Search (58 results, page 1 of 3)

  • × theme_ss:"Wissensrepräsentation"
  1. Pepper, S.; Moore, G.; TopicMaps.Org Authoring Group: XML Topic Maps (XTM) 1.0 : TopicMaps.Org Specification (2001) 0.08 
    0.08084675 = product of:
  0.1616935 = sum of:
    0.1616935 = product of:
      0.323387 = sum of:
        0.323387 = weight(_text_:1.0 in 1623) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.323387 = score(doc=1623,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.32222155 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.5697527 = idf(docFreq=61, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042566985 = queryNorm
            1.0036169 = fieldWeight in 1623, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              7.5697527 = idf(docFreq=61, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1623)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    This specification provides a model and grammar for representing the structure of information resources used to define topics, and the associations (relationships) between topics. Names, resources, and relationships are said to be characteristics of abstract subjects, which are called topics. Topics have their characteristics within scopes: i.e. the limited contexts within which the names and resources are regarded as their name, resource, and relationship characteristics. One or more interrelated documents employing this grammar is called a topic map.TopicMaps.Org is an independent consortium of parties developing the applicability of the topic map paradigm [ISO13250] to the World Wide Web by leveraging the XML family of specifications. This specification describes version 1.0 of XML Topic Maps (XTM) 1.0 [XTM], an abstract model and XML grammar for interchanging Web-based topic maps, written by the members of the TopicMaps.Org Authoring Group. More information on XTM and TopicMaps.Org is available at http://www.topicmaps.org/about.html. All versions of the XTM Specification are permanently licensed to the public, as provided by the Charter of TopicMaps.Org.
    Source
    http://www.topicmaps.org/xtm/1.0/xtm1-20010806.html
  2. RDF Vocabulary Description Language 1.0 : RDF Schema (2004) 0.05 
    0.05389783 = product of:
  0.10779566 = sum of:
    0.10779566 = product of:
      0.21559133 = sum of:
        0.21559133 = weight(_text_:1.0 in 3057) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.21559133 = score(doc=3057,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.32222155 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.5697527 = idf(docFreq=61, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042566985 = queryNorm
            0.66907793 = fieldWeight in 3057, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.5697527 = idf(docFreq=61, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3057)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  3. Sigel, A.: Was leisten Topic Maps? (2001) 0.04 
    0.040423375 = product of:
  0.08084675 = sum of:
    0.08084675 = product of:
      0.1616935 = sum of:
        0.1616935 = weight(_text_:1.0 in 5855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1616935 = score(doc=5855,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.32222155 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.5697527 = idf(docFreq=61, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042566985 = queryNorm
            0.50180846 = fieldWeight in 5855, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.5697527 = idf(docFreq=61, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5855)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Dieser Kurzbeitrag skizziert das Potenzial der Topic Map-Technologie (ISO/IEC 13250 und XTM 1.0) für die Wissensorganisation und veranschaulicht dies anhand einer Liste fruchtbarer Anwendungsfälle (Use Cases). Er berichtet auch knapp über erste Erfahrungen bei der experimentellen Anwendung. Am Beispiel von Informationsressourcen zur Thematik sozialwissenschaftlicher Migration werden Möglichkeiten und Grenzen von Topic Maps für die inhaltliche Erschließung und semantische Suche aufgezeigt werden. Da es sich um eine terminologisch "weiche" Donnerte handelt, ist von besonderem Interesse, wie sich komplexe Relationen und multiple Indexierungssichten umsetzen lassen und wie sich diese auf das Retrieval-Ergebnis auswirken
  4. Zeng, Q.; Yu, M.; Yu, W.; Xiong, J.; Shi, Y.; Jiang, M.: Faceted hierarchy : a new graph type to organize scientific concepts and a construction method (2019) 0.03 
    0.025352871 = product of:
  0.050705742 = sum of:
    0.050705742 = product of:
      0.20282297 = sum of:
        0.20282297 = weight(_text_:3a in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.20282297 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.36088338 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042566985 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Faclanthology.org%2FD19-5317.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0ZZFyq5wWTtNTvNkrvjlGA.
  5. Fischer, D.H.: Converting a thesaurus to OWL : Notes on the paper "The National Cancer Institute's Thesaurus and Ontology" (2004) 0.02 
    0.023580302 = product of:
  0.047160603 = sum of:
    0.047160603 = product of:
      0.094321206 = sum of:
        0.094321206 = weight(_text_:1.0 in 2362) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.094321206 = score(doc=2362,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.32222155 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.5697527 = idf(docFreq=61, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042566985 = queryNorm
            0.2927216 = fieldWeight in 2362, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.5697527 = idf(docFreq=61, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2362)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The paper analysed here is a kind of position paper. In order to get a better under-standing of the reported work I used the retrieval interface of the thesaurus, the so-called NCI DTS Browser accessible via the Web3, and I perused the cited OWL file4 with numerous "Find" and "Find next" string searches. In addition the file was im-ported into Protégé 2000, Release 2.0, with OWL Plugin 1.0 and Racer Plugin 1.7.14. At the end of the paper's introduction the authors say: "In the following sections, this paper will describe the terminology development process at NCI, and the issues associated with converting a description logic based nomenclature to a semantically rich OWL ontology." While I will not deal with the first part, i.e. the terminology development process at NCI, I do not see the thesaurus as a description logic based nomenclature, or its cur-rent state and conversion already result in a "rich" OWL ontology. What does "rich" mean here? According to my view there is a great quantity of concepts and links but a very poor description logic structure which enables inferences. And what does the fol-lowing really mean, which is said a few lines previously: "Although editors have defined a number of named ontologic relations to support the description-logic based structure of the Thesaurus, additional relation-ships are considered for inclusion as required to support dependent applications."
  6. Stojanovic, N.: Ontology-based Information Retrieval : methods and tools for cooperative query answering (2005) 0.02 
    0.016901914 = product of:
  0.033803828 = sum of:
    0.033803828 = product of:
      0.13521531 = sum of:
        0.13521531 = weight(_text_:3a in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13521531 = score(doc=701,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.36088338 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042566985 = queryNorm
            0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F1627&ei=tAtYUYrBNoHKtQb3l4GYBw&usg=AFQjCNHeaxKkKU3-u54LWxMNYGXaaDLCGw&sig2=8WykXWQoDKjDSdGtAakH2Q&bvm=bv.44442042,d.Yms.
  7. Xiong, C.: Knowledge based text representations for information retrieval (2016) 0.02 
    0.016901914 = product of:
  0.033803828 = sum of:
    0.033803828 = product of:
      0.13521531 = sum of:
        0.13521531 = weight(_text_:3a in 5820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13521531 = score(doc=5820,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.36088338 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042566985 = queryNorm
            0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 5820, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5820)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Language and Information Technologies. Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cs.cmu.edu%2F~cx%2Fpapers%2Fknowledge_based_text_representation.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0SaTSvhWLTh__Uz_HtOtl3.
  8. Schmitz-Esser, W.: Language of general communication and concept compatibility (1996) 0.01 
    0.014418098 = product of:
  0.028836196 = sum of:
    0.028836196 = product of:
      0.057672393 = sum of:
        0.057672393 = weight(_text_:22 in 6089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.057672393 = score(doc=6089,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14906234 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042566985 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 6089, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6089)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Pages
    S.11-22
  9. Drewer, P.; Massion, F; Pulitano, D: Was haben Wissensmodellierung, Wissensstrukturierung, künstliche Intelligenz und Terminologie miteinander zu tun? (2017) 0.01 
    0.014418098 = product of:
  0.028836196 = sum of:
    0.028836196 = product of:
      0.057672393 = sum of:
        0.057672393 = weight(_text_:22 in 5576) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.057672393 = score(doc=5576,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14906234 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042566985 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5576, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5576)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    13.12.2017 14:17:22
  10. Tudhope, D.; Hodge, G.: Terminology registries (2007) 0.01 
    0.014418098 = product of:
  0.028836196 = sum of:
    0.028836196 = product of:
      0.057672393 = sum of:
        0.057672393 = weight(_text_:22 in 539) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.057672393 = score(doc=539,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14906234 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042566985 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 539, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=539)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    26.12.2011 13:22:07
  11. Haller, S.H.M.: Mappingverfahren zur Wissensorganisation (2002) 0.01 
    0.014418098 = product of:
  0.028836196 = sum of:
    0.028836196 = product of:
      0.057672393 = sum of:
        0.057672393 = weight(_text_:22 in 3406) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.057672393 = score(doc=3406,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14906234 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042566985 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3406, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3406)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    30. 5.2010 16:22:35
