-
Moens, M.-F.; Uyttendaele, C.; Dumotier, J.: Abstracting of legal cases : the potential of clustering based on the selection of representative objects (1999)
0.03
0.0297299 = product of:
0.0891897 = sum of:
0.0891897 = weight(_text_:objects in 2944) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0891897 = score(doc=2944,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25313336 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.047625583 = queryNorm
0.35234275 = fieldWeight in 2944, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2944)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
-
Yang, C.C.; Wang, F.L.: Hierarchical summarization of large documents (2008)
0.02
0.02477492 = product of:
0.07432476 = sum of:
0.07432476 = weight(_text_:objects in 1719) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07432476 = score(doc=1719,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25313336 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.047625583 = queryNorm
0.29361898 = fieldWeight in 1719, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1719)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Many automatic text summarization models have been developed in the last decades. Related research in information science has shown that human abstractors extract sentences for summaries based on the hierarchical structure of documents; however, the existing automatic summarization models do not take into account the human abstractor's behavior of sentence extraction and only consider the document as a sequence of sentences during the process of extraction of sentences as a summary. In general, a document exhibits a well-defined hierarchical structure that can be described as fractals - mathematical objects with a high degree of redundancy. In this article, we introduce the fractal summarization model based on the fractal theory. The important information is captured from the source document by exploring the hierarchical structure and salient features of the document. A condensed version of the document that is informatively close to the source document is produced iteratively using the contractive transformation in the fractal theory. The fractal summarization model is the first attempt to apply fractal theory to document summarization. It significantly improves the divergence of information coverage of summary and the precision of summary. User evaluations have been conducted. Results have indicated that fractal summarization is promising and outperforms current summarization techniques that do not consider the hierarchical structure of documents.
-
Cai, X.; Li, W.: Enhancing sentence-level clustering with integrated and interactive frameworks for theme-based summarization (2011)
0.02
0.02477492 = product of:
0.07432476 = sum of:
0.07432476 = weight(_text_:objects in 4770) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07432476 = score(doc=4770,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25313336 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.047625583 = queryNorm
0.29361898 = fieldWeight in 4770, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4770)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Sentence clustering plays a pivotal role in theme-based summarization, which discovers topic themes defined as the clusters of highly related sentences to avoid redundancy and cover more diverse information. As the length of sentences is short and the content it contains is limited, the bag-of-words cosine similarity traditionally used for document clustering is no longer suitable. Special treatment for measuring sentence similarity is necessary. In this article, we study the sentence-level clustering problem. After exploiting concept- and context-enriched sentence vector representations, we develop two co-clustering frameworks to enhance sentence-level clustering for theme-based summarization-integrated clustering and interactive clustering-both allowing word and document to play an explicit role in sentence clustering as independent text objects rather than using word or concept as features of a sentence in a document set. In each framework, we experiment with two-level co-clustering (i.e., sentence-word co-clustering or sentence-document co-clustering) and three-level co-clustering (i.e., document-sentence-word co-clustering). Compared against concept- and context-oriented sentence-representation reformation, co-clustering shows a clear advantage in both intrinsic clustering quality evaluation and extrinsic summarization evaluation conducted on the Document Understanding Conferences (DUC) datasets.
-
Goh, A.; Hui, S.C.: TES: a text extraction system (1996)
0.01
0.008603479 = product of:
0.025810435 = sum of:
0.025810435 = product of:
0.05162087 = sum of:
0.05162087 = weight(_text_:22 in 6599) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05162087 = score(doc=6599,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16677667 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047625583 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6599, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6599)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 26. 2.1997 10:22:43
-
Robin, J.; McKeown, K.: Empirically designing and evaluating a new revision-based model for summary generation (1996)
0.01
0.008603479 = product of:
0.025810435 = sum of:
0.025810435 = product of:
0.05162087 = sum of:
0.05162087 = weight(_text_:22 in 6751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05162087 = score(doc=6751,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16677667 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047625583 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6751, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6751)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 6. 3.1997 16:22:15
-
Jones, P.A.; Bradbeer, P.V.G.: Discovery of optimal weights in a concept selection system (1996)
0.01
0.008603479 = product of:
0.025810435 = sum of:
0.025810435 = product of:
0.05162087 = sum of:
0.05162087 = weight(_text_:22 in 6974) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05162087 = score(doc=6974,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16677667 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047625583 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6974, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6974)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Information retrieval: new systems and current research. Proceedings of the 16th Research Colloquium of the British Computer Society Information Retrieval Specialist Group, Drymen, Scotland, 22-23 Mar 94. Ed.: R. Leon
-
Vanderwende, L.; Suzuki, H.; Brockett, J.M.; Nenkova, A.: Beyond SumBasic : task-focused summarization with sentence simplification and lexical expansion (2007)
0.01
0.006452609 = product of:
0.019357827 = sum of:
0.019357827 = product of:
0.038715653 = sum of:
0.038715653 = weight(_text_:22 in 948) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038715653 = score(doc=948,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16677667 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047625583 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 948, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=948)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- In recent years, there has been increased interest in topic-focused multi-document summarization. In this task, automatic summaries are produced in response to a specific information request, or topic, stated by the user. The system we have designed to accomplish this task comprises four main components: a generic extractive summarization system, a topic-focusing component, sentence simplification, and lexical expansion of topic words. This paper details each of these components, together with experiments designed to quantify their individual contributions. We include an analysis of our results on two large datasets commonly used to evaluate task-focused summarization, the DUC2005 and DUC2006 datasets, using automatic metrics. Additionally, we include an analysis of our results on the DUC2006 task according to human evaluation metrics. In the human evaluation of system summaries compared to human summaries, i.e., the Pyramid method, our system ranked first out of 22 systems in terms of overall mean Pyramid score; and in the human evaluation of summary responsiveness to the topic, our system ranked third out of 35 systems.
-
Wu, Y.-f.B.; Li, Q.; Bot, R.S.; Chen, X.: Finding nuggets in documents : a machine learning approach (2006)
0.01
0.0053771744 = product of:
0.016131522 = sum of:
0.016131522 = product of:
0.032263044 = sum of:
0.032263044 = weight(_text_:22 in 5290) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032263044 = score(doc=5290,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16677667 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047625583 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5290, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5290)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 17:25:48
-
Kim, H.H.; Kim, Y.H.: Generic speech summarization of transcribed lecture videos : using tags and their semantic relations (2016)
0.01
0.0053771744 = product of:
0.016131522 = sum of:
0.016131522 = product of:
0.032263044 = sum of:
0.032263044 = weight(_text_:22 in 2640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032263044 = score(doc=2640,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16677667 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047625583 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2640, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2640)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 22. 1.2016 12:29:41
-
Oh, H.; Nam, S.; Zhu, Y.: Structured abstract summarization of scientific articles : summarization using full-text section information (2023)
0.01
0.0053771744 = product of:
0.016131522 = sum of:
0.016131522 = product of:
0.032263044 = sum of:
0.032263044 = weight(_text_:22 in 889) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032263044 = score(doc=889,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16677667 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047625583 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 889, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=889)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 22. 1.2023 18:57:12
-
Jiang, Y.; Meng, R.; Huang, Y.; Lu, W.; Liu, J.: Generating keyphrases for readers : a controllable keyphrase generation framework (2023)
0.01
0.0053771744 = product of:
0.016131522 = sum of:
0.016131522 = product of:
0.032263044 = sum of:
0.032263044 = weight(_text_:22 in 1012) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032263044 = score(doc=1012,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16677667 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047625583 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1012, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1012)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 22. 6.2023 14:55:20
