Search (63 results, page 1 of 4)

  • × type_ss:"b"
  1. Singh, S. (Sewa); Singh, S. (Sukhbir): Colon Classification : a select bibliography (1992) 0.07 
    0.07042619 = product of:
  0.10563928 = sum of:
    0.055055197 = weight(_text_:interest in 1479) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.055055197 = score(doc=1479,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.25074318 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.9682584 = idf(docFreq=835, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05046903 = queryNorm
        0.21956807 = fieldWeight in 1479, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.9682584 = idf(docFreq=835, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1479)
    0.050584078 = product of:
      0.101168156 = sum of:
        0.101168156 = weight(_text_:classification in 1479) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.101168156 = score(doc=1479,freq=40.0), product of:
            0.16072905 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05046903 = queryNorm
            0.6294329 = fieldWeight in 1479, product of:
              6.3245554 = tf(freq=40.0), with freq of:
                40.0 = termFreq=40.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1479)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    This being the Birth Centenary.Year of Dr. S. R. Ranganathan, it was deemed as a befitting tribute to the author of Colon Classifiction to bring together all that has been published thus far on it and complile it in the form of a bibliographies are an important source of information on a particular field of study and research. A research worker has to carry out the literature survey on the area of interest which sometimes consumes many precious man hours in order to collect some relevent citations. Thus bibliographies are a useful source in saving the precious time and energy of the reseach workers, and lead them to the primary sources for carryying out the research further to the destination.
    Content
    Inhalt: General Classification, Colon Classification, Edition7, Philosophy, Conference, Literature Survey, Features, History. Countries and Areas , Theoru, Design of Classification, Classification Problems , Research in Classification, Trends in Classification, Depth Classification, Automatic Classification, Uses of Classification, Practical Classification, Application of Classification, Standards, Glossary.Teminology, classification and Reference Service, Classificationand Documentation, Classification and Communication, Classification and Retrieval, Comparison to Other Schemes, Canons, Isolates, Common Isolates , Space Isolates, Time Isolates, Special Isolates, Postulates, Fundamental Categories, Facet Formula, Optionl Facets, Rounds and Levels, Basic Subjects, Notation and Symbols, Array and Chanin, Devices, Mnemonics, Phase Relation, Systems and Specials, Book Number, Cooperative Calssification, Teaching of Classification, Classification of Specific Subjects, Book Science, Bibliography, Library and Information Science, Classification, Cataloguing, Mathematics, Cybernetics, Engineering, Computer, Chemistry, Crystallography, Technology. Food Technology, Corrosion, Parasitism, Geology , Agriculture, Zoology, Animal Husbandry, Medicine, Useful Arts, Military Science, Creative Arts, Aiterature, Sanskrit, Marathi, Tamil, Calssics, Linguistics, Philosophy, Ssocial Science, Geography, Maps, History , Political Science, Economics, Sociology, Law,
    LCSH
    Classification, Colon / Bibliography
    Subject
    Classification, Colon / Bibliography
  2. Banush, D.; Kurth, M:; Pajerek, J.: Rehabilitating killer serials : an automated strategy for maintaining E-journal metadata (2005) 0.06 
    0.057275757 = product of:
  0.085913636 = sum of:
    0.068818994 = weight(_text_:interest in 124) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.068818994 = score(doc=124,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.25074318 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.9682584 = idf(docFreq=835, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05046903 = queryNorm
        0.27446008 = fieldWeight in 124, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.9682584 = idf(docFreq=835, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=124)
    0.017094642 = product of:
      0.034189284 = sum of:
        0.034189284 = weight(_text_:22 in 124) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034189284 = score(doc=124,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17673394 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05046903 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 124, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=124)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    Cornell University Library (CUL) has developed a largely automated method for providing title-level catalog access to electronic journals made available through aggregator packages. CUL's technique for automated e-journal record creation and maintenance relies largely on the conversion of externally supplied metadata into streamlined, abbreviated-level MARC records. Unlike the Cooperative Online Serials Cataloging Program's recently implemented aggregator-neutral approach to e-journal cataloging, CUL's method involves the creation of a separate bibliographic record for each version of an e-journal title in order to facilitate automated record maintenance. An indexed local field indicates the aggregation to which each title belongs and enables machine manipulation of all the records associated with a specific aggregation. Information encoded in another locally defined field facilitates the identification of all of the library's e-journal titles and allows for the automatic generation of a Web-based title list of e-journals. CUL's approach to providing title-level catalog access to its e-journal aggregations involves a number of tradeoffs in which some elements of traditional bibliographic description (such as subject headings and linking fields) are sacrificed in the interest of timeliness and affordability. URLs (Uniform Resource Locators) and holdings information are updated on a regular basis by use of automated methods that save on staff costs.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  3. Zendulkova, D.: Bibliografia CDS/ISIS (1997) 0.05 
    0.04587933 = product of:
  0.13763799 = sum of:
    0.13763799 = weight(_text_:interest in 343) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13763799 = score(doc=343,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.25074318 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.9682584 = idf(docFreq=835, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05046903 = queryNorm
        0.54892015 = fieldWeight in 343, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.9682584 = idf(docFreq=835, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=343)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Presents a bibliography of literature and Internet information devoted to the CDS/ISIS system. The Internet information is listed on the WWW server of the Wageningen Agricultural University Library (Holland), which is a Gopher server, with links to other Internet sites of interest
  4. Miksa, S.D.: ¬The challenges of change : a review of cataloging and classification literature, 2003-2004 (2007) 0.04 
    0.04435579 = product of:
  0.13306737 = sum of:
    0.13306737 = sum of:
      0.07836452 = weight(_text_:classification in 266) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.07836452 = score(doc=266,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.16072905 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05046903 = queryNorm
          0.48755667 = fieldWeight in 266, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=266)
      0.054702852 = weight(_text_:22 in 266) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.054702852 = score(doc=266,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17673394 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05046903 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 266, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=266)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    This paper reviews the enormous changes in cataloging and classification reflected in the literature of 2003 and 2004, and discusses major themes and issues. Traditional cataloging and classification tools have been re-vamped and new resources have emerged. Most notable themes are: the continuing influence of the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Control (FRBR); the struggle to understand the ever-broadening concept of an "information entity"; steady developments in metadata-encoding standards; and the globalization of information systems, including multilinguistic challenges.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  5. El-Sherbini, M.A.: Cataloging and classification : review of the literature 2005-06 (2008) 0.04 
    0.039562404 = product of:
  0.11868721 = sum of:
    0.11868721 = sum of:
      0.06398436 = weight(_text_:classification in 249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.06398436 = score(doc=249,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.16072905 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05046903 = queryNorm
          0.39808834 = fieldWeight in 249, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=249)
      0.054702852 = weight(_text_:22 in 249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.054702852 = score(doc=249,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17673394 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05046903 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 249, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=249)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    This paper reviews library literature on cataloging and classification published in 2005-06. It covers pertinent literature in the following areas: the future of cataloging; Functional Requirement for Bibliographic Records (FRBR); metadata and its applications and relation to Machine-Readable Cataloging (MARC); cataloging tools and standards; authority control; and recruitment, training, and the changing role of catalogers.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  6. Chambers, S.; Myall, C.: Cataloging and classification : review of the literature 2007-8 (2010) 0.04 
    0.03881132 = product of:
  0.11643395 = sum of:
    0.11643395 = sum of:
      0.06856895 = weight(_text_:classification in 4309) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.06856895 = score(doc=4309,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.16072905 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05046903 = queryNorm
          0.42661208 = fieldWeight in 4309, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4309)
      0.047864996 = weight(_text_:22 in 4309) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.047864996 = score(doc=4309,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17673394 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05046903 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4309, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4309)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    This paper surveys library literature on cataloging and classification published in 2007-8, indicating its extent and range in terms of types of literature, major subject areas, and themes. The paper reviews pertinent literature in the following areas: the future of bibliographic control, general cataloging standards and texts, Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR), cataloging varied resources, metadata and cataloging in the Web world, classification and subject access, questions of diversity and diverse perspectives, additional reports of practice and research, catalogers' education and careers, keeping current through columns and blogs, and cataloging history.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  7. Billick, D.: ¬A selective bibliography on library imaging technology and applications (1995) 0.04 
    0.036703467 = product of:
  0.110110395 = sum of:
    0.110110395 = weight(_text_:interest in 3072) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.110110395 = score(doc=3072,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.25074318 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.9682584 = idf(docFreq=835, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05046903 = queryNorm
        0.43913615 = fieldWeight in 3072, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.9682584 = idf(docFreq=835, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3072)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Selectively surveys recent materials (mostly from 1990 to 1994) on basic imaging technologies like scanners, storage media, display units and compression; and reviews in a summary way publications of general interest to library professionals. Emphasizes material from the public and academic library domains. Excludes museum librarianship, records management and commercial/ industrial applications although a few references are included as representative of various approaches to exploiting imaging capabilities
  8. Shorten, J.; Seikel, M.; Ahrberg, J.H.: Why do you still use dewey? : Academic libraries that continue with dewey decimal classification (2005) 0.04 
    0.0362976 = product of:
  0.1088928 = sum of:
    0.1088928 = sum of:
      0.06786566 = weight(_text_:classification in 125) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.06786566 = score(doc=125,freq=8.0), product of:
          0.16072905 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05046903 = queryNorm
          0.42223644 = fieldWeight in 125, product of:
            2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
              8.0 = termFreq=8.0
            3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=125)
      0.04102714 = weight(_text_:22 in 125) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04102714 = score(doc=125,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17673394 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05046903 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 125, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=125)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Reclassification was a popular trend during the 1960s and 1970s for many academic libraries wanting to change from Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) to Library of Congress (LC) Classification. In 2002, Southern Illinois University at Carbondale's Morris Library changed from DDC to LC. If one academic library recently converted, might other DDC academic libraries consider switching, too? Conversely, for those academic libraries that remain with DDC, what are the reasons they continue with it? A survey of thirty-four DDC academic libraries in the United States and Canada determined what factors influence these libraries to continue using DDC, and if reclassification is something they have considered or are considering. The survey also investigated whether patrons of these DDC libraries prefer LC and if their preference influences the library's decision to reclassify. Results from the survey indicate that the issue of reclassification is being considered by some of these libraries even though, overall, they are satisfied with DDC. The study was unable to determine if patrons' preference for a classification scheme influenced a library's decision to reclassify.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  9. Buckland, M.K.; Liu, Z.: History of information science (1995) 0.03 
    0.033315543 = product of:
  0.099946626 = sum of:
    0.099946626 = sum of:
      0.045243774 = weight(_text_:classification in 4226) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.045243774 = score(doc=4226,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16072905 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05046903 = queryNorm
          0.28149095 = fieldWeight in 4226, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4226)
      0.054702852 = weight(_text_:22 in 4226) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.054702852 = score(doc=4226,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17673394 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05046903 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4226, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4226)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    State of the art review of the historical development of information science as deemed to be covered by the particular interests of memebers of the American Society for Information Science, as defined as the representation, storage, transmission, selection, retrieval, filtering, and use of documents and messages. Arranges the references cited roughly according to the classification scheme used by Information Science Abstracts, and so uses the headings: background; information science; techniques and technology; information related behaviour; application areas; social aspects; education for information science; institutions; individuals; geographical areas; and conclusions
    Date
    13. 6.1996 19:22:20
  10. Gatti, T.H.: Utilization of students as cataloging assistants at carnegie category I institution libraries (2005) 0.03 
    0.033315543 = product of:
  0.099946626 = sum of:
    0.099946626 = sum of:
      0.045243774 = weight(_text_:classification in 43) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.045243774 = score(doc=43,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16072905 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05046903 = queryNorm
          0.28149095 = fieldWeight in 43, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=43)
      0.054702852 = weight(_text_:22 in 43) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.054702852 = score(doc=43,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17673394 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05046903 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 43, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=43)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    A survey of 261 libraries was undertaken to determine the level of use of and duties performed by student assistants in monographic cataloging operations. Ninety-five of 142 responding libraries (64.1 percent) indicate that they use student assistants for some type of monographic cataloging tasks. These tasks are downloading of bibliographic and authority records, monographic cataloging, classification, subject heading authority control, holdings, database maintenance, and editing of 246 or 505 MARC tags. Some respondents expressed reluctance to use student assistants for higher-level cataloging tasks.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  11. Williams, R.V.; Whitmire, L.; Bradley, C.: Bibliography of the history of information science in North America : 1900-1995 (1997) 0.03 
    0.032115534 = product of:
  0.0963466 = sum of:
    0.0963466 = weight(_text_:interest in 53) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0963466 = score(doc=53,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.25074318 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.9682584 = idf(docFreq=835, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05046903 = queryNorm
        0.38424414 = fieldWeight in 53, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.9682584 = idf(docFreq=835, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=53)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    A bibliography of the history of information science in North America, 1900-1995, created by the University of South Caroline College of Library and Information Science, USA, under a grant from the Special Interest Group Projects Fund of the American Society for Information Science. The project identified early individual and organizations of information science in the USA and Canada, determines the location of the personal/professional papers and archives of these pioneers, and compiled the bibliography. The bibliography id divided into: books (including encyclopaedia articles), journal articles, and unpublished papers
  12. Martin, K.E.; Mundle, K.: Positioning libraries for a new bibliographic universe (2014) 0.03 
    0.029671803 = product of:
  0.08901541 = sum of:
    0.08901541 = sum of:
      0.04798827 = weight(_text_:classification in 2608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04798827 = score(doc=2608,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.16072905 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05046903 = queryNorm
          0.29856625 = fieldWeight in 2608, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2608)
      0.04102714 = weight(_text_:22 in 2608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04102714 = score(doc=2608,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17673394 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05046903 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2608, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2608)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    This paper surveys the English-language literature on cataloging and classification published during 2011 and 2012, covering both theory and application. A major theme of the literature centered on Resource Description and Access (RDA), as the period covered in this review includes the conclusion of the RDA test, revisions to RDA, and the implementation decision. Explorations in the theory and practical applications of the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR), upon which RDA is organized, are also heavily represented. Library involvement with linked data through the creation of prototypes and vocabularies are explored further during the period. Other areas covered in the review include: classification, controlled vocabularies and name authority, evaluation and history of cataloging, special formats cataloging, cataloging and discovery services, non-AACR2/RDA metadata, cataloging workflows, and the education and careers of catalogers.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  13. Julien, C.-A.; Leide, J.E.; Bouthillier, F.: Controlled user evaluations of information visualization interfaces for text retrieval : literature review and meta-analysis (2008) 0.03 
    0.027527599 = product of:
  0.082582794 = sum of:
    0.082582794 = weight(_text_:interest in 1718) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.082582794 = score(doc=1718,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.25074318 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.9682584 = idf(docFreq=835, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05046903 = queryNorm
        0.3293521 = fieldWeight in 1718, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.9682584 = idf(docFreq=835, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1718)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    This review describes experimental designs (users, search tasks, measures, etc.) used by 31 controlled user studies of information visualization (IV) tools for textual information retrieval (IR) and a meta-analysis of the reported statistical effects. Comparable experimental designs allow research designers to compare their results with other reports, and support the development of experimentally verified design guidelines concerning which IV techniques are better suited to which types of IR tasks. The studies generally use a within-subject design with 15 or more undergraduate students performing browsing to known-item tasks on sets of at least 1,000 full-text articles or Web pages on topics of general interest/news. Results of the meta-analysis (N = 8) showed no significant effects of the IV tool as compared with a text-only equivalent, but the set shows great variability suggesting an inadequate basis of comparison. Experimental design recommendations are provided which would support comparison of existing IV tools for IR usability testing.
  14. Miller, D.; Olson, T.; Layne, S.S.: Promoting research and best practices in subject reference structures : a decade of work by the subject analysis committee (2005) 0.02 
    0.024986658 = product of:
  0.07495997 = sum of:
    0.07495997 = sum of:
      0.03393283 = weight(_text_:classification in 123) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03393283 = score(doc=123,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16072905 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05046903 = queryNorm
          0.21111822 = fieldWeight in 123, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=123)
      0.04102714 = weight(_text_:22 in 123) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04102714 = score(doc=123,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17673394 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05046903 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 123, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=123)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    In 2004, the ALCTS (Association for Library Collections & Technical Services) Cataloging and Classification Section Subject Analysis Committee (SAC) produced the report Recommendations for Providing Access to, Display of, Navigation within and among, and Modifications of Existing Practice Regarding Subject Reference Structures in Automated Systems. This document is one important outcome of nearly ten years' work by three SAC (Subject Analysis Committee) subcommittees investigating the theoretical, pragmatic, and political dimensions of improving subject access through better use of reference structure data. The work of those subcommittees is reviewed and their recommendations are described and summarized. Potential future effects of the report are discussed, as is a snapshot view of several major automation systems' current compliance with the recommendations.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  15. Baga, J.; Hoover, L.; Wolverton, R.E.: Online, practical, and free cataloging resources (2013) 0.02 
    0.024986658 = product of:
  0.07495997 = sum of:
    0.07495997 = sum of:
      0.03393283 = weight(_text_:classification in 2603) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03393283 = score(doc=2603,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16072905 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05046903 = queryNorm
          0.21111822 = fieldWeight in 2603, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2603)
      0.04102714 = weight(_text_:22 in 2603) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04102714 = score(doc=2603,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17673394 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05046903 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2603, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2603)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    This comprehensive annotated webliography describes online cataloging resources that are free to use, currently updated, and of high quality. The major aim of this webliography is to provide assistance for catalogers who are new to the profession, unfamiliar with cataloging specific formats, or unable to access costly print and subscription resources. The annotated resources include general websites and webpages, databases, workshop presentations, streaming media, and local documentation. The scope of the webliography is limited to resources reflecting traditional cataloging practices using the Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules, 2nd edition, RDA: Resource Description and Access, and MAchine Readable Cataloging (MARC) standards. Non-MARC metadata schemas like Dublin Core are not covered. Most components of cataloging are represented in this webliography, such as authority control, classification, subject headings, and genre terms. Guidance also is provided for cataloging miscellaneous formats including sound and videorecordings, streaming media, e-books, video games, graphic novels, kits, rare materials, maps, serials, realia, government documents, and music.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  16. Filk, C.: Online, Internet und Digitalkultur : eine Bibliographie zur jüngsten Diskussion um die Informationsgesellschaft (1996) 0.02 
    0.022563778 = product of:
  0.06769133 = sum of:
    0.06769133 = product of:
      0.13538267 = sum of:
        0.13538267 = weight(_text_:22 in 44) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13538267 = score(doc=44,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17673394 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05046903 = queryNorm
            0.76602525 = fieldWeight in 44, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=44)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Date
    5. 9.1997 19:22:27
    Source
    Rundfunk und Geschichte. 22(1996) H.2/3, S.184-193
  17. Bibliography of papers on classification and allied subjects (1956) 0.02 
    0.02132812 = product of:
  0.06398436 = sum of:
    0.06398436 = product of:
      0.12796871 = sum of:
        0.12796871 = weight(_text_:classification in 294) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12796871 = score(doc=294,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.16072905 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05046903 = queryNorm
            0.7961767 = fieldWeight in 294, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=294)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Editor
    Classification Research Group
  18. Kapur, S.: Classification and cataloguing : a select bibliography (1988) 0.02 
    0.018851573 = product of:
  0.056554716 = sum of:
    0.056554716 = product of:
      0.11310943 = sum of:
        0.11310943 = weight(_text_:classification in 7359) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11310943 = score(doc=7359,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16072905 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05046903 = queryNorm
            0.70372736 = fieldWeight in 7359, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=7359)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  19. T.1: Classification systems and thesauri, 1950-1982 (1982) // T.2: Reference tools and conferences in classification and indexing (1984) // T.3: Classification- and indexing systems: theory - structure - methodology, 1950-1982 (1985) // T.4: On universal and special classification systems and thesauri (in Vorb.) // T.5: Language foundation, apllication and environment of classification and indexing (in Vorb.) : International classification and indexing bibliography (ICIB) (1982-) 0.02 
    0.018662104 = product of:
  0.05598631 = sum of:
    0.05598631 = product of:
      0.11197262 = sum of:
        0.11197262 = weight(_text_:classification in 2839) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11197262 = score(doc=2839,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.16072905 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05046903 = queryNorm
            0.69665456 = fieldWeight in 2839, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2839)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Content
    Diese (zum Thema umfangreichste) Bibliographie wird durch eine ständige Rubrik in der Zeitschrift 'International Classification' laufend ergänzt; danach fortgesetzt in: Knowledge organization. - Vgl. zum verwendeten Klassifikationssystem: Dahlberg, I. u.a. in: International classification 9(1982) S.87-93; 12(1985) S.143-152.
  20. Metz, A.: Community service : a bibliography (1996) 0.02 
    0.018234285 = product of:
  0.054702852 = sum of:
    0.054702852 = product of:
      0.109405704 = sum of:
        0.109405704 = weight(_text_:22 in 5341) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.109405704 = score(doc=5341,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17673394 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05046903 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 5341, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5341)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Date
    17.10.1996 14:22:33

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 54
  • d 6
  • m 1
  • nl 1
  • ru 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 46
  • m 7
  • el 3
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications