Search (7 results, page 1 of 1)

0.021470724 = product of:
  0.042941447 = sum of:
    0.042941447 = product of:
      0.085882895 = sum of:
        0.085882895 = weight(_text_:international in 2006) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.085882895 = score(doc=2006,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.17368206 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05206484 = queryNorm
            0.49448338 = fieldWeight in 2006, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2006)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Since the end of the last century, catalogs have been changing more and more quickly. This change is following a recognizable course, beginning with the publication of Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records, passing through the reorganization of international cataloging principles, the revision of international standards of the International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions (International Standard for Bibliographic Description), and the foundation of new cataloging codes, such as Resource Description and Access. While principles, models, and rules are well established, bibliographic formats seem to be a bottleneck and users seem far from libraries. This article aims to present an overview of current changes, potential convergences, developments, and weak points from Ranganathan's point of view.

Content

Beitrag in einem Themenheft: Reshaping the Library Catalog: Selected Papers from the International Conference FSR2014 (Rome, February 27-28, 2014).

0.02117042 = product of:
  0.04234084 = sum of:
    0.04234084 = product of:
      0.08468168 = sum of:
        0.08468168 = weight(_text_:international in 258) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08468168 = score(doc=258,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.17368206 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05206484 = queryNorm
            0.48756722 = fieldWeight in 258, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=258)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Many current cataloguing codes have their roots in a common tradition started by the 1961 Paris International Conference on Cataloguing Principles-ICCP. Since 1961, the construction of new national codes had been based on the sharing of cataloguing principles, on agreements for international cooperation, and on a common tradition. The new technological and international environment suggests, more and more, a redesign of those principles to include more suitable features and to assert firmly that the highest principle is the convenience of the users of the catalogue. Within this framework, the authors analyze the Italian cataloguing tradition and its relationships with the international tradition and recount the main activities towards a revision of the present Italian code-Regole italiane di catalogazione per autori RICA. The paper shows that, since the first Italian rules written by Fumagalli, special attention has been paid to the international tradition (in particular toward Panizzi's rules). After describing the relationships among the international trends and the Italian codes of 1922, 1956 and 1979, the paper deals with the recent works of the new Commission that, since 1997, has started to revise RICA. The paper concludes by reflecting on the Italian position in the debate first on the ISBD and then on the new entity-relationship models.

0.018105704 = product of:
  0.03621141 = sum of:
    0.03621141 = product of:
      0.07242282 = sum of:
        0.07242282 = weight(_text_:international in 2944) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07242282 = score(doc=2944,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17368206 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05206484 = queryNorm
            0.416985 = fieldWeight in 2944, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2944)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

This issue of Jlis.it is focused on RDA, Resource Description and Access. In light of increasing international acceptance of this new cataloging content standard, the editors of Jlis.it wish to capture the background of how RDA came to be and the implications of its implementation at this time. This special issue offers a wide overview on the new guidelines from their making to their spreading around the world.

0.015842492 = product of:
  0.031684984 = sum of:
    0.031684984 = product of:
      0.06336997 = sum of:
        0.06336997 = weight(_text_:international in 2002) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06336997 = score(doc=2002,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17368206 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05206484 = queryNorm
            0.36486188 = fieldWeight in 2002, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2002)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

The collection of nearly 1,000 piano rolls housed within the Department of Musicology and Cultural Heritage, University of Pavia, Cremona, Italy, remains in need of preservation. A digitalization project requires cataloging based on international cataloging standards. A distinction among instruments and media must be introduced and specific features of mechanical musical devices are to be identified. Four main classes of media have been identified: disks, pinned barrels, books, and rolls. Lastly, morphological peculiarities of the media must be examined to establish their correct and complete description within the International Standard for Bibliographic Description (ISBD) areas.

0.011202332 = product of:
  0.022404663 = sum of:
    0.022404663 = product of:
      0.044809327 = sum of:
        0.044809327 = weight(_text_:international in 2973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.044809327 = score(doc=2973,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17368206 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05206484 = queryNorm
            0.2579963 = fieldWeight in 2973, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2973)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

This article discusses the changes that are occurring in the world of cataloguing. It argues that these changes need to be coordinated. It also discusses the feature of current OPACs, FRBR, the Paris Principles and its proposed replacement (ICP), AACR2 and its proposed replacement (RDA), ISBD, and the relationships between and among these standards. It argues that the syntax of ISBD is an essential component of RDA and all future international and national cataloguing codes.

0.011202332 = product of:
  0.022404663 = sum of:
    0.022404663 = product of:
      0.044809327 = sum of:
        0.044809327 = weight(_text_:international in 1998) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.044809327 = score(doc=1998,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17368206 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05206484 = queryNorm
            0.2579963 = fieldWeight in 1998, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1998)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

This article explores the question "What is an International Standard for Bibliographic Description (ISBD) resource in the context of the Semantic Web, and what is the relationship of its description to the linked data?" This question is discussed against the background of the dichotomy between the description and access using the Semantic Web differentiation of the three logical layers: real-world objects, web of data, and special purpose (bibliographic) data. The representation of bibliographic data as linked data is discussed, distinguishing the description of a resource from the iconic/objective and the informational/subjective viewpoints. In the conclusion, the authors give views on possible directions of future development of the ISBD.

0.0105811 = product of:
  0.0211622 = sum of:
    0.0211622 = product of:
      0.0423244 = sum of:
        0.0423244 = weight(_text_:22 in 4889) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0423244 = score(doc=4889,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1823222 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05206484 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4889, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4889)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

22. 1.2012 13:05:47