-
Mitchell, J.S.; Zeng, M.L.; Zumer, M.: Modeling classification systems in multicultural and multilingual contexts (2012)
0.05
0.047046423 = product of:
0.14113927 = sum of:
0.14113927 = sum of:
0.083118126 = weight(_text_:classification in 1967) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.083118126 = score(doc=1967,freq=12.0), product of:
0.16072905 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.05046903 = queryNorm
0.5171319 = fieldWeight in 1967, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1967)
0.058021143 = weight(_text_:22 in 1967) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.058021143 = score(doc=1967,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17673394 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05046903 = queryNorm
0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 1967, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1967)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- This paper reports on the second part of an initiative of the authors on researching classification systems with the conceptual model defined by the Functional Requirements for Subject Authority Data (FRSAD) final report. In an earlier study, the authors explored whether the FRSAD conceptual model could be extended beyond subject authority data to model classification data. The focus of the current study is to determine if classification data modeled using FRSAD can be used to solve real-world discovery problems in multicultural and multilingual contexts. The paper discusses the relationships between entities (same type or different types) in the context of classification systems that involve multiple translations and /or multicultural implementations. Results of two case studies are presented in detail: (a) two instances of the DDC (DDC 22 in English, and the Swedish-English mixed translation of DDC 22), and (b) Chinese Library Classification. The use cases of conceptual models in practice are also discussed.
-
Riesthuis, G.J.A.; Zumer, M.: FRBR and FRANAR : subject access (2004)
0.04
0.044244096 = product of:
0.06636614 = sum of:
0.055055197 = weight(_text_:interest in 2646) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055055197 = score(doc=2646,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25074318 = queryWeight, product of:
4.9682584 = idf(docFreq=835, maxDocs=44218)
0.05046903 = queryNorm
0.21956807 = fieldWeight in 2646, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.9682584 = idf(docFreq=835, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2646)
0.011310943 = product of:
0.022621887 = sum of:
0.022621887 = weight(_text_:classification in 2646) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022621887 = score(doc=2646,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16072905 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.05046903 = queryNorm
0.14074548 = fieldWeight in 2646, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2646)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- In the last decade a discussion has been going an in the Division of Bibliographic Control of the International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions (IFLA) about the principles of cataloguing. This discussion was initiated by the widespread replacement of the card and list catalogues by Online Public Access Catalogues (OPACs) since 1980. In this paper we discuss the role of subject cataloguing in three important documents that are the results of this discussion. Our conclusion is that the interest in subject cataloguing has grown remarkably, but is still not an the level it deserves given the fact that a great part of all searches in OPACs are subject oriented.
- Content
- 1. Introduction In this paper we address two questions: 1. What is the position of subject indexing in the thinking of the library world after the publication of the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (1998)? 2. Is this position in accordance with the requirements of the users searching for documents about a given subject? Research Shows that searching an a topic (i.e. subject access) is an important, even predominant type of end-user searching of library catalogues and even more so of other bibliographic databases. Between one third and two thirds of all OPAC searches are probably subject searches (Large & Beheshti, 199%). Taking into account different ways in which searching an a topic is implemented in library catalogues (subject headings, classification, keywords only) the percentage may be even higher. For example title word searching may be a substitute for subject searching if no better tools are available. In the light of this it is not surprising that the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) (1998) pays attention to subject searching, as well as the Functional Requirements and Numbering of Authority Records (FRANAR) (2003). Also the Statement of International Cataloguing Principles: Final draft of 19 December 2003, which is the result of the first First IFLA Meeting of Experts an an International Cataloguing Code mentiong subject access as a function of cataloguing (Statement, 2003). In this paper we discuss the ways these three documents deal with subjects.
-
Mitchell, J.S.; Zeng, M.L.; Zumer, M.: Modeling classification systems in multicultural and multilingual contexts (2014)
0.04
0.042777132 = product of:
0.1283314 = sum of:
0.1283314 = sum of:
0.07998045 = weight(_text_:classification in 1962) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07998045 = score(doc=1962,freq=16.0), product of:
0.16072905 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.05046903 = queryNorm
0.49761042 = fieldWeight in 1962, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1962)
0.04835095 = weight(_text_:22 in 1962) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04835095 = score(doc=1962,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17673394 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05046903 = queryNorm
0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 1962, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1962)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- This article reports on the second part of an initiative of the authors on researching classification systems with the conceptual model defined by the Functional Requirements for Subject Authority Data (FRSAD) final report. In an earlier study, the authors explored whether the FRSAD conceptual model could be extended beyond subject authority data to model classification data. The focus of the current study is to determine if classification data modeled using FRSAD can be used to solve real-world discovery problems in multicultural and multilingual contexts. The article discusses the relationships between entities (same type or different types) in the context of classification systems that involve multiple translations and/or multicultural implementations. Results of two case studies are presented in detail: (a) two instances of the Dewey Decimal Classification [DDC] (DDC 22 in English, and the Swedish-English mixed translation of DDC 22), and (b) Chinese Library Classification. The use cases of conceptual models in practice are also discussed.
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 52(2014) no.1, S.90-101
-
Pisanski, J.; Zumer, M.: User verification of the FRBR conceptual model (2012)
0.02
0.022939665 = product of:
0.068818994 = sum of:
0.068818994 = weight(_text_:interest in 395) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.068818994 = score(doc=395,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25074318 = queryWeight, product of:
4.9682584 = idf(docFreq=835, maxDocs=44218)
0.05046903 = queryNorm
0.27446008 = fieldWeight in 395, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.9682584 = idf(docFreq=835, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=395)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Purpose - This paper aims to build on of a previous study of mental models of the bibliographic universe, which found that the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) conceptual model is intuitive. Design/methodology/approach - A total of 120 participants were presented with a list of bibliographic entities and six graphs each. They were asked to choose the graph they thought best represented the relationships between entities described. Findings - The graph based on the FRBR model was chosen by more than half of the participants and none of the alternatives stood out. This gives further indication that FRBR is an appropriate model of the bibliographic universe from users' standpoint. Research limitations/implications - The study only looked at the textual part of the bibliographic universe. Further research is needed for other types of materials. Practical implications - This research suggests that there should be a more positive attitude towards implementation of FRBR-based catalogues. Originality/value - This is one of only a handful of user studies relating to FRBR, which looks to be the backbone of catalogues for years to come. As such, the results should be of interest to everybody involved with catalogues, from cataloguers to the end-users.
-
Zumer, M.; Clavel, G.: EDLproject : one more step towards the European digtial library (2007)
0.01
0.013675714 = product of:
0.04102714 = sum of:
0.04102714 = product of:
0.08205428 = sum of:
0.08205428 = weight(_text_:22 in 3184) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08205428 = score(doc=3184,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17673394 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05046903 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3184, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3184)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Content
- Vortrag anläasslich des Workshops: "Extending the multilingual capacity of The European Library in the EDL project Stockholm, Swedish National Library, 22-23 November 2007".
-
Zumer, M.; Zeng, M.L.; Mitchell, J.S.: FRBRizing KOS relationships : applying the FRBR model to versions of the DDC (2012)
0.01
0.012646019 = product of:
0.03793806 = sum of:
0.03793806 = product of:
0.07587612 = sum of:
0.07587612 = weight(_text_:classification in 846) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07587612 = score(doc=846,freq=10.0), product of:
0.16072905 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.05046903 = queryNorm
0.4720747 = fieldWeight in 846, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=846)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- The paper presents the approach of using the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) model to investigate the complicated sets of relationships among different versions of a classification system for the purposes of specifying provenance of classification data and facilitating collaborative efforts for using and reusing classification data, particularly in a linked data setting. The long-term goal of this research goes beyond the Dewey Decimal Classification that is used as a case. It addresses the questions of if and how the modelling approach and the FRBR-based model itself can be generalized and applied to other classification systems, multilingual and multicultural vocabularies, and even non-KOS resources that share similar characteristics.
-
Mitchell, J.S.; Zeng, M.L.; Zumer, M.: Extending models for controlled vocabularies to classification systems : modeling DDC with FRSAD (2011)
0.01
0.012469145 = product of:
0.03740743 = sum of:
0.03740743 = product of:
0.07481486 = sum of:
0.07481486 = weight(_text_:classification in 4092) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07481486 = score(doc=4092,freq=14.0), product of:
0.16072905 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.05046903 = queryNorm
0.46547192 = fieldWeight in 4092, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4092)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- The Functional Requirements for Subject Authority Data (FRSAD) conceptual model identifies entities, attributes and relationships as they relate to subject authority data. FRSAD includes two main entities, thema (any entity used as a subject of a work) and nomen (any sign or sequence of signs that a thema is known by, referred to, or addressed as). In a given controlled vocabulary and within a domain, a nomen is the appellation of only one thema. The authors consider the question, can the FRSAD conceptual model be extended beyond controlled vocabularies (its original focus) to model classification data? Models that are developed based on the structures and functions of controlled vocabularies (such as thesauri and subject heading systems) often need to be adjusted or extended to accommodate classification systems that have been developed with different focused functions, structures and fundamental theories. The Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) system is used as a case study to test applicability of the FRSAD model for classification data, and as a springboard for a general discussion of issues related to the use of FRSAD for the representation of classification data.
- Content
- EPC Exhibit 134-25.1; May 13, 2011. To be presented at Classification & Ontology: Formal Approaches and Access to Knowledge, The Hague, 19-20 September 2011.
-
Mitchell, J.S.; Zeng, M.L.; Zumer, M.: Extending models for controlled vocabularies to classification systems : modelling DDC with FRSAD (2011)
0.01
0.012469145 = product of:
0.03740743 = sum of:
0.03740743 = product of:
0.07481486 = sum of:
0.07481486 = weight(_text_:classification in 4828) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07481486 = score(doc=4828,freq=14.0), product of:
0.16072905 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.05046903 = queryNorm
0.46547192 = fieldWeight in 4828, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4828)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- The Functional Requirements for Subject Authority Data (FRSAD) conceptual model identifies entities, attributes and relationships as they relate to subject authority data. FRSAD includes two main entities, thema (any entity used as a subject of a work) and nomen (any sign or sequence of signs that a thema is known by, referred to, or addressed as). In a given controlled vocabulary and within a domain, a nomen is the appellation of only one thema. The authors consider the question, can the FRSAD conceptual model be extended beyond controlled vocabularies (its original focus) to model classification data? Models that are developed based on the structures and functions of controlled vocabularies (such as thesauri and subject heading systems) often need to be adjusted or extended to accommodate classification systems that have been developed with different focused functions, structures and fundamental theories. The Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) system is used as a case study to test applicability of the FRSAD model for classification data, and as a springboard for a general discussion of issues related to the use of FRSAD for the representation of classification data.
- Source
- Classification and ontology: formal approaches and access to knowledge: proceedings of the International UDC Seminar, 19-20 September 2011, The Hague, The Netherlands. Eds.: A. Slavic u. E. Civallero
-
Zumer, M.; Zeng, M.L.: Application of FRBR and FRSAD to classification systems (2015)
0.01
0.012469145 = product of:
0.03740743 = sum of:
0.03740743 = product of:
0.07481486 = sum of:
0.07481486 = weight(_text_:classification in 2284) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07481486 = score(doc=2284,freq=14.0), product of:
0.16072905 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.05046903 = queryNorm
0.46547192 = fieldWeight in 2284, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2284)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- The Functional Requirements for Subject Authority Data (FRSAD) conceptual model defines entities, attributes and relationships as they relate to subject authority data. FRSAD includes two main entities, thema (any entity used as the subject of a work) and nomen (any sign or arrangement of signs that a thema is known by, referred to, or addressed as). In a given controlled vocabulary and within a domain, a nomen is the appellation of only one thema. The authors consider the question: can the FRSAD conceptual model be extended beyond controlled vocabularies (its original focus) to model classification data? Models that are developed based on the structures and functions of controlled vocabularies (such as thesauri and subject heading systems) often need to be adjusted or extended to accommodate classification systems that have been developed with different focused functions, structures and fundamental theories. The Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) system and Universal Decimal Classification (UDC) are used as a case study to test applicability of the FRSAD model for classification data and the applicability of the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) for modelling versions, such as different adaptations and different language editions.
- Source
- Classification and authority control: expanding resource discovery: proceedings of the International UDC Seminar 2015, 29-30 October 2015, Lisbon, Portugal. Eds.: Slavic, A. u. M.I. Cordeiro
-
Zumer, M.: Dedication [to Zlata Dimec] (2004)
0.01
0.011310944 = product of:
0.03393283 = sum of:
0.03393283 = product of:
0.06786566 = sum of:
0.06786566 = weight(_text_:classification in 4184) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06786566 = score(doc=4184,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16072905 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.05046903 = queryNorm
0.42223644 = fieldWeight in 4184, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4184)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Series
- Cataloging and classification quarterly; 39, nos.3/4
-
Zumer, M.: Guidelines for (electronic) national bibliographies : work in progress (2005)
0.01
0.0079775 = product of:
0.023932498 = sum of:
0.023932498 = product of:
0.047864996 = sum of:
0.047864996 = weight(_text_:22 in 4346) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047864996 = score(doc=4346,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17673394 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05046903 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4346, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4346)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 1.11.2005 18:56:22
-
Zumer, M.; Zeng, L.: Comparison and evaluation of OPAC end-user interfaces (1994)
0.01
0.0075406292 = product of:
0.022621887 = sum of:
0.022621887 = product of:
0.045243774 = sum of:
0.045243774 = weight(_text_:classification in 3568) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.045243774 = score(doc=3568,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16072905 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.05046903 = queryNorm
0.28149095 = fieldWeight in 3568, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3568)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 19(1994) no.2, S.67-98
-
Zumer, M.: Implementation of FRBR : European research initiative (2004)
0.01
0.0075406292 = product of:
0.022621887 = sum of:
0.022621887 = product of:
0.045243774 = sum of:
0.045243774 = weight(_text_:classification in 5858) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.045243774 = score(doc=5858,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16072905 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.05046903 = queryNorm
0.28149095 = fieldWeight in 5858, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5858)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Series
- Cataloging and classification quarterly; 39, nos.3/4
-
Harej, V.; Zumer, M.: Analysis of FRBR user tasks (2013)
0.01
0.0075406292 = product of:
0.022621887 = sum of:
0.022621887 = product of:
0.045243774 = sum of:
0.045243774 = weight(_text_:classification in 1955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.045243774 = score(doc=1955,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16072905 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.05046903 = queryNorm
0.28149095 = fieldWeight in 1955, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1955)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 51(2013) no.7, S.741-759
-
Golub, K.; Tudhope, D.; Zeng, M.L.; Zumer, M.: Terminology registries for knowledge organization systems : functionality, use, and attributes (2014)
0.01
0.006837857 = product of:
0.02051357 = sum of:
0.02051357 = product of:
0.04102714 = sum of:
0.04102714 = weight(_text_:22 in 1347) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04102714 = score(doc=1347,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17673394 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05046903 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1347, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1347)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 22. 8.2014 17:12:54
-
Zeng, M.L.; Gracy, K.F.; Zumer, M.: Using a semantic analysis tool to generate subject access points : a study using Panofsky's theory and two research samples (2014)
0.01
0.006837857 = product of:
0.02051357 = sum of:
0.02051357 = product of:
0.04102714 = sum of:
0.04102714 = weight(_text_:22 in 1464) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04102714 = score(doc=1464,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17673394 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05046903 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1464, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1464)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
-
O'Neill, E.; Zumer, M.; Mixter, J.: FRBR aggregates : their types and frequency in library collections (2015)
0.01
0.006837857 = product of:
0.02051357 = sum of:
0.02051357 = product of:
0.04102714 = sum of:
0.04102714 = weight(_text_:22 in 2610) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04102714 = score(doc=2610,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17673394 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05046903 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2610, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2610)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Zumer, M.: ¬The new "Guidelines for national bibliographies in the digital age" (2007)
0.01
0.0065980507 = product of:
0.019794151 = sum of:
0.019794151 = product of:
0.039588302 = sum of:
0.039588302 = weight(_text_:classification in 696) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.039588302 = score(doc=696,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16072905 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.05046903 = queryNorm
0.24630459 = fieldWeight in 696, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=696)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Content
- Vortrag anlässlich: WORLD LIBRARY AND INFORMATION CONGRESS: 73RD IFLA GENERAL CONFERENCE AND COUNCIL 19-23 August 2007, Durban, South Africa. - 89 - Bibliography with National Libraries and Classification and Indexing
-
Zumer, M.; Zeng, M.L.; Salaba, A.: FRSAD: conceptual modeling of aboutness (2012)
0.01
0.0065980507 = product of:
0.019794151 = sum of:
0.019794151 = product of:
0.039588302 = sum of:
0.039588302 = weight(_text_:classification in 1960) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.039588302 = score(doc=1960,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16072905 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.05046903 = queryNorm
0.24630459 = fieldWeight in 1960, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1960)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: Cataloging and classification quarterly 52(2014) no.3, S.343-346 (T. Brenndorfer)
-
Svab, K.; Zumer, M.: ¬The value of a library catalog for selecting children's picture books (2015)
0.01
0.0065980507 = product of:
0.019794151 = sum of:
0.019794151 = product of:
0.039588302 = sum of:
0.039588302 = weight(_text_:classification in 2614) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.039588302 = score(doc=2614,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16072905 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.05046903 = queryNorm
0.24630459 = fieldWeight in 2614, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2614)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 53(2015) no.7, S.717-737
