Search (1537 results, page 1 of 77)

0.23604803 = product of:
  0.35407203 = sum of:
    0.1261333 = weight(_text_:objects in 763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.1261333 = score(doc=763,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.25313336 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047625583 = queryNorm
        0.49828792 = fieldWeight in 763, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=763)
    0.22793876 = sum of:
      0.17318656 = weight(_text_:fusion in 763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.17318656 = score(doc=763,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.35273543 = queryWeight, product of:
            7.406428 = idf(docFreq=72, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047625583 = queryNorm
          0.49098146 = fieldWeight in 763, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            7.406428 = idf(docFreq=72, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=763)
      0.054752205 = weight(_text_:22 in 763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.054752205 = score(doc=763,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.16677667 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047625583 = queryNorm
          0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 763, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=763)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Abstract

Describes an approach to the problem of object recognition structured around a sequence of increasingly specialised grouping activities that assemble coherent regions of images that can be sown to satisfy increasingly stringent conditions. The recognition system is designed to cope with: colour and texture; the ability to deal with general objects in uncontrolled configurations and contexts; and a satisfactory notion of classification. These properties are illustrated using 3 case studies, demonstrating: the use of descriptions that fuse colour and spatial properties; the use of fusion of texture and geometric properties to describes trees; and the use of a recognition system to determine accurately whether an image contains people and animals

Date

22. 9.1997 19:16:05
3. 1.1999 12:21:22

0.20072794 = product of:
  0.3010919 = sum of:
    0.0891897 = weight(_text_:objects in 6963) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0891897 = score(doc=6963,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.25313336 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047625583 = queryNorm
        0.35234275 = fieldWeight in 6963, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6963)
    0.2119022 = sum of:
      0.17318656 = weight(_text_:fusion in 6963) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.17318656 = score(doc=6963,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.35273543 = queryWeight, product of:
            7.406428 = idf(docFreq=72, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047625583 = queryNorm
          0.49098146 = fieldWeight in 6963, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            7.406428 = idf(docFreq=72, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6963)
      0.038715653 = weight(_text_:22 in 6963) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.038715653 = score(doc=6963,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16677667 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047625583 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 6963, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6963)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Abstract

Presents a framework for the theoretical comparison of information retrieval models based on how the models decide aboutness. The framework is based on concepts emerging from the field of situation theory. So called infons and profons represent elementary information carriers which can be manipulated by unions and fusion operators. These operators allow relationships between information carriers to be established. Sets of infons form so called situations which are used to model the information born by objects such as documents. Demonstrates how an arbitrary information retrieval model can be mapped down into the framework with special functions defined for this purpose depending on the model at hand. 2 examples are given based on the Boolean retrieval and coordination level matching models. Starting from an axiomatization of aboutness, retrieval models can be compared according to which axioms they are governed by

Source

Information retrieval: new systems and current research. Proceedings of the 16th Research Colloquium of the British Computer Society Information Retrieval Specialist Group, Drymen, Scotland, 22-23 Mar 94. Ed.: R. Leon

0.14126813 = product of:
  0.4238044 = sum of:
    0.4238044 = sum of:
      0.3463731 = weight(_text_:fusion in 2011) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.3463731 = score(doc=2011,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.35273543 = queryWeight, product of:
            7.406428 = idf(docFreq=72, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047625583 = queryNorm
          0.9819629 = fieldWeight in 2011, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            7.406428 = idf(docFreq=72, maxDocs=44218)
            0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2011)
      0.077431306 = weight(_text_:22 in 2011) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.077431306 = score(doc=2011,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16677667 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047625583 = queryNorm
          0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 2011, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2011)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Date

22. 8.1998 10:40:17

Object

Cold Fusion

0.12932545 = product of:
  0.19398816 = sum of:
    0.16817772 = weight(_text_:objects in 2341) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.16817772 = score(doc=2341,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.25313336 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047625583 = queryNorm
        0.6643839 = fieldWeight in 2341, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2341)
    0.025810435 = product of:
      0.05162087 = sum of:
        0.05162087 = weight(_text_:22 in 2341) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05162087 = score(doc=2341,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16677667 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047625583 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2341, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2341)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Abstract

IODyone is an Internet client program that allows one to retriev information from servers by dynamically combining information objects. Information objects are abstract representations of bibliographic data, typically titles (or title keywords), author names, subject and classification identifiers, and full-text search terms

Date

22. 9.1997 19:16:05

0.11818143 = product of:
  0.17727214 = sum of:
    0.10511108 = weight(_text_:objects in 3616) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10511108 = score(doc=3616,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.25313336 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047625583 = queryNorm
        0.41523993 = fieldWeight in 3616, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3616)
    0.07216106 = product of:
      0.14432213 = sum of:
        0.14432213 = weight(_text_:fusion in 3616) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14432213 = score(doc=3616,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.35273543 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.406428 = idf(docFreq=72, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047625583 = queryNorm
            0.4091512 = fieldWeight in 3616, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.406428 = idf(docFreq=72, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3616)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Abstract

The objective of this paper is to amalgamate theories of text retrieval from various research traditions into a cognitive theory for information retrieval interaction. Set in a cognitive framework, the paper outlines the concept of polyrepresentation applied to both the user's cognitive space and the information space of IR systems. The concept seeks to represent the current user's information need, problem state, and domain work task or interest in a structure of causality. Further, it implies that we should apply different methods of representation and a variety of IR techniques of different cognitive and functional origin simultaneously to each semantic full-text entity in the information space. The cognitive differences imply that by applying cognitive overlaps of information objects, originating from different interprestations of such objects through time and by type, the degree of uncertainty inherent in IR is decreased. ... The lack of consistency among authors, indexers, evaluators or users is of an identical cognitive nature. It is unavoidable, and indeed favourable to IR. In particular, for full-text retrieval, alternative semantic entities, including Salton 'et al.'s' 'passage retrieval', are proposed to replace the traditional document record as the basic retrieval entity. These empirically observed phenomena of inconsistency and of semantic entities and values associated with data interpretation support strongly a cognitive approach to IR and the logical use of olypresentation, cognitive overlaps, and both data fusion and data diffusion

0.11772345 = product of:
  0.35317034 = sum of:
    0.35317034 = sum of:
      0.28864425 = weight(_text_:fusion in 3107) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.28864425 = score(doc=3107,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.35273543 = queryWeight, product of:
            7.406428 = idf(docFreq=72, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047625583 = queryNorm
          0.8183024 = fieldWeight in 3107, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            7.406428 = idf(docFreq=72, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3107)
      0.06452609 = weight(_text_:22 in 3107) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.06452609 = score(doc=3107,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16677667 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047625583 = queryNorm
          0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3107, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3107)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Date

27. 2.1999 20:59:22

0.115892634 = product of:
  0.17383894 = sum of:
    0.15448111 = weight(_text_:objects in 3968) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.15448111 = score(doc=3968,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.25313336 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047625583 = queryNorm
        0.6102756 = fieldWeight in 3968, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3968)
    0.019357827 = product of:
      0.038715653 = sum of:
        0.038715653 = weight(_text_:22 in 3968) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.038715653 = score(doc=3968,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16677667 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047625583 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3968, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3968)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Abstract

We present a declarative language for the construction of hypertext views on databases. The language is based on an object-oriented data model and a simple hypertext model with reference and inclusion links. A hypertext view specification consists in a collection of parameterized node schemes which specify how to construct node and links instances from the database contents. We show how this language can express different issues in hypertext view design. These include: the direct mapping of objects to nodes; the construction of complex nodes based on sets of objects; the representation of polymorphic sets of objects; and the representation of tree and graph structures. We have defined sublanguages corresponding to particular database models (relational, semantic, object-oriented) and implemented tools to generate Web views for these database models

Date

21.10.2000 15:01:22

0.11315976 = product of:
  0.16973963 = sum of:
    0.14715551 = weight(_text_:objects in 735) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.14715551 = score(doc=735,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.25313336 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047625583 = queryNorm
        0.5813359 = fieldWeight in 735, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=735)
    0.022584131 = product of:
      0.045168262 = sum of:
        0.045168262 = weight(_text_:22 in 735) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.045168262 = score(doc=735,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16677667 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047625583 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 735, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=735)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Abstract

Part 1 of a series of articles, exploring the concept of 'the work' in cataloguing practice, which attempts to construct a definition of the term based on AACR theory and practice. The study begins with a consideration of the objects of the catalogue, their history and the evidence that bears on the question of the degree to which the user needs access to the work, as opposed to a particular edition of the work

Footnote

Vgl. auch: Pt.2: Cataloging and classification quarterly. 19(1994) no.2, S.5-22; Pt.3: Cataloging and classification quarterly. 20(1995) no.1, S.25-46; Pt.4: Cataloging and classification quarterly. 20(1995) no.2, S.3-24

