Search (90 results, page 1 of 5)

  • × theme_ss:"Universale Facettenklassifikationen"
  1. Broughton, V.: Finding Bliss on the Web : some problems of representing faceted terminologies in digital environments 0.07
    0.071051285 = product of:
      0.10657693 = sum of:
        0.082582794 = weight(_text_:interest in 3532) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.082582794 = score(doc=3532,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25074318 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.9682584 = idf(docFreq=835, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05046903 = queryNorm
            0.3293521 = fieldWeight in 3532, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.9682584 = idf(docFreq=835, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3532)
        0.023994135 = product of:
          0.04798827 = sum of:
            0.04798827 = weight(_text_:classification in 3532) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04798827 = score(doc=3532,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16072905 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05046903 = queryNorm
                0.29856625 = fieldWeight in 3532, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3532)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    The Bliss Bibliographic Classification is the only example of a fully faceted general classification scheme in the Western world. Although it is the object of much interest as a model for other tools it suffers from the lack of a web presence, and remedying this is an immediate objective for its editors. Understanding how this might be done presents some challenges, as the scheme is semantically very rich and complex in the range and nature of the relationships it contains. The automatic management of these is already in place using local software, but exporting this to a common data format needs careful thought and planning. Various encoding schemes, both for traditional classifications, and for digital materials, represent variously: the concepts; their functional roles; and the relationships between them. Integrating these aspects in a coherent and interchangeable manner appears to be achievable, but the most appropriate format is as yet unclear.
  2. Dousa, T.: Everything Old is New Again : Perspectivism and Polyhierarchy in Julius O. Kaiser's Theory of Systematic Indexing (2007) 0.06
    0.059209406 = product of:
      0.08881411 = sum of:
        0.068818994 = weight(_text_:interest in 4835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.068818994 = score(doc=4835,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25074318 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.9682584 = idf(docFreq=835, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05046903 = queryNorm
            0.27446008 = fieldWeight in 4835, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.9682584 = idf(docFreq=835, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4835)
        0.019995112 = product of:
          0.039990224 = sum of:
            0.039990224 = weight(_text_:classification in 4835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.039990224 = score(doc=4835,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16072905 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05046903 = queryNorm
                0.24880521 = fieldWeight in 4835, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4835)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    In the early years of the 20th century, Julius Otto Kaiser (1868-1927), a special librarian and indexer of technical literature, developed a method of knowledge organization (KO) known as systematic indexing. Certain elements of the method-its stipulation that all indexing terms be divided into fundamental categories "concretes", "countries", and "processes", which are then to be synthesized into indexing "statements" formulated according to strict rules of citation order-have long been recognized as precursors to key principles of the theory of faceted classification. However, other, less well-known elements of the method may prove no less interesting to practitioners of KO. In particular, two aspects of systematic indexing seem to prefigure current trends in KO: (1) a perspectivist outlook that rejects universal classifications in favor of information organization systems customized to reflect local needs and (2) the incorporation of index terms extracted from source documents into a polyhierarchical taxonomical structure. Kaiser's perspectivism anticipates postmodern theories of KO, while his principled use of polyhierarchy to organize terms derived from the language of source documents provides a potentially fruitful model that can inform current discussions about harvesting natural-language terms, such as tags, and incorporating them into a flexibly structured controlled vocabulary.
    Source
    Proceedings 18th Workshop of the American Society for Information Science and Technology Special Interest Group in Classification Research, Milwaukee, Wisconsin. Ed.: Lussky, Joan
  3. Lin, W.-Y.C.: ¬The concept and applications of faceted classifications (2006) 0.04
    0.04435579 = product of:
      0.13306737 = sum of:
        0.13306737 = sum of:
          0.07836452 = weight(_text_:classification in 5083) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07836452 = score(doc=5083,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.16072905 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05046903 = queryNorm
              0.48755667 = fieldWeight in 5083, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5083)
          0.054702852 = weight(_text_:22 in 5083) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.054702852 = score(doc=5083,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17673394 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05046903 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5083, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5083)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    The concept of faceted classification has its long history and importance in the human civilization. Recently, more and more consumer Web sites adopt the idea of facet analysis to organize and display their products or services. The aim of this article is to review the origin and develpment of faceted classification, as well as its concepts, essence, advantage and limitation. Further, the applications of faceted classification in various domians have been explored.
    Date
    27. 5.2007 22:19:35
  4. Tennis, J.T.: Facets and fugit tempus : considering time's effect on faceted classification schemes (2012) 0.04
    0.04435579 = product of:
      0.13306737 = sum of:
        0.13306737 = sum of:
          0.07836452 = weight(_text_:classification in 826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07836452 = score(doc=826,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.16072905 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05046903 = queryNorm
              0.48755667 = fieldWeight in 826, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=826)
          0.054702852 = weight(_text_:22 in 826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.054702852 = score(doc=826,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17673394 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05046903 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 826, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=826)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Describes the effect of scheme change on the semantics in faceted classification. Two types of change are identified: ecological change and lexical change. Examples from different editions of the Colon Classification are used to illustrate change.