  12. Nielsen, M.: Neuronale Netze : Alpha Go - Computer lernen Intuition (2018) 0.01 
    0.014418098 = product of:
  0.028836196 = sum of:
    0.028836196 = product of:
      0.057672393 = sum of:
        0.057672393 = weight(_text_:22 in 4523) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.057672393 = score(doc=4523,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14906234 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042566985 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4523, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4523)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Spektrum der Wissenschaft. 2018, H.1, S.22-27
  13. Börner, K.: Atlas of knowledge : anyone can map (2015) 0.01 
    0.012234163 = product of:
  0.024468325 = sum of:
    0.024468325 = product of:
      0.04893665 = sum of:
        0.04893665 = weight(_text_:22 in 3355) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04893665 = score(doc=3355,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.14906234 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042566985 = queryNorm
            0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 3355, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3355)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 1.2017 16:54:03
    22. 1.2017 17:10:56
  14. Synak, M.; Dabrowski, M.; Kruk, S.R.: Semantic Web and ontologies (2009) 0.01 
    0.0115344785 = product of:
  0.023068957 = sum of:
    0.023068957 = product of:
      0.046137914 = sum of:
        0.046137914 = weight(_text_:22 in 3376) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.046137914 = score(doc=3376,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14906234 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042566985 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3376, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3376)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    31. 7.2010 16:58:22
  15. OWL Web Ontology Language Test Cases (2004) 0.01 
    0.0115344785 = product of:
  0.023068957 = sum of:
    0.023068957 = product of:
      0.046137914 = sum of:
        0.046137914 = weight(_text_:22 in 4685) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.046137914 = score(doc=4685,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14906234 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042566985 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4685, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4685)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    14. 8.2011 13:33:22
  16. Giunchiglia, F.; Villafiorita, A.; Walsh, T.: Theories of abstraction (1997) 0.01 
    0.0115344785 = product of:
  0.023068957 = sum of:
    0.023068957 = product of:
      0.046137914 = sum of:
        0.046137914 = weight(_text_:22 in 4476) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.046137914 = score(doc=4476,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14906234 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042566985 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4476, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4476)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    1.10.2018 14:13:22
  17. Hauff-Hartig, S.: Wissensrepräsentation durch RDF: Drei angewandte Forschungsbeispiele : Bitte recht vielfältig: Wie Wissensgraphen, Disco und FaBiO Struktur in Mangas und die Humanities bringen (2021) 0.01 
    0.0115344785 = product of:
  0.023068957 = sum of:
    0.023068957 = product of:
      0.046137914 = sum of:
        0.046137914 = weight(_text_:22 in 318) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.046137914 = score(doc=318,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14906234 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042566985 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 318, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=318)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 5.2021 12:43:05
  18. Priss, U.: Faceted information representation (2000) 0.01 
    0.010092668 = product of:
  0.020185336 = sum of:
    0.020185336 = product of:
      0.040370673 = sum of:
        0.040370673 = weight(_text_:22 in 5095) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040370673 = score(doc=5095,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14906234 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042566985 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5095, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5095)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 1.2016 17:47:06
  19. Knorz, G.; Rein, B.: Semantische Suche in einer Hochschulontologie (2005) 0.01 
    0.010092668 = product of:
  0.020185336 = sum of:
    0.020185336 = product of:
      0.040370673 = sum of:
        0.040370673 = weight(_text_:22 in 1852) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040370673 = score(doc=1852,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14906234 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042566985 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1852, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1852)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    11. 2.2011 18:22:58
  20. Deokattey, S.; Neelameghan, A.; Kumar, V.: ¬A method for developing a domain ontology : a case study for a multidisciplinary subject (2010) 0.01 
    0.010092668 = product of:
  0.020185336 = sum of:
    0.020185336 = product of:
      0.040370673 = sum of:
        0.040370673 = weight(_text_:22 in 3694) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040370673 = score(doc=3694,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14906234 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042566985 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3694, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3694)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 7.2010 19:41:16

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 46
  • d 12

Types

  • a 41
  • el 16
  • x 5
  • m 2
  • n 2
  • r 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications