Search (228 results, page 1 of 12)

  • × theme_ss:"Benutzerstudien"
  1. Wallace, P.M.: Periodical title searching in online catalogues (1997) 0.05
    0.046671957 = product of:
      0.11667989 = sum of:
        0.06010012 = weight(_text_:online in 1628) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06010012 = score(doc=1628,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15842392 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05220068 = queryNorm
            0.37936267 = fieldWeight in 1628, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1628)
        0.05657977 = weight(_text_:22 in 1628) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05657977 = score(doc=1628,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18279788 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05220068 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1628, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1628)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Reports on a dramatic shift from subject to periodical title searching at Colorado University Libraries. States possible reasons for the change, examines problems encountered by users with searching the periodical title index and suggests how this change in online catalogue searching may affect future catalogue design and bibliographic instruction
    Date
    29. 7.1998 10:57:22
  2. Schneider, R.: OPACs, Benutzer und das Web (2009) 0.05
    0.046671957 = product of:
      0.11667989 = sum of:
        0.06010012 = weight(_text_:online in 2905) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06010012 = score(doc=2905,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15842392 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05220068 = queryNorm
            0.37936267 = fieldWeight in 2905, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2905)
        0.05657977 = weight(_text_:22 in 2905) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05657977 = score(doc=2905,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18279788 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05220068 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2905, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2905)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Der Artikel betrachtet anhand einer Studie zum Benutzerverhalten bei der Online-Katalogrecherche den gegenwärtigen Stellenwert und das zukünftige Potential der Web-OPACs. Dabei werden zunächst die Ergebnisse einer quantitativen Logfile-Analyse sowie qualitativer Benutzertests erörtert, bevor aktuelle Entwicklungen der Webtechnologie, die unter den Schlagworten Web 2.0 und Web 3.0 propagiert werden, im Zusammenhang mit der Online-Recherche und der Entwicklung neuartiger Suchverfahren kurz diskutiert werden.
    Date
    22. 2.2009 18:50:43
  3. Witt, M.: Survey on the use of the catalogue at the Mediatheque of the Cité des Sciences et de l'Industrie (CSI) (1993) 0.04
    0.040837962 = product of:
      0.1020949 = sum of:
        0.052587606 = weight(_text_:online in 7914) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.052587606 = score(doc=7914,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15842392 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05220068 = queryNorm
            0.33194235 = fieldWeight in 7914, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7914)
        0.049507298 = weight(_text_:22 in 7914) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049507298 = score(doc=7914,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18279788 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05220068 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 7914, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7914)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    The library of the Cité des Sciences et de l'industrie attracts 4.000 visitors daily of whom 25% consult the GEAC system OPAC. Describes a 1992 survey consisting of online questions followed by an interview. The questionnaires were adapted from ones used in the UK and utilised OLIVE (Online Interactive Validation and Evaluation). While difficulties arose from users' inconsistency in their replies and failures to answer questions, it has become clear that subject access is unsatisfactory, sometimes because of mistyping by the searcher but also because of the vocabulary problems and lack of guidance in search strategies
    Source
    International cataloguing and bibliographic control. 22(1993) no.4, S.68-71
  4. Moulaison, H.L.: OPAC queries at a medium-sized academic library : a transaction log analysis (2008) 0.04
    0.040837962 = product of:
      0.1020949 = sum of:
        0.052587606 = weight(_text_:online in 3599) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.052587606 = score(doc=3599,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15842392 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05220068 = queryNorm
            0.33194235 = fieldWeight in 3599, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3599)
        0.049507298 = weight(_text_:22 in 3599) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049507298 = score(doc=3599,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18279788 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05220068 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3599, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3599)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Patron queries at a four-year comprehensive college's online public access catalog were examined via transaction logs from March 2007. Three representative days were isolated for a more detailed examination of search characteristics. The results show that library users employed an average of one to three terms in a search, did not use Boolean operators, and made use of limits one-tenth of the time. Failed queries remained problematic, as a full one-third of searches resulted in zero hits. Implications and recommendations for improvements in the online public access catalog are discussed.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  5. Kaske, N.K.: ¬A comparative study of subject searching in an OPAC among branch libraries of a university library system (1988) 0.03
    0.03467694 = product of:
      0.08669235 = sum of:
        0.03718505 = weight(_text_:online in 760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03718505 = score(doc=760,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15842392 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05220068 = queryNorm
            0.23471867 = fieldWeight in 760, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=760)
        0.049507298 = weight(_text_:22 in 760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049507298 = score(doc=760,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18279788 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05220068 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 760, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=760)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    The degree of variability in the percentage of subject searching in an online public access catalog (OPAC) among branch libraries of one university was studied. A full semester's worth of transactions was analyzed, not sampled. The time units used were hour of the day, day of the week, and week of the semester. The findings show that subject searching varies from a low of 22% to a high of 74% over the hours of a day. Variability for the days of the week ranged from 17% to 64%, and for the weeks of the semester variability ranged from 12% to 70%. Valuable management information on the utilization of the OPAC within each brach library and among all the branch libraries is provided through numerous charts and graphs.
