Search (104 results, page 1 of 6)

  • × theme_ss:"Benutzerstudien"
  1. Hirsh, S.G.: Complexity of search tasks and children's information retrieval (1996) 0.03
    0.03292724 = product of:
      0.11524534 = sum of:
        0.07655808 = weight(_text_:global in 4430) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07655808 = score(doc=4430,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19788647 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.002325 = idf(docFreq=807, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0395589 = queryNorm
            0.38687882 = fieldWeight in 4430, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.002325 = idf(docFreq=807, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4430)
        0.038687263 = weight(_text_:ed in 4430) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.038687263 = score(doc=4430,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.140671 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0395589 = queryNorm
            0.27501947 = fieldWeight in 4430, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4430)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Source
    Global complexity: information, chaos and control. Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science, ASIS'96, Baltimore, Maryland, 21-24 Oct 1996. Ed.: S. Hardin
  2. Agosto, D.E.: Bounded rationality and satisficing in young people's Web-based decision making (2002) 0.03
    0.03153911 = product of:
      0.11038688 = sum of:
        0.094307825 = weight(_text_:personal in 177) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.094307825 = score(doc=177,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.19948503 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.0427346 = idf(docFreq=775, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0395589 = queryNorm
            0.4727564 = fieldWeight in 177, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.0427346 = idf(docFreq=775, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=177)
        0.016079053 = product of:
          0.032158107 = sum of:
            0.032158107 = weight(_text_:22 in 177) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.032158107 = score(doc=177,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13852853 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0395589 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 177, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=177)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    This study investigated Simon's behavioral decisionmaking theories of bounded rationality and satisficing in relation to young people's decision making in the World Wide Web, and considered the role of personal preferences in Web-based decisions. It employed a qualitative research methodology involving group interviews with 22 adolescent females. Data analysis took the form of iterative pattern coding using QSR NUD*IST Vivo qualitative data analysis software. Data analysis revealed that the study participants did operate within the limits of bounded rationality. These limits took the form of time constraints, information overload, and physical constraints. Data analysis also uncovered two major satisficing behaviors-reduction and termination. Personal preference was found to play a major role in Web site evaluation in the areas of graphic/multimedia and subject content preferences. This study has related implications for Web site designers and for adult intermediaries who work with young people and the Web
  3. Nordlie, R.: Unmediated and mediated information saerching in the public library (1996) 0.03
    0.02822335 = product of:
      0.09878172 = sum of:
        0.06562121 = weight(_text_:global in 7396) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06562121 = score(doc=7396,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19788647 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.002325 = idf(docFreq=807, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0395589 = queryNorm
            0.3316104 = fieldWeight in 7396, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.002325 = idf(docFreq=807, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7396)
        0.03316051 = weight(_text_:ed in 7396) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03316051 = score(doc=7396,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.140671 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0395589 = queryNorm
            0.23573098 = fieldWeight in 7396, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7396)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Source
    Global complexity: information, chaos and control. Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science, ASIS'96, Baltimore, Maryland, 21-24 Oct 1996. Ed.: S. Hardin
  4. Shiri, A.A.; Revie, C.: End-user interaction with thesauri : an evaluation of cognitive overlap in search term selection (2004) 0.03
    0.02822335 = product of:
      0.09878172 = sum of:
        0.06562121 = weight(_text_:global in 2658) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06562121 = score(doc=2658,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19788647 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.002325 = idf(docFreq=807, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0395589 = queryNorm
