Search (3738 results, page 1 of 187)

  1. Knauth, M.: Bibliographies made easy : a look at PRO-CITE (1989) 0.21 
    0.21338263 = product of:
  0.53345656 = sum of:
    0.47971192 = weight(_text_:cite in 2830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.47971192 = score(doc=2830,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.34691685 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.996407 = idf(docFreq=109, maxDocs=44218)
          0.049585003 = queryNorm
        1.3827864 = fieldWeight in 2830, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          6.996407 = idf(docFreq=109, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2830)
    0.05374467 = weight(_text_:22 in 2830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05374467 = score(doc=2830,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17363824 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.049585003 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2830, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2830)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    The PRO-CITE and BIBLIO-LINK software packages make the process of compiling bibliographies and internal data bases much easier than when all the steps in the process were manual (compiling, typing). The 2 programs work on records that have been downloaded from on-line data bases. BIBLIO-LINK analyses the downloaded records to determine document type and stores the data in the appropriate PRO-CITE workform, putting fields from the downloaded record into the correct PRO-CITE fields.
    Object
    PRO-CITE
    Source
    Computers in libraries. 9(1989) no.4, S.22-24
  2. Bellarby, L.: ¬A comparison of two personal bibliographic software packages : EndNote and Pro-Cite (1993) 0.19 
    0.19312482 = product of:
  0.48281205 = sum of:
    0.42906737 = weight(_text_:cite in 561) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.42906737 = score(doc=561,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.34691685 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.996407 = idf(docFreq=109, maxDocs=44218)
          0.049585003 = queryNorm
        1.2368017 = fieldWeight in 561, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          6.996407 = idf(docFreq=109, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=561)
    0.05374467 = weight(_text_:22 in 561) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05374467 = score(doc=561,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17363824 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.049585003 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 561, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=561)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    Presents a summary of a more detailed study made of evaluation versions of these 2 US software packages, due to appear in 'C and L applications'. The packages are aimed at individual researchers, students and lecturers rather than libraries. Concludes that the cheaper package, EndNote, appears better suited to the students with occasional need for bibliographies, whereas the more complex (and expensive) Pro-Cite would suit a researcher or writer with a high output of professional papers. Pro-Cite could probably also be used by a small library as a means of creating a database
    Object
    Pro-Cite
    Source
    Law librarian. 24(1993) no.1, S.22-23
  3. Cramer, M.D.; Markland, M.J.: Newspaper indexing with Pro-Cite (1989) 0.17 
    0.17013118 = product of:
  0.42532793 = sum of:
    0.37158325 = weight(_text_:cite in 2855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.37158325 = score(doc=2855,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.34691685 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.996407 = idf(docFreq=109, maxDocs=44218)
          0.049585003 = queryNorm
        1.0711018 = fieldWeight in 2855, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          6.996407 = idf(docFreq=109, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2855)
    0.05374467 = weight(_text_:22 in 2855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05374467 = score(doc=2855,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17363824 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.049585003 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2855, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2855)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    The university libraries at Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University began an innovative indexing method in 1985 with the objectives of stronger and easier subject access to local newspapers and the creation of an index which could store information compactly and economically. Discusses the decision to use Pro-Cite software and describes the creation of 10 area data base files. Outlines 2 areas of difficulty: documentation and terminology.