0.11030382 = product of:
  0.33091146 = sum of:
    0.33091146 = sum of:
      0.2857432 = weight(_text_:fusion in 2245) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.2857432 = score(doc=2245,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.35273543 = queryWeight, product of:
            7.406428 = idf(docFreq=72, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047625583 = queryNorm
          0.810078 = fieldWeight in 2245, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            7.406428 = idf(docFreq=72, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2245)
      0.045168262 = weight(_text_:22 in 2245) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.045168262 = score(doc=2245,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16677667 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047625583 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2245, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2245)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Date

1. 8.1996 22:01:00

Footnote

Übers. d. Titels: Compatibility of indexing languages: fusion, marriage or just living together? Some concrete examples

0.09066229 = product of:
  0.13599344 = sum of:
    0.10405465 = weight(_text_:objects in 1087) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10405465 = score(doc=1087,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.25313336 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047625583 = queryNorm
        0.41106653 = fieldWeight in 1087, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1087)
    0.031938784 = product of:
      0.06387757 = sum of:
        0.06387757 = weight(_text_:22 in 1087) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06387757 = score(doc=1087,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.16677667 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047625583 = queryNorm
            0.38301262 = fieldWeight in 1087, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1087)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Abstract

Discusses the need for facilities for online vocabulary control and standardization of terms, codes, etc., so as to secure consistency in naming of subjects, objects, countries, languages, etc., in databases at data entry stage. Most information storage and retrieval packages for microcomputers including MicroIsis provide for online vocabulary control in formulating search expressions for information retrieval, but not at the data entry stage. VOCON.PAS is a Pascal interface program for use with MicroIsis software for (a) online selection of term(s) and/or code(s) from vocabulary control tool, such as, thesaurus, subject heading list, classification scheme, nomenclature list(s)

Source

Knowledge organization. 22(1995) no.1, S.18-22

0.08582284 = product of:
  0.25746852 = sum of:
    0.25746852 = weight(_text_:objects in 3072) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.25746852 = score(doc=3072,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.25313336 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047625583 = queryNorm
        1.017126 = fieldWeight in 3072, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3072)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

In this article, an iconic indexing mechanism is suggested for spatial similarity retrieval on iconic image databases based upon the spatial relationships among the objects in a picture. The iconic objects dealt with were some kinds of gross panorama of simple objects

0.08442586 = product of:
  0.12663879 = sum of:
    0.10405465 = weight(_text_:objects in 3383) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10405465 = score(doc=3383,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.25313336 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047625583 = queryNorm
        0.41106653 = fieldWeight in 3383, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3383)
    0.022584131 = product of:
      0.045168262 = sum of:
        0.045168262 = weight(_text_:22 in 3383) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.045168262 = score(doc=3383,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16677667 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047625583 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3383, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3383)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Abstract

Highlights 2 major problems of the WWW metadata: it will take some time before a reasonable number of people start using metadata to provide a better Web classification, and that no one can guarantee that a majority of the Web objects will be ever properly classified via metadata. Addresses the problem of how to cope with intrinsic limits of Web metadata, proposes a method to solve these problems and show evidence of its effectiveness. Examines the important problem of what is the required critical mass in the WWW for metadata in order for it to be really useful

Date

1. 8.1996 22:08:06

0.08442586 = product of:
  0.12663879 = sum of:
    0.10405465 = weight(_text_:objects in 3612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10405465 = score(doc=3612,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.25313336 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047625583 = queryNorm
        0.41106653 = fieldWeight in 3612, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3612)
    0.022584131 = product of:
      0.045168262 = sum of:
        0.045168262 = weight(_text_:22 in 3612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.045168262 = score(doc=3612,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16677667 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047625583 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3612, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3612)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Date

1. 8.1996 22:08:06

0.08442586 = product of:
  0.12663879 = sum of:
    0.10405465 = weight(_text_:objects in 4640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10405465 = score(doc=4640,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.25313336 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047625583 = queryNorm
        0.41106653 = fieldWeight in 4640, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4640)
    0.022584131 = product of:
      0.045168262 = sum of:
        0.045168262 = weight(_text_:22 in 4640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.045168262 = score(doc=4640,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16677667 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047625583 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4640, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4640)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Abstract

The General Motors Media Archives (GMMA) project is undertaking one of the largest digitization efforts in the world. GMMA houses over 3 million still photographic images and tens of thousands of motion picture films and videos spanning over a hundred years. The images are a rich history of the evolution of transport, urban growth, fashion, design, and popular culture. GMMA has developed a layered approach to visual indexing that dissects the objects, style and implication of each image, so that the indexing system can accomodate all potential approaches to the material. Explains each layer of indexing and provides examples which show implication layers that can easily be missed

Date

9. 4.2000 17:22:00

0.08442586 = product of:
  0.12663879 = sum of:
    0.10405465 = weight(_text_:objects in 597) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10405465 = score(doc=597,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.25313336 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047625583 = queryNorm
        0.41106653 = fieldWeight in 597, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=597)
    0.022584131 = product of:
      0.045168262 = sum of:
        0.045168262 = weight(_text_:22 in 597) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.045168262 = score(doc=597,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16677667 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047625583 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 597, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=597)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Abstract

This paper considers the relevance of Charles Ami Cutter's principles of bibliographic access to the uiniverse of Internet accessible digital objects and explores new methods for applying these principles in the context of new information technologies. The paper examines the value for retrieval of collecting authors' names, identifying authors' roles, collocating works and versions, and providing subject access through classification and controlled vocabularies for digital resources available through the World Wide Web. THe authors identify emerging techniques and technologies that can be used in lieu of or as a supplement to traditional cataloging to achieve these functions in organizing access to Internet resources

Source

Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.25-42

0.08442586 = product of:
  0.12663879 = sum of:
    0.10405465 = weight(_text_:objects in 771) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10405465 = score(doc=771,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.25313336 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047625583 = queryNorm
        0.41106653 = fieldWeight in 771, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=771)
    0.022584131 = product of:
      0.045168262 = sum of:
        0.045168262 = weight(_text_:22 in 771) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.045168262 = score(doc=771,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16677667 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047625583 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 771, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=771)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Abstract

It is contended that while there are considerable numbers of people interested in the application of information retrieval (IR) software on their home computers in their professional, working and recreational activities, they are not very well served in using it to best advantage. Describes the writer's attempts to transfer some of the recorded good practice of the first information managers to contemporary problems. Data input standards devoted to library organisation may be developed to establish a set of principles to encourage the consistent organisation of the entire range of objects which might be represented in databases. Specific areas of difficulty are examined.

Date

24. 1.2007 19:38:22

0.08442586 = product of:
  0.12663879 = sum of:
    0.10405465 = weight(_text_:objects in 2654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10405465 = score(doc=2654,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.25313336 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047625583 = queryNorm
        0.41106653 = fieldWeight in 2654, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2654)
    0.022584131 = product of:
      0.045168262 = sum of:
        0.045168262 = weight(_text_:22 in 2654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.045168262 = score(doc=2654,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16677667 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047625583 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2654, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2654)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Abstract

Faceted Knowledge Representation provides a formalism for implementing knowledge systems. The basic notions of faceted knowledge representation are "unit", "relation", "facet" and "interpretation". Units are atomic elements and can be abstract elements or refer to external objects in an application. Relations are sequences or matrices of 0 and 1's (binary matrices). Facets are relational structures that combine units and relations. Each facet represents an aspect or viewpoint of a knowledge system. Interpretations are mappings that can be used to translate between different representations. This paper introduces the basic notions of faceted knowledge representation. The formalism is applied here to an abstract modeling of a faceted thesaurus as used in information retrieval.

Date

22. 1.2016 17:30:31

0.08332442 = product of:
  0.24997325 = sum of:
    0.24997325 = product of:
      0.4999465 = sum of:
        0.4999465 = weight(_text_:fusion in 2171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.4999465 = score(doc=2171,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.35273543 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.406428 = idf(docFreq=72, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047625583 = queryNorm
            1.4173414 = fieldWeight in 2171, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              7.406428 = idf(docFreq=72, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2171)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

Describes Cold Fusion Professional 3.0, a WWW publishing tool which can serve as the key component of a component-oriented approach to providing interactive database access. Outlines the technology, its installation, and its application in the online Maine Library Directory, Maine State University, USA

Object

Cold Fusion

0.08164093 = product of:
  0.24492277 = sum of:
    0.24492277 = product of:
      0.48984554 = sum of:
        0.48984554 = weight(_text_:fusion in 3108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.48984554 = score(doc=3108,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.35273543 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.406428 = idf(docFreq=72, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047625583 = queryNorm
            1.3887053 = fieldWeight in 3108, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              7.406428 = idf(docFreq=72, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3108)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

0.079279736 = product of:
  0.2378392 = sum of:
    0.2378392 = weight(_text_:objects in 6101) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.2378392 = score(doc=6101,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.25313336 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047625583 = queryNorm
        0.9395807 = fieldWeight in 6101, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6101)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)