    Date
    2. 6.2013 18:33:22
  5. Rodriguez, R.D.: Kaiser's systematic indexing (1984) 0.04
    0.036703467 = product of:
      0.110110395 = sum of:
        0.110110395 = weight(_text_:interest in 4521) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.110110395 = score(doc=4521,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25074318 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.9682584 = idf(docFreq=835, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05046903 = queryNorm
            0.43913615 = fieldWeight in 4521, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.9682584 = idf(docFreq=835, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4521)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    J. Kaiser (1868-1927) developed a system of subject indexing based on what he called "concretes" and "processes" to govern the form of subject headings and subdivisions. Although Kaiser applied his systematic indexing to specialized technical and business collections, his ideas are entirely applicable to all book collections and catalogs. Though largely ignored, Kaiser's system is of permanent interest in the study of the development of subject analysis
  6. Perugini, S.: Supporting multiple paths to objects in information hierarchies : faceted classification, faceted search, and symbolic links (2010) 0.03
    0.034617104 = product of:
      0.1038513 = sum of:
        0.1038513 = sum of:
          0.05598631 = weight(_text_:classification in 4227) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05598631 = score(doc=4227,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.16072905 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05046903 = queryNorm
              0.34832728 = fieldWeight in 4227, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4227)
          0.047864996 = weight(_text_:22 in 4227) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.047864996 = score(doc=4227,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17673394 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05046903 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4227, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4227)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    We present three fundamental, interrelated approaches to support multiple access paths to each terminal object in information hierarchies: faceted classification, faceted search, and web directories with embedded symbolic links. This survey aims to demonstrate how each approach supports users who seek information from multiple perspectives. We achieve this by exploring each approach, the relationships between these approaches, including tradeoffs, and how they can be used in concert, while focusing on a core set of hypermedia elements common to all. This approach provides a foundation from which to study, understand, and synthesize applications which employ these techniques. This survey does not aim to be comprehensive, but rather focuses on thematic issues.
    Source
    Information processing and management. 46(2010) no.1, S.22-43
  7. Gnoli, C.; Merli, G.; Pavan, G.; Bernuzzi, E.; Priano, M.: Freely faceted classification for a Web-based bibliographic archive : the BioAcoustic Reference Database (2010) 0.03
    0.030248001 = product of:
      0.090744 = sum of:
        0.090744 = sum of:
          0.056554716 = weight(_text_:classification in 3739) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.056554716 = score(doc=3739,freq=8.0), product of:
              0.16072905 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05046903 = queryNorm
              0.35186368 = fieldWeight in 3739, product of:
                2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                  8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3739)
          0.034189284 = weight(_text_:22 in 3739) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.034189284 = score(doc=3739,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17673394 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05046903 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3739, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3739)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    The Integrative Level Classification (ILC) research project is experimenting with a knowledge organization system based on phenomena rather than disciplines. Each phenomenon has a constant notation, which can be combined with that of any other phenomenon in a freely faceted structure. Citation order can express differential focality of the facets. Very specific subjects can have long classmarks, although their complexity is reduced by various devices. Freely faceted classification is being tested by indexing a corpus of about 3300 papers in the interdisciplinary domain of bioacoustics. The subjects of these papers often include phenomena from a wide variety of integrative levels (mechanical waves, animals, behaviour, vessels, fishing, law, ...) as well as information about the methods of study, as predicted in the León Manifesto. The archive is recorded in a MySQL database, and can be fed and searched through PHP Web interfaces. Indexer's work is made easier by mechanisms that suggest possible classes on the basis of matching title words with terms in the ILC schedules, and synthesize automatically the verbal caption corresponding to the classmark being edited. Users can search the archive by selecting and combining values in each facet. Search refinement should be improved, especially for the cases where no record, or too many records, match the faceted query. However, experience is being gained progressively, showing that freely faceted classification by phenomena, theories, and methods is feasible and successfully working.
    Source
    Wissensspeicher in digitalen Räumen: Nachhaltigkeit - Verfügbarkeit - semantische Interoperabilität. Proceedings der 11. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Konstanz, 20. bis 22. Februar 2008. Hrsg.: J. Sieglerschmidt u. H.P.Ohly
  8. Heuvel, C. van den: Multidimensional classifications : past and future conceptualizations and visualizations (2012) 0.03
    0.0291511 = product of:
      0.0874533 = sum of:
        0.0874533 = sum of:
          0.039588302 = weight(_text_:classification in 632) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.039588302 = score(doc=632,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16072905 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05046903 = queryNorm
              0.24630459 = fieldWeight in 632, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=632)
          0.047864996 = weight(_text_:22 in 632) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.047864996 = score(doc=632,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17673394 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05046903 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 632, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=632)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    This paper maps the concepts "space" and "dimensionality" in classifications, in particular in visualizations hereof, from a historical perspective. After a historical excursion in the domain of classification theory of what in mathematics is known as dimensionality reduction in representations of a single universe of knowledge, its potentiality will be explored for information retrieval and navigation in the multiverse of the World Wide Web.
    Date
    22. 2.2013 11:31:25
  9. Mills, J.; Broughton, V.: Bliss Bibliographic Classification : Introduction and auxiliary schedules (1992) 0.03
    0.025009438 = product of:
      0.075028315 = sum of:
        0.075028315 = product of:
          0.15005663 = sum of:
            0.15005663 = weight(_text_:classification in 821) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.15005663 = score(doc=821,freq=22.0), product of:
                0.16072905 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05046903 = queryNorm
                0.93359995 = fieldWeight in 821, product of:
                  4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
                    22.0 = termFreq=22.0
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=821)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    COMPASS
    Documents / Subject classification
    LCSH
    Classification, Bibliographic
    Bliss Bibliographic classification
    PRECIS
    Documents / Subject classification schemes: Bliss, Henry Evelyn / Bliss bibliographic classification / Texts
    Subject
    Classification, Bibliographic
    Bliss Bibliographic classification
    Documents / Subject classification schemes: Bliss, Henry Evelyn / Bliss bibliographic classification / Texts
    Documents / Subject classification
  10. Ranganathan, S.R.: Colon Classification : Pt.1: Rules of classification; Pt.2: Schedules of classification; Pt.3: Index to the schedules (1933) 0.02
    0.022856317 = product of:
      0.06856895 = sum of:
        0.06856895 = product of:
          0.1371379 = sum of:
            0.1371379 = weight(_text_:classification in 1833) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.1371379 = score(doc=1833,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.16072905 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05046903 = queryNorm
                0.85322416 = fieldWeight in 1833, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1833)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  11. Satija, M. P.: Use of Colon Classification (1986) 0.02
    0.02132812 = product of:
      0.06398436 = sum of:
        0.06398436 = product of:
          0.12796871 = sum of:
            0.12796871 = weight(_text_:classification in 101) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.12796871 = score(doc=101,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16072905 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05046903 = queryNorm
                0.7961767 = fieldWeight in 101, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=101)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    International classification. 13(1986), S.88-92
  12. Mills, J.: Bibliographic classification (1976) 0.02
    0.02132812 = product of:
      0.06398436 = sum of:
        0.06398436 = product of:
          0.12796871 = sum of:
            0.12796871 = weight(_text_:classification in 1272) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.12796871 = score(doc=1272,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16072905 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05046903 = queryNorm
                0.7961767 = fieldWeight in 1272, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1272)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Classification in the 1970s: a second look. Rev. ed. Ed.: A. Maltby
  13. Dousa, T.M.; Ibekwe-SanJuan, F.: Epistemological and methodological eclecticism in the construction of knowledge organization systems (KOSs) : the case of analytico-synthetic KOSs (2014) 0.02
    0.020822216 = product of:
      0.062466644 = sum of:
        0.062466644 = sum of:
          0.028277358 = weight(_text_:classification in 1417) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.028277358 = score(doc=1417,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16072905 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05046903 = queryNorm
              0.17593184 = fieldWeight in 1417, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1417)
          0.034189284 = weight(_text_:22 in 1417) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.034189284 = score(doc=1417,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17673394 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05046903 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1417, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1417)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    In recent years, Hjørland has developed a typology of basic epistemological approaches to KO that identifies four basic positions - empiricism, rationalism, historicism/hermeneutics, and pragmatism -with which to characterize the epistemological bases and methodological orientation of KOSs. Although scholars of KO have noted that the design of a single KOS may incorporate epistemological-methodological features from more than one of these approaches, studies of concrete examples of epistemologico-methodological eclecticism have been rare. In this paper, we consider the phenomenon of epistemologico-methodological eclecticism in one theoretically significant family of KOSs - namely analytico-synthetic, or faceted, KOSs - by examining two cases - Julius Otto Kaiser's method of Systematic Indexing (SI) and Brian Vickery's method of facet analysis (FA) for document classification. We show that both of these systems combined classical features of rationalism with elements of empiricism and pragmatism and argue that such eclecticism is the norm, rather than the exception, for such KOSs in general.
