Search (11 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Indexierungsstudien"
  1. Ellis, D.; Furner, J.; Willett, P.: On the creation of hypertext links in full-text documents : measurement of retrieval effectiveness (1996) 0.04
    0.035037026 = product of:
      0.10511108 = sum of:
        0.10511108 = weight(_text_:objects in 4214) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10511108 = score(doc=4214,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.25313336 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047625583 = queryNorm
            0.41523993 = fieldWeight in 4214, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4214)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    An important stage in the process or retrieval of objects from a hypertext database is the creation of a set of internodal links that are intended to represent the relationships existing between objects; this operation is often undertaken manually, just as index terms are often manually assigned to documents in a conventional retrieval system. In an earlier article (1994), the results were published of a study in which several different sets of links were inserted, each by a different person, between the paragraphs of each of a number of full-text documents. These results showed little similarity between the link-sets, a finding that was comparable with those of studies of inter-indexer consistency, which suggest that there is generally only a low level of agreement between the sets of index terms assigned to a document by different indexers. In this article, a description is provided of an investigation into the nature of the relationship existing between (i) the levels of inter-linker consistency obtaining among the group of hypertext databases used in our earlier experiments, and (ii) the levels of effectiveness of a number of searches carried out in those databases. An account is given of the implementation of the searches and of the methods used in the calculation of numerical values expressing their effectiveness. Analysis of the results of a comparison between recorded levels of consistency and those of effectiveness does not allow us to draw conclusions about the consistency - effectiveness relationship that are equivalent to those drawn in comparable studies of inter-indexer consistency
  2. Hudon, M.: Conceptual compatibility in controlled language tools used to index and access the content of moving image collections (2004) 0.03
    0.0297299 = product of:
      0.0891897 = sum of:
        0.0891897 = weight(_text_:objects in 2655) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0891897 = score(doc=2655,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25313336 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047625583 = queryNorm
            0.35234275 = fieldWeight in 2655, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2655)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Five controlled vocabularies currently used for content representation in collections of non art moving images were examined to determine their level of conceptual compatibility. Methods borrowed from previous research in the area of indexing language compatibility were used. Quantitative data and qualitative observations allowed us to estimate more precisely and realistically the actual degree of conceptual redundancy in these indexing languages. It was found that the conceptual overlap is high enough to justify the pursuit of research and development work an a common basic indexing and access language that could be used to name objects, events, categories of persons, and relations most frequently depicted in non art moving image collections.
  3. Cleverdon, C.W.: ASLIB Cranfield Research Project : Report on the first stage of an investigation into the comparative efficiency of indexing systems (1960) 0.01
    0.012905218 = product of:
      0.038715653 = sum of:
        0.038715653 = product of:
          0.077431306 = sum of:
            0.077431306 = weight(_text_:22 in 6158) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.077431306 = score(doc=6158,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16677667 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047625583 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6158, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6158)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: College and research libraries 22(1961) no.3, S.228 (G. Jahoda)
  4. Veenema, F.: To index or not to index (1996) 0.01
    0.008603479 = product of:
      0.025810435 = sum of:
        0.025810435 = product of:
          0.05162087 = sum of:
            0.05162087 = weight(_text_:22 in 7247) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05162087 = score(doc=7247,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16677667 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047625583 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7247, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7247)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Canadian journal of information and library science. 21(1996) no.2, S.1-22
  5. Booth, A.: How consistent is MEDLINE indexing? (1990) 0.01
    0.007528044 = product of:
      0.022584131 = sum of:
        0.022584131 = product of:
          0.045168262 = sum of:
            0.045168262 = weight(_text_:22 in 3510) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.045168262 = score(doc=3510,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16677667 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047625583 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3510, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3510)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Health libraries review. 7(1990) no.1, S.22-26
  6. Neshat, N.; Horri, A.: ¬A study of subject indexing consistency between the National Library of Iran and Humanities Libraries in the area of Iranian studies (2006) 0.01
    0.007528044 = product of:
      0.022584131 = sum of:
        0.022584131 = product of:
          0.045168262 = sum of:
            0.045168262 = weight(_text_:22 in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.045168262 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16677667 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047625583 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    4. 1.2007 10:22:26
  7. Taniguchi, S.: Recording evidence in bibliographic records and descriptive metadata (2005) 0.01
    0.006452609 = product of:
      0.019357827 = sum of:
        0.019357827 = product of:
          0.038715653 = sum of:
            0.038715653 = weight(_text_:22 in 3565) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.038715653 = score(doc=3565,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16677667 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047625583 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3565, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3565)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    18. 6.2005 13:16:22
  8. Leininger, K.: Interindexer consistency in PsychINFO (2000) 0.01
    0.006452609 = product of:
      0.019357827 = sum of:
        0.019357827 = product of:
          0.038715653 = sum of:
            0.038715653 = weight(_text_:22 in 2552) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.038715653 = score(doc=2552,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16677667 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047625583 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2552, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2552)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    9. 2.1997 18:44:22
  9. Subrahmanyam, B.: Library of Congress Classification numbers : issues of consistency and their implications for union catalogs (2006) 0.01
    0.0053771744 = product of:
      0.016131522 = sum of:
        0.016131522 = product of:
          0.032263044 = sum of:
            0.032263044 = weight(_text_:22 in 5784) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.032263044 = score(doc=5784,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16677667 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047625583 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5784, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5784)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  10. White, H.; Willis, C.; Greenberg, J.: HIVEing : the effect of a semantic web technology on inter-indexer consistency (2014) 0.01
    0.0053771744 = product of:
      0.016131522 = sum of:
        0.016131522 = product of:
          0.032263044 = sum of:
            0.032263044 = weight(_text_:22 in 1781) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.032263044 = score(doc=1781,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16677667 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047625583 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1781, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1781)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to examine the effect of the Helping Interdisciplinary Vocabulary Engineering (HIVE) system on the inter-indexer consistency of information professionals when assigning keywords to a scientific abstract. This study examined first, the inter-indexer consistency of potential HIVE users; second, the impact HIVE had on consistency; and third, challenges associated with using HIVE. Design/methodology/approach - A within-subjects quasi-experimental research design was used for this study. Data were collected using a task-scenario based questionnaire. Analysis was performed on consistency results using Hooper's and Rolling's inter-indexer consistency measures. A series of t-tests was used to judge the significance between consistency measure results. Findings - Results suggest that HIVE improves inter-indexing consistency. Working with HIVE increased consistency rates by 22 percent (Rolling's) and 25 percent (Hooper's) when selecting relevant terms from all vocabularies. A statistically significant difference exists between the assignment of free-text keywords and machine-aided keywords. Issues with homographs, disambiguation, vocabulary choice, and document structure were all identified as potential challenges. Research limitations/implications - Research limitations for this study can be found in the small number of vocabularies used for the study. Future research will include implementing HIVE into the Dryad Repository and studying its application in a repository system. Originality/value - This paper showcases several features used in HIVE system. By using traditional consistency measures to evaluate a semantic web technology, this paper emphasizes the link between traditional indexing and next generation machine-aided indexing (MAI) tools.
  11. Bade, D.: ¬The creation and persistence of misinformation in shared library catalogs : language and subject knowledge in a technological era (2002) 0.00
    0.0021508697 = product of:
      0.006452609 = sum of:
        0.006452609 = product of:
          0.012905218 = sum of:
            0.012905218 = weight(_text_:22 in 1858) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.012905218 = score(doc=1858,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16677667 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047625583 = queryNorm
                0.07738023 = fieldWeight in 1858, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=1858)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22. 9.1997 19:16:05