Search (694 results, page 1 of 35)

0.0812065 = product of:
  0.162413 = sum of:
    0.162413 = product of:
      0.48723897 = sum of:
        0.48723897 = weight(_text_:3a in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.48723897 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.43347272 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051129058 = queryNorm
            1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Content

Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fcreativechoice.org%2Fdoc%2FHansJonas.pdf&usg=AOvVaw1TM3teaYKgABL5H9yoIifA&opi=89978449.

0.06767209 = product of:
  0.13534418 = sum of:
    0.13534418 = product of:
      0.4060325 = sum of:
        0.4060325 = weight(_text_:3a in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.4060325 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.43347272 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051129058 = queryNorm
            0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=5&ved=0CDQQFjAE&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F3131107&ei=HzFWVYvGMsiNsgGTyoFI&usg=AFQjCNE2FHUeR9oQTQlNC4TPedv4Mo3DaQ&sig2=Rlzpr7a3BLZZkqZCXXN_IA&bvm=bv.93564037,d.bGg&cad=rja

0.05340803 = product of:
  0.10681606 = sum of:
    0.10681606 = sum of:
      0.079106934 = weight(_text_:librarian in 1424) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.079106934 = score(doc=1424,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.25439066 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.9754615 = idf(docFreq=829, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051129058 = queryNorm
          0.31096634 = fieldWeight in 1424, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            4.9754615 = idf(docFreq=829, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1424)
      0.027709125 = weight(_text_:22 in 1424) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.027709125 = score(doc=1424,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17904525 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051129058 = queryNorm
          0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1424, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1424)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Some scholars argue that certain classificatory structures possess inherent social-semantic values and that the desirability (or lack thereof) of these values should form a basis for evaluating the classificatory goodness of such structures. Others hold that it is possible to distinguish between the structural properties of a given classificatory structure and the semantic content (and values) of the classification in which it is used, and that the classificatory goodness of a given structural form is best evaluated by its capacity to support effectively the organization of re-sources in a given context. This paper illustrates the second, "functionalist" position by means of a historical case study examining the contrasting evaluations of a single structural form - namely, the flat (a)hierarchical structure known as constitutive classification - by two early pioneers of knowledge organization, Julius Otto Kaiser and James Duff Brown. Both men knew of the use of constitutive classification for the organization of documents and were aware of its affordances, yet formed highly different opinions of it: Kaiser, a special librarian who sought to classify documents by documentary form in business offices and business libraries, endorsed it, whil Brown, a public librarian concerned with subject-based classification of books, rejected it. In both cases, it was the functional capacity (or lack thereof) of constitutive classification to enable an adequate classification of documents with respect to a given semantic content and in a certain context that determined the evaluation of its structural form. This example suggests that structural form is analytically separable from semantic context and social context and that it is its functional alignment with the latter, rather than any supposedly inherent socio-semantic values, that has, in the past, served as a norm for evaluating the goodness of classificatory structures.

Source

Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik

0.052278858 = product of:
  0.104557715 = sum of:
    0.104557715 = sum of:
      0.06992131 = weight(_text_:librarian in 3692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.06992131 = score(doc=3692,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.25439066 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.9754615 = idf(docFreq=829, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051129058 = queryNorm
          0.274858 = fieldWeight in 3692, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.9754615 = idf(docFreq=829, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3692)
      0.034636408 = weight(_text_:22 in 3692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.034636408 = score(doc=3692,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17904525 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051129058 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3692, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3692)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

The death of Brian Vickery sees a great era of classification research coming towards an end. Born in Australia, he completed his schooling in England, before going up to Brasenose to read Chemistry just before the outbreak of the Second World War. Brian was never in the services, but after Oxford he worked as a chemist in the Royal Ordnance Factory from 1941-45. After the War he became a librarian at Imperial Chemical Industries (ICI). He was a delegate at the Royal Society Scientific Information Conference held in 1948. One of the offshoots of that conference was the formation of a small committee of scientists under the leadership of Professor J.D. Bernal, to make a study of library classification. After two years of discussions, they elicited the assistance of Jack Wells, then editor of the British National Bibliography, and Brian. They circularized a group of colleagues and convened a meeting in February 1952 which led to the formation of the Classification Research Group. As is well known, this Group, all practising librarians, were to exert a groundbreaking influence on the organization and retrieval of information.

Date

22. 7.2010 19:32:06

0.052278858 = product of:
  0.104557715 = sum of:
    0.104557715 = sum of:
      0.06992131 = weight(_text_:librarian in 5491) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.06992131 = score(doc=5491,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.25439066 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.9754615 = idf(docFreq=829, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051129058 = queryNorm
          0.274858 = fieldWeight in 5491, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.9754615 = idf(docFreq=829, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5491)
      0.034636408 = weight(_text_:22 in 5491) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.034636408 = score(doc=5491,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17904525 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051129058 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5491, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5491)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

RDS are usually cross-disciplinary, centralised services, which are increasingly provided at a university by the academic library and in collaboration with other RDM stakeholders, such as the Research Office. At research-intensive universities, research data is generated in a wide range of disciplines and sub-disciplines. This paper will discuss how providing discipline-specific RDM support is approached by such universities and academic libraries, and the advantages and disadvantages of these central and discipline-specific approaches. A descriptive case study on the author's experiences of collaborating with a central RDS at the University of Cambridge, as a subject librarian embedded in an academic department, is a major component of this paper. The case study describes how centralised RDM services offered by the Office of Scholarly Communication (OSC) have been adapted to meet discipline-specific needs in the Department of Chemistry. It will introduce the department and the OSC, and describe the author's role in delivering RDM training, as well as the Data Champions programme, and their membership of the RDM Project Group. It will describe the outcomes of this collaboration for the Department of Chemistry, and for the centralised service. Centralised and discipline-specific approaches to RDS provision have their own advantages and disadvantages. Supporting the discipline-specific RDM needs of researchers is proving particularly challenging for universities to address sustainably: it requires adequate financial resources and staff skilled (or re-skilled) in RDM. A mixed approach is the most desirable, cost-effective way of providing RDS, but this still has constraints.

Date

7. 9.2019 21:30:22

0.04737046 = product of:
  0.09474092 = sum of:
    0.09474092 = product of:
      0.28422275 = sum of:
        0.28422275 = weight(_text_:3a in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.28422275 = score(doc=5955,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.43347272 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051129058 = queryNorm
            0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Footnote

Rez. in: Philosophisch-ethische Rezensionen vom 09.11.2019 (Jürgen Czogalla), Unter: https://philosophisch-ethische-rezensionen.de/rezension/Goedert1.html. In: B.I.T. online 23(2020) H.3, S.345-347 (W. Sühl-Strohmenger) [Unter: https%3A%2F%2Fwww.b-i-t-online.de%2Fheft%2F2020-03-rezensionen.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0iY3f_zNcvEjeZ6inHVnOK]. In: Open Password Nr. 805 vom 14.08.2020 (H.-C. Hobohm) [Unter: https://www.password-online.de/?mailpoet_router&endpoint=view_in_browser&action=view&data=WzE0MywiOGI3NjZkZmNkZjQ1IiwwLDAsMTMxLDFd].

0.046904642 = product of:
  0.093809284 = sum of:
    0.093809284 = product of:
      0.18761857 = sum of:
        0.18761857 = weight(_text_:librarian in 999) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18761857 = score(doc=999,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.25439066 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.9754615 = idf(docFreq=829, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051129058 = queryNorm
            0.73752147 = fieldWeight in 999, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              4.9754615 = idf(docFreq=829, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=999)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

The purpose of this review is to examine the shaping of librarianship in the academic context through the literature of career specialties, with Abbott's (1988) system of professions providing an analytic framework. The specialties investigated are systems librarian, electronic resource librarian, digital librarian, institutional repository manager, clinical librarian and informationist, digital curator/research data manager, teaching librarian/information literacy educator, and information and knowledge manager. Piecemeal literature based on job advertisements, surveys, and individual case studies is consolidated to offer a novel perspective on the evolution of the profession. The resilience of the profession's core jurisdiction is apparent despite pressures to erode it. Forays into teaching, and more recently into open access and data management, can be understood as responses to such pressure. The attractions but also the risks of embedded roles and overextended claims become apparent when comparing past and prospective specialties.

0.042387545 = product of:
  0.08477509 = sum of:
    0.08477509 = product of:
      0.16955018 = sum of:
        0.16955018 = weight(_text_:librarian in 5156) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16955018 = score(doc=5156,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.25439066 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.9754615 = idf(docFreq=829, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051129058 = queryNorm
            0.6664953 = fieldWeight in 5156, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              4.9754615 = idf(docFreq=829, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5156)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Controlled vocabulary and subject headings in OPAC records have proven to be useful in improving search results. The authors used a survey to gather information about librarian opinions and professional use of controlled vocabulary. Data from a range of backgrounds and expertise were examined, including academic and public libraries, and technical services as well as public services professionals. Responses overall demonstrated positive opinions of the value of controlled vocabulary, including in reference interactions as well as during bibliographic instruction sessions. Results are also examined based upon factors such as age and type of librarian.

0.041952785 = product of:
  0.08390557 = sum of:
    0.08390557 = product of:
      0.16781114 = sum of:
        0.16781114 = weight(_text_:librarian in 5182) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16781114 = score(doc=5182,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.25439066 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.9754615 = idf(docFreq=829, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051129058 = queryNorm
            0.6596592 = fieldWeight in 5182, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              4.9754615 = idf(docFreq=829, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5182)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

This article deals with the figure of Antonio Panizzi, considered as an Italian patriot and English librarian. It highlights the constant attention he devoted to the Italian political events throughout his life: from his arrival in London (1823) as a political exile, to his informal ambassador in United Kingdom, a role that allowed him to lobby the political class and the press on behalf of the cause of Italian patriots forced in the prisons of Kingdom of the Two Sicilies. The article describes the multifaceted library activity carried out by Panizzi at the British Library, of which he became Principal Librarian in 1856. Panizzi is considered to be the first Promethean Librarian of the 19th century, a great reformer with new ideas on library services, innovative methodologies, and working practices in librarianship. Panizzi rigorously carried out the activity of librarian at the British Library without ever forgetting the need for a free, unified, and democratic Italian state.

0.04060325 = product of:
  0.0812065 = sum of:
    0.0812065 = product of:
      0.24361949 = sum of:
        0.24361949 = weight(_text_:3a in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.24361949 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.43347272 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051129058 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Content

Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Faclanthology.org%2FD19-5317.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0ZZFyq5wWTtNTvNkrvjlGA.

0.04060325 = product of:
  0.0812065 = sum of:
    0.0812065 = product of:
      0.24361949 = sum of:
        0.24361949 = weight(_text_:3a in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.24361949 = score(doc=484,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.43347272 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051129058 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Footnote

https%3A%2F%2Fjournals.univie.ac.at%2Findex.php%2Fvoebm%2Farticle%2Fdownload%2F5332%2F5271%2F&usg=AOvVaw2yQdFGHlmOwVls7ANCpTii.

0.03633218 = product of:
  0.07266436 = sum of:
    0.07266436 = product of:
      0.14532872 = sum of:
        0.14532872 = weight(_text_:librarian in 2536) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14532872 = score(doc=2536,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.25439066 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.9754615 = idf(docFreq=829, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051129058 = queryNorm
            0.5712817 = fieldWeight in 2536, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              4.9754615 = idf(docFreq=829, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2536)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Der Begriff »Teaching Librarian« ist im deutschen Bibliothekswesen bislang nicht geläufig - abgesehen von dem neuen Zertifikatskurs an der Fachhochschule Köln, der gerade begonnen hat - jedoch sehr wohl im angloamerikanischen Bibliothekswesen. Dort sind die Aufgaben zum Beispiel in Stellenanzeigen oder auch in Profilbeschreibungen genau definiert. Sie umfassen gegenwärtige Anforderungen wie auch Herausforderungen der weiteren Entwicklung auf dem wissenschaftlichen Informationssektor. In dem Beitrag wird eine Standortbestimmung des »Teaching Librarian « im deutschen wissenschaftlichen Bibliothekswesen unternommen, sodann werden einige zentrale Trends und Herausforderungen, vor allem infolge des digitalen Wandels sowie der Strukturveränderungen in Studium und Wissenschaft, herausgearbeitet, um schließlich Perspektiven dieses für das Bibliothekspersonal neuen Arbeitsbereichs bis zum Jahr 2020 zu entwickeln. Den pädagogisch-didaktischen Qualifikationen kommt dabei ein gleich hoher Rang zu wie den fachlich-bibliothekarischen Kenntnissen und Fähigkeiten in der digitalen Welt.

0.034960654 = product of:
  0.06992131 = sum of:
    0.06992131 = product of:
      0.13984261 = sum of:
        0.13984261 = weight(_text_:librarian in 2507) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13984261 = score(doc=2507,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25439066 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.9754615 = idf(docFreq=829, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051129058 = queryNorm
            0.549716 = fieldWeight in 2507, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.9754615 = idf(docFreq=829, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2507)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

0.034609284 = product of:
  0.06921857 = sum of:
    0.06921857 = product of:
      0.13843714 = sum of:
        0.13843714 = weight(_text_:librarian in 1966) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13843714 = score(doc=1966,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.25439066 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.9754615 = idf(docFreq=829, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051129058 = queryNorm
            0.5441911 = fieldWeight in 1966, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.9754615 = idf(docFreq=829, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1966)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

This article details the results of a 2011 study of cataloger librarians' changing roles and responsibilities at academic Association of Research Libraries. The study participants, cataloging department heads, report that cataloger librarian roles are expanding to include cataloging more electronic resources and local hidden collections in addition to print materials. They are also creating non-MARC metadata. The increased usage of vendor products and services is also affecting the roles of cataloger librarians at some institutions. The article explores what skills cataloger librarians will need in the future and how libraries are providing training for that future.

0.034609284 = product of:
  0.06921857 = sum of:
    0.06921857 = product of:
      0.13843714 = sum of:
        0.13843714 = weight(_text_:librarian in 3998) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13843714 = score(doc=3998,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.25439066 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.9754615 = idf(docFreq=829, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051129058 = queryNorm
            0.5441911 = fieldWeight in 3998, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.9754615 = idf(docFreq=829, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3998)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Der Beitrag stellt das in Zusammenarbeit zwischen Expertinnen und Experten aus Bibliotheken und Hochschulen erarbeitete Qualifikationsprofil "Teaching Librarian" vor und präsentiert die Ergebnisse einer Online-Befragung unter Vertreterinnen und Vertretern der bibliothekarischen Berufspraxis zu der Relevanz der darin aufgeführten Kenntnisse und Fähigkeiten für die verschiedenen bibliothekarischen Qualifikationsstufen. Darauf aufbauend zeigt er Wege auf, diese von der Praxis geforderten Kenntnisse und Fähigkeiten in Studium und Ausbildung praxisbezogen zu vermitteln. Hochschulen und Ausbildungseinrichtungen erhalten dadurch eine Orientierungshilfe für die Weiterentwicklung ihrer Curricula und die Gestaltung ihrer Lehre im Bereich der Vermittlung von Informationskompetenz.

0.034609284 = product of:
  0.06921857 = sum of:
    0.06921857 = product of:
      0.13843714 = sum of:
        0.13843714 = weight(_text_:librarian in 5551) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13843714 = score(doc=5551,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.25439066 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.9754615 = idf(docFreq=829, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051129058 = queryNorm
            0.5441911 = fieldWeight in 5551, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.9754615 = idf(docFreq=829, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5551)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

The German librarian Julius Hanauer, primarily known for his support of decimal classification in the 1920s, was an important link between Germany and the international bibliographic movement and documentation network in the first third of the twentieth century. Working in the early twentieth century at the Institut International de Bibliographie in Brussels, Hanauer had regular contact with members of the documentation community, such as Henri La Fontaine and Paul Otlet, and others outside Belgium, such as Wilhelm Ostwald. Tracing the facets of Hanauer's activities and connections as an information pioneer mirrored the contemporary world of internationalism and documentation.

0.034609284 = product of:
  0.06921857 = sum of:
    0.06921857 = product of:
      0.13843714 = sum of:
        0.13843714 = weight(_text_:librarian in 5836) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13843714 = score(doc=5836,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.25439066 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.9754615 = idf(docFreq=829, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051129058 = queryNorm
            0.5441911 = fieldWeight in 5836, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.9754615 = idf(docFreq=829, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5836)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Der Beitrag beschäftigt sich mit dem neuen Studienschwerpunkt "Data Librarian" im Studiengang "Data and Information Science", der seit dem Wintersemester 2018/19 am Institut für Informationswissenschaft der Technischen Hochschule Köln angeboten wird. Im Rahmen einer gemeinsamen Akkreditierung aller Bachelor-Studiengänge des Instituts entwickelt, bündelt bzw. vermittelt er u. a. umfassende Kenntnisse in den Bereichen Datenstrukturen, Datenverarbeitung, Informationssysteme, Datenanalyse und Information Research in den ersten Semestern. Das sechsmonatige Praxissemester findet in einer wissenschaftlichen Bibliothek oder Informationseinrichtung statt, bevor die Schwerpunkte Forschungsdaten I+II, Wissenschaftskommunikation, Szientometrie und automatische Erschließung vermittelt werden.

0.033836044 = product of:
  0.06767209 = sum of:
    0.06767209 = product of:
      0.20301625 = sum of:
        0.20301625 = weight(_text_:3a in 4997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.20301625 = score(doc=4997,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.43347272 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051129058 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4997, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4997)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Content

PhD Dissertation at International Doctorate School in Information and Communication Technology. Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Fcore.ac.uk%2Fdownload%2Fpdf%2F150083013.pdf&usg=AOvVaw2n-qisNagpyT0lli_6QbAQ.

0.033836044 = product of:
  0.06767209 = sum of:
    0.06767209 = product of:
      0.20301625 = sum of:
        0.20301625 = weight(_text_:3a in 4388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.20301625 = score(doc=4388,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.43347272 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051129058 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4388, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4388)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Footnote

Vgl. unter: https://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=2&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwizweHljdbcAhVS16QKHXcFD9QQFjABegQICRAB&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.researchgate.net%2Fpublication%2F271200105_Die_Autonomie_des_Menschen_und_der_Maschine_-_gegenwartige_Definitionen_von_Autonomie_zwischen_philosophischem_Hintergrund_und_technologischer_Umsetzbarkeit_Redigierte_Version_der_Magisterarbeit_Karls&usg=AOvVaw06orrdJmFF2xbCCp_hL26q.

0.033836044 = product of:
  0.06767209 = sum of:
    0.06767209 = product of:
      0.20301625 = sum of:
        0.20301625 = weight(_text_:3a in 855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.20301625 = score(doc=855,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.43347272 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051129058 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 855, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=855)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Content

Vgl. auch: New automatic interpreter for complex UDC numbers. Unter: <https%3A%2F%2Fudcc.org%2Ffiles%2FAttilaPiros_EC_36-37_2014-2015.pdf&usg=AOvVaw3kc9CwDDCWP7aArpfjrs5b>