Search (165 results, page 1 of 9)

0.041346382 = product of:
  0.082692765 = sum of:
    0.082692765 = product of:
      0.24807829 = sum of:
        0.24807829 = weight(_text_:3a in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.24807829 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.44140628 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05206484 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

https%3A%2F%2Farxiv.org%2Fabs%2F2212.06721&usg=AOvVaw3i_9pZm9y_dQWoHi6uv0EN

0.040267296 = product of:
  0.08053459 = sum of:
    0.08053459 = sum of:
      0.04526426 = weight(_text_:international in 313) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04526426 = score(doc=313,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.17368206 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05206484 = queryNorm
          0.26061562 = fieldWeight in 313, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=313)
      0.035270337 = weight(_text_:22 in 313) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.035270337 = score(doc=313,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1823222 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05206484 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 313, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=313)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

This study provides the first systematic, international, large-scale evidence on the extent and nature of multiple institutional affiliations on journal publications. Studying more than 15 million authors and 22 million articles from 40 countries we document that: In 2019, almost one in three articles was (co-)authored by authors with multiple affiliations and the share of authors with multiple affiliations increased from around 10% to 16% since 1996. The growth of multiple affiliations is prevalent in all fields and it is stronger in high impact journals. About 60% of multiple affiliations are between institutions from within the academic sector. International co-affiliations, which account for about a quarter of multiple affiliations, most often involve institutions from the United States, China, Germany and the United Kingdom, suggesting a core-periphery network. Network analysis also reveals a number communities of countries that are more likely to share affiliations. We discuss potential causes and show that the timing of the rise in multiple affiliations can be linked to the introduction of more competitive funding structures such as "excellence initiatives" in a number of countries. We discuss implications for science and science policy.

0.03445532 = product of:
  0.06891064 = sum of:
    0.06891064 = product of:
      0.20673192 = sum of:
        0.20673192 = weight(_text_:3a in 5669) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.20673192 = score(doc=5669,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.44140628 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05206484 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 5669, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5669)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Content

"Die Englischsprachige Wikipedia verfügt jetzt über mehr als 6 Millionen Artikel. An zweiter Stelle kommt die deutschsprachige Wikipedia mit 2.3 Millionen Artikeln, an dritter Stelle steht die französischsprachige Wikipedia mit 2.1 Millionen Artikeln (via Researchbuzz: Firehose <https://rbfirehose.com/2020/01/24/techcrunch-wikipedia-now-has-more-than-6-million-articles-in-english/> und Techcrunch <https://techcrunch.com/2020/01/23/wikipedia-english-six-million-articles/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Techcrunch+%28TechCrunch%29&guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly9yYmZpcmVob3NlLmNvbS8yMDIwLzAxLzI0L3RlY2hjcnVuY2gtd2lraXBlZGlhLW5vdy1oYXMtbW9yZS10aGFuLTYtbWlsbGlvbi1hcnRpY2xlcy1pbi1lbmdsaXNoLw&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAAK0zHfjdDZ_spFZBF_z-zDjtL5iWvuKDumFTzm4HvQzkUfE2pLXQzGS6FGB_y-VISdMEsUSvkNsg2U_NWQ4lwWSvOo3jvXo1I3GtgHpP8exukVxYAnn5mJspqX50VHIWFADHhs5AerkRn3hMRtf_R3F1qmEbo8EROZXp328HMC-o>). 250120 via digithek ch = #fineBlog s.a.: Angesichts der Veröffentlichung des 6-millionsten Artikels vergangene Woche in der englischsprachigen Wikipedia hat die Community-Zeitungsseite "Wikipedia Signpost" ein Moratorium bei der Veröffentlichung von Unternehmensartikeln gefordert. Das sei kein Vorwurf gegen die Wikimedia Foundation, aber die derzeitigen Maßnahmen, um die Enzyklopädie gegen missbräuchliches undeklariertes Paid Editing zu schützen, funktionierten ganz klar nicht. *"Da die ehrenamtlichen Autoren derzeit von Werbung in Gestalt von Wikipedia-Artikeln überwältigt werden, und da die WMF nicht in der Lage zu sein scheint, dem irgendetwas entgegenzusetzen, wäre der einzige gangbare Weg für die Autoren, fürs erste die Neuanlage von Artikeln über Unternehmen zu untersagen"*, schreibt der Benutzer Smallbones in seinem Editorial <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2020-01-27/From_the_editor> zur heutigen Ausgabe."

0.03445532 = product of:
  0.06891064 = sum of:
    0.06891064 = product of:
      0.20673192 = sum of:
        0.20673192 = weight(_text_:3a in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.20673192 = score(doc=1000,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.44140628 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05206484 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Content

Master thesis Master of Science (Library and Information Studies) (MSc), Universität Wien. Advisor: Christoph Steiner. Vgl.: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/371680244_Vergabe_von_DDC-Sachgruppen_mittels_eines_Schlagwort-Thesaurus. DOI: 10.25365/thesis.70030. Vgl. dazu die Präsentation unter: https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&ved=0CAIQw7AJahcKEwjwoZzzytz_AhUAAAAAHQAAAAAQAg&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwiki.dnb.de%2Fdownload%2Fattachments%2F252121510%2FDA3%2520Workshop-Gabler.pdf%3Fversion%3D1%26modificationDate%3D1671093170000%26api%3Dv2&psig=AOvVaw0szwENK1or3HevgvIDOfjx&ust=1687719410889597&opi=89978449.

0.0336385 = product of:
  0.067277 = sum of:
    0.067277 = sum of:
      0.032006666 = weight(_text_:international in 330) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.032006666 = score(doc=330,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17368206 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05206484 = queryNorm
          0.18428308 = fieldWeight in 330, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=330)
      0.035270337 = weight(_text_:22 in 330) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.035270337 = score(doc=330,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1823222 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05206484 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 330, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=330)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Nur noch Informationsethik, Informationskompetenz und Information Assessment? Doch gerade die Abschottung von anderen Disziplinen verstärkt die Isolation des "kleinen Faches" Informationswissenschaft in der Scientific Community. So bleiben ihr als letzte "eigenständige" Forschungsrandgebiete nur die, die Wolf Rauch als Keynote Speaker bereits in seinem einführenden, historisch-genetischen Vortrag zur Lage der Informationswissenschaft auf der ISI 2021 benannt hat: "Wenn die universitäre Informationswissenschaft (zumindest in Europa) wohl kaum eine Chance hat, im Bereich der Entwicklung von Systemen und Anwendungen wieder an die Spitze der Entwicklung vorzustoßen, bleiben ihr doch Gebiete, in denen ihr Beitrag in der kommenden Entwicklungsphase dringend erforderlich sein wird: Informationsethik, Informationskompetenz, Information Assessment" (Wolf Rauch: Was aus der Informationswissenschaft geworden ist; in: Thomas Schmidt; Christian Wolff (Eds): Information between Data and Knowledge. Schriften zur Informationswissenschaft 74, Regensburg, 2021, Seiten 20-22 - siehe auch die Rezeption des Beitrages von Rauch durch Johannes Elia Panskus, Was aus der Informationswissenschaft geworden ist. Sie ist in der Realität angekommen, in: Open Password, 17. März 2021). Das ist alles? Ernüchternd.

0.0336385 = product of:
  0.067277 = sum of:
    0.067277 = sum of:
      0.032006666 = weight(_text_:international in 1055) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.032006666 = score(doc=1055,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17368206 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05206484 = queryNorm
          0.18428308 = fieldWeight in 1055, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1055)
      0.035270337 = weight(_text_:22 in 1055) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.035270337 = score(doc=1055,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1823222 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05206484 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1055, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1055)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Journal lists are instruments to categorize, compare, and assess research and scholarly publications. Our study investigates the remarkable proliferation of such journal lists in China, analyses their underlying values, quality criteria and ranking principles, and specifies how concerns specific to the Chinese research policy and publishing system inform these lists. Discouraged lists of "bad journals" reflect concerns over inferior research publications, but also the involved drain on public resources. Endorsed lists of "good journals" are based on criteria valued in research policy, reflecting the distinctive administrative logic of state-led Chinese research and publishing policy, ascribing worth to scientific journals for its specific national and institutional needs. In this regard, the criteria used for journal list construction are contextual and reflect the challenges of public resource allocation in a market-led publication system. Chinese journal lists therefore reflect research policy changes, such as a shift away from output-dominated research evaluation, the specific concerns about research misconduct, and balancing national research needs against international standards, resulting in distinctly Chinese quality criteria. However, contrasting concerns and inaccuracies lead to contradictions in the "qualify" and "disqualify" binary logic and demonstrate inherent tensions and limitations in journal lists as policy tools.

Date

22. 9.2023 16:39:23

0.024689235 = product of:
  0.04937847 = sum of:
    0.04937847 = product of:
      0.09875694 = sum of:
        0.09875694 = weight(_text_:22 in 1079) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09875694 = score(doc=1079,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1823222 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05206484 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 1079, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1079)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

27. 1.2023 16:22:55

0.0211622 = product of:
  0.0423244 = sum of:
    0.0423244 = product of:
      0.0846488 = sum of:
        0.0846488 = weight(_text_:22 in 4156) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0846488 = score(doc=4156,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1823222 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05206484 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4156, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4156)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

2. 3.2020 14:08:22

0.0211622 = product of:
  0.0423244 = sum of:
    0.0423244 = product of:
      0.0846488 = sum of:
        0.0846488 = weight(_text_:22 in 1203) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0846488 = score(doc=1203,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1823222 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05206484 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 1203, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1203)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

Spektrum der Wissenschaft. 2023, H.10, S.22-24

0.019203998 = product of:
  0.038407996 = sum of:
    0.038407996 = product of:
      0.07681599 = sum of:
        0.07681599 = weight(_text_:international in 856) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07681599 = score(doc=856,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17368206 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05206484 = queryNorm
            0.44227937 = fieldWeight in 856, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=856)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

6th International Conference on Computer-Human Interaction Research and Applications, [https://www.researchgate.net/publication/364940444_A_Study_of_Search_User_Interface_Design_based_on_Hofstede's_Six_Cultural_Dimensions]

0.019203998 = product of:
  0.038407996 = sum of:
    0.038407996 = product of:
      0.07681599 = sum of:
        0.07681599 = weight(_text_:international in 1195) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07681599 = score(doc=1195,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.17368206 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05206484 = queryNorm
            0.44227937 = fieldWeight in 1195, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1195)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

In the context of the increasing global connectivity in science, this article investigates the internal heterogeneity of international research collaborations (IRCs). We focus on the prevalence of shared heritage collaborations and the rise of multiple institutional affiliations as a collaboration mechanism. An analytical typology of IRCs based on the characteristics of collaborating researchers' location and heritage is developed and empirically tested on the dataset of Russia's publications in 2015. We found that shared heritage IRC and IRC via multiple affiliations are the cornerstones of internationalization. Significant structural differences are revealed between conventional IRC and these nonconventional IRCs across fields of science, locations, visibility of international partners, and the sources of funding. These results contribute towards a better understanding of IRC as a complex, heterogeneous phenomenon, which encompasses a variety of arrangements for knowledge creation across borders. A more nuanced understanding of IRC is needed for smarter university strategy, metric development, and policymaking.

0.018105704 = product of:
  0.03621141 = sum of:
    0.03621141 = product of:
      0.07242282 = sum of:
        0.07242282 = weight(_text_:international in 5760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07242282 = score(doc=5760,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17368206 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05206484 = queryNorm
            0.416985 = fieldWeight in 5760, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5760)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Dr. Ingetraut Dahlberg essentially introduced and shaped the term "knowledge organization." She also was the main engine in the founding of the scientific associations Society for Classification and International Society for Knowledge Organization as well as the journals International Classification and Knowledge Organization. In 2017, Ingetraut Dahlberg died at the age of ninety years. Some life data and scientific contributions are presented here.

0.018105704 = product of:
  0.03621141 = sum of:
    0.03621141 = product of:
      0.07242282 = sum of:
        0.07242282 = weight(_text_:international in 5925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07242282 = score(doc=5925,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17368206 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05206484 = queryNorm
            0.416985 = fieldWeight in 5925, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5925)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Das documenta archiv zählt in der Landschaft der Kunstarchive sicherlich zu den außergewöhnlichsten in Deutschland. Zum einen ist es aufgrund seines inhaltlichen Schwerpunkts sehr international positioniert: Kein anderes Kunstarchiv in Deutschland hat aufgrund der Bestände des international agierenden Kuratoren- und Kuratorinnen-Teams und der aus allen Kontinenten eingeladenen Künstlerinnen und Künstler eine solche Reichweite an Nachfragen, die in Kassel aus der ganzen Welt eintreffen. Zum anderen ist es - mit dem Bauhaus-Archiv - eines der beiden ältesten Kunstarchive Deutschlands.

0.017635169 = product of:
  0.035270337 = sum of:
    0.035270337 = product of:
      0.070540674 = sum of:
        0.070540674 = weight(_text_:22 in 5723) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.070540674 = score(doc=5723,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1823222 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05206484 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5723, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5723)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

17. 1.2020 22:15:11

0.017635169 = product of:
  0.035270337 = sum of:
    0.035270337 = product of:
      0.070540674 = sum of:
        0.070540674 = weight(_text_:22 in 5846) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.070540674 = score(doc=5846,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1823222 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05206484 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5846, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5846)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

4. 5.2020 17:22:40

0.017635169 = product of:
  0.035270337 = sum of:
    0.035270337 = product of:
      0.070540674 = sum of:
        0.070540674 = weight(_text_:22 in 5906) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.070540674 = score(doc=5906,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1823222 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05206484 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5906, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5906)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

4. 5.2020 17:22:28

0.017635169 = product of:
  0.035270337 = sum of:
    0.035270337 = product of:
      0.070540674 = sum of:
        0.070540674 = weight(_text_:22 in 5907) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.070540674 = score(doc=5907,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1823222 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05206484 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5907, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5907)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

22. 6.2020 19:11:24

0.017635169 = product of:
  0.035270337 = sum of:
    0.035270337 = product of:
      0.070540674 = sum of:
        0.070540674 = weight(_text_:22 in 82) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.070540674 = score(doc=82,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1823222 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05206484 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 82, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=82)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

22. 6.2020 19:16:24

0.017635169 = product of:
  0.035270337 = sum of:
    0.035270337 = product of:
      0.070540674 = sum of:
        0.070540674 = weight(_text_:22 in 236) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.070540674 = score(doc=236,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1823222 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05206484 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 236, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=236)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

7. 5.2021 22:10:24

0.017635169 = product of:
  0.035270337 = sum of:
    0.035270337 = product of:
      0.070540674 = sum of:
        0.070540674 = weight(_text_:22 in 1001) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.070540674 = score(doc=1001,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1823222 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05206484 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1001, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1001)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

Mitteilungen der Deutschen Mathematiker-Vereinigung. 2023, H.1, S.22-25