-
Ohly, P.: Dimensions of globality : a bibliometric analysis (2016)
0.06
0.064427674 = product of:
0.12885535 = sum of:
0.12885535 = sum of:
0.07242282 = weight(_text_:international in 4942) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07242282 = score(doc=4942,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17368206 = queryWeight, product of:
3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
0.05206484 = queryNorm
0.416985 = fieldWeight in 4942, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4942)
0.056432538 = weight(_text_:22 in 4942) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056432538 = score(doc=4942,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1823222 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05206484 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4942, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4942)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 20. 1.2019 11:22:31
- Source
- Knowledge organization for a sustainable world: challenges and perspectives for cultural, scientific, and technological sharing in a connected society : proceedings of the Fourteenth International ISKO Conference 27-29 September 2016, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil / organized by International Society for Knowledge Organization (ISKO), ISKO-Brazil, São Paulo State University ; edited by José Augusto Chaves Guimarães, Suellen Oliveira Milani, Vera Dodebei
-
Leydesdorff, L.; Sun, Y.: National and international dimensions of the Triple Helix in Japan : university-industry-government versus international coauthorship relations (2009)
0.06
0.06410365 = product of:
0.1282073 = sum of:
0.1282073 = sum of:
0.085882895 = weight(_text_:international in 2761) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.085882895 = score(doc=2761,freq=10.0), product of:
0.17368206 = queryWeight, product of:
3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
0.05206484 = queryNorm
0.49448338 = fieldWeight in 2761, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2761)
0.0423244 = weight(_text_:22 in 2761) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0423244 = score(doc=2761,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1823222 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05206484 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2761, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2761)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- International co-authorship relations and university-industry-government (Triple Helix) relations have hitherto been studied separately. Using Japanese publication data for the 1981-2004 period, we were able to study both kinds of relations in a single design. In the Japanese file, 1,277,030 articles with at least one Japanese address were attributed to the three sectors, and we know additionally whether these papers were coauthored internationally. Using the mutual information in three and four dimensions, respectively, we show that the Japanese Triple-Helix system has been continuously eroded at the national level. However, since the mid-1990s, international coauthorship relations have contributed to a reduction of the uncertainty at the national level. In other words, the national publication system of Japan has developed a capacity to retain surplus value generated internationally. In a final section, we compare these results with an analysis based on similar data for Canada. A relative uncoupling of national university-industry-government relations because of international collaborations is indicated in both countries.
- Date
- 22. 3.2009 19:07:20
-
He, Z.-L.: International collaboration does not have greater epistemic authority (2009)
0.06
0.06410365 = product of:
0.1282073 = sum of:
0.1282073 = sum of:
0.085882895 = weight(_text_:international in 3122) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.085882895 = score(doc=3122,freq=10.0), product of:
0.17368206 = queryWeight, product of:
3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
0.05206484 = queryNorm
0.49448338 = fieldWeight in 3122, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3122)
0.0423244 = weight(_text_:22 in 3122) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0423244 = score(doc=3122,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1823222 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05206484 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3122, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3122)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The consistent finding that internationally coauthored papers are more heavily cited has led to a tacit agreement among politicians and scientists that international collaboration in scientific research should be particularly promoted. However, existing studies of research collaboration suffer from a major weakness in that the Thomson Reuters Web of Science until recently did not link author names with affiliation addresses. The general approach has been to hierarchically code papers into international paper, national paper, or local paper based on the address information. This hierarchical coding scheme severely understates the level and contribution of local or national collaboration on an internationally coauthored paper. In this research, I code collaboration variables by hand checking each paper in the sample, use two measures of a paper's impact, and try several regression models. I find that both international collaboration and local collaboration are positively and significantly associated with a paper's impact, but international collaboration does not have more epistemic authority than local collaboration. This result suggests that previous findings based on hierarchical coding might be misleading.
