-
Martínez-Ávila, D.: Reader interest classifications : an alternative arrangement for libraries (2017)
0.12
0.12142134 = product of:
0.182132 = sum of:
0.16516559 = weight(_text_:interest in 3626) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.16516559 = score(doc=3626,freq=8.0), product of:
0.25074318 = queryWeight, product of:
4.9682584 = idf(docFreq=835, maxDocs=44218)
0.05046903 = queryNorm
0.6587042 = fieldWeight in 3626, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
4.9682584 = idf(docFreq=835, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3626)
0.016966416 = product of:
0.03393283 = sum of:
0.03393283 = weight(_text_:classification in 3626) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03393283 = score(doc=3626,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16072905 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.05046903 = queryNorm
0.21111822 = fieldWeight in 3626, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3626)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- The concept of reader-interest classifications and its related terminology have shown a well-established presence and common characteristics in the knowledge organization literature for more than half a century. During the period 1952-1995, it was not unusual to find works, projects and discourses using a common core of characteristics and terms to refer to a recognizable type of projects involving alternative classifications to the DDC and other traditional practices in libraries. The use of reader-interest classification related terms and references drastically declined since 1995, although similar projects and characteristics are being used until the present day such as those of implementation of BISAC in American public libraries. The present paper attempts to overview the concept and terminology of reader-interest classifications in a historical perspective emphasizing the transformation of the concept and its remaining characteristics in time.
-
Alternative arrangement : new approaches to public library stock (1982)
0.12
0.11889433 = product of:
0.1783415 = sum of:
0.15571961 = weight(_text_:interest in 1774) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15571961 = score(doc=1774,freq=4.0), product of:
0.25074318 = queryWeight, product of:
4.9682584 = idf(docFreq=835, maxDocs=44218)
0.05046903 = queryNorm
0.6210323 = fieldWeight in 1774, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.9682584 = idf(docFreq=835, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1774)
0.022621887 = product of:
0.045243774 = sum of:
0.045243774 = weight(_text_:classification in 1774) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.045243774 = score(doc=1774,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16072905 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.05046903 = queryNorm
0.28149095 = fieldWeight in 1774, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1774)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Content
- Enthält die Beiträge: ASTIN, J.: Cheshire: Alternative arrangement and beyond; READER, D.: User orientation in a Hertfordshire branch; CHANDLER, D.: Self-service-libraries: providing for the smaller community in Cambridgeshire; BETTS, D.: Reader interest categories in Surrey; DONBROSKI, L.: Categorisation at East Sussex County Library; McCARTHY, A.: Burning issues: stock appeal in Sunderland; MORSON, I. u. M. PERRY: Two-tier and total: stock arrangement in Brent
- Object
- Reader interest classification
-
Moeller, R.; Becnel, K.: Why on earth would we not genrefy the books? : a study of Reader-Interest Classification in school libraries (2019)
0.10
0.09579128 = product of:
0.14368692 = sum of:
0.11919801 = weight(_text_:interest in 5266) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11919801 = score(doc=5266,freq=6.0), product of:
0.25074318 = queryWeight, product of:
4.9682584 = idf(docFreq=835, maxDocs=44218)
0.05046903 = queryNorm
0.47537887 = fieldWeight in 5266, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.9682584 = idf(docFreq=835, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5266)
0.024488911 = product of:
0.048977822 = sum of:
0.048977822 = weight(_text_:classification in 5266) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048977822 = score(doc=5266,freq=6.0), product of:
0.16072905 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.05046903 = queryNorm
0.3047229 = fieldWeight in 5266, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5266)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Through their work as instructors in a master of library science program, the authors observed a sharp increase in students' desire to adopt the reader-interest classification approach of genrefication for their school libraries' fiction collections. In order to better understand this trend, the researchers interviewed seven school librarians regarding their motivations for genrefying their libraries' fiction collections; the challenges they encountered during or after the genrefication process; and any benefits they perceived as having resulted in the implementation of genrefication. The data suggest that the librarians' interests in genrefication stem mostly from the lack of time they have to help individual students find materials, and the lack of time students are given out of the instructional day to explore the libraries' fiction collections. The participants felt that reclassifying the library's fiction collection by genre gave students more ownership of the fiction collection and allowed them to find ma-terials that genuinely interested them. The significant challenges the librarians faced in the reorganization process speak to challenges regarding the ways in which librarians attempt to provide access to diverse materials for all patrons.
- Object
- Reader Interest Classification
-
Sauperl, A.: Four views of a novel : characteristics of novels as described by publishers, librarians, literary theorists, and readers (2013)
0.08
0.08289318 = product of:
0.12433976 = sum of:
0.0963466 = weight(_text_:interest in 1952) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0963466 = score(doc=1952,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25074318 = queryWeight, product of:
4.9682584 = idf(docFreq=835, maxDocs=44218)
0.05046903 = queryNorm
0.38424414 = fieldWeight in 1952, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.9682584 = idf(docFreq=835, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1952)
0.027993156 = product of:
0.05598631 = sum of:
0.05598631 = weight(_text_:classification in 1952) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05598631 = score(doc=1952,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16072905 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.05046903 = queryNorm
0.34832728 = fieldWeight in 1952, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1952)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Publishers present novels with summaries, librarians provide subject headings, classification numbers and annotations, literary theorists write reviews. Readers share opinions and tags in social networks. These groups share interest in the same novel and possibly in the same library catalogs. I analyze the descriptions of novels written by these four groups to propose the enhancement of library catalogs. Results show that the story, information about the author, genre, personal experience with reading the novel, and an evaluation (awards, personal evaluation) are consistently presented by all four groups and should become standard elements for the subject description of fiction.
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 51(2013) no.6, S.624-654
-
Mikkonen, A.; Vakkari, P.: Readers' interest criteria in fiction book search in library catalogs (2016)
0.06
0.056190483 = product of:
0.16857144 = sum of:
0.16857144 = weight(_text_:interest in 3030) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.16857144 = score(doc=3030,freq=12.0), product of:
0.25074318 = queryWeight, product of:
4.9682584 = idf(docFreq=835, maxDocs=44218)
0.05046903 = queryNorm
0.6722872 = fieldWeight in 3030, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
4.9682584 = idf(docFreq=835, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3030)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to investigate fiction readers' interest criteria when selecting novels in library catalogs for various search tasks. Design/methodology/approach - The data of the book selection behavior from 80 genuine fiction readers were collected using recorded interviews and conversations. The data were qualitatively analyzed. Reuter's categorization of the components of aesthetic relevance has contributed to the construction of interest dimensions. Findings - A five-dimension categorization of interest criteria is presented based on fiction readers' interpretations of the influential factors in fiction book selection in different search tasks. The findings revealed that readers apply the identified interest criteria in a flexible and multiphase way depending to the search task and the system used. The findings showed a context-related pattern in readers' fiction book selections. A combination of readers' search capacities, "behind the eyes" knowledge, affective factors and a well-functioning interaction with a system used results in a successful book selection. Originality/value - A five-dimension categorization of adult fiction readers' interest criteria was created based on their search behaviors in library catalogs. The results provide a systematic step toward a comprehensive understanding of readers' fiction book selection in digital environments.
-
Laakso, J.; Puukko, O.: Classification of fiction by topic in the light of experiments carried out in two public libraries : [Original in Finnisch] (1992)
0.05
0.049973316 = product of:
0.14991994 = sum of:
0.14991994 = sum of:
0.06786566 = weight(_text_:classification in 4155) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06786566 = score(doc=4155,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16072905 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.05046903 = queryNorm
0.42223644 = fieldWeight in 4155, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4155)
0.08205428 = weight(_text_:22 in 4155) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08205428 = score(doc=4155,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17673394 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05046903 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4155, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4155)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 5. 8.2006 10:22:39
-
Klein, R.D.: ¬The problem of cataloguing world literature using the Nippon Decimal Classification (1994)
0.04
0.04435579 = product of:
0.13306737 = sum of:
0.13306737 = sum of:
0.07836452 = weight(_text_:classification in 867) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07836452 = score(doc=867,freq=6.0), product of:
0.16072905 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.05046903 = queryNorm
0.48755667 = fieldWeight in 867, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=867)
0.054702852 = weight(_text_:22 in 867) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054702852 = score(doc=867,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17673394 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05046903 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 867, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=867)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- The Nippon Decimal Classification (NDC) system, extensively used in Japanese libraries, was devised in 1929. It is difficult to use NDC to classify world literature, such as fiction in English by non American, non British writers. This is not necessarily straightforward in other classification schemes but a survey of 40 Japanese university libraries, of which 24 responded, showed remarkable inconsistencies in the treatment of 22 world literature authors. NDC clearly needs updating to deal with this problem
-
Pejtersen, A.M.: Design of a classification scheme for fiction based on an analysis of actual user-librarian communication, and use of the scheme for control of librarians' search strategies (1980)
0.04
0.04164443 = product of:
0.12493329 = sum of:
0.12493329 = sum of:
0.056554716 = weight(_text_:classification in 5835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056554716 = score(doc=5835,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16072905 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.05046903 = queryNorm
0.35186368 = fieldWeight in 5835, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5835)
0.06837857 = weight(_text_:22 in 5835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06837857 = score(doc=5835,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17673394 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05046903 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5835, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5835)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 5. 8.2006 13:22:44
-
Beghtol, C.: Toward a theory of fiction analysis for information storage and retrieval (1992)
0.04
0.039562404 = product of:
0.11868721 = sum of:
0.11868721 = sum of:
0.06398436 = weight(_text_:classification in 5830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06398436 = score(doc=5830,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16072905 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.05046903 = queryNorm
0.39808834 = fieldWeight in 5830, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5830)
0.054702852 = weight(_text_:22 in 5830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054702852 = score(doc=5830,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17673394 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05046903 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5830, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5830)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 5. 8.2006 13:22:08
- Source
- Classification research for knowledge representation and organization. Proc. 5th Int. Study Conf. on Classification Research, Toronto, Canada, 24.-28.6.1991. Ed. by N.J. Williamson u. M. Hudon
-
Ward, M.; Saarti, J.: Reviewing, rebutting, and reimagining fiction classification (2018)
0.02
0.018470693 = product of:
0.05541208 = sum of:
0.05541208 = product of:
0.11082416 = sum of:
0.11082416 = weight(_text_:classification in 5164) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11082416 = score(doc=5164,freq=12.0), product of:
0.16072905 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.05046903 = queryNorm
0.6895092 = fieldWeight in 5164, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5164)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- This article explores the topic of fiction classification. The first section attempts to define the field, discussing fiction classification, its schemes, objectivity, aboutness, and shelf classification. The second section suggests three new ideas building upon the foundation of the first: a faceted multi-warrant classification, controlled term affective dimension searching, and the design of a user-oriented recommendation-based system.
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 56(2018) no.4, S.317-329
-
Guard, A.: ¬An antidote for browsing : subject headings for fiction (1991)
0.02
0.018234285 = product of:
0.054702852 = sum of:
0.054702852 = product of:
0.109405704 = sum of:
0.109405704 = weight(_text_:22 in 1108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.109405704 = score(doc=1108,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17673394 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05046903 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 1108, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1108)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 5. 8.2006 10:22:00
-
OCLC/LC fiction headings project : too little, too late? (1992)
0.02
0.018234285 = product of:
0.054702852 = sum of:
0.054702852 = product of:
0.109405704 = sum of:
0.109405704 = weight(_text_:22 in 1298) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.109405704 = score(doc=1298,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17673394 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05046903 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 1298, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1298)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 5. 8.2006 10:22:14
-
Stünkel, M.: Neuere Methoden der inhaltlichen Erschließung schöner Literatur in öffentlichen Bibliotheken (1986)
0.02
0.018234285 = product of:
0.054702852 = sum of:
0.054702852 = product of:
0.109405704 = sum of:
0.109405704 = weight(_text_:22 in 5815) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.109405704 = score(doc=5815,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17673394 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05046903 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 5815, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5815)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 4. 8.2006 21:35:22
-
Austin, J.: ¬The AMP classification system for fiction : Trial application and retrieval tests (1982)
0.02
0.016325941 = product of:
0.048977822 = sum of:
0.048977822 = product of:
0.097955644 = sum of:
0.097955644 = weight(_text_:classification in 6387) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.097955644 = score(doc=6387,freq=6.0), product of:
0.16072905 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.05046903 = queryNorm
0.6094458 = fieldWeight in 6387, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6387)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Universal classification I: subject analysis and ordering systems. Proc. of the 4th Int. Study Conf. on Classification Research, Augsburg, 28.6.-2.7.1982. Ed.: I. Dahlberg
-
Pejtersen, A.M.: ¬A new approach to the classification of fiction (1982)
0.02
0.016325941 = product of:
0.048977822 = sum of:
0.048977822 = product of:
0.097955644 = sum of:
0.097955644 = weight(_text_:classification in 7240) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.097955644 = score(doc=7240,freq=6.0), product of:
0.16072905 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.05046903 = queryNorm
0.6094458 = fieldWeight in 7240, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=7240)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Universal classification I: subject analysis and ordering systems. Proc. of the 4th Int. Study Conf. on Classification Research, Augsburg, 28.6.-2.7.1982. Ed. I. Dahlberg
-
Beghtol, C.: Access to fiction : A problem in classification theory and practice. Pt.1-2 (1989-90)
0.02
0.015996091 = product of:
0.04798827 = sum of:
0.04798827 = product of:
0.09597654 = sum of:
0.09597654 = weight(_text_:classification in 909) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09597654 = score(doc=909,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16072905 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.05046903 = queryNorm
0.5971325 = fieldWeight in 909, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=909)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- International classification. Pt.1: 16(1989), S.134-140; Pt.2: 17(1990), S.21-26
-
Schneider, A.: ¬Die Verzeichnung und sachliche Erschließung der Belletristik in Kaysers Bücherlexikon und im Schlagwortkatalog Georg/Ost (1980)
0.02
0.015955 = product of:
0.047864996 = sum of:
0.047864996 = product of:
0.09572999 = sum of:
0.09572999 = weight(_text_:22 in 5309) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09572999 = score(doc=5309,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17673394 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05046903 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 5309, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5309)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 5. 8.2006 13:07:22
-
Pejtersen, A.M.: Fiction and library classification (1978)
0.02
0.0150812585 = product of:
0.045243774 = sum of:
0.045243774 = product of:
0.09048755 = sum of:
0.09048755 = weight(_text_:classification in 722) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09048755 = score(doc=722,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16072905 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.05046903 = queryNorm
0.5629819 = fieldWeight in 722, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=722)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
-
Massey, A.P.: Classification of fiction (1881)
0.02
0.0150812585 = product of:
0.045243774 = sum of:
0.045243774 = product of:
0.09048755 = sum of:
0.09048755 = weight(_text_:classification in 913) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09048755 = score(doc=913,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16072905 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.05046903 = queryNorm
0.5629819 = fieldWeight in 913, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=913)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
-
Corbett, E.V.: ¬The classification of fiction (1938)
0.02
0.0150812585 = product of:
0.045243774 = sum of:
0.045243774 = product of:
0.09048755 = sum of:
0.09048755 = weight(_text_:classification in 915) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09048755 = score(doc=915,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16072905 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.05046903 = queryNorm
0.5629819 = fieldWeight in 915, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=915)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
