39776745 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.200379 = idf(docFreq=32, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04850598 = queryNorm
        0.22650562 = fieldWeight in 3976, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.200379 = idf(docFreq=32, maxDocs=44218)
          0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=3976)
    0.016429728 = weight(_text_:22 in 3976) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.016429728 = score(doc=3976,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16985968 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04850598 = queryNorm
        0.09672529 = fieldWeight in 3976, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=3976)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)

Content

"Kürzlich bat mich ein Anhänger der Numerologie, ihm mein Geburtsdatum zu nennen. Wiederholte Quersummenbildung ergab 4, meine ,Geburtszahl`. Auf dieselbe Weise addierte er auch die Alphabet-Positionen der Vokale in meinem Namen zu 8, meiner ,Herzzahl`. Das nennt sich Gematrie. Einer Tabelle waren dann Charakter und Schicksal zu entnehmen, soweit sie mir aus kosmischen Einflüssen vorbestimmt sind. Kein Zweifel, Okkultes braucht den großen Rahmen. Der Kosmos darf es da schon sein - oder die Pythagoräer, auf die man sich gerne beruft, weil sie Zahlen und Dinge geradezu identifiziert haben. Ich ließ meinen Gesprächspartner wissen, dass ich diesen Umgang mit Zahlen und Zeichen für spekulatives, ja abergläubisches Wunschdenken halte. "Aber Sie sind doch Mathematiker", gab er triumphierend zurück, "dann beweisen Sie mir erst einmal, dass die Numerologie nicht funktioniert!". Das, natürlich, konnte ich nicht. Als weitere Quelle geheimer Gewissheiten diente ihm die jüdische Kabbalah. Gematrische Verfahren hat sie durch kombinatorische Zeichenmanipulationen erweitert wie Zeruph (Permutation) oder Temurah (zyklisches Vertauschen). Die Welt wird als Buch vorgestellt, vom Schöpfer geschrieben mit den 22 Buchstaben des hebräischen Alphabets und den 10 dekadischen Ziffern (den "Sephiroth" eines urbildlichen Lebensbaums, mit denen Umberto Eco in seinem Roman Das Foucaultsche Pendel noch ein postmodernes Spiel treibt). Einer magischen Richtung zufolge wirken Um- und Zusammenstellungen von Buchstaben und Ziffern auf die Dinge selbst ein. So kann der Bestand verborgener Beziehungen ungehemmt wachsen. Doch "nur solche Beziehungen und Feststellungen haben objektive Bedeutung, die nicht durch irgend einen Wechsel in der Wahl der Etiketten ... beeinflußt werden". Dieses "Relativitätsprinzip" formulierte Hermann Weyl - ohne auf die Kabbalah anzuspielen - in dem Anhang Ars combinatoria zur 3. Auflage seiner Philosophie der Mathematik und Naturwissenschaft. Ihren Operationen verlieh die Kabbalah denn auch keine objektive, vielmehr eine mystische, in reiner Innenschau gewonnene Bedeutung.
Der schwärmerische Ton dieser Eloge mag später Karl Friedrich Hindenburg (1739-1808) in der Hoch- oder besser Überschätzung seiner "Combinationslehre" bestärkt haben. Der gebürtige Dresdner war stolzer Gründer einer merkwürdig isoliert gebliebenen sog. kombinatorischen Schule und überzeugt, "der polynomische Lehrsatz" sei "das wichtigste Theorem der Analysis". Auch wenn man das für übertrieben hält, so ist doch die Kornbinatorik nach heutigem Stand eine Disziplin, die den Vergleich mit anderen Gebieten der Mathematik nicht zu scheuen braucht. - Was die universale Logik betrifft, die Leibniz sich ausgemalt hat, so kann sie nicht gelingen; doch ihre praktische Seite hat sich auf erstaunliche Weise im Computer verwirklicht: einer Maschine, die rechnen und - vor allem - Symbole verarbeiten kann. Auch außerhalb von Wissenschaft und Technik hat die bloß Idee gebliebene ars combinatoria eine anhaltende Wirkung auf die Einbildungskraft entfaltet. Sie führt die 'Kunst' (ars) in ihrem Namen und war ihr vielfach zu Diensten. Einiges spricht dafür, dass kombinatorische Verfahren im künstlerischen Feld immer dann vermehrt ins Spiel kommen, wenn die inhaltliche Seite des Schaffensprozesses an Bedeutung verliert: aufgrund mangelnder Vorgaben von außen (durch Auftraggeber, Mäzene) und brüchig gewordener Bindungen (an metaphysische Ideen, Anschauungen über Natur und Gesellschaft). Ein solches Stadium war zu Beginn des 20. Jhs. erreicht. Die damit verbundende "Entfesselung des Materials" (Adorno) verlangte vom Künstler, sich über den Rohstoff seiner Arbeit - Farben, Formen, Töne, Wörter, Buchstaben etc. - prinzipielle Gedanken zu machen. Wie ist mit den freigesetzten Elementen umzugehen und wie der Verdacht zu entkräften, es könne nun ziemlich beliebig zugehen? Zunächst behauptete man die Eigengesetzlichkeit des Materials. Adorno zufolge arbeitet der Künstler ganz "im strengen Anspruch der Richtigkeit, den sein Gebilde an ihn stellt". Der Urheber einer Komposition etwa ist darüberhinaus "einzig der, der sie zu lesen vermag und seine eigene Musik versteht"2. Ähnlich, aber nicht ganz so überraschend war das, was zuvor Wassily Kandinsky für die von gegenständlicher Darstellung sich ablösende Malerei reklamiert hatte, nämlich: einer "inneren Notwendigkeit" zu gehorchen - zweifellos eine mystische Kategorie.

0.03852018 = product of:
  0.19260089 = sum of:
    0.19260089 = weight(_text_:3a in 4997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.19260089 = score(doc=4997,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.41123423 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04850598 = queryNorm
        0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4997, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4997)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Content

PhD Dissertation at International Doctorate School in Information and Communication Technology. Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Fcore.ac.uk%2Fdownload%2Fpdf%2F150083013.pdf&usg=AOvVaw2n-qisNagpyT0lli_6QbAQ.

0.03852018 = product of:
  0.19260089 = sum of:
    0.19260089 = weight(_text_:3a in 4388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.19260089 = score(doc=4388,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.41123423 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04850598 = queryNorm
        0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4388, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4388)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Footnote

Vgl. unter: https://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=2&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwizweHljdbcAhVS16QKHXcFD9QQFjABegQICRAB&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.researchgate.net%2Fpublication%2F271200105_Die_Autonomie_des_Menschen_und_der_Maschine_-_gegenwartige_Definitionen_von_Autonomie_zwischen_philosophischem_Hintergrund_und_technologischer_Umsetzbarkeit_Redigierte_Version_der_Magisterarbeit_Karls&usg=AOvVaw06orrdJmFF2xbCCp_hL26q.

0.03852018 = product of:
  0.19260089 = sum of:
    0.19260089 = weight(_text_:3a in 855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.19260089 = score(doc=855,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.41123423 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04850598 = queryNorm
        0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 855, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=855)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Content

Vgl. auch: New automatic interpreter for complex UDC numbers. Unter: <https%3A%2F%2Fudcc.org%2Ffiles%2FAttilaPiros_EC_36-37_2014-2015.pdf&usg=AOvVaw3kc9CwDDCWP7aArpfjrs5b>

0.030816142 = product of:
  0.1540807 = sum of:
    0.1540807 = weight(_text_:3a in 5820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.1540807 = score(doc=5820,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.41123423 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04850598 = queryNorm
        0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 5820, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5820)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Content

Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Language and Information Technologies. Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cs.cmu.edu%2F~cx%2Fpapers%2Fknowledge_based_text_representation.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0SaTSvhWLTh__Uz_HtOtl3.

0.021030052 = product of:
  0.10515025 = sum of:
    0.10515025 = weight(_text_:22 in 2851) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10515025 = score(doc=2851,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16985968 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04850598 = queryNorm
        0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 2851, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2851)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Date

20. 1.2015 18:30:22

0.018588115 = product of:
  0.09294057 = sum of:
    0.09294057 = weight(_text_:22 in 2810) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09294057 = score(doc=2810,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.16985968 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04850598 = queryNorm
        0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 2810, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2810)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Date

22. 7.2004 9:42:33
22. 4.2017 11:58:05

0.018588115 = product of:
  0.09294057 = sum of:
    0.09294057 = weight(_text_:22 in 3582) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09294057 = score(doc=3582,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.16985968 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04850598 = queryNorm
        0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3582, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3582)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Date

22. 4.2017 10:42:05
22. 4.2017 10:48:38

0.018588115 = product of:
  0.09294057 = sum of:
    0.09294057 = weight(_text_:22 in 3975) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09294057 = score(doc=3975,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.16985968 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04850598 = queryNorm
        0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3975, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3975)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Date

22. 2.2018 12:06:44
22. 2.2018 12:13:53