- Date
- 26. 9.2009 11:22:05
-
Leydesdorff, L.; Bornmann, L.; Wagner, C.S.: ¬The relative influences of government funding and international collaboration on citation impact (2019)
0.05
0.054424506 = product of:
0.10884901 = sum of:
0.10884901 = sum of:
0.06652461 = weight(_text_:international in 4681) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06652461 = score(doc=4681,freq=6.0), product of:
0.17368206 = queryWeight, product of:
3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
0.05206484 = queryNorm
0.38302523 = fieldWeight in 4681, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4681)
0.0423244 = weight(_text_:22 in 4681) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0423244 = score(doc=4681,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1823222 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05206484 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4681, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4681)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- A recent publication in Nature reports that public R&D funding is only weakly correlated with the citation impact of a nation's articles as measured by the field-weighted citation index (FWCI; defined by Scopus). On the basis of the supplementary data, we up-scaled the design using Web of Science data for the decade 2003-2013 and OECD funding data for the corresponding decade assuming a 2-year delay (2001-2011). Using negative binomial regression analysis, we found very small coefficients, but the effects of international collaboration are positive and statistically significant, whereas the effects of government funding are negative, an order of magnitude smaller, and statistically nonsignificant (in two of three analyses). In other words, international collaboration improves the impact of research articles, whereas more government funding tends to have a small adverse effect when comparing OECD countries.
- Date
- 8. 1.2019 18:22:45
-
Tijssen, R.J.W.; Wijk, E. van: ¬The global science base of information and communication technologies : bibliometric analysis of ICT research papers (1998)
0.05
0.0538216 = product of:
0.1076432 = sum of:
0.1076432 = sum of:
0.051210664 = weight(_text_:international in 3691) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.051210664 = score(doc=3691,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17368206 = queryWeight, product of:
3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
0.05206484 = queryNorm
0.2948529 = fieldWeight in 3691, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3691)
0.056432538 = weight(_text_:22 in 3691) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056432538 = score(doc=3691,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1823222 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05206484 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3691, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3691)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- International bibliographic databases and related biblimetric indicators together provide an analytical framework and appropriate measure to cover both the 'supply side' - research capabilities and outputs - and 'demand side' - collaboration, diffusion and citation impact - related to information and communication technologies (ICT) research. Presents results of such a bibliometric study describing macro level features of this ICT knowledge base
- Date
- 22. 5.1999 19:26:54
-
Siddiqui, M.A.: ¬A bibliometric study of authorship characteristics in four international information science journals (1997)
0.05
0.048320755 = product of:
0.09664151 = sum of:
0.09664151 = sum of:
0.05431711 = weight(_text_:international in 853) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05431711 = score(doc=853,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17368206 = queryWeight, product of:
3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
0.05206484 = queryNorm
0.31273875 = fieldWeight in 853, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=853)
0.0423244 = weight(_text_:22 in 853) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0423244 = score(doc=853,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1823222 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05206484 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 853, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=853)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- International forum on information and documentation. 22(1997) no.3, S.3-23
-
Chan, H.C.; Kim, H.-W.; Tan, W.C.: Information systems citation patterns from International Conference on Information Systems articles (2006)
0.05
0.048320755 = product of:
0.09664151 = sum of:
0.09664151 = sum of:
0.05431711 = weight(_text_:international in 201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05431711 = score(doc=201,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17368206 = queryWeight, product of:
3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
0.05206484 = queryNorm
0.31273875 = fieldWeight in 201, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=201)
0.0423244 = weight(_text_:22 in 201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0423244 = score(doc=201,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1823222 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05206484 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 201, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=201)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Research patterns could enhance understanding of the Information Systems (IS) field. Citation analysis is the methodology commonly used to determine such research patterns. In this study, the citation methodology is applied to one of the top-ranked Information Systems conferences - International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS). Information is extracted from papers in the proceedings of ICIS 2000 to 2002. A total of 145 base articles and 4,226 citations are used. Research patterns are obtained using total citations, citations per journal or conference, and overlapping citations. We then provide the citation ranking of journals and conferences. We also examine the difference between the citation ranking in this study and the ranking of IS journals and IS conferences in other studies. Based on the comparison, we confirm that IS research is a multidisciplinary research area. We also identify the most cited papers and authors in the IS research area, and the organizations most active in producing papers in the top-rated IS conference. We discuss the findings and implications of the study.
- Date
- 3. 1.2007 17:22:03
-
Haiqi, Z.: ¬The literature of Qigong : publication patterns and subject headings (1997)
0.05
0.047093898 = product of:
0.094187796 = sum of:
0.094187796 = sum of:
0.044809327 = weight(_text_:international in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044809327 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17368206 = queryWeight, product of:
3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
0.05206484 = queryNorm
0.2579963 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
0.04937847 = weight(_text_:22 in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04937847 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1823222 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05206484 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- International forum on information and documentation. 22(1997) no.3, S.38-44
-
Schlögl, C.: Internationale Sichtbarkeit der europäischen und insbesondere der deutschsprachigen Informationswissenschaft (2013)
0.05
0.047093898 = product of:
0.094187796 = sum of:
0.094187796 = sum of:
0.044809327 = weight(_text_:international in 900) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044809327 = score(doc=900,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17368206 = queryWeight, product of:
3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
0.05206484 = queryNorm
0.2579963 = fieldWeight in 900, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=900)
0.04937847 = weight(_text_:22 in 900) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04937847 = score(doc=900,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1823222 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05206484 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 900, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=900)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- Eine englische Version dieses Beitrags erscheint unter dem Titel "International visibility of European and in particular German language publications in library and information science" im Tagungsband des 13. Internationalen Symposiums für Informationswissenschaft (ISI 2013). Vgl.: http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/iwp.2013.64.issue-1/iwp-2013-0001/iwp-2013-0001.xml?format=INT.
- Date
- 22. 3.2013 14:04:09
-
Ball, R.: Wissenschaftsindikatoren im Zeitalter digitaler Wissenschaft (2007)
0.03
0.0336385 = product of:
0.067277 = sum of:
0.067277 = sum of:
0.032006666 = weight(_text_:international in 875) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032006666 = score(doc=875,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17368206 = queryWeight, product of:
3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
0.05206484 = queryNorm
0.18428308 = fieldWeight in 875, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=875)
0.035270337 = weight(_text_:22 in 875) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035270337 = score(doc=875,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1823222 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05206484 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 875, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=875)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Die Bereitstellung und Nutzung digitaler Bibliotheken entwickelt sich allmählich zum Standard der Literatur und Informationsversorgung in Wissenschaft und Forschung. Ganzen Disziplinen genügt oftmals die verfügbare digitale Information, Printmedien werden besonders im STM-Segment zu einem Nischenprodukt. Digitale Texte können beliebig eingebaut, kopiert und nachgenutzt werden, die Verlinkung zwischen Metadaten und Volltexten bringt weitere Nutzungsvorteile. Dabei sind die Angebote von Digital Libraries Bestandteil eines ganzheitlichen digitalen Ansatzes, wonach die elektronische Informations- und Literaturversorgung integraler Bestandteil von E-Science (Enhanced Science) oder Cyberinfrastructure darstellt. Hierbei verschmelzen dann Produktion, Diskussion, Distribution und Rezeption der wissenschaftlichen Inhalte auf einer einzigen digitalen Plattform. Damit sind dann nicht nur die Literatur- und Informationsversorgung (Digital Libraries), sondern auch die Wissenschaft selbst digital geworden. Diese dramatische Veränderung in der Wissenschaftskommunikation hat direkte Auswirkungen auf die Messung der Wissenschaftskommunikation, also auf die Evaluation von wissenschaftlichem Output. Bisherige Systeme der Wissenschaftsvermessung basieren hauptsächlich auf bibliometrischen Analysen, d.h. der Quantifizierung des Outputs und dessen Rezeption (Zitierhäufigkeit). Basis dafür sind insbesondere im STM-Bereich die international anerkannten Datenbanken des ISI (Thomson Scientific) insbesondere der Science Citation Index, SCI) oder vielleicht zukünftig das Konkurrenzprodukt SCOPUS des Wissenschaftskonzerns Reed Elsevier. Die Digitalisierung der Wissenschaft in ihrem kompletten Lebenszyklus, die zunehmende Nutzung und Akzeptanz von Dokumentenrepositorien, Institutsservern und anderen elektronischen Publikationsformen im Rahmen von E-Science erfordern und ermöglichen zugleich den Nachweis von Output und Rezeption durch neue bibliometrische Formen, etwa der Webometrie (Webmetrics). Im vorliegenden Paper haben wir hierzu Analysen durchgeführt und stellen eine Abschätzung vor, wie sich der Anteil von webometrisch erfassbarer und zugänglicher wissenschaftlicher Literatur im Vergleich zu Literatur, die mit den Standardsystemen nachgewiesen werden kann im Laufe der letzten Jahre verändert hat. Dabei haben wir unterschiedliche Disziplinen und Länder berücksichtigt. Zudem wird ein Vergleich der webometrischen Nachweisqualität so unterschiedlicher Systeme wie SCI, SCOPUS und Google Scholar vorgestellt.
- Date
- 23.12.2007 19:22:21
-
Heneberg, P.: Supposedly uncited articles of Nobel laureates and Fields medalists can be prevalently attributed to the errors of omission and commission (2013)
0.03
0.0336385 = product of:
0.067277 = sum of:
0.067277 = sum of:
0.032006666 = weight(_text_:international in 660) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032006666 = score(doc=660,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17368206 = queryWeight, product of:
3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
0.05206484 = queryNorm
0.18428308 = fieldWeight in 660, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=660)
0.035270337 = weight(_text_:22 in 660) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035270337 = score(doc=660,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1823222 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05206484 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 660, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=660)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Several independent authors reported a high share of uncited publications, which include those produced by top scientists. This share was repeatedly reported to exceed 10% of the total papers produced, without any explanation of this phenomenon and the lack of difference in uncitedness between average and successful researchers. In this report, we analyze the uncitedness among two independent groups of highly visible scientists (mathematicians represented by Fields medalists, and researchers in physiology or medicine represented by Nobel Prize laureates in the respective field). Analysis of both groups led to the identical conclusion: over 90% of the uncited database records of highly visible scientists can be explained by the inclusion of editorial materials progress reports presented at international meetings (meeting abstracts), discussion items (letters to the editor, discussion), personalia (biographic items), and by errors of omission and commission of the Web of Science (WoS) database and of the citing documents. Only a marginal amount of original articles and reviews were found to be uncited (0.9 and 0.3%, respectively), which is in strong contrast with the previously reported data, which never addressed the document types among the uncited records.
- Date
- 22. 3.2013 19:21:46
-
Schubert, T.; Michels, C.: Placing articles in the large publisher nations : is there a "free lunch" in terms of higher impact? (2013)
0.03
0.0336385 = product of:
0.067277 = sum of:
0.067277 = sum of:
0.032006666 = weight(_text_:international in 669) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032006666 = score(doc=669,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17368206 = queryWeight, product of:
3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
0.05206484 = queryNorm
0.18428308 = fieldWeight in 669, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=669)
0.035270337 = weight(_text_:22 in 669) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035270337 = score(doc=669,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1823222 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05206484 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 669, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=669)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This paper deals with the role of a journal's publisher country in determining the expected citation rates of the articles published in it. We analyze whether a paper has a higher citation rate when it is published in one of the large publisher nations, the U.S., U.K., or the Netherlands, compared to a hypothetical situation when the same paper is published in journals of different origin. This would constitute a "free lunch," which could be explained by a Matthew effect visible on the country-level, similar to the well-documented Matthew effect on the author-level. We first use a simulation model that highlights increasing citation returns to quality as the central key condition on which such a Matthew effect may emerge. Then we use an international bibliometric panel data set of forty-nine countries for the years 2000-2010 and show that such a "free lunch" implied by this Matthew effect can be observed for top journals from the U.S. and depending on the specification also from the U.K. and the Netherlands, while there is no effect for lower-ranked American journals and negative effects for lower-ranked British journals as well as those coming from the Netherlands.
- Date
- 22. 3.2013 19:45:49
-
Nicholls, P.T.: Empirical validation of Lotka's law (1986)
0.03
0.028216269 = product of:
0.056432538 = sum of:
0.056432538 = product of:
0.112865075 = sum of:
0.112865075 = weight(_text_:22 in 5509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.112865075 = score(doc=5509,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1823222 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05206484 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 5509, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5509)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Information processing and management. 22(1986), S.417-419
-
Nicolaisen, J.: Citation analysis (2007)
0.03
0.028216269 = product of:
0.056432538 = sum of:
0.056432538 = product of:
0.112865075 = sum of:
0.112865075 = weight(_text_:22 in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.112865075 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1823222 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05206484 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 13. 7.2008 19:53:22
-
Fiala, J.: Information flood : fiction and reality (1987)
0.03
0.028216269 = product of:
0.056432538 = sum of:
0.056432538 = product of:
0.112865075 = sum of:
0.112865075 = weight(_text_:22 in 1080) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.112865075 = score(doc=1080,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1823222 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05206484 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 1080, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1080)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Thermochimica acta. 110(1987), S.11-22
-
First International Conference on the Evaluation of Research Technology and Development (1995)
0.03
0.027158555 = product of:
0.05431711 = sum of:
0.05431711 = product of:
0.10863422 = sum of:
0.10863422 = weight(_text_:international in 415) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10863422 = score(doc=415,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17368206 = queryWeight, product of:
3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
0.05206484 = queryNorm
0.6254775 = fieldWeight in 415, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=415)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- Issue comprising papers presented at the First International Conference on the Evaluation of Research Technology and Development, Thessaloniki, 26-28 Apr 95
-
Su, Y.; Han, L.-F.: ¬A new literature growth model : variable exponential growth law of literature (1998)
0.02
0.024939893 = product of:
0.049879786 = sum of:
0.049879786 = product of:
0.09975957 = sum of:
0.09975957 = weight(_text_:22 in 3690) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09975957 = score(doc=3690,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1823222 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05206484 = queryNorm
0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3690, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3690)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 5.1999 19:22:35
-
Van der Veer Martens, B.: Do citation systems represent theories of truth? (2001)
0.02
0.024939893 = product of:
0.049879786 = sum of:
0.049879786 = product of:
0.09975957 = sum of:
0.09975957 = weight(_text_:22 in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09975957 = score(doc=3925,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1823222 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05206484 = queryNorm
0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 15:22:28
-
Diodato, V.: Dictionary of bibliometrics (1994)
0.02
0.024689235 = product of:
0.04937847 = sum of:
0.04937847 = product of:
0.09875694 = sum of:
0.09875694 = weight(_text_:22 in 5666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09875694 = score(doc=5666,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1823222 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05206484 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 5666, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5666)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: Journal of library and information science 22(1996) no.2, S.116-117 (L.C. Smith)
-
Bookstein, A.: Informetric distributions : I. Unified overview (1990)
0.02
0.024689235 = product of:
0.04937847 = sum of:
0.04937847 = product of:
0.09875694 = sum of:
0.09875694 = weight(_text_:22 in 6902) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09875694 = score(doc=6902,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1823222 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05206484 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6902, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6902)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 18:55:29