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  14. Tomlinson, H.: Report on work for new general classification scheme (1969) 0.02
    0.01959113 = product of:
      0.058773387 = sum of:
        0.058773387 = product of:
          0.117546774 = sum of:
            0.117546774 = weight(_text_:classification in 1285) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.117546774 = score(doc=1285,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.16072905 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05046903 = queryNorm
                0.731335 = fieldWeight in 1285, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1285)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Classification and information control. Papers representing the work of the Classification Research Group during 1960-1968
  15. Austin, D.: ¬The theory of integrative levels reconsidered as the basis of a general classification (1969) 0.02
    0.01959113 = product of:
      0.058773387 = sum of:
        0.058773387 = product of:
          0.117546774 = sum of:
            0.117546774 = weight(_text_:classification in 1286) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.117546774 = score(doc=1286,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.16072905 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05046903 = queryNorm
                0.731335 = fieldWeight in 1286, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1286)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Classification and information control. Papers representing the work of the Classification Research Group during 1960-1968
  16. Mills, J.: Library classification (1970) 0.02
    0.018851573 = product of:
      0.056554716 = sum of:
        0.056554716 = product of:
          0.11310943 = sum of:
            0.11310943 = weight(_text_:classification in 1806) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11310943 = score(doc=1806,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16072905 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05046903 = queryNorm
                0.70372736 = fieldWeight in 1806, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=1806)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  17. Gopinath, M.A.: Colon classification (1976) 0.02
    0.018662104 = product of:
      0.05598631 = sum of:
        0.05598631 = product of:
          0.11197262 = sum of:
            0.11197262 = weight(_text_:classification in 5935) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11197262 = score(doc=5935,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16072905 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05046903 = queryNorm
                0.69665456 = fieldWeight in 5935, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5935)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Classification in the 1970s: a second look. Rev. ed. Ed.: A. Maltby
  18. Dahlberg, I.: Principles for the construction of a universal classification system : a proposal (1978) 0.02
    0.018662104 = product of:
      0.05598631 = sum of:
        0.05598631 = product of:
          0.11197262 = sum of:
            0.11197262 = weight(_text_:classification in 67) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11197262 = score(doc=67,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16072905 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05046903 = queryNorm
                0.69665456 = fieldWeight in 67, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=67)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Conceptual basis of the classification of knowledge. Proc. of the Ottawa Conf. ... 1.5.10.1971. Ed. by J.A. Wojciechowski
  19. Classification and information control : Papers representing the work of the Classification Research Group during 1960-1968 (1969) 0.02
    0.016966414 = product of:
      0.05089924 = sum of:
        0.05089924 = product of:
          0.10179848 = sum of:
            0.10179848 = weight(_text_:classification in 3402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10179848 = score(doc=3402,freq=18.0), product of:
                0.16072905 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05046903 = queryNorm
                0.6333546 = fieldWeight in 3402, product of:
                  4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                    18.0 = termFreq=18.0
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3402)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Content
    Enthält die Beiträge: FAIRTHORNE, R.A.: 'Browsing' schemes and 'specialist' schemes; KYLE, B.R.F.: Lessons learned from experience in drafting the Kyle classification; MILLS, J.: Inadequacies of exing general classification schemes; COATES, E.J.: CRG proposals for a new general classification; TOMLINSON, H.: Notes on initial work for NATO classification; TOMLINSON, H.: Report on work for new general classification scheme; TOMLINSON, H.: Expansion of categories using mining terms; TOMLINSON, H.: Relationship between geology and mining; TOMLINSON, H.: Use of categories for sculpture; TOMLINSON, H.: Expansion of categories using terms from physics; TOMLINSON, H.: The distinction between physical and chemical entities; TOMLINSON, H.: Concepts within politics; TOMLINSON, H.: Problems arising from first GCS papers; AUSTIN, D.: The theory of integrative levels reconsidered as the basis of a general classification; AUSTIN, D.: Demonstration: provisional scheme for naturally occuring entities; AUSTIN, D.: Stages in classing and exercises; AUSTIN, D.: Report to the Library Association Research Committee on the use of the NATO grant
    Editor
    Classification Research Group
  20. Foskett, D.J.: Classification for a general index language: a review of recent research by the Classification Research Group (1970) 0.02
    0.015996091 = product of:
      0.04798827 = sum of:
        0.04798827 = product of:
          0.09597654 = sum of:
            0.09597654 = weight(_text_:classification in 3403) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09597654 = score(doc=3403,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16072905 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05046903 = queryNorm
                0.5971325 = fieldWeight in 3403, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3403)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    

Languages

  • e 86
  • d 3
  • chi 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 72
  • el 10
  • m 10
  • s 4
  • b 2
  • More… Less…