            0.3316104 = fieldWeight in 2658, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.002325 = idf(docFreq=807, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2658)
        0.03316051 = weight(_text_:ed in 2658) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03316051 = score(doc=2658,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.140671 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0395589 = queryNorm
            0.23573098 = fieldWeight in 2658, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2658)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization and the global information society: Proceedings of the 8th International ISKO Conference 13-16 July 2004, London, UK. Ed.: I.C. McIlwaine
  5. Meadow, C.T.: Speculations on the measurement and use of user characteristics in information retrieval experimentation (1994) 0.03
    0.027588254 = product of:
      0.096558884 = sum of:
        0.07779998 = weight(_text_:personal in 1795) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07779998 = score(doc=1795,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19948503 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.0427346 = idf(docFreq=775, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0395589 = queryNorm
            0.3900041 = fieldWeight in 1795, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.0427346 = idf(docFreq=775, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1795)
        0.018758897 = product of:
          0.037517793 = sum of:
            0.037517793 = weight(_text_:22 in 1795) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037517793 = score(doc=1795,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13852853 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0395589 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1795, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1795)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    Presents a recently composite view of several user studies in information retrieval. Contains personal conclusions and speculations based on these studies, rather than formal statistical results, which so often are not comparable from 1 experiment to another. Suggests a taxonomy of user characteristics for such studies, in order to make results comparable. Discusses methods and effects of user training, then manner of expression of a query or information need, conduct of a search, use of the system command language or its equivalent, analysis by the user of retrieved information, and user satisfaction with outcome. Concludes with suggestions for system design and experimental methodology
    Source
    Canadian journal of information and library science. 19(1994) no.4, S.1-22
  6. Mizrachi, D.; Bates, M.J.: Undergraduates' personal academic information management and the consideration of time and task-urgency (2013) 0.03
    0.02628259 = product of:
      0.09198906 = sum of:
        0.07858985 = weight(_text_:personal in 1003) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07858985 = score(doc=1003,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.19948503 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.0427346 = idf(docFreq=775, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0395589 = queryNorm
            0.39396363 = fieldWeight in 1003, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.0427346 = idf(docFreq=775, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1003)
        0.013399213 = product of:
          0.026798425 = sum of:
            0.026798425 = weight(_text_:22 in 1003) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.026798425 = score(doc=1003,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13852853 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0395589 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1003, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1003)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    Young undergraduate college students are often described as "digital natives," presumed to prefer living and working in completely digital information environments. In reality, their world is part-paper/part-digital, in constant transition among successive forms of digital storage and communication devices. Studying for a degree is the daily work of these young people, and effective management of paper and digital academic materials and resources contributes crucially to their success in life. Students must also constantly manage their work against deadlines to meet their course and university requirements. This study, following the "Personal Information Management" (PIM) paradigm, examines student academic information management under these various constraints and pressures. A total of 41 18- to 22-year-old students were interviewed and observed regarding the content, structure, and uses of their immediate working environment within their dormitory rooms. Students exhibited remarkable creativity and variety in the mixture of automated and manual resources and devices used to support their academic work. The demands of a yearlong procession of assignments, papers, projects, and examinations increase the importance of time management activities and influence much of their behavior. Results provide insights on student use of various kinds of information technology and their overall planning and management of information associated with their studies.