    Aid
    Pro-Cite
    Date
    30.11.1995 17:22:01
  4. Wurangian, N.: Using the OCLC Cataloging Micro Enhancer to produce a bibliography list (1993) 0.14 
    0.14285645 = product of:
  0.3571411 = sum of:
    0.30339643 = weight(_text_:cite in 5055) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.30339643 = score(doc=5055,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.34691685 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.996407 = idf(docFreq=109, maxDocs=44218)
          0.049585003 = queryNorm
        0.8745509 = fieldWeight in 5055, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          6.996407 = idf(docFreq=109, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5055)
    0.05374467 = weight(_text_:22 in 5055) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05374467 = score(doc=5055,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17363824 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.049585003 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5055, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5055)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    Describes the work of the E. Del Webb Memorial Library, Loma Linda Univ., in using the OCLC Cataloging Micro Enhancer and Pro-Cite software to produce a bibliography listing the latest books added to the library collection. Describes the use of the macro facility of WordPerfect for Windows to process records downloaded using the recent PRISM version of the OCLC Cataloging Micro Enhancer
    Object
    Pro-Cite
    Source
    OCLC systems and services. 9(1993) no.1, S.22-24
  5. Doszkocs, T.E.: CITE NLM: Natural language searching in an online catalog (1983) 0.12 
    0.12135857 = product of:
  0.60679287 = sum of:
    0.60679287 = weight(_text_:cite in 784) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.60679287 = score(doc=784,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.34691685 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.996407 = idf(docFreq=109, maxDocs=44218)
          0.049585003 = queryNorm
        1.7491018 = fieldWeight in 784, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          6.996407 = idf(docFreq=109, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=784)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Object
    CITE
  6. Stigleman, S.: Pro-Cite 2.0 : steady evolution (1992) 0.12 
    0.12135857 = product of:
  0.60679287 = sum of:
    0.60679287 = weight(_text_:cite in 5035) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.60679287 = score(doc=5035,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.34691685 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.996407 = idf(docFreq=109, maxDocs=44218)
          0.049585003 = queryNorm
        1.7491018 = fieldWeight in 5035, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          6.996407 = idf(docFreq=109, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5035)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Object
    Pro-Cite
  7. Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004) 0.11 
    0.11062836 = product of:
  0.2765709 = sum of:
    0.23626238 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.23626238 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.4203822 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.049585003 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
    0.0403085 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0403085 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17363824 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.049585003 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Content
    Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
    Date
    8. 1.2013 10:22:32
  8. Delozier, E.P.: Bibliography management with Pro-Cite version 2.0 (1993) 0.11 
    0.10726684 = product of:
  0.5363342 = sum of:
    0.5363342 = weight(_text_:cite in 6502) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.5363342 = score(doc=6502,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.34691685 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.996407 = idf(docFreq=109, maxDocs=44218)
          0.049585003 = queryNorm
        1.5460021 = fieldWeight in 6502, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          6.996407 = idf(docFreq=109, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6502)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Reviews Pro-Cite, a database management system specifically designed to manage bibliographic references. Pro-Cite provides a wide range of data manipulation capabilities. These include: creating, editing and deleting database records; querying for specific records; organizing databases; and printing selected records to a variety of devices
    Object
    Pro-Cite
  9. Ho, B.: Using PASSPORT, Biblio-Links OCLC and Pro-Cite to create a bibliography (1992) 0.11 
    0.10618875 = product of:
  0.53094375 = sum of:
    0.53094375 = weight(_text_:cite in 5036) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.53094375 = score(doc=5036,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.34691685 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.996407 = idf(docFreq=109, maxDocs=44218)
          0.049585003 = queryNorm
        1.530464 = fieldWeight in 5036, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          6.996407 = idf(docFreq=109, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5036)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Object
    Pro-Cite
  10. Zhang, Y.: ¬The impact of Internet-based electronic resources on formal scholarly communication in the area of library and information science : a citation analysis (1998) 0.09 
    0.09485073 = product of:
  0.23712681 = sum of:
    0.18962279 = weight(_text_:cite in 2808) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.18962279 = score(doc=2808,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.34691685 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.996407 = idf(docFreq=109, maxDocs=44218)
          0.049585003 = queryNorm
        0.5465943 = fieldWeight in 2808, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          6.996407 = idf(docFreq=109, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2808)
    0.047504023 = weight(_text_:22 in 2808) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.047504023 = score(doc=2808,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.17363824 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.049585003 = queryNorm
        0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2808, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2808)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    Internet based electronic resources are growing dramatically but there have been no empirical studies evaluating the impact of e-sources, as a whole, on formal scholarly communication. reports results of an investigation into how much e-sources have been used in formal scholarly communication, using a case study in the area of Library and Information Science (LIS) during the period 1994 to 1996. 4 citation based indicators were used in the study of the impact measurement. Concludes that, compared with the impact of print sources, the impact of e-sources on formal scholarly communication in LIS is small, as measured by e-sources cited, and does not increase significantly by year even though there is observable growth of these impact across the years. It is found that periodical format is related to the rate of citing e-sources, articles are more likely to cite e-sources than are print priodical articles. However, once authors cite electronic resource, there is no significant difference in the number of references per article by periodical format or by year. Suggests that, at this stage, citing e-sources may depend on authors rather than the periodical format in which authors choose to publish
    Date
    30. 1.1999 17:22:22
  11. Verwer, K.: Freiheit und Verantwortung bei Hans Jonas (2011) 0.09 
    0.09450495 = product of:
  0.47252476 = sum of:
    0.47252476 = weight(_text_:3a in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.47252476 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.4203822 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.049585003 = queryNorm
        1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Content
    Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fcreativechoice.org%2Fdoc%2FHansJonas.pdf&usg=AOvVaw1TM3teaYKgABL5H9yoIifA&opi=89978449.
  12. Henttonen, P.: Bibliographic subject headings as access points to archival sources (2014) 0.09 
    0.093897425 = product of:
  0.23474355 = sum of:
    0.18771696 = weight(_text_:cite in 1460) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.18771696 = score(doc=1460,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.34691685 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.996407 = idf(docFreq=109, maxDocs=44218)
          0.049585003 = queryNorm
        0.54110074 = fieldWeight in 1460, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.996407 = idf(docFreq=109, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1460)
    0.047026586 = weight(_text_:22 in 1460) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.047026586 = score(doc=1460,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17363824 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.049585003 = queryNorm
        0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1460, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1460)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    The paper examines whether subject headings in a bibliographic description could be used to direct users to relevant archival sources: a publication about a subject is likely to cite archival sources that are related to the subject. In the light of the data collected for the paper this approach might work in case of some keywords. However, there are also problems, like finding the optimal level the user should be directed to in the archival hierarchy, and the lack of information in archival persistent identifiers (PIDs).
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  13. Hanson, T.: Pro-Cite version 2 : a review (1993) 0.09 
    0.09289581 = product of:
  0.46447906 = sum of:
    0.46447906 = weight(_text_:cite in 5553) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.46447906 = score(doc=5553,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.34691685 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.996407 = idf(docFreq=109, maxDocs=44218)
          0.049585003 = queryNorm
        1.3388772 = fieldWeight in 5553, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          6.996407 = idf(docFreq=109, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5553)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Reviews the IBM version of the Pro-Cite 2 bibliographic reference management system. Discusses menu structure; database selection; searching; editing; inserting and viewing records; biblio-links and importing and other changes
    Object
    Pro-Cite
  14. Fachsystematik Bremen nebst Schlüssel 1970 ff. (1970 ff) 0.09 
    0.092190295 = product of:
  0.23047574 = sum of:
    0.19688532 = weight(_text_:3a in 3577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.19688532 = score(doc=3577,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.4203822 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.049585003 = queryNorm
        0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 3577, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3577)
    0.033590417 = weight(_text_:22 in 3577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.033590417 = score(doc=3577,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17363824 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.049585003 = queryNorm
        0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3577, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3577)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Content
    1. Agrarwissenschaften 1981. - 3. Allgemeine Geographie 2.1972. - 3a. Allgemeine Naturwissenschaften 1.1973. - 4. Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft, Allgemeine Literaturwissenschaft 2.1971. - 6. Allgemeines. 5.1983. - 7. Anglistik 3.1976. - 8. Astronomie, Geodäsie 4.1977. - 12. bio Biologie, bcp Biochemie-Biophysik, bot Botanik, zoo Zoologie 1981. - 13. Bremensien 3.1983. - 13a. Buch- und Bibliothekswesen 3.1975. - 14. Chemie 4.1977. - 14a. Elektrotechnik 1974. - 15 Ethnologie 2.1976. - 16,1. Geowissenschaften. Sachteil 3.1977. - 16,2. Geowissenschaften. Regionaler Teil 3.1977. - 17. Germanistik 6.1984. - 17a,1. Geschichte. Teilsystematik hil. - 17a,2. Geschichte. Teilsystematik his Neuere Geschichte. - 17a,3. Geschichte. Teilsystematik hit Neueste Geschichte. - 18. Humanbiologie 2.1983. - 19. Ingenieurwissenschaften 1974. - 20. siehe 14a. - 21. klassische Philologie 3.1977. - 22. Klinische Medizin 1975. - 23. Kunstgeschichte 2.1971. - 24. Kybernetik. 2.1975. - 25. Mathematik 3.1974. - 26. Medizin 1976. - 26a. Militärwissenschaft 1985. - 27. Musikwissenschaft 1978. - 27a. Noten 2.1974. - 28. Ozeanographie 3.1977. -29. Pädagogik 8.1985. - 30. Philosphie 3.1974. - 31. Physik 3.1974. - 33. Politik, Politische Wissenschaft, Sozialwissenschaft. Soziologie. Länderschlüssel. Register 1981. - 34. Psychologie 2.1972. - 35. Publizistik und Kommunikationswissenschaft 1985. - 36. Rechtswissenschaften 1986. - 37. Regionale Geograpgie 3.1975. - 37a. Religionswissenschaft 1970. - 38. Romanistik 3.1976. - 39. Skandinavistik 4.1985. - 40. Slavistik 1977. - 40a. Sonstige Sprachen und Literaturen 1973. - 43. Sport 4.1983. - 44. Theaterwissenschaft 1985. - 45. Theologie 2.1976. - 45a. Ur- und Frühgeschichte, Archäologie 1970. - 47. Volkskunde 1976. - 47a. Wirtschaftswissenschaften 1971 // Schlüssel: 1. Länderschlüssel 1971. - 2. Formenschlüssel (Kurzform) 1974. - 3. Personenschlüssel Literatur 5. Fassung 1968
  15. Pro-Cite 2.0 for the IBM and Biblio-Link to USMARC comunications format records (1993) 0.09 
    0.09101894 = product of:
  0.45509467 = sum of:
    0.45509467 = weight(_text_:cite in 5618) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.45509467 = score(doc=5618,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.34691685 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.996407 = idf(docFreq=109, maxDocs=44218)
          0.049585003 = queryNorm
        1.3118263 = fieldWeight in 5618, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          6.996407 = idf(docFreq=109, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5618)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Object
    Pro-Cite
  16. Edelblute, T.: ¬A Pro-Cite authority file on a network (1995) 0.09 
    0.09101894 = product of:
  0.45509467 = sum of:
    0.45509467 = weight(_text_:cite in 3350) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.45509467 = score(doc=3350,freq=16.0), product of:
        0.34691685 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.996407 = idf(docFreq=109, maxDocs=44218)
          0.049585003 = queryNorm
        1.3118263 = fieldWeight in 3350, product of:
          4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
            16.0 = termFreq=16.0
          6.996407 = idf(docFreq=109, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3350)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Describes the creation of a subject authority file, using Pro-Cite bibliographic management software for the US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service and the Agricultural Engineering Faculty at the University of Missouri at Columbia. Pro-Cite was selected for its flexible customization abilities. A workform was created in Pro-Cite with fields for authorized term, variant spellings, definitions, primary source consulted, other sources consulted, notes, cross references, and date of last edit. Using the authorized term and cross reference fields, an INDEX.LST file and a printed thesaurus were created. By putting Pro-Cite on a Novell network, it was hoped that all users would be able to view the authority file, and directly upload terms into their search strategies, but this proved not to be possible until the release of Pro-Cite 2.0. Further upgrades were needed to keep the authority file working properly. Further improvments in a network version of Pro-Cite that include password protection are needed
    Object
    Pro-Cite
  17. Larivière, V.; Sugimoto, C.R.; Bergeron, P.: In their own image? : a comparison of doctoral students' and faculty members' referencing behavior (2013) 0.09 
    0.09101894 = product of:
  0.45509467 = sum of:
    0.45509467 = weight(_text_:cite in 751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.45509467 = score(doc=751,freq=16.0), product of:
        0.34691685 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.996407 = idf(docFreq=109, maxDocs=44218)
          0.049585003 = queryNorm
        1.3118263 = fieldWeight in 751, product of:
          4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
            16.0 = termFreq=16.0
          6.996407 = idf(docFreq=109, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=751)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    This article compares doctoral students' and faculty members' referencing behavior through the analysis of a large corpus of scientific articles. It shows that doctoral students tend to cite more documents per article than faculty members, and that the literature they cite is, on average, more recent. It also demonstrates that doctoral students cite a larger proportion of conference proceedings and journal articles than faculty members and faculty members are more likely to self-cite and cite theses than doctoral students. Analysis of the impact of cited journals indicates that in health research, faculty members tend to cite journals with slightly lower impact factors whereas in social sciences and humanities, faculty members cite journals with higher impact factors. Finally, it provides evidence that, in every discipline, faculty members tend to cite a higher proportion of clinical/applied research journals than doctoral students. This study contributes to the understanding of referencing patterns and age stratification in academia. Implications for understanding the information-seeking behavior of academics are discussed.
  18. Lundeen, G.: Bibliographic software (1989) 0.09 
    0.08581348 = product of:
  0.42906737 = sum of:
    0.42906737 = weight(_text_:cite in 5038) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.42906737 = score(doc=5038,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.34691685 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.996407 = idf(docFreq=109, maxDocs=44218)
          0.049585003 = queryNorm
        1.2368017 = fieldWeight in 5038, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.996407 = idf(docFreq=109, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5038)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Object
    Pro-Cite
  19. Hanson, T.A.; Hanson, A.C.: Managing bibliographies with Pro-Cite (1989) 0.08 
    0.08394958 = product of:
  0.4197479 = sum of:
    0.4197479 = weight(_text_:cite in 5034) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.4197479 = score(doc=5034,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.34691685 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.996407 = idf(docFreq=109, maxDocs=44218)
          0.049585003 = queryNorm
        1.209938 = fieldWeight in 5034, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          6.996407 = idf(docFreq=109, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5034)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Pro-Cite is a software package for managing personal bibliographic data bases from which printed bibliographies are frequently required. Condisers the kinds of project for which Pro-Cite is intended, and those for which it is not intended. In the latter category is included the management of large permanent data bases to which powerful online access is frequently required. Its strength lies in its specialisation: it provides pre-defined data structures for various kinds of printed and audiovisual output formats corresponding to a range of standard styles. Discusses the package under the following headings: editing, searching, printing and browsing, indexing, and sorting. Examnines the use of Biblio-Links which are reformatting devices used to convert downloaded on-line serch results to Pro-Cite format
    Object
    Pro-Cite
  20. Dell'Orso, F.: Pro-Cite, per dare forma ai record bibliografici (1994) 0.08 
    0.08394958 = product of:
  0.4197479 = sum of:
    0.4197479 = weight(_text_:cite in 2423) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.4197479 = score(doc=2423,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.34691685 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.996407 = idf(docFreq=109, maxDocs=44218)
          0.049585003 = queryNorm
        1.209938 = fieldWeight in 2423, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          6.996407 = idf(docFreq=109, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2423)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Pro-Cite is a high quality bibliography formatting software program designed for the efficient management of a text data file. The program can sort the lists of bibliographical references provided by abstracts and keywords in variable length fields, prepare selected lists classified in different ways so that writing is needed once only, and provide a variety of output formats. Describes Pro-Cite database organization, editing procedures, the authority file, reformatting and input, the inverted file quick search field, sorting, and output. Summarizes the pros and cons of the system
    Footnote
    Pro-Cite gives shape to bibliographical records
    Object
    Pro-Cite

Authors

Years

Languages

Types

  • a 3130
  • m 349
  • el 163
  • s 142
  • b 39
  • x 35
  • i 23
  • r 17
  • ? 8
  • p 4
  • d 3
  • n 3
  • u 2
  • z 2
  • au 1
  • h 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications