Search (90 results, page 1 of 5)

0.03890489 = product of:
  0.13616711 = sum of:
    0.10936869 = weight(_text_:global in 1544) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10936869 = score(doc=1544,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19788647 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.002325 = idf(docFreq=807, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0395589 = queryNorm
        0.552684 = fieldWeight in 1544, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.002325 = idf(docFreq=807, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1544)
    0.026798425 = product of:
      0.05359685 = sum of:
        0.05359685 = weight(_text_:22 in 1544) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05359685 = score(doc=1544,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13852853 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0395589 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1544, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1544)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)

Date

22. 3.2016 12:15:46

0.020991702 = product of:
  0.07347095 = sum of:
    0.054712057 = weight(_text_:ed in 3844) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.054712057 = score(doc=3844,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.140671 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0395589 = queryNorm
        0.38893628 = fieldWeight in 3844, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3844)
    0.018758897 = product of:
      0.037517793 = sum of:
        0.037517793 = weight(_text_:22 in 3844) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037517793 = score(doc=3844,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13852853 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0395589 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3844, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3844)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)

Date

27. 8.2011 14:22:53

Source

Encyclopedia of library and information sciences. 3rd ed. Ed.: M.J. Bates

0.017992888 = product of:
  0.0629751 = sum of:
    0.046896048 = weight(_text_:ed in 3841) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.046896048 = score(doc=3841,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.140671 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0395589 = queryNorm
        0.33337396 = fieldWeight in 3841, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3841)
    0.016079053 = product of:
      0.032158107 = sum of:
        0.032158107 = weight(_text_:22 in 3841) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032158107 = score(doc=3841,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13852853 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0395589 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3841, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3841)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)

Date

27. 8.2011 14:22:38

Source

Encyclopedia of library and information sciences. 3rd ed. Ed.: M.J. Bates

0.01579072 = product of:
  0.11053503 = sum of:
    0.11053503 = weight(_text_:ed in 4752) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.11053503 = score(doc=4752,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.140671 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0395589 = queryNorm
        0.7857699 = fieldWeight in 4752, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
          0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=4752)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Issue

Ed. Aug 96

0.014068448 = product of:
  0.049239565 = sum of:
    0.03316051 = weight(_text_:ed in 1183) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03316051 = score(doc=1183,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.140671 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0395589 = queryNorm
        0.23573098 = fieldWeight in 1183, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1183)
    0.016079053 = product of:
      0.032158107 = sum of:
        0.032158107 = weight(_text_:22 in 1183) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032158107 = score(doc=1183,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13852853 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0395589 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1183, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1183)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)

Date

22. 9.1997 19:16:05

Source

Saving the time of the library user through subject access innovation: Papers in honor of Pauline Atherton Cochrane. Ed.: W.J. Wheeler

0.012632576 = product of:
  0.08842803 = sum of:
    0.08842803 = weight(_text_:ed in 2033) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08842803 = score(doc=2033,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.140671 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0395589 = queryNorm
        0.6286159 = fieldWeight in 2033, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2033)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Issue

3rd ed.

0.012632576 = product of:
  0.08842803 = sum of:
    0.08842803 = weight(_text_:ed in 7877) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08842803 = score(doc=7877,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.140671 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0395589 = queryNorm
        0.6286159 = fieldWeight in 7877, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7877)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Issue

2nd ed.

0.012632576 = product of:
  0.08842803 = sum of:
    0.08842803 = weight(_text_:ed in 8716) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08842803 = score(doc=8716,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.140671 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0395589 = queryNorm
        0.6286159 = fieldWeight in 8716, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=8716)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Issue

2nd ed.

0.012499279 = product of:
  0.087494954 = sum of:
    0.087494954 = weight(_text_:global in 1760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.087494954 = score(doc=1760,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19788647 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.002325 = idf(docFreq=807, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0395589 = queryNorm
        0.44214723 = fieldWeight in 1760, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.002325 = idf(docFreq=807, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1760)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Abstract

Considers the future for the MARC record format in the electronic age. Suggests its use for cataloguing Internet resources. The convergence of UKMARC with US, and Canada formats is long overdue. The change over needs to be done quickly within a 3-year period. The British Library should continue providing MARC records, but the role of the NBA to market and control the access to and control of the redistribution of these records should change. The library community should take a global view of MARC and its function in the electronic age

0.011114283 = product of:
  0.07779998 = sum of:
    0.07779998 = weight(_text_:personal in 8166) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07779998 = score(doc=8166,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19948503 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.0427346 = idf(docFreq=775, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0395589 = queryNorm
        0.3900041 = fieldWeight in 8166, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.0427346 = idf(docFreq=775, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=8166)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Abstract

Discusses the origins of the concept of main entry and of confusion about what is meant by the term: a card in the catalogue, or a line above the the description serving as an access point. Examines the drawbacks of dual meaning: the full bibliographic record headed by the name of the author; and the author heading itself. Calls for change in the transfer to the electronic catalogue of terminology that was only descriptive and meaningful in the card catalogue. Proposes, in answer to the question of how the role of the entry can be transformed into uniform, collocative author-name access in the MARC record, that the 100/110 main entry MARC field be transformed into the primary field for the creator's authorized personal or corporate name

0.011114283 = product of:
  0.07779998 = sum of:
    0.07779998 = weight(_text_:personal in 5409) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07779998 = score(doc=5409,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19948503 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.0427346 = idf(docFreq=775, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0395589 = queryNorm
        0.3900041 = fieldWeight in 5409, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.0427346 = idf(docFreq=775, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5409)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Abstract

With the introduction of the microcomputer in the 1980s, a revolution of sorts was initiated. In libraries this was evidenced by the acquisition of personal computers and the software to run on them. All that catalogers needed were cataloging rules and a MARC format to ensure their bibliographic control. However, little did catalogers realize they were dealing with an industry that introduced rapid technological changes, which effected continual revision of existing rules and the formulation of special guidelines to deal with the industry's innovative products. This article focuses on the attempts of libraries and organized cataloging groups to develop the Chapter 9 descriptive cataloging rules in AACR2; it highlights selected events and includes cataloging examples that illustrate the evolution of the chapter.

0.011053504 = product of:
  0.077374525 = sum of:
    0.077374525 = weight(_text_:ed in 899) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.077374525 = score(doc=899,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.140671 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0395589 = queryNorm
        0.55003893 = fieldWeight in 899, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=899)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Issue

2nd ed.

0.011053504 = product of:
  0.077374525 = sum of:
    0.077374525 = weight(_text_:ed in 4574) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.077374525 = score(doc=4574,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.140671 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0395589 = queryNorm
        0.55003893 = fieldWeight in 4574, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4574)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Source

Proceedings of the 6th ASIS SIG/CR Classification Research Workshop, Oct. 8, 1995, Chicago, IL. Ed.: R.P. Schwartz et al

0.010936869 = product of:
  0.07655808 = sum of:
    0.07655808 = weight(_text_:global in 963) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07655808 = score(doc=963,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19788647 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.002325 = idf(docFreq=807, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0395589 = queryNorm
        0.38687882 = fieldWeight in 963, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.002325 = idf(docFreq=807, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=963)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

0.009474432 = product of:
  0.06632102 = sum of:
    0.06632102 = weight(_text_:ed in 4602) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06632102 = score(doc=4602,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.140671 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0395589 = queryNorm
        0.47146195 = fieldWeight in 4602, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4602)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Issue

2nd ed.

0.009374459 = product of:
  0.06562121 = sum of:
    0.06562121 = weight(_text_:global in 5437) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06562121 = score(doc=5437,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19788647 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.002325 = idf(docFreq=807, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0395589 = queryNorm
        0.3316104 = fieldWeight in 5437, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.002325 = idf(docFreq=807, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5437)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to raise and address a number of issues pertaining to the conversion of Common Communication Format (CCF) into MARC21. In this era of global resource sharing, exchange of bibliographic records from one system to another is imperative in today's library communities. Instead of using a single standard to create machine-readable catalogue records, more than 20 standards have emerged and are being used by different institutions. Because of these variations in standards, sharing of resources and transfer of data from one system to another among the institutions locally and globally has become a significant problem. Addressing this problem requires keeping in mind that countries such as India and others in southeast Asia are using the CCF as a standard for creating bibliographic cataloguing records. This paper describes a way to map the bibliographic catalogue records from CCF to MARC21, although 100% mapping is not possible. In addition, the paper describes an experimental approach that enumerates problems that may occur during the mapping of records/exchanging of records and how these problems can be overcome.

0.00893258 = product of:
  0.06252806 = sum of:
    0.06252806 = weight(_text_:ed in 3858) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06252806 = score(doc=3858,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.140671 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0395589 = queryNorm
        0.4444986 = fieldWeight in 3858, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3858)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Source

Encyclopedia of library and information sciences. 3rd ed. Ed.: M.J. Bates

0.007938774 = product of:
  0.055571415 = sum of:
    0.055571415 = weight(_text_:personal in 1166) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.055571415 = score(doc=1166,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.19948503 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.0427346 = idf(docFreq=775, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0395589 = queryNorm
        0.27857435 = fieldWeight in 1166, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          5.0427346 = idf(docFreq=775, maxDocs=44218)
          0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=1166)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Abstract

This article presents an overview of the LEAF project (Linking and Exploring Authority Files)1, which has set out to provide a framework for international, collaborative work in the sector of authority data with respect to authority control. Elaborating the virtues of authority control in today's Web environment is an almost futile exercise, since so much has been said and written about it in the last few years.2 The World Wide Web is generally understood to be poorly structured-both with regard to content and to locating required information. Highly structured databases might be viewed as small islands of precision within this chaotic environment. Though the Web in general or any particular structured database would greatly benefit from increased authority control, it should be noted that our following considerations only refer to authority control with regard to databases of "memory institutions" (i.e., libraries, archives, and museums). Moreover, when talking about authority records, we exclusively refer to personal name authority records that describe a specific person. Although different types of authority records could indeed be used in similar ways to the ones presented in this article, discussing those different types is outside the scope of both the LEAF project and this article. Personal name authority records-as are all other "authorities"-are maintained as separate records and linked to various kinds of descriptive records. Name authority records are usually either kept in independent databases or in separate tables in the database containing the descriptive records. This practice points at a crucial benefit: by linking any number of descriptive records to an authorized name record, the records related to this entity are collocated in the database. Variant forms of the authorized name are referenced in the authority records and thus ensure the consistency of the database while enabling search and retrieval operations that produce accurate results. On one hand, authority control may be viewed as a positive prerequisite of a consistent catalogue; on the other, the creation of new authority records is a very time consuming and expensive undertaking. As a consequence, various models of providing access to existing authority records have emerged: the Library of Congress and the French National Library (Bibliothèque nationale de France), for example, make their authority records available to all via a web-based search service.3 In Germany, the Personal Name Authority File (PND, Personennamendatei4) maintained by the German National Library (Die Deutsche Bibliothek, Frankfurt/Main) offers a different approach to shared access: within a closed network, participating institutions have online access to their pooled data. The number of recent projects and initiatives that have addressed the issue of authority control in one way or another is considerable.5 Two important current initiatives should be mentioned here: The Name Authority Cooperative (NACO) and Virtual International Authority File (VIAF).
NACO was established in 1976 and is hosted by the Library of Congress. At the beginning of 2003, nearly 400 institutions were involved in this undertaking, including 43 institutions from outside the United States.6 Despite the enormous success of NACO and the impressive annual growth of the initiative, there are requirements for participation that form an obstacle for many institutions: they have to follow the Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules (AACR2) and employ the MARC217 data format. Participating institutions also have to belong to either OCLC (Online Computer Library Center) or RLG (Research Libraries Group) in order to be able to contribute records, and they have to provide a specified minimum number of authority records per year. A recent proof of concept project of the Library of Congress, OCLC and the German National Library-Virtual International Authority File (VIAF)8-will, in its first phase, test automatic linking of the records of the Library of Congress Name Authority File (LCNAF) and the German Personal Name Authority File by using matching algorithms and software developed by OCLC. The results are expected to form the basis of a "Virtual International Authority File". The project will then test the maintenance of the virtual authority file by employing the Open Archives Initiative Protocol for Metadata Harvesting (OAI-PMH)9 to harvest the metadata for new, updated, and deleted records. When using the "Virtual International Authority File" a cataloguer will be able to check the system to see whether the authority record he wants to establish already exists. The final phase of the project will test possibilities for displaying records in the preferred language and script of the end user. Currently, there are still some clear limitations associated with the ways in which authority records are used by memory institutions. One of the main problems has to do with limited access: generally only large institutions or those that are part of a library network have unlimited online access to permanently updated authority records. Smaller institutions outside these networks usually have to fall back on less efficient ways of obtaining authority data, or have no access at all. Cross-domain sharing of authority data between libraries, archives, museums and other memory institutions simply does not happen at present. Public users are, by and large, not even aware that such things as name authority records exist and are excluded from access to these information resources.

0.00789536 = product of:
  0.055267517 = sum of:
    0.055267517 = weight(_text_:ed in 7891) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.055267517 = score(doc=7891,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.140671 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0395589 = queryNorm
        0.39288494 = fieldWeight in 7891, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=7891)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Source

Standards for the international exchange of bibliographic information: papers presented at a course held at the School of Library, Archive and Information Studies, University College, London, 3-18 August 1990. Ed.: I.C. McIlwaine

0.00789536 = product of:
  0.055267517 = sum of:
    0.055267517 = weight(_text_:ed in 4278) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.055267517 = score(doc=4278,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.140671 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0395589 = queryNorm
        0.39288494 = fieldWeight in 4278, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4278)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Issue

2nd ed.