-
Lanvent, A.: Licht im Daten Chaos (2004)
0.43
0.4298144 = product of:
0.5014501 = sum of:
0.061868276 = weight(_text_:global in 2806) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.061868276 = score(doc=2806,freq=4.0), product of:
0.19788647 = queryWeight, product of:
5.002325 = idf(docFreq=807, maxDocs=44218)
0.0395589 = queryNorm
0.31264532 = fieldWeight in 2806, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.002325 = idf(docFreq=807, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2806)
0.11831932 = weight(_text_:brain in 2806) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11831932 = score(doc=2806,freq=4.0), product of:
0.2736591 = queryWeight, product of:
6.9177637 = idf(docFreq=118, maxDocs=44218)
0.0395589 = queryNorm
0.43236023 = fieldWeight in 2806, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
6.9177637 = idf(docFreq=118, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2806)
0.044457134 = weight(_text_:personal in 2806) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044457134 = score(doc=2806,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19948503 = queryWeight, product of:
5.0427346 = idf(docFreq=775, maxDocs=44218)
0.0395589 = queryNorm
0.22285949 = fieldWeight in 2806, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.0427346 = idf(docFreq=775, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2806)
0.022107007 = weight(_text_:ed in 2806) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022107007 = score(doc=2806,freq=2.0), product of:
0.140671 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
0.0395589 = queryNorm
0.15715398 = fieldWeight in 2806, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2806)
0.2116849 = weight(_text_:1.7.7 in 2806) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.2116849 = score(doc=2806,freq=2.0), product of:
0.43529585 = queryWeight, product of:
11.00374 = idf(docFreq=1, maxDocs=44218)
0.0395589 = queryNorm
0.4863012 = fieldWeight in 2806, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
11.00374 = idf(docFreq=1, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2806)
0.04301346 = product of:
0.08602692 = sum of:
0.08602692 = weight(_text_:prof in 2806) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08602692 = score(doc=2806,freq=2.0), product of:
0.27749604 = queryWeight, product of:
7.014756 = idf(docFreq=107, maxDocs=44218)
0.0395589 = queryNorm
0.31001136 = fieldWeight in 2806, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
7.014756 = idf(docFreq=107, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2806)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.85714287 = coord(6/7)
- Content
- "Bitte suchen Sie alle Unterlagen, die im PC zum Ibelshäuser-Vertrag in Sprockhövel gespeichert sind. Finden Sie alles, was wir haben - Dokumente, Tabellen, Präsentationen, Scans, E-Mails. Und erledigen Sie das gleich! « Wer diese Aufgabe an das Windows-eigene Suchmodul vergibt, wird zwangsläufig enttäuscht. Denn das Betriebssystem beherrscht weder die formatübergreifende Recherche noch die Kontextsuche, die für solche komplexen Aufträge nötig sind. Professionelle Desktop-Suchmaschinen erledigen Aufgaben dieser Art jedoch im Handumdrehen - genauer gesagt in einer einzigen Sekunde. Spitzenprogramme wie Global Brain benötigen dafür nicht einmal umfangreiche Abfrageformulare. Es genügt, einen Satz im Eingabefeld zu formulieren, der das Thema der gewünschten Dokumente eingrenzt. Dabei suchen die Programme über alle Laufwerke, die sich auf dem System einbinden lassen - also auch im Netzwerk-Ordner (Shared Folder), sofern dieser freigegeben wurde. Allen Testkandidaten - mit Ausnahme von Search 32 - gemeinsam ist, dass sie weitaus bessere Rechercheergebnisse abliefern als Windows, deutlich schneller arbeiten und meist auch in den Online-Postfächern stöbern. Wer schon öfter vergeblich über die Windows-Suche nach wichtigen Dokumenten gefahndet hat, kommt angesichts der Qualität der Search-Engines kaum mehr um die Anschaffung eines Desktop-Suchtools herum. Aber Microsoft will nachbessern. Für den Windows-XP-Nachfolger Longhorn wirbt der Hersteller vor allem mit dem Hinweis auf das neue Dateisystem WinFS, das sämtliche Files auf der Festplatte über Meta-Tags indiziert und dem Anwender damit lange Suchläufe erspart. So sollen sich anders als bei Windows XP alle Dateien zu bestimmten Themen in wenigen Sekunden auflisten lassen - unabhängig vom Format und vom physikalischen Speicherort der Files. Für die Recherche selbst ist dann weder der Dateiname noch das Erstelldatum ausschlaggebend. Anhand der kontextsensitiven Suche von WinFS kann der Anwender einfach einen Suchbefehl wie »Vertragsabschluss mit Firma XYZ, Neunkirchen/Saar« eingeben, der dann ohne Umwege zum Ziel führt."
- Object
- SER Global Brain Personal Ed. 1.7.7 Prof.
-
Brenner, E.H.: Beyond Boolean : new approaches in information retrieval; the quest for intuitive online search systems past, present & future (1995)
0.05
0.053309683 = product of:
0.18658388 = sum of:
0.07655808 = weight(_text_:global in 2547) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07655808 = score(doc=2547,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19788647 = queryWeight, product of:
5.002325 = idf(docFreq=807, maxDocs=44218)
0.0395589 = queryNorm
0.38687882 = fieldWeight in 2547, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.002325 = idf(docFreq=807, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2547)
0.110025786 = weight(_text_:personal in 2547) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.110025786 = score(doc=2547,freq=4.0), product of:
0.19948503 = queryWeight, product of:
5.0427346 = idf(docFreq=775, maxDocs=44218)
0.0395589 = queryNorm
0.5515491 = fieldWeight in 2547, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.0427346 = idf(docFreq=775, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2547)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Abstract
- The challenge of effectively bringing specific, relevant information from the global sea of data to our fingertips, has become an increasingly difficult one. Discusses how the online information industry, founded on Boolean search systems, may be evolving to take advantage of other methods, such as 'term weighting', 'relevance ranking' and 'query by example'
- Content
- (1) The Boolean world; (2) The Non-Boolean picture; (3) The commercial search engines: Personal Librarian, CLARIT, ConQuest, DR-LINK, InQuizit, InTEXT, TOPIC, WIN, TARGET, FREESTYLE, InfoSeek; (4) Wiedergabe von 8 Aufsätzen aus 'Monitor'
- Object
- Personal Librarian
-
Witschel, H.F.: Global term weights in distributed environments (2008)
0.04
0.037068095 = product of:
0.12973833 = sum of:
0.113659285 = weight(_text_:global in 2096) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.113659285 = score(doc=2096,freq=6.0), product of:
0.19788647 = queryWeight, product of:
5.002325 = idf(docFreq=807, maxDocs=44218)
0.0395589 = queryNorm
0.57436615 = fieldWeight in 2096, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
5.002325 = idf(docFreq=807, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2096)
0.016079053 = product of:
0.032158107 = sum of:
0.032158107 = weight(_text_:22 in 2096) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032158107 = score(doc=2096,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13852853 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0395589 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2096, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2096)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Abstract
- This paper examines the estimation of global term weights (such as IDF) in information retrieval scenarios where a global view on the collection is not available. In particular, the two options of either sampling documents or of using a reference corpus independent of the target retrieval collection are compared using standard IR test collections. In addition, the possibility of pruning term lists based on frequency is evaluated. The results show that very good retrieval performance can be reached when just the most frequent terms of a collection - an "extended stop word list" - are known and all terms which are not in that list are treated equally. However, the list cannot always be fully estimated from a general-purpose reference corpus, but some "domain-specific stop words" need to be added. A good solution for achieving this is to mix estimates from small samples of the target retrieval collection with ones derived from a reference corpus.
- Date
- 1. 8.2008 9:44:22
-
Deerwester, S.; Dumais, S.; Landauer, T.; Furnass, G.; Beck, L.: Improving information retrieval with latent semantic indexing (1988)
0.03
0.02822335 = product of:
0.09878172 = sum of:
0.06562121 = weight(_text_:global in 2396) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06562121 = score(doc=2396,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19788647 = queryWeight, product of:
5.002325 = idf(docFreq=807, maxDocs=44218)
0.0395589 = queryNorm
0.3316104 = fieldWeight in 2396, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.002325 = idf(docFreq=807, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2396)
0.03316051 = weight(_text_:ed in 2396) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03316051 = score(doc=2396,freq=2.0), product of:
0.140671 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
0.0395589 = queryNorm
0.23573098 = fieldWeight in 2396, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2396)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Abstract
- Describes a latent semantic indexing (LSI) approach for improving information retrieval. Most document retrieval systems depend on matching keywords in queries against those in documents. The LSI approach tries to overcome the incompleteness and imprecision of latent relations among terms and documents. Tested performance of the LSI method ranged from considerably better than to roughly comparable to performance based on weighted keyword matching, apparently depending on the quality of the queries. Best LSI performance was found using a global entropy weighting for terms and about 100 dimensions for representing terms, documents and queries.
- Source
- ASIS'88. Information technology: planning for the next fifty years. Proceedings of the 51st Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science, Atlanta, Georgia, 23.-27.10.1988. Vol.25. Ed. by C.L. Borgman and E.Y.H. Pai
-
Jacucci, G.; Barral, O.; Daee, P.; Wenzel, M.; Serim, B.; Ruotsalo, T.; Pluchino, P.; Freeman, J.; Gamberini, L.; Kaski, S.; Blankertz, B.: Integrating neurophysiologic relevance feedback in intent modeling for information retrieval (2019)
0.02
0.02112845 = product of:
0.14789914 = sum of:
0.14789914 = weight(_text_:brain in 5356) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14789914 = score(doc=5356,freq=4.0), product of:
0.2736591 = queryWeight, product of:
6.9177637 = idf(docFreq=118, maxDocs=44218)
0.0395589 = queryNorm
0.5404503 = fieldWeight in 5356, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
6.9177637 = idf(docFreq=118, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5356)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Abstract
- The use of implicit relevance feedback from neurophysiology could deliver effortless information retrieval. However, both computing neurophysiologic responses and retrieving documents are characterized by uncertainty because of noisy signals and incomplete or inconsistent representations of the data. We present the first-of-its-kind, fully integrated information retrieval system that makes use of online implicit relevance feedback generated from brain activity as measured through electroencephalography (EEG), and eye movements. The findings of the evaluation experiment (N = 16) show that we are able to compute online neurophysiology-based relevance feedback with performance significantly better than chance in complex data domains and realistic search tasks. We contribute by demonstrating how to integrate in interactive intent modeling this inherently noisy implicit relevance feedback combined with scarce explicit feedback. Although experimental measures of task performance did not allow us to demonstrate how the classification outcomes translated into search task performance, the experiment proved that our approach is able to generate relevance feedback from brain signals and eye movements in a realistic scenario, thus providing promising implications for future work in neuroadaptive information retrieval (IR).
-
Faloutsos, C.: Signature files (1992)
0.02
0.01875793 = product of:
0.06565275 = sum of:
0.044214014 = weight(_text_:ed in 3499) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044214014 = score(doc=3499,freq=2.0), product of:
0.140671 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
0.0395589 = queryNorm
0.31430796 = fieldWeight in 3499, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3499)
0.021438738 = product of:
0.042877477 = sum of:
0.042877477 = weight(_text_:22 in 3499) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042877477 = score(doc=3499,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13852853 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0395589 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3499, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3499)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Date
- 7. 5.1999 15:22:48
- Source
- Information retrieval: data structures and algorithms. Ed.: W.B. Frakes u. R. Baeza-Yates
-
Kelledy, F.; Smeaton, A.F.: Signature files and beyond (1996)
0.01
0.014068448 = product of:
0.049239565 = sum of:
0.03316051 = weight(_text_:ed in 6973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03316051 = score(doc=6973,freq=2.0), product of:
0.140671 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
0.0395589 = queryNorm
0.23573098 = fieldWeight in 6973, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6973)
0.016079053 = product of:
0.032158107 = sum of:
0.032158107 = weight(_text_:22 in 6973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032158107 = score(doc=6973,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13852853 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0395589 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 6973, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6973)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Source
- Information retrieval: new systems and current research. Proceedings of the 16th Research Colloquium of the British Computer Society Information Retrieval Specialist Group, Drymen, Scotland, 22-23 Mar 94. Ed.: R. Leon
-
Furner, J.: ¬A unifying model of document relatedness for hybrid search engines (2003)
0.01
0.014068448 = product of:
0.049239565 = sum of:
0.03316051 = weight(_text_:ed in 2717) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03316051 = score(doc=2717,freq=2.0), product of:
0.140671 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
0.0395589 = queryNorm
0.23573098 = fieldWeight in 2717, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2717)
0.016079053 = product of:
0.032158107 = sum of:
0.032158107 = weight(_text_:22 in 2717) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032158107 = score(doc=2717,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13852853 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0395589 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2717, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2717)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Date
- 11. 9.2004 17:32:22
- Source
- Challenges in knowledge representation and organization for the 21st century: Integration of knowledge across boundaries. Proceedings of the 7th ISKO International Conference Granada, Spain, July 10-13, 2002. Ed.: M. López-Huertas
-
Ning, X.; Jin, H.; Wu, H.: RSS: a framework enabling ranked search on the semantic web (2008)
0.01
0.011047906 = product of:
0.07733534 = sum of:
0.07733534 = weight(_text_:global in 2069) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07733534 = score(doc=2069,freq=4.0), product of:
0.19788647 = queryWeight, product of:
5.002325 = idf(docFreq=807, maxDocs=44218)
0.0395589 = queryNorm
0.39080665 = fieldWeight in 2069, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.002325 = idf(docFreq=807, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2069)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Abstract
- The semantic web not only contains resources but also includes the heterogeneous relationships among them, which is sharply distinguished from the current web. As the growth of the semantic web, specialized search techniques are of significance. In this paper, we present RSS-a framework for enabling ranked semantic search on the semantic web. In this framework, the heterogeneity of relationships is fully exploited to determine the global importance of resources. In addition, the search results can be greatly expanded with entities most semantically related to the query, thus able to provide users with properly ordered semantic search results by combining global ranking values and the relevance between the resources and the query. The proposed semantic search model which supports inference is very different from traditional keyword-based search methods. Moreover, RSS also distinguishes from many current methods of accessing the semantic web data in that it applies novel ranking strategies to prevent returning search results in disorder. The experimental results show that the framework is feasible and can produce better ordering of semantic search results than directly applying the standard PageRank algorithm on the semantic web.
-
Clarke, C.L.A.; Cormack, G.V.; Burkowski, F.J.: Shortest substring ranking : multitext experiments for TREC-4 (1996)
0.01
0.009474432 = product of:
0.06632102 = sum of:
0.06632102 = weight(_text_:ed in 549) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06632102 = score(doc=549,freq=2.0), product of:
0.140671 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
0.0395589 = queryNorm
0.47146195 = fieldWeight in 549, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=549)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Source
- The Fourth Text Retrieval Conference (TREC-4). Ed.: K. Harman
-
Feder, J.D.; Hobbs, E.T.: Speech recognition and full-text retrieval : interface and integration (1995)
0.01
0.009474432 = product of:
0.06632102 = sum of:
0.06632102 = weight(_text_:ed in 2725) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06632102 = score(doc=2725,freq=2.0), product of:
0.140671 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
0.0395589 = queryNorm
0.47146195 = fieldWeight in 2725, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2725)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Source
- Proceedings of the 16th National Online Meeting 1995, New York, 2-4 May 1995. Ed.: M.E. Williams
-
Savoy, J.; Ndarugendamwo, M.; Vrajitoru, D.: Report on the TREC-4 experiment : combining probabilistic and vector-space schemes (1996)
0.01
0.009474432 = product of:
0.06632102 = sum of:
0.06632102 = weight(_text_:ed in 7574) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06632102 = score(doc=7574,freq=2.0), product of:
0.140671 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
0.0395589 = queryNorm
0.47146195 = fieldWeight in 7574, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7574)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Source
- The Fourth Text Retrieval Conference (TREC-4). Ed.: K. Harman
-
Belkin, N.J.; Cool, C.; Koenemann, J.; Ng, K.B.; Park, S.: Using relevance feedback and ranking in interactive searching (1996)
0.01
0.009474432 = product of:
0.06632102 = sum of:
0.06632102 = weight(_text_:ed in 7588) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06632102 = score(doc=7588,freq=2.0), product of:
0.140671 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
0.0395589 = queryNorm
0.47146195 = fieldWeight in 7588, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7588)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Source
- The Fourth Text Retrieval Conference (TREC-4). Ed.: K. Harman
-
Jascó, P.: Mapping algorithms to translate natural language questions into search queries for Web databases (1997)
0.01
0.009474432 = product of:
0.06632102 = sum of:
0.06632102 = weight(_text_:ed in 314) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06632102 = score(doc=314,freq=2.0), product of:
0.140671 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
0.0395589 = queryNorm
0.47146195 = fieldWeight in 314, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=314)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Source
- Proceedings of the 18th National Online Meeting 1997, New York, 13.-15.5.1997. Ed.: M.E. Williams
-
Robertson, S.E.: ¬The probability ranking principle in IR (1977)
0.01
0.009474432 = product of:
0.06632102 = sum of:
0.06632102 = weight(_text_:ed in 1935) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06632102 = score(doc=1935,freq=2.0), product of:
0.140671 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
0.0395589 = queryNorm
0.47146195 = fieldWeight in 1935, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1935)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Footnote
- Wiederabgedruckt in: Readings in information retrieval. Ed.: K. Sparck Jones u. P. Willet. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann 1997. S.281-286.
-
Salton, G.; Buckley, C.: Term-weighting approaches in automatic text retrieval (1988)
0.01
0.009474432 = product of:
0.06632102 = sum of:
0.06632102 = weight(_text_:ed in 1938) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06632102 = score(doc=1938,freq=2.0), product of:
0.140671 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
0.0395589 = queryNorm
0.47146195 = fieldWeight in 1938, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1938)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Footnote
- Wiederabgedruckt in: Readings in information retrieval. Ed.: K. Sparck Jones u. P. Willett. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann 1997. S.323-328.
-
Sparck Jones, K.: Search term relevance weighting given little relevance information (1979)
0.01
0.009474432 = product of:
0.06632102 = sum of:
0.06632102 = weight(_text_:ed in 1939) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06632102 = score(doc=1939,freq=2.0), product of:
0.140671 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
0.0395589 = queryNorm
0.47146195 = fieldWeight in 1939, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1939)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Footnote
- Wiederabgedruckt in: Readings in information retrieval. Ed.: K. Sparck Jones u. P. Willett. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann 1997. S.329-338.
-
Yang, L.; Ji, D.; Leong, M.: Document reranking by term distribution and maximal marginal relevance for chinese information retrieval (2007)
0.01
0.009374459 = product of:
0.06562121 = sum of:
0.06562121 = weight(_text_:global in 907) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06562121 = score(doc=907,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19788647 = queryWeight, product of:
5.002325 = idf(docFreq=807, maxDocs=44218)
0.0395589 = queryNorm
0.3316104 = fieldWeight in 907, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.002325 = idf(docFreq=807, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=907)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Abstract
- In this paper, we propose a document reranking method for Chinese information retrieval. The method is based on a term weighting scheme, which integrates local and global distribution of terms as well as document frequency, document positions and term length. The weight scheme allows randomly setting a larger portion of the retrieved documents as relevance feedback, and lifts off the worry that very fewer relevant documents appear in top retrieved documents. It also helps to improve the performance of maximal marginal relevance (MMR) in document reranking. The method was evaluated by MAP (mean average precision), a recall-oriented measure. Significance tests showed that our method can get significant improvement against standard baselines, and outperform relevant methods consistently.
-
Baeza-Yates, R.A.: Introduction to data structures and algorithms related to information retrieval (1992)
0.01
0.00789536 = product of:
0.055267517 = sum of:
0.055267517 = weight(_text_:ed in 3082) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055267517 = score(doc=3082,freq=2.0), product of:
0.140671 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
0.0395589 = queryNorm
0.39288494 = fieldWeight in 3082, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3082)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Source
- Information retrieval: data structures and algorithms. Ed.: W.B. Frakes u. R. Baeza-Yates
-
Ruthven, I.; Lalmas, M.: Selective relevance feedback using term characteristics (1999)
0.01
0.00789536 = product of:
0.055267517 = sum of:
0.055267517 = weight(_text_:ed in 3824) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055267517 = score(doc=3824,freq=2.0), product of:
0.140671 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
0.0395589 = queryNorm
0.39288494 = fieldWeight in 3824, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3824)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Source
- Vocabulary as a central concept in digital libraries: interdisciplinary concepts, challenges, and opportunities : proceedings of the Third International Conference an Conceptions of Library and Information Science (COLIS3), Dubrovnik, Croatia, 23-26 May 1999. Ed. by T. Arpanac et al
