Search (661 results, page 1 of 34)

  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Verwer, K.: Freiheit und Verantwortung bei Hans Jonas (2011) 0.05 
    0.050705742 = product of:
  0.101411484 = sum of:
    0.101411484 = product of:
      0.40564594 = sum of:
        0.40564594 = weight(_text_:3a in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.40564594 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.36088338 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042566985 = queryNorm
            1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fcreativechoice.org%2Fdoc%2FHansJonas.pdf&usg=AOvVaw1TM3teaYKgABL5H9yoIifA&opi=89978449.
  2. Geiger, J.; Seubert, K.: Qualitätsbewertung von Online-Informationsressourcen (2011) 0.05 
    0.047160603 = product of:
  0.094321206 = sum of:
    0.094321206 = product of:
      0.18864241 = sum of:
        0.18864241 = weight(_text_:1.0 in 4906) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18864241 = score(doc=4906,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.32222155 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.5697527 = idf(docFreq=61, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042566985 = queryNorm
            0.5854432 = fieldWeight in 4906, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.5697527 = idf(docFreq=61, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4906)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Im Studiengang "Information Science & Engineering" der Hochschule Darmstadt untersuchten vier Studenten des vierten Semesters in der Lehrveranstaltung "Qualitätsbewertung von Informationsressourcen", betreut von Prof. Dr. Heide Gloystein, die Qualität von Online-Informationsressourcen anhand von standardisierten Suchanfragen zu einem festgelegten Thema. Die Suchergebnisse werden nach einem vorher definierten Bewertungskatalog untersucht. Die beispielhaft ausgewählten Informationsressourcen teilen sich in folgende Kategorien ein: Internet/Web 1.0, Datenbanken, Web 2.0, sowie Bibliografische Datenbanken/OPAC. Die Fachdatenbanken schneiden hierbei erwartungsgemäß am Besten ab. Weniger professionelle Informationsquellen, wie Web 2.0-Anwendungen sind ungeeignet als fachliche Informationsressource. Das Endergebnis wird zusammengefasst in einer Matrix präsentiert, die die Stärken und Schwächen der einzelnen Ressourcen durch einheitliche Bewertungskriterien vergleichbar machen.
  3. Balster, K.; Rendall, R.; Shrader, T.: Linked serial data : mapping the CONSER standard record to BIBFRAME (2018) 0.05 
    0.047160603 = product of:
  0.094321206 = sum of:
    0.094321206 = product of:
      0.18864241 = sum of:
        0.18864241 = weight(_text_:1.0 in 5174) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18864241 = score(doc=5174,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.32222155 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.5697527 = idf(docFreq=61, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042566985 = queryNorm
            0.5854432 = fieldWeight in 5174, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.5697527 = idf(docFreq=61, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5174)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The CONSER BIBFRAME mapping project began in December 2015, and completed a mapping between the elements of the CONSER Standard Record and BIBFRAME 1.0. Subsequently, the group has converted that mapping to BIBFRAME 2.0, developed sample RDF serializations for each element, and is developing recommendations for PCC best practices. This article summarizes CONSER BIBFRAME mapping outcomes, describes Valerie Bross' contributions to the project, and presents topics for further consideration within the PCC: BIBFRAME development, and serials cataloging communities, including: changes to the description, literal vs. machine actionable data, enumeration and chronology information, modeling issues, and relationships.
  4. Kleineberg, M.: Context analysis and context indexing : formal pragmatics in knowledge organization (2014) 0.04 
    0.042254787 = product of:
  0.084509574 = sum of:
    0.084509574 = product of:
      0.3380383 = sum of:
        0.3380383 = weight(_text_:3a in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.3380383 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.36088338 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042566985 = queryNorm
            0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=5&ved=0CDQQFjAE&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F3131107&ei=HzFWVYvGMsiNsgGTyoFI&usg=AFQjCNE2FHUeR9oQTQlNC4TPedv4Mo3DaQ&sig2=Rlzpr7a3BLZZkqZCXXN_IA&bvm=bv.93564037,d.bGg&cad=rja
  5. Sojka, P.; Lee, M.; Rehurek, R.; Hatlapatka, R.; Kucbel, M.; Bouche, T.; Goutorbe, C.; Anghelache, R.; Wojciechowski, K.: Toolset for entity and semantic associations : Final Release (2013) 0.04 
    0.040423375 = product of:
  0.08084675 = sum of:
    0.08084675 = product of:
      0.1616935 = sum of:
        0.1616935 = weight(_text_:1.0 in 1057) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1616935 = score(doc=1057,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.32222155 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.5697527 = idf(docFreq=61, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042566985 = queryNorm
            0.50180846 = fieldWeight in 1057, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.5697527 = idf(docFreq=61, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1057)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Issue
    Revision: 1.0 as of 8th February 2013.
  6. Peroni, S.; Dutton, A.; Gray, T.; Shotton, D.: Setting our bibliographic references free : towards open citation data (2015) 0.04 
    0.040423375 = product of:
  0.08084675 = sum of:
    0.08084675 = product of:
      0.1616935 = sum of:
        0.1616935 = weight(_text_:1.0 in 1790) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1616935 = score(doc=1790,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.32222155 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.5697527 = idf(docFreq=61, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042566985 = queryNorm
            0.50180846 = fieldWeight in 1790, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.5697527 = idf(docFreq=61, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1790)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Purpose - Citation data needs to be recognised as a part of the Commons - those works that are freely and legally available for sharing - and placed in an open repository. The paper aims to discuss this issue. Design/methodology/approach - The Open Citation Corpus is a new open repository of scholarly citation data, made available under a Creative Commons CC0 1.0 public domain dedication and encoded as Open Linked Data using the SPAR Ontologies. Findings - The Open Citation Corpus presently provides open access (OA) to reference lists from 204,637 articles from the OA Subset of PubMed Central, containing 6,325,178 individual references to 3,373,961 unique papers. Originality/value - Scholars, publishers and institutions may freely build upon, enhance and reuse the open citation data for any purpose, without restriction under copyright or database law.
  7. Ronda-Pupo, G.A.; Katz, J.S.: ¬The scaling relationship between citation-based performance and coauthorship patterns in natural sciences (2017) 0.04 
    0.040423375 = product of:
  0.08084675 = sum of:
    0.08084675 = product of:
      0.1616935 = sum of:
        0.1616935 = weight(_text_:1.0 in 3603) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1616935 = score(doc=3603,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.32222155 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.5697527 = idf(docFreq=61, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042566985 = queryNorm
            0.50180846 = fieldWeight in 3603, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.5697527 = idf(docFreq=61, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3603)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The aim of this paper is to extend our knowledge about the power-law relationship between citation-based performance and coauthorship patterns in papers in the natural sciences. We analyzed 829,924 articles that received 16,490,346 citations. The number of articles published through coauthorship accounts for 89%. The citation-based performance and coauthorship patterns exhibit a power-law correlation with a scaling exponent of 1.20?±?0.07. Citations to a subfield's research articles tended to increase 2.1.20 or 2.30 times each time it doubled the number of coauthored papers. The scaling exponent for the power-law relationship for single-authored papers was 0.85?±?0.11. The citations to a subfield's single-authored research articles increased 2.0.85 or 1.89 times each time the research area doubled the number of single-authored papers. The Matthew Effect is stronger for coauthored papers than for single-authored. In fact, with a scaling exponent <1.0 the impact of single-authored papers exhibits a cumulative disadvantage or inverse Matthew Effect.
  8. Hjoerland, B.: Does the traditional thesaurus have a place in modern information retrieval? (2016) 0.03 
    0.033686142 = product of:
  0.067372285 = sum of:
    0.067372285 = product of:
      0.13474457 = sum of:
        0.13474457 = weight(_text_:1.0 in 2915) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13474457 = score(doc=2915,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.32222155 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.5697527 = idf(docFreq=61, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042566985 = queryNorm
            0.4181737 = fieldWeight in 2915, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.5697527 = idf(docFreq=61, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2915)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The introduction (1.0) of this article considers the status of the thesaurus within LIS and asks about the future prospect for thesauri. The main following points are: (2.0) Any knowledge organization system (KOS) is today threatened by Google-like systems, and it is therefore important to consider if there still is a need for knowledge organization (KO) in the traditional sense. (3.0) A thesaurus is a somewhat reduced form of KOS compared to, for example, an ontology, and its "bundling" and restricted number of semantic relations has never been justified theoretically or empirically. Which semantic relations are most fruitful for a given task is thus an open question, and different domains may need different kinds of KOS including different sets of relations between terms. (4.0) A KOS is a controlled vocabulary (CV) and should not be considered a "perfect language" (Eco 1995) that is simply able to remove the ambiguity of natural language; rather much ambiguity in language represents a battle between many "voices" (Bakhtin 1981) or "paradigms" (Kuhn 1962). In this perspective, a specific KOS, e.g. a specific thesaurus, is just one "voice" among many voices, and that voice has to demonstrate its authority and utility. It is concluded (5.0) that the traditional thesaurus does not have a place in modern information retrieval, but that more flexible semantic tools based on proper studies of domains will always be important.
  9. Fachkollegium der Arbeitsgruppe RNA/RDA derBibliotheken, Archive und Museen in Deutschland, Österreich und der Schweiz: Ressourcenerschließung mit Normdaten in Archiven und Bibliotheken (RNAB) für Personen-, Familien-, Körperschaftsarchive und Sammlungen : Richtlinie und Regeln (2019) 0.03 
    0.033686142 = product of:
  0.067372285 = sum of:
    0.067372285 = product of:
      0.13474457 = sum of:
        0.13474457 = weight(_text_:1.0 in 5259) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13474457 = score(doc=5259,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.32222155 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.5697527 = idf(docFreq=61, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042566985 = queryNorm
            0.4181737 = fieldWeight in 5259, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.5697527 = idf(docFreq=61, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5259)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Issue
    Version 1.0 (Januar 2019).
  10. Nassehi, A.: Muster : Theorie der digitalen Gesellschaft (2019) 0.03 
    0.033347584 = product of:
  0.06669517 = sum of:
    0.06669517 = product of:
      0.13339034 = sum of:
        0.13339034 = weight(_text_:1.0 in 5426) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13339034 = score(doc=5426,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.32222155 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.5697527 = idf(docFreq=61, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042566985 = queryNorm
            0.41397086 = fieldWeight in 5426, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              7.5697527 = idf(docFreq=61, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=5426)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    5 Funktionierende Technik Die Funktion des Technischen - Digitale Technik - Kommunizierende Technik - Die Funktion des Funktionierens - Niedrigschwellige Technik - Dämonisierte Technik - Unsichtbare Technik und der Turing-Test - Das Privileg, Fehler zu machen 6 Lernende Technik Entscheidungen - Abduktive Maschinen? - Verteilte Intelligenz? - Anthropologische und technologische Fragen - Erlebende und handelnde Maschinen - Unvollständigkeit, Vorläufigkeit, systemische Paradoxien - Künstliche, leibliche, unvollständige Intelligenz 7 Das Internet als Massenmedium Sinnüberschussgeschäfte - Synchronisationsfunktion - Synchronisation und Sozialisation - Selektivität, Medialität und Voice im Netz - Beim Zuschauen zuschauen - Komplexität und Überhitzung - Das Netz als Archiv aller möglichen Sätze - Intelligenz im Modus des Futur 2.0 8 Gefährdete Privatheit Die Unwahrscheinlichkeit informationeller Selbstbestimmung - Ein neuer Strukturwandel der Öffentlichkeit? - Gefährdungen - Privatheit 1.0 - Privatheit 1.0 als Ergebnis von Big Data? - Big Data und die Privatheit 2.0 - Privatheit retten? 9 Debug: Die Wiedergeburt der Soziologie aus dem Geist der Digitalisierung Digitale Dynamik und gesellschaftliche Komplexität - Eine Chance für die Soziologie
  11. Gödert, W.; Lepsky, K.: Informationelle Kompetenz : ein humanistischer Entwurf (2019) 0.03 
    0.029578352 = product of:
  0.059156705 = sum of:
    0.059156705 = product of:
      0.23662682 = sum of:
        0.23662682 = weight(_text_:3a in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.23662682 = score(doc=5955,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.36088338 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042566985 = queryNorm
            0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Philosophisch-ethische Rezensionen vom 09.11.2019 (Jürgen Czogalla), Unter: https://philosophisch-ethische-rezensionen.de/rezension/Goedert1.html. In: B.I.T. online 23(2020) H.3, S.345-347 (W. Sühl-Strohmenger) [Unter: https%3A%2F%2Fwww.b-i-t-online.de%2Fheft%2F2020-03-rezensionen.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0iY3f_zNcvEjeZ6inHVnOK]. In: Open Password Nr. 805 vom 14.08.2020 (H.-C. Hobohm) [Unter: https://www.password-online.de/?mailpoet_router&endpoint=view_in_browser&action=view&data=WzE0MywiOGI3NjZkZmNkZjQ1IiwwLDAsMTMxLDFd].
  12. Zeng, Q.; Yu, M.; Yu, W.; Xiong, J.; Shi, Y.; Jiang, M.: Faceted hierarchy : a new graph type to organize scientific concepts and a construction method (2019) 0.03 
    0.025352871 = product of:
  0.050705742 = sum of:
    0.050705742 = product of:
      0.20282297 = sum of:
        0.20282297 = weight(_text_:3a in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.20282297 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.36088338 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042566985 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Faclanthology.org%2FD19-5317.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0ZZFyq5wWTtNTvNkrvjlGA.
  13. Suchenwirth, L.: Sacherschliessung in Zeiten von Corona : neue Herausforderungen und Chancen (2019) 0.03 
    0.025352871 = product of:
  0.050705742 = sum of:
    0.050705742 = product of:
      0.20282297 = sum of:
        0.20282297 = weight(_text_:3a in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.20282297 = score(doc=484,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.36088338 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042566985 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Footnote
    https%3A%2F%2Fjournals.univie.ac.at%2Findex.php%2Fvoebm%2Farticle%2Fdownload%2F5332%2F5271%2F&usg=AOvVaw2yQdFGHlmOwVls7ANCpTii.
  14. Stuart, D.: Web metrics for library and information professionals (2014) 0.02 
    0.023580302 = product of:
  0.047160603 = sum of:
    0.047160603 = product of:
      0.094321206 = sum of:
        0.094321206 = weight(_text_:1.0 in 2274) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.094321206 = score(doc=2274,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.32222155 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.5697527 = idf(docFreq=61, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042566985 = queryNorm
            0.2927216 = fieldWeight in 2274, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.5697527 = idf(docFreq=61, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2274)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    1. Introduction. MetricsIndicators -- Web metrics and Ranganathan's laws of library science -- Web metrics for the library and information professional -- The aim of this book -- The structure of the rest of this book -- 2. Bibliometrics, webometrics and web metrics. Web metrics -- Information science metrics -- Web analytics -- Relational and evaluative metrics -- Evaluative web metrics -- Relational web metrics -- Validating the results -- 3. Data collection tools. The anatomy of a URL, web links and the structure of the web -- Search engines 1.0 -- Web crawlers -- Search engines 2.0 -- Post search engine 2.0: fragmentation -- 4. Evaluating impact on the web. Websites -- Blogs -- Wikis -- Internal metrics -- External metrics -- A systematic approach to content analysis -- 5. Evaluating social media impact. Aspects of social network sites -- Typology of social network sites -- Research and tools for specific sites and services -- Other social network sites -- URL shorteners: web analytic links on any site -- General social media impact -- Sentiment analysis -- 6. Investigating relationships between actors. Social network analysis methods -- Sources for relational network analysis -- 7. Exploring traditional publications in a new environment. More bibliographic items -- Full text analysis -- Greater context -- 8. Web metrics and the web of data. The web of data -- Building the semantic web -- Implications of the web of data for web metrics -- Investigating the web of data today -- SPARQL -- Sindice -- LDSpider: an RDF web crawler -- 9. The future of web metrics and the library and information professional. How far we have come -- The future of web metrics -- The future of the library and information professional and web metrics.
  15. (2013 ff.) 0.02 
    0.023068957 = product of:
  0.046137914 = sum of:
    0.046137914 = product of:
      0.09227583 = sum of:
        0.09227583 = weight(_text_:22 in 2851) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09227583 = score(doc=2851,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14906234 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042566985 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 2851, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2851)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  16. Farazi, M.: Faceted lightweight ontologies : a formalization and some experiments (2010) 0.02 
    0.021127393 = product of:
  0.042254787 = sum of:
    0.042254787 = product of:
      0.16901915 = sum of:
        0.16901915 = weight(_text_:3a in 4997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16901915 = score(doc=4997,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.36088338 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042566985 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4997, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4997)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    PhD Dissertation at International Doctorate School in Information and Communication Technology. Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Fcore.ac.uk%2Fdownload%2Fpdf%2F150083013.pdf&usg=AOvVaw2n-qisNagpyT0lli_6QbAQ.
  17. Shala, E.: ¬Die Autonomie des Menschen und der Maschine : gegenwärtige Definitionen von Autonomie zwischen philosophischem Hintergrund und technologischer Umsetzbarkeit (2014) 0.02 
    0.021127393 = product of:
  0.042254787 = sum of:
    0.042254787 = product of:
      0.16901915 = sum of:
        0.16901915 = weight(_text_:3a in 4388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16901915 = score(doc=4388,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.36088338 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042566985 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4388, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4388)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Footnote
    Vgl. unter: https://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=2&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwizweHljdbcAhVS16QKHXcFD9QQFjABegQICRAB&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.researchgate.net%2Fpublication%2F271200105_Die_Autonomie_des_Menschen_und_der_Maschine_-_gegenwartige_Definitionen_von_Autonomie_zwischen_philosophischem_Hintergrund_und_technologischer_Umsetzbarkeit_Redigierte_Version_der_Magisterarbeit_Karls&usg=AOvVaw06orrdJmFF2xbCCp_hL26q.
  18. Piros, A.: Az ETO-jelzetek automatikus interpretálásának és elemzésének kérdései (2018) 0.02 
    0.021127393 = product of:
  0.042254787 = sum of:
    0.042254787 = product of:
      0.16901915 = sum of:
        0.16901915 = weight(_text_:3a in 855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16901915 = score(doc=855,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.36088338 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042566985 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 855, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=855)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Vgl. auch: New automatic interpreter for complex UDC numbers. Unter: <https%3A%2F%2Fudcc.org%2Ffiles%2FAttilaPiros_EC_36-37_2014-2015.pdf&usg=AOvVaw3kc9CwDDCWP7aArpfjrs5b>
  19. Schöne neue Welt? : Fragen und Antworten: Wie Facebook menschliche Gedanken auslesen will (2017) 0.02 
    0.020390268 = product of:
  0.040780537 = sum of:
    0.040780537 = product of:
      0.08156107 = sum of:
        0.08156107 = weight(_text_:22 in 2810) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08156107 = score(doc=2810,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.14906234 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042566985 = queryNorm
            0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 2810, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2810)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 7.2004 9:42:33
    22. 4.2017 11:58:05
  20. Wolchover, N.: Wie ein Aufsehen erregender Beweis kaum Beachtung fand (2017) 0.02 
    0.020390268 = product of:
  0.040780537 = sum of:
    0.040780537 = product of:
      0.08156107 = sum of:
        0.08156107 = weight(_text_:22 in 3582) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08156107 = score(doc=3582,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.14906234 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042566985 = queryNorm
            0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3582, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3582)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 4.2017 10:42:05
    22. 4.2017 10:48:38

Authors

Languages

  • e 472
  • d 181
  • a 1
  • hu 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 571
  • el 61
  • m 46
  • s 15
  • x 12
  • r 7
  • b 5
  • i 1
  • n 1
  • z 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications