Search (119 results, page 1 of 6)

  • × theme_ss:"Informetrie"
  1. Lisée, C.; Larivière, V.; Archambault, E.: Conference proceedings as a source of scientific information : a bibliometric analysis (2008) 0.06
    0.060200274 = product of:
      0.12040055 = sum of:
        0.12040055 = product of:
          0.2408011 = sum of:
            0.2408011 = weight(_text_:1.7 in 2356) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.2408011 = score(doc=2356,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.45323527 = queryWeight, product of:
                  9.617446 = idf(docFreq=7, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047126364 = queryNorm
                0.5312938 = fieldWeight in 2356, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  9.617446 = idf(docFreq=7, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2356)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    While several authors have argued that conference proceedings are an important source of scientific knowledge, the extent of their importance has not been measured in a systematic manner. This article examines the scientific impact and aging of conference proceedings compared to those of scientific literature in general. It shows that the relative importance of proceedings is diminishing over time and currently represents only 1.7% of references made in the natural sciences and engineering, and 2.5% in the social sciences and humanities. Although the scientific impact of proceedings is losing ground to other types of scientific literature in nearly all fields, it has grown from 8% of the references in engineering papers in the early 1980s to its current 10%. Proceedings play a particularly important role in computer sciences, where they account for close to 20% of the references. This article also shows that not unexpectedly, proceedings age faster than cited scientific literature in general. The evidence thus shows that proceedings have a relatively limited scientific impact, on average representing only about 2% of total citations, that their relative importance is shrinking, and that they become obsolete faster than the scientific literature in general.
  2. Zhu, Y.; Quan, L.; Chen, P.-Y.; Kim, M.C.; Che, C.: Predicting coauthorship using bibliographic network embedding (2023) 0.06
    0.060200274 = product of:
      0.12040055 = sum of:
        0.12040055 = product of:
          0.2408011 = sum of:
            0.2408011 = weight(_text_:1.7 in 917) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.2408011 = score(doc=917,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.45323527 = queryWeight, product of:
                  9.617446 = idf(docFreq=7, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047126364 = queryNorm
                0.5312938 = fieldWeight in 917, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  9.617446 = idf(docFreq=7, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=917)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Coauthorship prediction applies predictive analytics to bibliographic data to predict authors who are highly likely to be coauthors. In this study, we propose an approach for coauthorship prediction based on bibliographic network embedding through a graph-based bibliographic data model that can be used to model common bibliographic data, including papers, terms, sources, authors, departments, research interests, universities, and countries. A real-world dataset released by AMiner that includes more than 2 million papers, 8 million citations, and 1.7 million authors were integrated into a large bibliographic network using the proposed bibliographic data model. Translation-based methods were applied to the entities and relationships to generate their low-dimensional embeddings while preserving their connectivity information in the original bibliographic network. We applied machine learning algorithms to embeddings that represent the coauthorship relationships of the two authors and achieved high prediction results. The reference model, which is the combination of a network embedding size of 100, the most basic translation-based method, and a gradient boosting method achieved an F1 score of 0.9 and even higher scores are obtainable with different embedding sizes and more advanced embedding methods. Thus, the strengths of the proposed approach lie in its customizable components under a unified framework.
  3. Nicholls, P.T.: Empirical validation of Lotka's law (1986) 0.03
    0.025539886 = product of:
      0.051079772 = sum of:
        0.051079772 = product of:
          0.102159545 = sum of:
            0.102159545 = weight(_text_:22 in 5509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.102159545 = score(doc=5509,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1650285 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047126364 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 5509, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5509)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 22(1986), S.417-419
  4. Nicolaisen, J.: Citation analysis (2007) 0.03
    0.025539886 = product of:
      0.051079772 = sum of:
        0.051079772 = product of:
          0.102159545 = sum of:
            0.102159545 = weight(_text_:22 in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.102159545 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1650285 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047126364 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    13. 7.2008 19:53:22
  5. Fiala, J.: Information flood : fiction and reality (1987) 0.03
    0.025539886 = product of:
      0.051079772 = sum of:
        0.051079772 = product of:
          0.102159545 = sum of:
            0.102159545 = weight(_text_:22 in 1080) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.102159545 = score(doc=1080,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1650285 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047126364 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 1080, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1080)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Thermochimica acta. 110(1987), S.11-22
  6. Su, Y.; Han, L.-F.: ¬A new literature growth model : variable exponential growth law of literature (1998) 0.02
    0.022574283 = product of:
      0.045148566 = sum of:
        0.045148566 = product of:
          0.09029713 = sum of:
            0.09029713 = weight(_text_:22 in 3690) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09029713 = score(doc=3690,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.1650285 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047126364 = queryNorm
                0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3690, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3690)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 5.1999 19:22:35
  7. Van der Veer Martens, B.: Do citation systems represent theories of truth? (2001) 0.02
    0.022574283 = product of:
      0.045148566 = sum of:
        0.045148566 = product of:
          0.09029713 = sum of:
            0.09029713 = weight(_text_:22 in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09029713 = score(doc=3925,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.1650285 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047126364 = queryNorm
                0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2006 15:22:28
  8. Diodato, V.: Dictionary of bibliometrics (1994) 0.02
    0.0223474 = product of:
      0.0446948 = sum of:
        0.0446948 = product of:
          0.0893896 = sum of:
            0.0893896 = weight(_text_:22 in 5666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0893896 = score(doc=5666,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1650285 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047126364 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 5666, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5666)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Journal of library and information science 22(1996) no.2, S.116-117 (L.C. Smith)
  9. Bookstein, A.: Informetric distributions : I. Unified overview (1990) 0.02
    0.0223474 = product of:
      0.0446948 = sum of:
        0.0446948 = product of:
          0.0893896 = sum of:
            0.0893896 = weight(_text_:22 in 6902) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0893896 = score(doc=6902,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1650285 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047126364 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6902, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6902)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2006 18:55:29
  10. Bookstein, A.: Informetric distributions : II. Resilience to ambiguity (1990) 0.02
    0.0223474 = product of:
      0.0446948 = sum of:
        0.0446948 = product of:
          0.0893896 = sum of:
            0.0893896 = weight(_text_:22 in 4689) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0893896 = score(doc=4689,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1650285 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047126364 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4689, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4689)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2006 18:55:55
  11. Lewison, G.: ¬The work of the Bibliometrics Research Group (City University) and associates (2005) 0.02
    0.019154916 = product of:
      0.03830983 = sum of:
        0.03830983 = product of:
          0.07661966 = sum of:
            0.07661966 = weight(_text_:22 in 4890) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07661966 = score(doc=4890,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1650285 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047126364 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4890, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4890)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2007 17:02:22
  12. Marx, W.; Bornmann, L.: On the problems of dealing with bibliometric data (2014) 0.02
    0.019154916 = product of:
      0.03830983 = sum of:
        0.03830983 = product of:
          0.07661966 = sum of:
            0.07661966 = weight(_text_:22 in 1239) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07661966 = score(doc=1239,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1650285 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047126364 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 1239, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1239)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    18. 3.2014 19:13:22
  13. Raan, A.F.J. van: Statistical properties of bibliometric indicators : research group indicator distributions and correlations (2006) 0.01
    0.013544572 = product of:
      0.027089143 = sum of:
        0.027089143 = product of:
          0.054178286 = sum of:
            0.054178286 = weight(_text_:22 in 5275) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054178286 = score(doc=5275,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.1650285 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047126364 = queryNorm
                0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 5275, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5275)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2006 16:20:22
  14. Larivière, V.; Gingras, Y.; Archambault, E.: ¬The decline in the concentration of citations, 1900-2007 (2009) 0.01
    0.013544572 = product of:
      0.027089143 = sum of:
        0.027089143 = product of:
          0.054178286 = sum of:
            0.054178286 = weight(_text_:22 in 2763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054178286 = score(doc=2763,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.1650285 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047126364 = queryNorm
                0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 2763, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2763)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2009 19:22:35
  15. Li, T.-C.: Reference sources in periodicals : research note (1995) 0.01
    0.012769943 = product of:
      0.025539886 = sum of:
        0.025539886 = product of:
          0.051079772 = sum of:
            0.051079772 = weight(_text_:22 in 5092) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.051079772 = score(doc=5092,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1650285 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047126364 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5092, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5092)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Presents a list of 53 periodicals in 22 subject fields which regularly provide bibliographies of theses, research in progress and patents in their particular subject field. The fields of business, economics, history and literature have most periodical listings of dissertations and theses. Also lists 63 periodicals in 25 sub-disciplines which provide rankings or ratings. Rankings and ratings information predominates in the fields of business, sports and games, finance and banking, and library and information science
  16. Pichappan, P.; Sangaranachiyar, S.: Ageing approach to scientific eponyms (1996) 0.01
    0.012769943 = product of:
      0.025539886 = sum of:
        0.025539886 = product of:
          0.051079772 = sum of:
            0.051079772 = weight(_text_:22 in 80) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.051079772 = score(doc=80,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1650285 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047126364 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 80, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=80)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Report presented at the 16th National Indian Association of Special Libraries and Information Centres Seminar Special Interest Group Meeting on Informatrics in Bombay, 19-22 Dec 94
  17. Mommoh, O.M.: Subject analysis of post-graduate theses in library, archival and information science at Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria (1995/96) 0.01
    0.012769943 = product of:
      0.025539886 = sum of:
        0.025539886 = product of:
          0.051079772 = sum of:
            0.051079772 = weight(_text_:22 in 673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.051079772 = score(doc=673,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1650285 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047126364 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 673, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=673)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Library focus. 13/14(1995/96), S.22-25
  18. Chongde, W.; Zhe, W.: Evaluation of the models for Bradford's law (1998) 0.01
    0.012769943 = product of:
      0.025539886 = sum of:
        0.025539886 = product of:
          0.051079772 = sum of:
            0.051079772 = weight(_text_:22 in 3688) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.051079772 = score(doc=3688,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1650285 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047126364 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3688, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3688)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 5.1999 19:12:28
  19. Tijssen, R.J.W.; Wijk, E. van: ¬The global science base of information and communication technologies : bibliometric analysis of ICT research papers (1998) 0.01
    0.012769943 = product of:
      0.025539886 = sum of:
        0.025539886 = product of:
          0.051079772 = sum of:
            0.051079772 = weight(_text_:22 in 3691) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.051079772 = score(doc=3691,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1650285 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047126364 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3691, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3691)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 5.1999 19:26:54
  20. Thelwall, M.; Ruschenburg, T.: Grundlagen und Forschungsfelder der Webometrie (2006) 0.01
    0.012769943 = product of:
      0.025539886 = sum of:
        0.025539886 = product of:
          0.051079772 = sum of:
            0.051079772 = weight(_text_:22 in 77) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.051079772 = score(doc=77,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1650285 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047126364 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 77, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=77)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    4.12.2006 12:12:22

Years

Languages

  • e 110
  • d 8
  • ro 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 117
  • m 2
  • el 1
  • s 1
  • More… Less…