Search (1313 results, page 1 of 66)

  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Schneider, R.: Bibliothek 1.0, 2.0 oder 3.0? (2008) 0.15
    0.15357567 = product of:
      0.30715135 = sum of:
        0.30715135 = sum of:
          0.26678067 = weight(_text_:1.0 in 6122) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.26678067 = score(doc=6122,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.32222155 = queryWeight, product of:
                7.5697527 = idf(docFreq=61, maxDocs=44218)
                0.042566985 = queryNorm
              0.8279417 = fieldWeight in 6122, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                7.5697527 = idf(docFreq=61, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6122)
          0.040370673 = weight(_text_:22 in 6122) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.040370673 = score(doc=6122,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.14906234 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.042566985 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 6122, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6122)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Noch ist nicht entschieden mit welcher Vehemenz das sogenannte Web 2.0 die Bibliotheken verändern wird. Allerdings wird hier und da bereits mit Bezugnahme auf das sogenannte Semantic Web von einer dritten und mancherorts von einer vierten Generation des Web gesprochen. Der Vortrag hinterfragt kritisch, welche Konzepte sich hinter diesen Bezeichnungen verbergen und geht der Frage nach, welche Herausforderungen eine Übernahme dieser Konzepte für die Bibliothekswelt mit sich bringen würde. Vgl. insbes. Folie 22 mit einer Darstellung von der Entwicklung vom Web 1.0 zum Web 4.0
  2. Behme, H.: Stöberei : Endlich fertig: Mozilla 1.0 (2002) 0.12
    0.11669223 = product of:
      0.23338446 = sum of:
        0.23338446 = product of:
          0.46676892 = sum of:
            0.46676892 = weight(_text_:1.0 in 844) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.46676892 = score(doc=844,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.32222155 = queryWeight, product of:
                  7.5697527 = idf(docFreq=61, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042566985 = queryNorm
                1.4485962 = fieldWeight in 844, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  7.5697527 = idf(docFreq=61, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=844)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Kaum war am 5. Juni dieses Jahres die Version 1.0 des Internet-Client Mozilla freigegeben, ließen die Entwickler - ebenfalls im Juni - eine Alpha-Version 1.1 auf testwütige Surfer los. In diesem Heft jedoch ein Blick auf den fertigen 1.0 Browser
  3. Becker, H.-G.; Lemanski, T.; Ziebarth, T.: Web 1.0 - 4.0 : Zwischen Reparaturbetrieb und ferner Vision (2008) 0.11
    0.11450654 = product of:
      0.22901309 = sum of:
        0.22901309 = sum of:
          0.18864241 = weight(_text_:1.0 in 1940) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.18864241 = score(doc=1940,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.32222155 = queryWeight, product of:
                7.5697527 = idf(docFreq=61, maxDocs=44218)
                0.042566985 = queryNorm
              0.5854432 = fieldWeight in 1940, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                7.5697527 = idf(docFreq=61, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1940)
          0.040370673 = weight(_text_:22 in 1940) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.040370673 = score(doc=1940,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.14906234 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.042566985 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1940, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1940)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 6.2008 17:20:09
  4. Tolksdorf, R.: HTML und XML - die Sprachen des Web : Informationen aufbereiten und präsentieren im Internet (2003) 0.09
    0.08775753 = product of:
      0.17551506 = sum of:
        0.17551506 = sum of:
          0.15244609 = weight(_text_:1.0 in 224) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.15244609 = score(doc=224,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.32222155 = queryWeight, product of:
                7.5697527 = idf(docFreq=61, maxDocs=44218)
                0.042566985 = queryNorm
              0.47310954 = fieldWeight in 224, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                7.5697527 = idf(docFreq=61, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=224)
          0.023068957 = weight(_text_:22 in 224) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.023068957 = score(doc=224,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.14906234 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.042566985 = queryNorm
              0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 224, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=224)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 4.2007 12:48:03
    RSWK
    XHTML 1.0
    Subject
    XHTML 1.0
  5. Pepper, S.; Moore, G.; TopicMaps.Org Authoring Group: XML Topic Maps (XTM) 1.0 : TopicMaps.Org Specification (2001) 0.08
    0.08084675 = product of:
      0.1616935 = sum of:
        0.1616935 = product of:
          0.323387 = sum of:
            0.323387 = weight(_text_:1.0 in 1623) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.323387 = score(doc=1623,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.32222155 = queryWeight, product of:
                  7.5697527 = idf(docFreq=61, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042566985 = queryNorm
                1.0036169 = fieldWeight in 1623, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  7.5697527 = idf(docFreq=61, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1623)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This specification provides a model and grammar for representing the structure of information resources used to define topics, and the associations (relationships) between topics. Names, resources, and relationships are said to be characteristics of abstract subjects, which are called topics. Topics have their characteristics within scopes: i.e. the limited contexts within which the names and resources are regarded as their name, resource, and relationship characteristics. One or more interrelated documents employing this grammar is called a topic map.TopicMaps.Org is an independent consortium of parties developing the applicability of the topic map paradigm [ISO13250] to the World Wide Web by leveraging the XML family of specifications. This specification describes version 1.0 of XML Topic Maps (XTM) 1.0 [XTM], an abstract model and XML grammar for interchanging Web-based topic maps, written by the members of the TopicMaps.Org Authoring Group. More information on XTM and TopicMaps.Org is available at http://www.topicmaps.org/about.html. All versions of the XTM Specification are permanently licensed to the public, as provided by the Charter of TopicMaps.Org.