  7. Su, L.T.; Chen, H.L.: Evaluation of Web search engines by undergraduate students (1999) 0.02
    0.019018328 = product of:
      0.06656414 = sum of:
        0.044457134 = weight(_text_:personal in 6546) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.044457134 = score(doc=6546,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19948503 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.0427346 = idf(docFreq=775, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0395589 = queryNorm
            0.22285949 = fieldWeight in 6546, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.0427346 = idf(docFreq=775, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=6546)
        0.022107007 = weight(_text_:ed in 6546) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022107007 = score(doc=6546,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.140671 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0395589 = queryNorm
            0.15715398 = fieldWeight in 6546, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=6546)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    This research continues to explore the user's evaluation of Web search engines using a methodology proposed by Su (1997) and tested in a pilot study (Su, Chen, & Dong, 1998). It seeks to generate useful insight for system design and improvement, and for engine choice. The researchers were interested in how undergraduate students used four selected engines to retrieve information for their studies or personal interests and how they evaluated the interaction and search results retrieved by the four engines. Measures used were based on five evaluation criteria: relevance, efficiency, utility, user satisfaction, and connectivity. Thirty-six undergraduate juniors and seniors were recruited from the disciplines of sciences, social sciences and humanities. Each searched his/her own topic on all four engines in an assigned order and each made relevance judgements of retrieved items in relation to his/her information need or problem. The study found some significant differences among the four engines but none dominated in every aspect of the multidimensional evaluation. Alta Vista had the highest number of relevant and partially relevant documents, the best relative recall and the highest precision ratio based on PR1, Alter Vista had significantly better scores for these three measures than for Lycos. Infoseek had the highest satisfaction rating for response time. Both Infoseek and Excite had significantly higher satisfaction ratings for response time than Lycos. Excite had the best score for output display. Excite and Alta Vista had significantly better scores for output display than Lycos. Excite had the best rating for time saving while Alta Vista achieved the best score for value of search results as a whole and for overall performance. Alta Vista and Excite had significantly better ratings for these three measures than Lycos. Lycos achieved the best relevance ranking performance. Further work will provide more complete picture for engine comparison and choice by taking into account participant characteristics and identify factors contributing to the user's satisfaction to gain better insight for system design and improvement
    Source
    Knowledge: creation, organization and use. Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science, 31.10.-4.11.1999. Ed.: L. Woods
  8. Cooper, L.; Kuhlthau, C.C.: Imagery for constructing meaning in the information search process : a study of middle school students (1999) 0.02
    0.019018328 = product of:
      0.06656414 = sum of:
        0.044457134 = weight(_text_:personal in 280) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.044457134 = score(doc=280,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19948503 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.0427346 = idf(docFreq=775, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0395589 = queryNorm
            0.22285949 = fieldWeight in 280, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.0427346 = idf(docFreq=775, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=280)
        0.022107007 = weight(_text_:ed in 280) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022107007 = score(doc=280,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.140671 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0395589 = queryNorm
            0.15715398 = fieldWeight in 280, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=280)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    More complex contexts of information seeking require extensive thinking that involves an intellectual leap which carries the user `beyond the information given' (Bruner, 1973) to the construction of something `new'. According to Arnheim (1969) such thinking is directly affected by one's visual perception of the world and he argues that the most productive thinking results from this imagery. The application of visual or mental imagery to the relationships and structure in information seeking situations may be thought of as a constructive strategy for making meaning. This paper explores the use of mental imagery in the constructive process of information seeking. For the individual, the meaning of information is not inherent in the information itself but in his or her perception of it and how it fits into an image of the world or personal construct system (Boulding, 1961; Kelly, 1963). The use of imagery may facilitate a user's mental image of information and its relation to previously acquired knowledge and, thus, also facilitate new construction during the information seeking process. Mental imagery has been found to play an important role in creativity and problem solving. Shepard (1978) argues that some of the most creative thoughts and solutions which humans devise are those which are not confined to expression within linear verbal communication but rather spring from mental imagery that embraces a spatial approach to problem solving. Mental imagery is more concrete and visually constructive in nature than verbal methods of problem solving. This paper explores the role of imagery in the constructive tasks of problem solving and learning in the information seeking process.
    Source
    Exploring the contexts of information behaviour: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Research in Information Needs, Seeking and Use in Different Contexts, 13-15 August 1998, Sheffield, UK. Ed. by D.K. Wilson u. D.K. Allen
  9. Campbell, G.: ¬A queer eye for the faceted guy : how a universal classification principle can be applied to a distinct subculture (2004) 0.02
    0.018815568 = product of:
      0.06585448 = sum of:
        0.043747477 = weight(_text_:global in 2639) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.043747477 = score(doc=2639,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19788647 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.002325 = idf(docFreq=807, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0395589 = queryNorm
            0.22107361 = fieldWeight in 2639, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.002325 = idf(docFreq=807, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2639)
        0.022107007 = weight(_text_:ed in 2639) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022107007 = score(doc=2639,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.140671 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0395589 = queryNorm
            0.15715398 = fieldWeight in 2639, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2639)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization and the global information society: Proceedings of the 8th International ISKO Conference 13-16 July 2004, London, UK. Ed.: I.C. McIlwaine
  10. Miller, D.H.: User perception and the online catalogue : public library OPAC users "think aloud" (2004) 0.02
    0.018815568 = product of:
      0.06585448 = sum of:
        0.043747477 = weight(_text_:global in 2659) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.043747477 = score(doc=2659,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19788647 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.002325 = idf(docFreq=807, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0395589 = queryNorm
            0.22107361 = fieldWeight in 2659, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.002325 = idf(docFreq=807, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2659)
        0.022107007 = weight(_text_:ed in 2659) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022107007 = score(doc=2659,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.140671 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0395589 = queryNorm
            0.15715398 = fieldWeight in 2659, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2659)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization and the global information society: Proceedings of the 8th International ISKO Conference 13-16 July 2004, London, UK. Ed.: I.C. McIlwaine
  11. Coleman, A.S.: Knowledge structures and the vocabulary of engineering novices (2004) 0.02
    0.018815568 = product of:
      0.06585448 = sum of:
        0.043747477 = weight(_text_:global in 2666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.043747477 = score(doc=2666,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19788647 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.002325 = idf(docFreq=807, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0395589 = queryNorm
            0.22107361 = fieldWeight in 2666, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.002325 = idf(docFreq=807, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2666)
        0.022107007 = weight(_text_:ed in 2666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022107007 = score(doc=2666,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.140671 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0395589 = queryNorm
            0.15715398 = fieldWeight in 2666, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2666)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization and the global information society: Proceedings of the 8th International ISKO Conference 13-16 July 2004, London, UK. Ed.: I.C. McIlwaine
  12. Berger, F.C.; Hofstede, A.H.M. ter; Van der Weide, T.P.: Supporting query by navigation (1996) 0.02
    0.01641319 = product of:
      0.05744616 = sum of:
        0.038687263 = weight(_text_:ed in 6966) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.038687263 = score(doc=6966,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.140671 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0395589 = queryNorm
            0.27501947 = fieldWeight in 6966, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6966)
        0.018758897 = product of:
          0.037517793 = sum of:
            0.037517793 = weight(_text_:22 in 6966) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037517793 = score(doc=6966,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13852853 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0395589 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 6966, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6966)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Source
    Information retrieval: new systems and current research. Proceedings of the 16th Research Colloquium of the British Computer Society Information Retrieval Specialist Group, Drymen, Scotland, 22-23 Mar 94. Ed.: R. Leon
  13. Borgman, C.L.; Smart, L.J.; Millwood, K.A.; Finley, J.R.; Champeny, L.; Gilliland, A.J.; Leazer, G.H.: Comparing faculty information seeking in teaching and research : implications for the design of digital libraries (2005) 0.02
    0.015764717 = product of:
      0.055176504 = sum of:
        0.044457134 = weight(_text_:personal in 3231) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.044457134 = score(doc=3231,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19948503 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.0427346 = idf(docFreq=775, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0395589 = queryNorm
            0.22285949 = fieldWeight in 3231, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.0427346 = idf(docFreq=775, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3231)
        0.010719369 = product of:
          0.021438738 = sum of:
            0.021438738 = weight(_text_:22 in 3231) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.021438738 = score(doc=3231,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13852853 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0395589 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 3231, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3231)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    ADEPT is a 5-year project whose goals are to develop, deploy, and evaluate inquiry learning capabilities for the Alexandria Digital Library, an extant digital library of primary sources in geography. We interviewed nine geography faculty members who teach undergraduate courses about their information seeking for research and teaching and their use of information resources in teaching. These data were supplemented by interviews with four faculty members from another ADEPT study about the nature of knowledge in geography. Among our key findings are that geography faculty are more likely to encounter useful teaching resources while seeking research resources than vice versa, although the influence goes in both directions. Their greatest information needs are for research data, maps, and images. They desire better searching by concept or theme, in addition to searching by location and place name. They make extensive use of their own research resources in their teaching. Among the implications for functionality and architecture of geographic digital libraries for educational use are that personal digital libraries are essential, because individual faculty members have personalized approaches to selecting, collecting, and organizing teaching resources. Digital library services for research and teaching should include the ability to import content from common office software and to store content in standard formats that can be exported to other applications. Digital library services can facilitate sharing among faculty but cannot overcome barriers such as intellectual property rights, access to proprietary research data, or the desire of individuals to maintain control over their own resources. Faculty use of primary and secondary resources needs to be better understood if we are to design successful digital libraries for research and teaching.
    Date
    3. 6.2005 20:40:22
  14. Griesbaum, J.; Mahrholz, N.; Kiedrowski, K. von Löwe; Rittberger, M.: Knowledge generation in online forums : a case study in the German educational domain (2015) 0.02
    0.015764717 = product of:
      0.055176504 = sum of:
        0.044457134 = weight(_text_:personal in 4440) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.044457134 = score(doc=4440,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19948503 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.0427346 = idf(docFreq=775, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0395589 = queryNorm
            0.22285949 = fieldWeight in 4440, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.0427346 = idf(docFreq=775, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4440)
        0.010719369 = product of:
          0.021438738 = sum of:
            0.021438738 = weight(_text_:22 in 4440) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.021438738 = score(doc=4440,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13852853 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0395589 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 4440, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4440)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to get a first approximation of the usefulness of online forums with regard to information seeking and knowledge generation. Design/methodology/approach - This study captures the characteristics of knowledge generation by examining the pragmatics and types of information needs of posted questions and by investigating knowledge related characteristics of discussion posts as well as the success of communication. Three online forums were examined. The data set consists of 55 threads, containing 533 posts which were categorized manually by two researchers. Findings - Results show that questioners often ask for personal estimations. Information needs often aim for actionable insights or uncertainty reduction. With regard to answers, factual information is the dominant content type and has the highest knowledge value as it is the strongest predictor with regard to the generation of new knowledge. Opinions are also relevant, but in a rather subsequent and complementary way. Emotional aspects are scarcely observed. Overall, results indicate that knowledge creation predominantly follows a socio-cultural paradigm of knowledge exchange. Research limitations/implications - Although the investigation captures important aspects of knowledge building processes, the measurement of the forums' knowledge value is still rather limited. Success is only partly measurable with the current scheme. The central coding category "new topical knowledge" is only of nominal value and therefore not able to compare different kinds of knowledge gains in the course of discussion. Originality/value - The investigation reaches out beyond studies that do not consider that the role and relevance of posts is dependent on the state of the discussion. Furthermore, the paper integrates two perspectives of knowledge value: the success of the questioner with regard to the expressed information need and the knowledge building value for communicants and readers.
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  15. Fidel, R.: ¬The user-centered approach (2000) 0.01
    0.014068448 = product of:
      0.049239565 = sum of:
        0.03316051 = weight(_text_:ed in 917) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03316051 = score(doc=917,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.140671 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0395589 = queryNorm
            0.23573098 = fieldWeight in 917, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=917)
        0.016079053 = product of:
          0.032158107 = sum of:
            0.032158107 = weight(_text_:22 in 917) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.032158107 = score(doc=917,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13852853 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0395589 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 917, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=917)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Date
    22. 9.1997 19:16:05
    Source
    Saving the time of the library user through subject access innovation: Papers in honor of Pauline Atherton Cochrane. Ed.: W.J. Wheeler
  16. Spink, A.; Park, M.; Koshman, S.: Factors affecting assigned information problem ordering during Web search : an exploratory study (2006) 0.01
    0.013472547 = product of:
      0.094307825 = sum of:
        0.094307825 = weight(_text_:personal in 991) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.094307825 = score(doc=991,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.19948503 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.0427346 = idf(docFreq=775, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0395589 = queryNorm
            0.4727564 = fieldWeight in 991, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.0427346 = idf(docFreq=775, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=991)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Abstract
    Multitasking is the human ability to handle the demands of multiple tasks. Multitasking behavior involves the ordering of multiple tasks and switching between tasks. People often multitask when using information retrieval (IR) technologies as they seek information on more than one information problem over single or multiple search episodes. However, limited studies have examined how people order their information problems, especially during their Web search engine interaction. The aim of our exploratory study was to investigate assigned information problem ordering by forty (40) study participants engaged in Web search. Findings suggest that assigned information problem ordering was influenced by the following factors, including personal interest, problem knowledge, perceived level of information available on the Web, ease of finding information, level of importance and seeking information on information problems in order from general to specific. Personal interest and problem knowledge were the major factors during assigned information problem ordering. Implications of the findings and further research are discussed. The relationship between information problem ordering and gratification theory is an important area for further exploration.
  17. Hancock-Beaulieu, M.: ¬Les catalogues en ligne juges par les utilisateurs (1991) 0.01
    0.0127020385 = product of:
      0.08891427 = sum of:
        0.08891427 = weight(_text_:personal in 6602) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08891427 = score(doc=6602,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19948503 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.0427346 = idf(docFreq=775, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0395589 = queryNorm
            0.44571897 = fieldWeight in 6602, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.0427346 = idf(docFreq=775, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6602)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Abstract
    Briefly reviews research on users and online catalogues, focusing on the different data gathering methodologies. OLIVE, an enhanced facility for logging transactions and introducing online questionnaires as a front end to a personal computer, was used to examine user intentions, search formulations and success ratings on several commercial systems. Describes a third generation system, OKAPI, which addresses some of the issues raised by the user feedback
  18. Markey, K.: Users and the online catalog : subject access problems (1986) 0.01
    0.012632576 = product of:
      0.08842803 = sum of:
        0.08842803 = weight(_text_:ed in 342) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08842803 = score(doc=342,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.140671 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0395589 = queryNorm
            0.6286159 = fieldWeight in 342, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=342)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Source
    The impact of online catalogs. Ed.: J.R. Matthews
  19. Klugman, S.: Failures in subject retrieval (1989) 0.01
    0.012632576 = product of:
      0.08842803 = sum of:
        0.08842803 = weight(_text_:ed in 2285) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08842803 = score(doc=2285,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.140671 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0395589 = queryNorm
            0.6286159 = fieldWeight in 2285, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2285)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Source
    Subject control in online catalogs. Ed.: R.P. Holley
  20. Belkin, N.J.: ¬An overview of results from Rutgers' investigations of interactive information retrieval (1998) 0.01
    0.0117237065 = product of:
      0.04103297 = sum of:
        0.027633758 = weight(_text_:ed in 2339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027633758 = score(doc=2339,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.140671 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0395589 = queryNorm
            0.19644247 = fieldWeight in 2339, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2339)
        0.013399213 = product of:
          0.026798425 = sum of:
            0.026798425 = weight(_text_:22 in 2339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.026798425 = score(doc=2339,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13852853 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0395589 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2339, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2339)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Date
    22. 9.1997 19:16:05
    Source
    Visualizing subject access for 21st century information resources: Papers presented at the 1997 Clinic on Library Applications of Data Processing, 2-4 Mar 1997, Graduate School of Library and Information Science, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Ed.: P.A. Cochrane et al

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 99
  • d 2
  • f 1
  • nl 1
  • sp 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 102
  • r 2
  • b 1
  • More… Less…