Search (45 results, page 1 of 3)

0.20383948 = product of:
  0.40767896 = sum of:
    0.40767896 = sum of:
      0.340052 = weight(_text_:manager in 3073) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.340052 = score(doc=3073,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.32959074 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.603137 = idf(docFreq=162, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049914267 = queryNorm
          1.0317402 = fieldWeight in 3073, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            6.603137 = idf(docFreq=162, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3073)
      0.067626946 = weight(_text_:22 in 3073) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.067626946 = score(doc=3073,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17479126 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049914267 = queryNorm
          0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3073, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3073)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Content

Vorstellung von integrierten Bibliothekssystemen auf PC-Basis: DavexPlus; Bib-Base; BiblioFile; EloquentLibrarian; LibraryWorks; ProfessionalSeries; Alexandria; Columbia Library System; Manager Series; TheAssistant; TINLIB

Date

30.11.1995 20:53:22

Object

Manager Series

0.1190182 = product of:
  0.2380364 = sum of:
    0.2380364 = product of:
      0.4760728 = sum of:
        0.4760728 = weight(_text_:manager in 512) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.4760728 = score(doc=512,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.32959074 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.603137 = idf(docFreq=162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049914267 = queryNorm
            1.4444362 = fieldWeight in 512, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              6.603137 = idf(docFreq=162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=512)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Object

Reference Manager

0.104119234 = product of:
  0.20823847 = sum of:
    0.20823847 = product of:
      0.41647694 = sum of:
        0.41647694 = weight(_text_:manager in 1572) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.41647694 = score(doc=1572,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.32959074 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.603137 = idf(docFreq=162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049914267 = queryNorm
            1.2636185 = fieldWeight in 1572, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              6.603137 = idf(docFreq=162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1572)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Reference Manager is one of the leading database software packages in the UK. Describes its significant features and reviews the Windows version focusing on: the word processing software with which it is compatible; installation; retrieval; drawbacks and its many advantages

Object

Reference Manager

0.10201559 = product of:
  0.20403118 = sum of:
    0.20403118 = product of:
      0.40806237 = sum of:
        0.40806237 = weight(_text_:manager in 5434) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.40806237 = score(doc=5434,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.32959074 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.603137 = idf(docFreq=162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049914267 = queryNorm
            1.2380881 = fieldWeight in 5434, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              6.603137 = idf(docFreq=162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5434)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Object

Reference Manager

0.10201559 = product of:
  0.20403118 = sum of:
    0.20403118 = product of:
      0.40806237 = sum of:
        0.40806237 = weight(_text_:manager in 4636) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.40806237 = score(doc=4636,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.32959074 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.603137 = idf(docFreq=162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049914267 = queryNorm
            1.2380881 = fieldWeight in 4636, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              6.603137 = idf(docFreq=162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4636)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Object

Reference Manager

0.09618122 = product of:
  0.19236244 = sum of:
    0.19236244 = product of:
      0.3847249 = sum of:
        0.3847249 = weight(_text_:manager in 4668) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.3847249 = score(doc=4668,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.32959074 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.603137 = idf(docFreq=162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049914267 = queryNorm
            1.1672807 = fieldWeight in 4668, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.603137 = idf(docFreq=162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4668)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Object

Reference Manager

0.09618122 = product of:
  0.19236244 = sum of:
    0.19236244 = product of:
      0.3847249 = sum of:
        0.3847249 = weight(_text_:manager in 5038) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.3847249 = score(doc=5038,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.32959074 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.603137 = idf(docFreq=162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049914267 = queryNorm
            1.1672807 = fieldWeight in 5038, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.603137 = idf(docFreq=162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5038)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Object

Reference Manager

0.085013 = product of:
  0.170026 = sum of:
    0.170026 = product of:
      0.340052 = sum of:
        0.340052 = weight(_text_:manager in 1523) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.340052 = score(doc=1523,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.32959074 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.603137 = idf(docFreq=162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049914267 = queryNorm
            1.0317402 = fieldWeight in 1523, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              6.603137 = idf(docFreq=162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1523)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Compares 4 data base management system software packages designed to enable scholars and researchers manage and search files of records, astracts and references: askSam; Notebook; Pro-Cite and Reference Manager.

Object

Reference Manager

0.08415858 = product of:
  0.16831715 = sum of:
    0.16831715 = product of:
      0.3366343 = sum of:
        0.3366343 = weight(_text_:manager in 5) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.3366343 = score(doc=5,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.32959074 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.603137 = idf(docFreq=162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049914267 = queryNorm
            1.0213706 = fieldWeight in 5, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.603137 = idf(docFreq=162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

0.0680104 = product of:
  0.1360208 = sum of:
    0.1360208 = product of:
      0.2720416 = sum of:
        0.2720416 = weight(_text_:manager in 8356) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.2720416 = score(doc=8356,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.32959074 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.603137 = idf(docFreq=162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049914267 = queryNorm
            0.8253921 = fieldWeight in 8356, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              6.603137 = idf(docFreq=162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8356)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Describes the value of using bibliographic management software to handle the process of downloading of references from online or CD-ROM databases. 3 critical tasks are involved: building the database of references to periodical articles, books or similar materials; searching the database created; and generating a list of selected items from the database. Illustrates the main downloading features of 4 popular software packages: Reference Manager; Papyrus; Library Master; and Pro-Cite

Object

Reference Manager

0.0680104 = product of:
  0.1360208 = sum of:
    0.1360208 = product of:
      0.2720416 = sum of:
        0.2720416 = weight(_text_:manager in 2624) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.2720416 = score(doc=2624,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.32959074 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.603137 = idf(docFreq=162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049914267 = queryNorm
            0.8253921 = fieldWeight in 2624, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              6.603137 = idf(docFreq=162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2624)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Reports on a user survey of bibliographic citation management software carried out in Jan 95. 176 responses were received. Reports user comments on: EndNote Plus; IBID; Library Master; Papyrus; ProCite; Reference Manager; and gives details of: RMS-3; Cardbox 4.1 and STN Personal File System

Object

Reference Manager

0.0680104 = product of:
  0.1360208 = sum of:
    0.1360208 = product of:
      0.2720416 = sum of:
        0.2720416 = weight(_text_:manager in 4905) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.2720416 = score(doc=4905,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.32959074 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.603137 = idf(docFreq=162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049914267 = queryNorm
            0.8253921 = fieldWeight in 4905, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              6.603137 = idf(docFreq=162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4905)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Reviews 3 bibliography formatting programs that run under Windows: EndNote Plus 2.0.0.0 for Windows; ProCite 3.0.5 for Windows and Reference Manager 7.0 for Windows. Covers: operating systems, types of materials, citations styles, assembling bibliography, subject bibliographies, importing with importing module, importing module, exporting, non-English characters, networking and price. Examines display styles, how to build a database, global editing, and searching

Object

Reference Manager

0.0680104 = product of:
  0.1360208 = sum of:
    0.1360208 = product of:
      0.2720416 = sum of:
        0.2720416 = weight(_text_:manager in 6429) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.2720416 = score(doc=6429,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.32959074 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.603137 = idf(docFreq=162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049914267 = queryNorm
            0.8253921 = fieldWeight in 6429, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              6.603137 = idf(docFreq=162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6429)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Reviews Citation 7 from Nota Bene / Oberon, New York, a datafile manager and bibliographic citation generator intended for writers, students, and academics to be used in conjunction with WordPerfect for Windows or Microsoft Word (6.0 and above). Because it generates bibliographies to files, it may be used with other word processors. Discusses features, performance; ease of learning and use; documentation; support; and library applicabiblity

0.0680104 = product of:
  0.1360208 = sum of:
    0.1360208 = product of:
      0.2720416 = sum of:
        0.2720416 = weight(_text_:manager in 1756) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.2720416 = score(doc=1756,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.32959074 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.603137 = idf(docFreq=162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049914267 = queryNorm
            0.8253921 = fieldWeight in 1756, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              6.603137 = idf(docFreq=162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1756)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Bibliography formatting software (BFS) programs maintain files of bibliographic references from books, articles, etc. in a personal computer, and are equipped with a special 'manuscript formatting' function that enables a typescript to be formatted using word processing software, such as WordPerfect or Word, in such a way that citations can be inserted automatically into the finished text. Discusses the merits and limitations of 4 BFS products: ProCite; Reference Manager; EndNote; and Library Master

Object

Reference Manager

0.0680104 = product of:
  0.1360208 = sum of:
    0.1360208 = product of:
      0.2720416 = sum of:
        0.2720416 = weight(_text_:manager in 4247) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.2720416 = score(doc=4247,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.32959074 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.603137 = idf(docFreq=162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049914267 = queryNorm
            0.8253921 = fieldWeight in 4247, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              6.603137 = idf(docFreq=162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4247)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

This discussion of Personal Bibliographic Systems (PBS) features deals with microcomputer programs that manage the input, storage, retrieval, and output of bibliographic references. Although various partially overlapping terminologies may be encountered in the literature such programs as EndNote, ProCite, and Reference Manager-three of the most popular PBS-have by now become household names in academic circles. Several dozens of similar programs exist, each with its own peculiar combination of desirable and less appropriate features. The names of over 100 PBS examples are listed in Appendix 2.

Object

Reference Manager

0.06311893 = product of:
  0.12623785 = sum of:
    0.12623785 = product of:
      0.2524757 = sum of:
        0.2524757 = weight(_text_:manager in 4368) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.2524757 = score(doc=4368,freq=18.0), product of:
            0.32959074 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.603137 = idf(docFreq=162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049914267 = queryNorm
            0.7660279 = fieldWeight in 4368, product of:
              4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                18.0 = termFreq=18.0
              6.603137 = idf(docFreq=162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=4368)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Im Sommer 2005 ist die neueste Version des weit verbreiteten persönlichen Literaturverwaltungssystems EndNote erschienen. Noch im Jahre 2000 musste diese Gattung von Software genauer beschrieben und für deutsche Wissenschaftler erklärt werden. Mittlerweile hat sich deren Gebrauch sogar institutionell verbreitet. So bietet der GBV EndNote und Reference Manager Connection Files, der edoc-Server der HU Berlin schreibt die Benutzung eigener Formate zur Ablieferung von Dissertationsliteraturlisten vor und die Max-Planck-Gesellschaft nutzt EndNote und Reference Manager offiziell für ihre Jahres-Berichte um nur einige Beispiele zu nennen. Obwohl viele (Natur-)Wissenschaftler eher von BiB-TeX oder "freien" Bibliographiemanagementsystemen kommen, scheinen sich diese beiden doch immer mehr durchzusetzen. Es erstaunt etwas, dass Geistes- und Sozialwissenschaftler sich dieser Systeme offenbar weniger bedienen, obwohl bekannt ist, dass deren Forschungsfront gerade eher auf bibliographische Vollständigkeit angewiesen ist als die der Naturwissenschaftler. Der Wettlauf zwischen EndNote und dem Konkurrenzprodukt aus dem Hause ISI ist jedoch nicht beendet wie ich noch vor Jahren spekulierte. ISI bzw. Thomson als dem Produzenten von Reference Manager hatte die beiden Konkurrenten EndNote und ProCite aufgekauft und man konnte erwarten, dass sich die Systeme angleichen und dem Nutzer der Übergang zu einem zentral gepflegten ISI Angebot erleichtert wird. In gewissen Teilen hat tatsächlich eine Angleichung stattgefunden. Die als herausragend empfundene Eigenschaft von Profite in höherem Maße inhaltliche Erschließung zu unterstützen ist mittlerweile auch bei den beiden anderen implementiert. Die einzigen verbleibenden Unterschiede (marketingtechnisch gesprochen: USPs - unique selling propositions) sind die Fähigkeit ProCites, Webseiten "on-the-fly" zu katalogisieren-sofern diese Metadaten aufweisen, die Web Publisher Funktion und erhöhte Netzwerkfähigkeit von Reference Manager sowie die Palm Version und die leicht größeren technischen Kapazitäten von Endnote und dessen Fähigkeit Abbildungen und Objekte direkt einzufügen. Zumindest ist zwischen EndNote und Reference Manager die Entscheidung nicht gefallen, da beide auf eigene Weise weiterentwickelt werden, während Profite seit sechs Jahren kein Update mehr erfahren hat. EndNote ist in den fünf Jahren seit der letzten Besprechung um 5 Versionsnummern auf Nummer 9 gewachsen. Reference Manager hat es auf elf (von 9.5) geschafft. In anderthalb Jahren wird EndNote also Reference Manager überholt haben. Man fragt sich, was die Unterschiede ausmacht, die solche Sprünge in den Versionsbezeichnungen rechtfertigen. Meist handelt es sich um die Einbindung neuer connection files und Importfilter, die Vorgabe neuer Medienformen und neuer bibliographischer Stile (Formatvorlagen): also neben der Anpassung an weiterentwickelte Betriebssysteme eher um quantitative Verbesserungen. Vielleicht ist der Vergleich gewagt, aber mir drängt sich die Parallele zu Virusprogrammen auf: Was wäre wenn diese bei jedem update des virus defintion files eine neue Versionsnummer erhielten? Andere Neuerungen wie die Unterstützung von XML, WSDL, openURL und teilweise auch Unicode werden von den Kunden sicher als selbstverständlich vorausgesetzt oder aber gar nicht bemerkt. Der Abstand der aktuellen Versionsnummer zur eigenen Version erhöht oft nur den psychologischen Druck, endlich auf die neue Fassung umzusteigen. Die meist um die 200 EUR (120 EUR für das update) dafür sind nicht immer gerechtfertigt.

Object

Reference Manager

0.060113266 = product of:
  0.12022653 = sum of:
    0.12022653 = product of:
      0.24045306 = sum of:
        0.24045306 = weight(_text_:manager in 341) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.24045306 = score(doc=341,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.32959074 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.603137 = idf(docFreq=162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049914267 = queryNorm
            0.7295504 = fieldWeight in 341, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.603137 = idf(docFreq=162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=341)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Reviews the EndNote Plus 2.3 dual purpose Windows based software designed as a database manager and as a bibliography maker to insert citations into word processing documents and later compile the bibliography in the required format

0.0595091 = product of:
  0.1190182 = sum of:
    0.1190182 = product of:
      0.2380364 = sum of:
        0.2380364 = weight(_text_:manager in 4783) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.2380364 = score(doc=4783,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.32959074 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.603137 = idf(docFreq=162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049914267 = queryNorm
            0.7222181 = fieldWeight in 4783, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              6.603137 = idf(docFreq=162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4783)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Many thousands of researchers are now using personal bibliographic managers such as Reference Manager, EndNote and ProCite to access bibliographic databases via the Z39.50 protocol. With the EndNote software as an example, this paper demonstrates how researchers are using a standard search interface to access diverse databases and download references into their personal databases. There follows an overview of problems involved in searching the Z39.50 servers of some standard library automation systems (Innovative Interfaces, GEAC, SIRSI, Endeavour) and of two vendors of non-OPAC databases (Research Libraries Group and SilverPlatter). The paper concludes with some suggestions as to how the library community can contribute to improving the effectiveness of Z39.50 as a research tool.

Object

Reference Manager

0.051007796 = product of:
  0.10201559 = sum of:
    0.10201559 = product of:
      0.20403118 = sum of:
        0.20403118 = weight(_text_:manager in 4634) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.20403118 = score(doc=4634,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.32959074 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.603137 = idf(docFreq=162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049914267 = queryNorm
            0.61904407 = fieldWeight in 4634, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              6.603137 = idf(docFreq=162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4634)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Content

HANSON, T.: What is bibliographic software; HANSON, T.: Importing downloaded records into bibliographic software; HANSON, T.: Standardising on Pro-Cite at the University of Portsmouth; COX, J.: Library support for Reference Manager at a School of Medicine; MILLIGAN, J.: EndNote on the Apple at the Imperial Cancer Research Fund; DAVNALL, S.: Papyrus at the University of Manchester and the CHEST licence; CARTER, E.R.: A trial of PC bibliographic database and formatting packages; SLEE, D.: Electrocopying from databases; OPPENHEIM, C.: Staying within the law

Object

Reference Manager

0.04809061 = product of:
  0.09618122 = sum of:
    0.09618122 = product of:
      0.19236244 = sum of:
        0.19236244 = weight(_text_:manager in 5037) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.19236244 = score(doc=5037,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.32959074 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.603137 = idf(docFreq=162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049914267 = queryNorm
            0.58364034 = fieldWeight in 5037, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.603137 = idf(docFreq=162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5037)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)