    Source
    http://www.topicmaps.org/xtm/1.0/xtm1-20010806.html
  6. Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004) 0.07
    0.068007454 = sum of:
      0.050705742 = product of:
        0.20282297 = sum of:
          0.20282297 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.20282297 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.36088338 = queryWeight, product of:
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.042566985 = queryNorm
              0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.017301716 = product of:
        0.03460343 = sum of:
          0.03460343 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03460343 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.14906234 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.042566985 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
    Date
    8. 1.2013 10:22:32
  7. XFML Core - eXchangeable Faceted Metadata Language (2003) 0.07
    0.067372285 = product of:
      0.13474457 = sum of:
        0.13474457 = product of:
          0.26948914 = sum of:
            0.26948914 = weight(_text_:1.0 in 6673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.26948914 = score(doc=6673,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.32222155 = queryWeight, product of:
                  7.5697527 = idf(docFreq=61, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042566985 = queryNorm
                0.8363474 = fieldWeight in 6673, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  7.5697527 = idf(docFreq=61, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6673)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    http://www.xfml.org/spec/1.0.html
  8. Young, J.A.; Hickey, T.B.: WikiD: an OpenURL 1.0 application (2006) 0.07
    0.06669517 = product of:
      0.13339034 = sum of:
        0.13339034 = product of:
          0.26678067 = sum of:
            0.26678067 = weight(_text_:1.0 in 3065) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.26678067 = score(doc=3065,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.32222155 = queryWeight, product of:
                  7.5697527 = idf(docFreq=61, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042566985 = queryNorm
                0.8279417 = fieldWeight in 3065, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  7.5697527 = idf(docFreq=61, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3065)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    OpenURL was originally developed to enable link resolution of citation information in a distributed interoperable way. The initial standard (version 0.1) has been effectively subsumed as an application (named the San Antonio Level 1 profile) of a much more general framework called OpenURL 1.0. We used the framework to create WikiD (Wiki/Data), an application that has little to do with citation link resolvers, but is instead a set of general purpose services for managing arbitrary collections of items. The model for this application is a wiki engine generalized to manage multiple collections of XML records. This article describes WikiD and how it can serve as an example for applications that can be built on the foundation of the OpenURL framework.
  9. Skulschus, M.; Wiederstein, M.: XSLT und XPath (2005) 0.06
    0.057759702 = product of:
      0.115519404 = sum of:
        0.115519404 = product of:
          0.23103881 = sum of:
            0.23103881 = weight(_text_:1.0 in 3665) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.23103881 = score(doc=3665,freq=12.0), product of:
                0.32222155 = queryWeight, product of:
                  7.5697527 = idf(docFreq=61, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042566985 = queryNorm
                0.7170185 = fieldWeight in 3665, product of:
                  3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                    12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                  7.5697527 = idf(docFreq=61, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3665)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Mit XSLT können XML-Dokumente in Formate wie HTML oder Text transformiert werden. Das Buch zeigt, wie Sie die Technik nutzen, um XML-Daten flexibel einzusetzen. Die Syntax und die praktische Arbeit mit XSLT und der Basistechnik für Transformationen, XPath, werden von den Autoren verständlich vorgestellt. Es wird gezeigt, wie Stylesheets erzeugt werden und XPath zur Adressierung benutzt wird. Dabei wird neben XPath 1.0 auch die neue Version 2.0 samt der Änderungen ausführlich beschrieben. Die Autoren gehen auf die unterschiedlichen Anforderungen ein, die bestimmte Ein- und Ausgabeformate mit sich bringen, darunter HTML, Text, CSS und XML. Das Buch wird mit einer XSLT-Referenz abgerundet, die die möglichen Elemente auflistet und ihre Funktion und Syntax kompakt erklärt. Zahlreiche Tipps, Hinweise und Beispiele lockern das Werk auf und helfen, die neu erlernten Kenntnisse schnell praktisch umzusetzen und dabei typische Einsteigerfehler zu vermeiden.
    XSLT (eXtensible Stylesheet Language forTransformations) ist eine W3C-Syntax, die speziell für die Transformation von XML-Dokumenten geschaffen wurde. In diesem Buch werden die Versionen 1.0 und 2.0 behandelt. Mit XSLT können XML-Dokumente in Formate wie HTML, Text und andere XML-Formate transformiert werden. Diese Technologie lässt sich in (fast) allen Programmiersprachen und in vielen Datenbanken für die XMLVerarbeitung nutzen und stellt die beste Möglichkeit dar, aus mehreren Anwendungen heraus die gleiche Transformation aufzurufen. Dieses Buch stellt Ihnen die Syntax vor und erläutert Ihnen umfassend die Arbeitsweise mit XSLT und XPath 1.0 und 2.0. Nach einer Einführung in die Grundkonzepte gehen die Autoren direkt detailliert auf das Arbeiten mit Vorlagen und XPath ein. Im Folgenden werden alle Techniken ausführlich behandelt, die Sie für professionelle XML-Transformationen brauchen: Kontrollstrukturen, Parameter und Variablen, Sortieren und Gruppieren und Sonderarbeiten für verschiedene Ein-und Ausgabeformate. Zahlreiche Beispiele ermöglichen es Ihnen, die vorgestellten Techniken sofort nachzuvollziehen und anhand des im Internet verfügbaren Quellcodes selber zu bearbeiten. Zusätzlich werden alle neuen Techniken in Schema-Zeichnungen umgesetzt. Neben XSLT stellt dieses Werk auch die zweite Basistechnologie für Transformationen dar: XPath in der neuen Version 2.0. Mit dieserTechnik hat man die Möglichkeit, XML-Strukturen zu lokalisieren und auszuwählen. Beide Technologien gehören eng zusammen. Aus dem Inhalt: - Definition und Aufruf von Vorlagen, Vorlagen-Typen und -Alternativen - XPath: Adressierung, Lokalisierung, Filtern - Algorithmen: Kontrollstrukturen in XSLT und XPath - Auslagerung und Wiederverwendung mit globalen Parametern und eingebetteten Dateien - Einsatz von Parametern und Variablen - Sortieren, Nummerieren und Gruppieren - Unterschiedliche Algorithmen für unterschiedliche Daten-Modellierungen
    Content
    Das Buch wird ergänzt um 2 weitere Titel: Der zweite Band stellt die Syntax von XSL-FO 1.0 bzw. XSL 1.0 mit dem Titel Extensible Stylesheet Language (XSL), Version 1.0, W3C Recommendation 15 October 2001 unter http: //www. w3.org/TR/xs1/ dar. Sie lernen in diesem Band, wie Druckerzeugnisse wie z.B. PDF-Dateien aus XML-Daten erzeugt werden. Dies erfordert einen eigenen Standard mit einer Vielzahl an unterschiedlichen Elementen, um Seitenbereiche, Seitenverläufe, Text- und Absatzformate sowie zusätzliche Dokumenteigenschaften anzugeben wie Inhaltsverzeichnisse. Der dritte Band stellt keine besondere Syntax dar, sondern kombiniert die einzelnen vorgestellten Standards mit allgemeinen Techniken, die nur die Transformation betreffen, mit Ideen, wie XSLT-Anwendungen aufgebaut werden können, und solchen Techniken wie die Verwendung einer Datenbank, um XML- und sogar XSLT Daten abzuspeichern und dynamisch für Transformationsabläufe zusammenzusetzen.
  10. Kramer, A.: Such, Programm! : Elf kostenlose Desktop-Tools schnüffeln um die Wette (2005) 0.05
    0.05389783 = product of:
      0.10779566 = sum of:
        0.10779566 = product of:
          0.21559133 = sum of:
            0.21559133 = weight(_text_:1.0 in 4560) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.21559133 = score(doc=4560,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.32222155 = queryWeight, product of:
                  7.5697527 = idf(docFreq=61, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042566985 = queryNorm
                0.66907793 = fieldWeight in 4560, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  7.5697527 = idf(docFreq=61, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4560)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Object
    Hotbot Desktop 1.0
  11. RDF Vocabulary Description Language 1.0 : RDF Schema (2004) 0.05
    0.05389783 = product of:
      0.10779566 = sum of:
        0.10779566 = product of:
          0.21559133 = sum of:
            0.21559133 = weight(_text_:1.0 in 3057) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.21559133 = score(doc=3057,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.32222155 = queryWeight, product of:
                  7.5697527 = idf(docFreq=61, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042566985 = queryNorm
                0.66907793 = fieldWeight in 3057, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  7.5697527 = idf(docFreq=61, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3057)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  12. Sommer, D.; Schöning-Walter, C.; Heiligenhaus, K.: URN Granular : persistente Identifizierung und Adressierung von Einzelseiten digitalisierter Drucke (2008) 0.05
    0.05389783 = product of:
      0.10779566 = sum of:
        0.10779566 = product of:
          0.21559133 = sum of:
            0.21559133 = weight(_text_:1.0 in 3929) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.21559133 = score(doc=3929,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.32222155 = queryWeight, product of:
                  7.5697527 = idf(docFreq=61, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042566985 = queryNorm
                0.66907793 = fieldWeight in 3929, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  7.5697527 = idf(docFreq=61, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3929)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Aufschlussreich kann womöglich auch der Abschlussbericht aus dem IANUS-Projekt bezüglich "Persistent Identifiers" sein. In diesem Bericht wird u.a. auf die Problematik der "Datenansammlung" eingegangen, die entstehen kann bei der Vergabe zuvieler einzelner URNs (siehe S. 10, S. 42 ff.). Martina Trognitz: Abschlussbericht Testbed "Persistent Identifiers". [Version 1.0] Hrsg. IANUS. 2013 http://www.ianus-fdz.de/projects/ergebnisse/wiki (direkter Link: http://www.ianus-fdz.de/attachments/download/560/Testbed-Persistent%20Identifiers.pdf)
  13. Horridge, M.; Knublauch, H.; Rector, A.; Stevens, R.; Wroe, C.: ¬A practical guide to building OWL ontologies using the Protégé-OWL plugin and CO-ODE Tools (2004) 0.05
    0.047160603 = product of:
      0.094321206 = sum of:
        0.094321206 = product of:
          0.18864241 = sum of:
            0.18864241 = weight(_text_:1.0 in 2057) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.18864241 = score(doc=2057,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.32222155 = queryWeight, product of:
                  7.5697527 = idf(docFreq=61, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042566985 = queryNorm
                0.5854432 = fieldWeight in 2057, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  7.5697527 = idf(docFreq=61, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2057)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Issue
    Edition 1.0.
  14. Sigel, A.: Was leisten Topic Maps? (2001) 0.04
    0.040423375 = product of:
      0.08084675 = sum of:
        0.08084675 = product of:
          0.1616935 = sum of:
            0.1616935 = weight(_text_:1.0 in 5855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.1616935 = score(doc=5855,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.32222155 = queryWeight, product of:
                  7.5697527 = idf(docFreq=61, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042566985 = queryNorm
                0.50180846 = fieldWeight in 5855, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  7.5697527 = idf(docFreq=61, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5855)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Dieser Kurzbeitrag skizziert das Potenzial der Topic Map-Technologie (ISO/IEC 13250 und XTM 1.0) für die Wissensorganisation und veranschaulicht dies anhand einer Liste fruchtbarer Anwendungsfälle (Use Cases). Er berichtet auch knapp über erste Erfahrungen bei der experimentellen Anwendung. Am Beispiel von Informationsressourcen zur Thematik sozialwissenschaftlicher Migration werden Möglichkeiten und Grenzen von Topic Maps für die inhaltliche Erschließung und semantische Suche aufgezeigt werden. Da es sich um eine terminologisch "weiche" Donnerte handelt, ist von besonderem Interesse, wie sich komplexe Relationen und multiple Indexierungssichten umsetzen lassen und wie sich diese auf das Retrieval-Ergebnis auswirken
  15. Schrodt, R.: Tiefen und Untiefen im wissenschaftlichen Sprachgebrauch (2008) 0.03
    0.033803828 = product of:
      0.067607656 = sum of:
        0.067607656 = product of:
          0.27043062 = sum of:
            0.27043062 = weight(_text_:3a in 140) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.27043062 = score(doc=140,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.36088338 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042566985 = queryNorm
                0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 140, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=140)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Vgl. auch: https://studylibde.com/doc/13053640/richard-schrodt. Vgl. auch: http%3A%2F%2Fwww.univie.ac.at%2FGermanistik%2Fschrodt%2Fvorlesung%2Fwissenschaftssprache.doc&usg=AOvVaw1lDLDR6NFf1W0-oC9mEUJf.
  16. Widyantoro, D.H.; Ioerger, T.R.; Yen, J.: Learning user Interest dynamics with a three-descriptor representation (2001) 0.03
    0.033686142 = product of:
      0.067372285 = sum of:
        0.067372285 = product of:
          0.13474457 = sum of:
            0.13474457 = weight(_text_:1.0 in 5185) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.13474457 = score(doc=5185,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.32222155 = queryWeight, product of:
                  7.5697527 = idf(docFreq=61, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042566985 = queryNorm
                0.4181737 = fieldWeight in 5185, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  7.5697527 = idf(docFreq=61, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5185)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The use of documents ranked high by user feedback to profile user interests is commonly done with Rocchio's `s algorithm which uses a single list of attribute value pairs called a descriptor to carry term value weights for an individual. Negative feed back on old preferences or positive feedback on new preferences adjusts the descriptor at a fixed, predetermined, and often slow pace. Widyantoro, et alia, suggest a three descriptor model which adds two short term interest descriptors, one each for positive and negative feedback. User short term interest in a particular document is computed by subtracting the similarity measure with the negative descriptor from the similarity measure with the positive descriptor. Using a constant to represent the desired impact of long and short term interests these values may be summed for a single interest value. Using the Reuters 21578 1.0 test collection split into training and test sets, topics with at least 100 documents in a tight cluster were chosen. The TDR handles change well showing better recovery speed and accuracy than the single descriptor model. The nearest neighbor update strategy appears to keep the category concept relatively consistent when multiple TDRs are used.
  17. Thurman, A.C.: Metadata standards for archival control : an introduction to EAD and EAC (2005) 0.03
    0.033686142 = product of:
      0.067372285 = sum of:
        0.067372285 = product of:
          0.13474457 = sum of:
            0.13474457 = weight(_text_:1.0 in 5733) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.13474457 = score(doc=5733,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.32222155 = queryWeight, product of:
                  7.5697527 = idf(docFreq=61, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042566985 = queryNorm
                0.4181737 = fieldWeight in 5733, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  7.5697527 = idf(docFreq=61, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5733)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The goal of cataloging is to provide maximum access to organized information. Archival materials-the unique, unpublished byproducts of the everyday activities of organizations, families, or individuals-are valuable information resources that have been difficult to integrate into the rapidly consolidating bibliographic universe. The formal introduction of Encoded Archival Description (EAD) Version 1.0 in 1998 provided archivists with a powerful tool for overcoming this difficulty. EAD enables the encoding of archival finding aids into records that are platform-independent, machine-readable, and fully searchable, helping to standardize archival descriptive practices while increasing our progress toward union access to archival materials. The related new metadata scheme Encoded Archival Context (EAC) goes further, allowing archivists to encode information about the creators and context of creation of archival materials, and to make that information available to users as an independent resource separate from individual finding aids. This article presents an overview of the role of these metadata standards in the achievement of archival control, featuring a concise guide to the structure and use of EAD (Version 2002) and an introduction to the emerging EAC standard.
  18. RAK-NBM : Interpretationshilfe zu NBM 3b,3 (2000) 0.03
    0.03262443 = product of:
      0.06524886 = sum of:
        0.06524886 = product of:
          0.13049772 = sum of:
            0.13049772 = weight(_text_:22 in 4362) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.13049772 = score(doc=4362,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.14906234 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042566985 = queryNorm
                0.8754574 = fieldWeight in 4362, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4362)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2000 19:22:27
  19. Diederichs, A.: Wissensmanagement ist Macht : Effektiv und kostenbewußt arbeiten im Informationszeitalter (2005) 0.03
    0.03262443 = product of:
      0.06524886 = sum of:
        0.06524886 = product of:
          0.13049772 = sum of:
            0.13049772 = weight(_text_:22 in 3211) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.13049772 = score(doc=3211,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.14906234 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042566985 = queryNorm
                0.8754574 = fieldWeight in 3211, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3211)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 2.2005 9:16:22
  20. Hawking, D.; Robertson, S.: On collection size and retrieval effectiveness (2003) 0.03
    0.03262443 = product of:
      0.06524886 = sum of:
        0.06524886 = product of:
          0.13049772 = sum of:
            0.13049772 = weight(_text_:22 in 4109) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.13049772 = score(doc=4109,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.14906234 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042566985 = queryNorm
                0.8754574 = fieldWeight in 4109, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4109)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    14. 8.2005 14:22:22

Languages

Types

  • a 1096
  • m 146
  • el 68
  • s 50
  • b 26
  • x 13
  • i 8
  • n 3
  • r 2
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications