Search (12 results, page 1 of 1)

0.11929822 = product of:
  0.23859644 = sum of:
    0.23859644 = product of:
      0.47719288 = sum of:
        0.47719288 = weight(_text_:soggettario in 5674) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.47719288 = score(doc=5674,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.4159804 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.652365 = idf(docFreq=20, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048077077 = queryNorm
            1.1471523 = fieldWeight in 5674, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              8.652365 = idf(docFreq=20, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5674)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

The project of the renewal of the Subject Headings for Italian Library Catalogues (Soggettario), financed by the National Central Library in Florence, proposes a pre-coordinated language, both analytic and synthetic, complying with international rules on vocabulary control and structure, based on category analysis of semantic relationships. It envisages a strict distinction between semantic relationships and syntactic ones, and bases its citation order of subject strings on the analysis model for logical relationships. Thanks to its features, the new Soggettario agrees both with the logic of Guidelines for Subject Authority and Reference Entries and of UNIMARC. Authorities, and with FRBR (Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records). The rigorous structure of the thesaurus will facilitate the transfer of controlled terminology to lists or authority files and archives. The Italian National Bibliography (BNI) will have to play a leading role on the control of coherence of semantic access points. It will validate the strings created by other libraries and control their coherence according to the syntax rules envisaged in the new method.

Object

Nuovo Soggettario

0.08435658 = product of:
  0.16871317 = sum of:
    0.16871317 = product of:
      0.33742633 = sum of:
        0.33742633 = weight(_text_:soggettario in 1886) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.33742633 = score(doc=1886,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.4159804 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.652365 = idf(docFreq=20, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048077077 = queryNorm
            0.8111592 = fieldWeight in 1886, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              8.652365 = idf(docFreq=20, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1886)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

This article presents an Italian experience of developing streamlined semantic interoperability between the Italian Thesaurus of Nuovo soggettario and the Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH). This ongoing project must take into consideration the differences between the two indexing tools, while the criteria on which the resulting actions are based are being clarified continually. Reciprocal interoperability, thanks to the Simple Knowledge Organization System format, enables us to create links with English language subject headings. The National Central Library of Florence is studying methods of automatically catching LCSH equivalents and the question of how to take advantage of both Semantic Web outputs and the multilingual dataset of Wikidata.

Object

Nuovo soggettario

0.07168931 = product of:
  0.14337862 = sum of:
    0.14337862 = product of:
      0.28675723 = sum of:
        0.28675723 = weight(_text_:soggettario in 664) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.28675723 = score(doc=664,freq=26.0), product of:
            0.4159804 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.652365 = idf(docFreq=20, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048077077 = queryNorm
            0.68935275 = fieldWeight in 664, product of:
              5.0990195 = tf(freq=26.0), with freq of:
                26.0 = termFreq=26.0
              8.652365 = idf(docFreq=20, maxDocs=44218)
              0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=664)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Footnote

Rez. in: Knowledge organization 34(2007) no.1, S.58-60 (P. Buizza): "This Nuovo soggettario is the first sign of subject indexing renewal in Italy. Italian subject indexing has been based until now on Soggettario per i cataloghi delle biblioteche italiane (Firenze, 1956), a list of preferred terms and see references, with suitable hierarchical subdivisions and cross references, derived from the subject catalogue of the National Library in Florence (BNCF). New headings later used in Bibliografia nazionale italiana (BNI) were added without references, nor indeed with any real maintenance. Systematic instructions on how to combine the terms are lacking: the indexer using this instrument is obliged to infer the order of terms absent from the lists by consulting analogous entries. Italian libraries are suffering from the limits of this subject catalogue: vocabulary is inadequate, obsolete and inconsistent, the syndetic structure incomplete and inaccurate, and the syntax ill-defined, poorly explained and unable to reflect complex subjects. In the nineties, the Subject Indexing Research Group (Gruppo di ricerca sull'indicizzazione per soggetto, GRIS) of the AIB (Italian Library Association) developed the indexing theory and some principles of PRECIS and drew up guidelines based on consistent principles for vocabulary, semantic relationships and subject string construction, the latter according to role syntax (Guida 1997). In overhauling the Soggettario, the National Library in Florence aimed at a comprehensive indexing system. (A report on the method and evolution of the work has been published in Knowledge Organization (Lucarelli 2005), while the feasibility study is available in Italian (Per un nuovo Soggettario 2002). Any usable terms from the old Soggettario will be transferred to the new system, while taking into consideration international norms and interlinguistic compatibility, as well as applications outside the immediate library context. The terms will be accessible via a suitable OPAC operating on the most advanced software.
The guide Nuovo soggettario was presented on February 8' 2007 at a one-day seminar in the Palazzo Vecchio, Florence, in front of some 500 spellbound people. The Nuovo soggettario comes in two parts: the guide in book-form and an accompanying CD-ROM, by way of which a prototype of the thesaurus may be accessed on the Internet. In the former, rules are stated; the latter contains a pdf version of the guide and the first installment of the controlled vocabulary, which is to be further enriched and refined. Syntactic instructions (general application guidelines, as well as special annotations of particular terms) and the compiled subject strings file have yet to be added. The essentials of the new system are: 1) an analytic-synthetic approach, 2) use of terms (units of controlled vocabulary) and subject strings (which represent subjects by combining terms in linear order to form syntactic relationships), instead of main headings and subdivisions, 3) specificity of terms and strings, with a view to the co-extension of subject string and subject matter and 4) a clear distinction between semantic and syntactic relationships, with full control of them both. Basic features of the vocabulary include the uniformity and univocality of terms and thesaural management of a priori (semantic) relationships. Starting from its definition, each term can be categorially analyzed: four macro-categories are represented (agents, action, things, time), for which there are subcategories called facets (e.g., for actions: activities, disciplines, processes), which in turn have sub-facets. Morphological instructions conform to national and international standards, including BS 8723, ANSI/ NISO Z39.19 and the IFLA draft of Guidelines for multilingual thesauri, even for syntactic factorization. Different kinds of semantic relationships are represented thoroughly, and particular attention is paid to poly-hierarchies, which are used only in moderation: both top terms must actually be relevant. Node labels are used to specify the principle of division applied. Instance relationships are also used.
Thesaurus software is based on AgroVoc (http:// www.fao.org/aims/ag_intro.htm) provided by the FAO, but in modified form. Many searching options and contextualization within the full hierarchies are possible, so that the choice of morphology and syntax of terms and strings is made easier by the complete overview of semantic relationships. New controlled terms will be available soon, thanks to the work in progress - there are now 13,000 terms, of which 40 percent are non-preferred. In three months, free Internet access by CD-ROM will cease and a subscription will be needed. The digital version of old Soggettario and the corresponding unstructured lists of headings adopted in 1956-1985 are accessible together with the thesaurus, so that the whole vocabulary, old and new, will be at the fingertips of the indexer, who is forced to work with both tools during this transition period. In the future, it will be possible to integrate the thesaurus into library OPACs. The two parts form a very consistent and detailed resource. The guide is filled with examples; the accurate, clearly-expressed and consistent instructions are further enhanced by good use of fonts and type size, facilitating reading. The thesaurus is simple and quick to use, very rich, albeit only a prototype; see, for instance, a list of DDC numbers and related terms with their category and facet, and then entries, hierarchies and so on, and the capacity of the structure to show organized knowledge. The excellent outcome of a demanding experimentation, the intended guide welcomes in a new era of subject indexing in Italy and is highly recommended. The new method has been designed to be easily teachable to new and experimented indexers.
Now BNI is beginning to use the new language, pointing the way for the adoption of Nuovo soggettario in Italian libraries: a difficult challenge whose success is not assured. To name only one issue: including all fields of study requires particular care in treating terms with different specialized meanings; cooperation of other libraries and institutions is foreseen. At the same time, efforts are being made to assure the system's interoperability outside the library world. It is clear that a great commitment is required. "Too complex a system!" say the naysayers. "Only at the beginning," the proponents reply. The new system goes against the mainstream, compared with the imitation of the easy way offered by search engines - but we know that they must enrich their devices to improve quality, just repeating the work on semantic and syntactic relationships that leads formal expressions to the meanings they are intended to communicate - and also compared with research to create automated devices supporting human work, for the need to simplify cataloguing. Here AI is not involved, but automation is widely used to facilitate and to support the conscious work of indexers guided by rules as clear as possible. The advantage of Nuovo soggettario is its combination of a thesaurus (a much-appreciated tool used across the world) with the equally widespread technique of subject-string construction, which is to say: the rational and predictable combination of the terms used. The appearance of this original, unparalleled working model may well be a great occasion in the international development of indexing, as, on one hand, the Nuovo soggettario uses a recognized tool (the thesaurus) and, on the other, by permitting both pre-coordination and post-coordination, it attempts to overcome the fragmentation of increasingly complex and specialized subjects into isolated, single-term descriptors. This is a serious proposition that merits consideration from both theoretical and practical points of view - and outside Italy, too."

Object

Nuovo Soggettario

0.01302756 = product of:
  0.02605512 = sum of:
    0.02605512 = product of:
      0.05211024 = sum of:
        0.05211024 = weight(_text_:22 in 3734) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05211024 = score(doc=3734,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16835773 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048077077 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3734, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3734)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

Searcher. 3(1995) no.8, S.18-22

0.011399115 = product of:
  0.02279823 = sum of:
    0.02279823 = product of:
      0.04559646 = sum of:
        0.04559646 = weight(_text_:22 in 7238) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04559646 = score(doc=7238,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16835773 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048077077 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 7238, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7238)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

22. 4.1997 20:43:23

0.00977067 = product of:
  0.01954134 = sum of:
    0.01954134 = product of:
      0.03908268 = sum of:
        0.03908268 = weight(_text_:22 in 5920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03908268 = score(doc=5920,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16835773 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048077077 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5920, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5920)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

27. 5.2001 16:22:21

0.00977067 = product of:
  0.01954134 = sum of:
    0.01954134 = product of:
      0.03908268 = sum of:
        0.03908268 = weight(_text_:22 in 131) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03908268 = score(doc=131,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16835773 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048077077 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 131, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=131)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

10. 9.2000 17:38:22

0.00977067 = product of:
  0.01954134 = sum of:
    0.01954134 = product of:
      0.03908268 = sum of:
        0.03908268 = weight(_text_:22 in 3728) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03908268 = score(doc=3728,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16835773 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048077077 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3728, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3728)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

Wissensspeicher in digitalen Räumen: Nachhaltigkeit - Verfügbarkeit - semantische Interoperabilität. Proceedings der 11. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Konstanz, 20. bis 22. Februar 2008. Hrsg.: J. Sieglerschmidt u. H.P.Ohly

0.00977067 = product of:
  0.01954134 = sum of:
    0.01954134 = product of:
      0.03908268 = sum of:
        0.03908268 = weight(_text_:22 in 3837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03908268 = score(doc=3837,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16835773 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048077077 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3837, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3837)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

27. 8.2011 14:22:13

0.008142225 = product of:
  0.01628445 = sum of:
    0.01628445 = product of:
      0.0325689 = sum of:
        0.0325689 = weight(_text_:22 in 2337) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0325689 = score(doc=2337,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16835773 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048077077 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2337, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2337)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

22. 9.1997 19:16:05

0.008142225 = product of:
  0.01628445 = sum of:
    0.01628445 = product of:
      0.0325689 = sum of:
        0.0325689 = weight(_text_:22 in 374) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0325689 = score(doc=374,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16835773 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048077077 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 374, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=374)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

24. 9.2021 12:22:02

0.008060392 = product of:
  0.016120784 = sum of:
    0.016120784 = product of:
      0.032241568 = sum of:
        0.032241568 = weight(_text_:22 in 4360) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032241568 = score(doc=4360,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.16835773 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048077077 = queryNorm
            0.19150631 = fieldWeight in 4360, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=4360)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

15. 7.2018 16:22:16

Footnote

Rez. in: Mitteilungen VÖB 48(1995) H.1, S.66-68 (K. Niedermair) - Vgl. auch Lepsky, K. in: Bibliotheksdienst 29(1995) H.3, S.500-519; Bibliothek: Forschung u. Praxis 19(1995) H.2, S.251-254 (G. Hartwieg; auch in: LDV-Forum Bd. 12, Nr. 2, Jg. 1995, S.22-29 [unter: http://www.jlcl.org/1995_Heft2/Rezensionen_19-27.pdf]) .