  6. Griesbaum, J.; Mahrholz, N.; Kiedrowski, K. von Löwe; Rittberger, M.: Knowledge generation in online forums : a case study in the German educational domain (2015) 0.03
    0.02603742 = product of:
      0.06509355 = sum of:
        0.03680366 = weight(_text_:online in 4440) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03680366 = score(doc=4440,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.15842392 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05220068 = queryNorm
            0.23231125 = fieldWeight in 4440, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4440)
        0.028289884 = weight(_text_:22 in 4440) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028289884 = score(doc=4440,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18279788 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05220068 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 4440, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4440)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to get a first approximation of the usefulness of online forums with regard to information seeking and knowledge generation. Design/methodology/approach - This study captures the characteristics of knowledge generation by examining the pragmatics and types of information needs of posted questions and by investigating knowledge related characteristics of discussion posts as well as the success of communication. Three online forums were examined. The data set consists of 55 threads, containing 533 posts which were categorized manually by two researchers. Findings - Results show that questioners often ask for personal estimations. Information needs often aim for actionable insights or uncertainty reduction. With regard to answers, factual information is the dominant content type and has the highest knowledge value as it is the strongest predictor with regard to the generation of new knowledge. Opinions are also relevant, but in a rather subsequent and complementary way. Emotional aspects are scarcely observed. Overall, results indicate that knowledge creation predominantly follows a socio-cultural paradigm of knowledge exchange. Research limitations/implications - Although the investigation captures important aspects of knowledge building processes, the measurement of the forums' knowledge value is still rather limited. Success is only partly measurable with the current scheme. The central coding category "new topical knowledge" is only of nominal value and therefore not able to compare different kinds of knowledge gains in the course of discussion. Originality/value - The investigation reaches out beyond studies that do not consider that the role and relevance of posts is dependent on the state of the discussion. Furthermore, the paper integrates two perspectives of knowledge value: the success of the questioner with regard to the expressed information need and the knowledge building value for communicants and readers.
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  7. Markey, K.: Users and the online catalog : subject access problems (1986) 0.02
    0.024040049 = product of:
      0.12020024 = sum of:
        0.12020024 = weight(_text_:online in 342) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12020024 = score(doc=342,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15842392 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05220068 = queryNorm
            0.75872535 = fieldWeight in 342, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=342)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    The impact of online catalogs. Ed.: J.R. Matthews
  8. Markey, K.: Subject searching in library catalogs : Before and after the introduction of online catalogs (1984) 0.02
    0.024040049 = product of:
      0.12020024 = sum of:
        0.12020024 = weight(_text_:online in 2284) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12020024 = score(doc=2284,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15842392 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05220068 = queryNorm
            0.75872535 = fieldWeight in 2284, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2284)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Theme
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
  9. Matthews, J.R.; Lawrence, G.S.; Ferguson, D.K.: Using online catalogs : a nationwide survey, a report of a study sponsored by the Council on Library Resources (1983) 0.02
    0.022311032 = product of:
      0.11155516 = sum of:
        0.11155516 = weight(_text_:online in 4168) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11155516 = score(doc=4168,freq=18.0), product of:
            0.15842392 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05220068 = queryNorm
            0.70415604 = fieldWeight in 4168, product of:
              4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                18.0 = termFreq=18.0
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4168)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    LCSH
    Online library catalogs / Use studies
    Online bibliographic searching
    RSWK
    USA / Online-Katalog / Benutzung
    Online-Katalog
    Subject
    USA / Online-Katalog / Benutzung
    Online-Katalog
    Online library catalogs / Use studies
    Online bibliographic searching
  10. Karbach, N.: Suchverhalten von Benutzern an Online-Publikumskatalogen (1991) 0.02
    0.0212486 = product of:
      0.106243 = sum of:
        0.106243 = weight(_text_:online in 2282) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.106243 = score(doc=2282,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15842392 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05220068 = queryNorm
            0.67062473 = fieldWeight in 2282, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=2282)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
  11. Larson, R.R.: Users look at online catalogs : Pt.2: interacting with online catalogs. Final report for the Council on Library Resources (1983) 0.02
    0.021035044 = product of:
      0.10517521 = sum of:
        0.10517521 = weight(_text_:online in 2424) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10517521 = score(doc=2424,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15842392 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05220068 = queryNorm
            0.6638847 = fieldWeight in 2424, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2424)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
  12. Thorne, R.; Whitlatch, J.B.: Patron online catalog success (1994) 0.02
    0.021035044 = product of:
      0.10517521 = sum of:
        0.10517521 = weight(_text_:online in 855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10517521 = score(doc=855,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.15842392 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05220068 = queryNorm
            0.6638847 = fieldWeight in 855, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=855)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    The project explored the ways in which the online catalogue contributes, or does not contribute to the success of library users. Key issues examined included: whether students are really getting appropriate assistance when using the online catalogue; the most common searching successes and failures observed for people using the online catalogue without staff assistance; and the effectiveness of online catalogue use by librarians providing reference assistance compared to other sources (reference books, electronic and printed indexes). Reviews relevant studies of online catalogues and reference success and describes the methodology and results of 3 different online catalogue studies: the Reference Assessment Survey; the online catalogue study of unassisted users; and the document availability study; all conducted at San José State University Library; California, using the Reference Transaction Assessment Instrument. Considers the implications of the results for reference practice and study methodology
  13. Scholle, U.: Kann ich Ihnen behilflich sein? : Erhebung am zentralen Auskunftsplatz der ULB Münster (2000) 0.02
    0.019802919 = product of:
      0.099014595 = sum of:
        0.099014595 = weight(_text_:22 in 7585) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.099014595 = score(doc=7585,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18279788 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05220068 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 7585, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7585)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2000 17:52:11
  14. Branch, J.L.: Investigating the information-seeking process of adolescents : the value of using think alouds and think afters (2000) 0.02
    0.019802919 = product of:
      0.099014595 = sum of:
        0.099014595 = weight(_text_:22 in 3924) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.099014595 = score(doc=3924,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18279788 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05220068 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3924, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3924)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Library and information science research. 22(2000) no.4, S.371-382
  15. Bates, M.J.: ¬The design of databases and other information resources for humanities scholars : the Getty Online Searching Project report no.4 (1994) 0.02
    0.019005328 = product of:
      0.09502664 = sum of:
        0.09502664 = weight(_text_:online in 6989) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09502664 = score(doc=6989,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.15842392 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05220068 = queryNorm
            0.5998251 = fieldWeight in 6989, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6989)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    The forth report in a series of studies, based on the 2 year Getty Art History Information Project; where humanities scholars were trained in DIALOG online searching and then allowed 24 hour unlimited access to DIALOG. Complete transaction logs were taken and form the data upon which the Getty Online Searching Project is based. Data obtained from the study is used to draw conclusions about the design of humanities information resources, particularly databases and other online resources
    Source
    Online and CD-ROM review. 18(1994) no.6, S.331-340
  16. Dickson, J.: ¬An analysis of user errors in searching an online catalog (1984) 0.02
    0.01840183 = product of:
      0.09200914 = sum of:
        0.09200914 = weight(_text_:online in 316) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09200914 = score(doc=316,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.15842392 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05220068 = queryNorm
            0.5807781 = fieldWeight in 316, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=316)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    The study extracts a sample of zero-hit author and title searches from the transaction log of Northwestern University Library's online catalog. It analyzes why the searches failed, in an effort to understand the users' conceptual model of the online catalog.
  17. Larson, R.R.: Evaluation of advanced retrieval techniques in an experimental online catalog (1992) 0.02
    0.018030036 = product of:
      0.09015018 = sum of:
        0.09015018 = weight(_text_:online in 481) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09015018 = score(doc=481,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.15842392 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05220068 = queryNorm
            0.569044 = fieldWeight in 481, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=481)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Research on the use and users of online catalogs conducted in the early 1980s found that subject searches were the most common form of online catalog search. At the same time, many of the problems experienced by online catalog users have been traced to difficulties with the subject access mechanisms of the online catalog. Numerous proposals have been made for methods intended to improve subject access to online catalog records. These commonly involve enhancing the catalog's bibliographic records with additional terms, or incorporating subject authority files or additional thesauri in the database. Another stream of research has concentrated on applying retrieval techniques derived from information retrieval (IR) research to replace the Boolean search methods of conventional online catalog systems. This study describes the results of retrieval tests using a variety of these search methods in the CHESHIRE experimental online catalog system.
  18. Larson, R.R.: Users look at online catalogs : results of a national survey of users and non-users of online public access catalogs (1982) 0.02
    0.018030036 = product of:
      0.09015018 = sum of:
        0.09015018 = weight(_text_:online in 2972) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09015018 = score(doc=2972,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15842392 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05220068 = queryNorm
            0.569044 = fieldWeight in 2972, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2972)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
  19. Spinas, P.: Benutzerfreundlichkeit von ETHICS : Ergebnisse einer Untersuchung des Online-Kataloges der ETH-Bibliothek (1992) 0.02
    0.01699888 = product of:
      0.0849944 = sum of:
        0.0849944 = weight(_text_:online in 491) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0849944 = score(doc=491,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15842392 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05220068 = queryNorm
            0.5364998 = fieldWeight in 491, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=491)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
  20. Moore, C.W.: User reactions to online catalogs : an exploratory study (1981) 0.02
    0.01699888 = product of:
      0.0849944 = sum of:
        0.0849944 = weight(_text_:online in 499) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0849944 = score(doc=499,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15842392 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05220068 = queryNorm
            0.5364998 = fieldWeight in 499, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=499)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    

Years

Languages

Types

  • a 211
  • r 9
  • m 4
  • el 2
  • x 2
  • b 1
  • p 1
  • More… Less…