-
Ding, Y.: Scholarly communication and bibliometrics : Part 1: The scholarly communication model: literature review (1998)
0.02
0.016003333 = product of:
0.032006666 = sum of:
0.032006666 = product of:
0.06401333 = sum of:
0.06401333 = weight(_text_:international in 3995) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06401333 = score(doc=3995,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17368206 = queryWeight, product of:
3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
0.05206484 = queryNorm
0.36856616 = fieldWeight in 3995, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3995)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- International forum on information and documentation. 23(1998) no.2, S.20-29
-
Ding, Y.: Visualization of intellectual structure in information retrieval : author cocitation analysis (1998)
0.02
0.015842492 = product of:
0.031684984 = sum of:
0.031684984 = product of:
0.06336997 = sum of:
0.06336997 = weight(_text_:international in 2792) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06336997 = score(doc=2792,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17368206 = queryWeight, product of:
3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
0.05206484 = queryNorm
0.36486188 = fieldWeight in 2792, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2792)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Reports results of a cocitation analysis study from the international retrieval research field from 1987 to 1997. Data was taken from Social SciSearch, via Dialog, and the top 40 authors were submitted to author cocitation analysis to yield the intellectual structure of information retrieval. The resulting multidimensional scaling map revealed: identifiable author groups for information retrieval; location of these groups with respect to each other; extend of centrality and peripherality of authors within groups, proximities of authors within groups and across group boundaries; and the meaning of the axes of the map. Factor analysis was used to reveal the extent of the authors' research areas and statistical routines included: ALSCAL; clustering analysis and factor analysis
- Source
- International forum on information and documentation. 23(1998) no.1, S.25-36
-
Liu, M.; Bu, Y.; Chen, C.; Xu, J.; Li, D.; Leng, Y.; Freeman, R.B.; Meyer, E.T.; Yoon, W.; Sung, M.; Jeong, M.; Lee, J.; Kang, J.; Min, C.; Zhai, Y.; Song, M.; Ding, Y.: Pandemics are catalysts of scientific novelty : evidence from COVID-19 (2022)
0.01
0.013859293 = product of:
0.027718587 = sum of:
0.027718587 = product of:
0.055437174 = sum of:
0.055437174 = weight(_text_:international in 633) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055437174 = score(doc=633,freq=6.0), product of:
0.17368206 = queryWeight, product of:
3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
0.05206484 = queryNorm
0.31918767 = fieldWeight in 633, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=633)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Scientific novelty drives the efforts to invent new vaccines and solutions during the pandemic. First-time collaboration and international collaboration are two pivotal channels to expand teams' search activities for a broader scope of resources required to address the global challenge, which might facilitate the generation of novel ideas. Our analysis of 98,981 coronavirus papers suggests that scientific novelty measured by the BioBERT model that is pretrained on 29 million PubMed articles, and first-time collaboration increased after the outbreak of COVID-19, and international collaboration witnessed a sudden decrease. During COVID-19, papers with more first-time collaboration were found to be more novel and international collaboration did not hamper novelty as it had done in the normal periods. The findings suggest the necessity of reaching out for distant resources and the importance of maintaining a collaborative scientific community beyond nationalism during a pandemic.
-
Yan, E.; Ding, Y.: Discovering author impact : a PageRank perspective (2011)
0.01
0.012802666 = product of:
0.025605332 = sum of:
0.025605332 = product of:
0.051210664 = sum of:
0.051210664 = weight(_text_:international in 2704) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.051210664 = score(doc=2704,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17368206 = queryWeight, product of:
3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
0.05206484 = queryNorm
0.2948529 = fieldWeight in 2704, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2704)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This article provides an alternative perspective for measuring author impact by applying PageRank algorithm to a coauthorship network. A weighted PageRank algorithm considering citation and coauthorship network topology is proposed. We test this algorithm under different damping factors by evaluating author impact in the informetrics research community. In addition, we also compare this weighted PageRank with the h-index, citation, and program committee (PC) membership of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics (ISSI) conferences. Findings show that this weighted PageRank algorithm provides reliable results in measuring author impact.
-
Ding, Y.: Applying weighted PageRank to author citation networks (2011)
0.01
0.012344617 = product of:
0.024689235 = sum of:
0.024689235 = product of:
0.04937847 = sum of:
0.04937847 = weight(_text_:22 in 4188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04937847 = score(doc=4188,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1823222 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05206484 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4188, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4188)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 1.2011 13:02:21
-
Ding, Y.; Zhang, G.; Chambers, T.; Song, M.; Wang, X.; Zhai, C.: Content-based citation analysis : the next generation of citation analysis (2014)
0.01
0.0105811 = product of:
0.0211622 = sum of:
0.0211622 = product of:
0.0423244 = sum of:
0.0423244 = weight(_text_:22 in 1521) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0423244 = score(doc=1521,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1823222 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05206484 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1521, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1521)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 8.2014 16:52:04
-
Ding, Y.; Chowdhury, G.; Foo, S.: Organsising keywords in a Web search environment : a methodology based on co-word analysis (2000)
0.01
0.009601999 = product of:
0.019203998 = sum of:
0.019203998 = product of:
0.038407996 = sum of:
0.038407996 = weight(_text_:international in 105) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038407996 = score(doc=105,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17368206 = queryWeight, product of:
3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
0.05206484 = queryNorm
0.22113968 = fieldWeight in 105, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=105)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Dynamism and stability in knowledge organization: Proceedings of the 6th International ISKO-Conference, 10-13 July 2000, Toronto, Canada. Ed.: C. Beghtol et al
