Search (3074 results, page 1 of 154)

  • × type_ss:"a"
  1. Three systems are substantially enhanced (1995) 0.12
    0.12199151 = product of:
      0.24398302 = sum of:
        0.24398302 = product of:
          0.36597452 = sum of:
            0.31996128 = weight(_text_:db in 3363) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.31996128 = score(doc=3363,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.329642 = queryWeight, product of:
                  7.7650614 = idf(docFreq=50, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04245195 = queryNorm
                0.9706327 = fieldWeight in 3363, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  7.7650614 = idf(docFreq=50, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3363)
            0.046013225 = weight(_text_:22 in 3363) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.046013225 = score(doc=3363,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1486595 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04245195 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3363, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3363)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    For about 10 years, systems such as STATUS, CAIRS and INMAGIC have offered the ability to search for any word in a collection of unstructured text. Until recently, only librarians and documentalists have been interested, but free text retrieval is increasingly valued in the business world in general and all 3 systems are striving for a wider market by adding other features to their established core competence. Illustrates this trend with particualr reference to: STATUS/IQ; CAIRS; TMS and DB/TextWorks (the successor to InMagic Plus)
    Date
    22. 2.1996 10:18:16
    Object
    INMAGIC DB/TextWorks
  2. Kiem, C.M.; Middleton, M.: ¬An evaluation of textual storage and retrieval software : CDS/ISIS and InMagic (1998) 0.12
    0.12199151 = product of:
      0.24398302 = sum of:
        0.24398302 = product of:
          0.36597452 = sum of:
            0.31996128 = weight(_text_:db in 1974) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.31996128 = score(doc=1974,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.329642 = queryWeight, product of:
                  7.7650614 = idf(docFreq=50, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04245195 = queryNorm
                0.9706327 = fieldWeight in 1974, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  7.7650614 = idf(docFreq=50, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1974)
            0.046013225 = weight(_text_:22 in 1974) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.046013225 = score(doc=1974,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1486595 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04245195 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1974, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1974)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    A comparison was made between CDS/ISIS, ist Windows version WINISIS, and InMagic's INMAGIC and DB/TextWorks software. Packages were evaluated for their database creation, information retrieval and report production capabilities. Windows versions were found to provide significant enhancements over DOS versions of software. The evaluation aimed to determine the advantages to a developing country of creating bibliographic databases using commercial software
    Date
    22. 2.1999 13:54:49
    Object
    INMAGIC DB/TextWorks
  3. Gracia, C. de: Selecting and adapting a second generation integrated library system (ILS) and extending it to users worldwide via the Internet (1997) 0.11
    0.106742576 = product of:
      0.21348515 = sum of:
        0.21348515 = product of:
          0.3202277 = sum of:
            0.27996615 = weight(_text_:db in 3021) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.27996615 = score(doc=3021,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.329642 = queryWeight, product of:
                  7.7650614 = idf(docFreq=50, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04245195 = queryNorm
                0.8493036 = fieldWeight in 3021, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  7.7650614 = idf(docFreq=50, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3021)
            0.04026157 = weight(_text_:22 in 3021) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04026157 = score(doc=3021,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1486595 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04245195 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3021, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3021)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Describes CIMMYT's (Centro Internacional de Mejoramiento de Maiz y Trigo) migration to a new integrated library software and the impact of that software on various management tasks. A product of INMAGIC Inc., the software in known as DB/TextWorks (Windows version). Flexibility and user friendliness are among its outstanding features. Gives special emphasis to the selection process
    Date
    22. 2.1999 13:55:01
    Object
    INMAGIC DB/TextWorks
  4. Levasseur, D.: Inmagic DB/TextWorks, un classique pour Windows (1997) 0.08
    0.08431721 = product of:
      0.16863441 = sum of:
        0.16863441 = product of:
          0.50590324 = sum of:
            0.50590324 = weight(_text_:db in 881) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.50590324 = score(doc=881,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.329642 = queryWeight, product of:
                  7.7650614 = idf(docFreq=50, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04245195 = queryNorm
                1.534705 = fieldWeight in 881, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  7.7650614 = idf(docFreq=50, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=881)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Discusses the characteristics and functions of the textual database management program DB/TextWorks 2.0 of Inmagic Inc. Operating on a PC microcomputer in a Windows environment (stand alone or network), it combines the advantages of full text retrieval systems and the flexibility of databases. Presents an evaluation of the program and examines its use in libraries with the DB/TextWorks Library guide kit which proposes database models conceived for various functions; acquisitions, cataloging, loans, OPAC, serials management, and interlibrary loan
    Footnote
    Übers. des Titels: Inmagic DB/TextWorks, a classic for Windows
    Object
    Inmagic DB/TextWorks
  5. Perez, E.: Industrial strength database publishing : Inmagic DB/Textworks WebPublisher (1997) 0.08
    0.079409175 = product of:
      0.15881835 = sum of:
        0.15881835 = product of:
          0.23822752 = sum of:
            0.19796595 = weight(_text_:db in 679) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.19796595 = score(doc=679,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.329642 = queryWeight, product of:
                  7.7650614 = idf(docFreq=50, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04245195 = queryNorm
                0.6005483 = fieldWeight in 679, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  7.7650614 = idf(docFreq=50, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=679)
            0.04026157 = weight(_text_:22 in 679) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04026157 = score(doc=679,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1486595 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04245195 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 679, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=679)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    6. 3.1997 16:22:15
  6. Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004) 0.08
    0.07892826 = sum of:
      0.06742495 = product of:
        0.20227484 = sum of:
          0.20227484 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.20227484 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.3599081 = queryWeight, product of:
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04245195 = queryNorm
              0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.011503307 = product of:
        0.03450992 = sum of:
          0.03450992 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03450992 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1486595 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04245195 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
    Date
    8. 1.2013 10:22:32
  7. Traiser, W.: Neue Sachgruppen für die Deutsche Nationalbibliographie (1992) 0.08
    0.0754156 = product of:
      0.1508312 = sum of:
        0.1508312 = product of:
          0.45249358 = sum of:
            0.45249358 = weight(_text_:db in 3026) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.45249358 = score(doc=3026,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.329642 = queryWeight, product of:
                  7.7650614 = idf(docFreq=50, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04245195 = queryNorm
                1.3726819 = fieldWeight in 3026, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  7.7650614 = idf(docFreq=50, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3026)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Object
    Sachgruppen DB/DNB
  8. Maaßen, B.: Neue Sachgruppeneinteilung für das Wöchentliche Verzeichnis : Ergebnisse einer Umfrage der Deutschen Bibliothek (1981) 0.08
    0.0754156 = product of:
      0.1508312 = sum of:
        0.1508312 = product of:
          0.45249358 = sum of:
            0.45249358 = weight(_text_:db in 4962) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.45249358 = score(doc=4962,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.329642 = queryWeight, product of:
                  7.7650614 = idf(docFreq=50, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04245195 = queryNorm
                1.3726819 = fieldWeight in 4962, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  7.7650614 = idf(docFreq=50, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4962)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Object
    Sachgruppen DB/DNB
  9. Nowak, K.: Freiheit und Notwendigkeit (1997) 0.08
    0.0754156 = product of:
      0.1508312 = sum of:
        0.1508312 = product of:
          0.45249358 = sum of:
            0.45249358 = weight(_text_:db in 721) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.45249358 = score(doc=721,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.329642 = queryWeight, product of:
                  7.7650614 = idf(docFreq=50, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04245195 = queryNorm
                1.3726819 = fieldWeight in 721, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  7.7650614 = idf(docFreq=50, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=721)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Object
    DB
  10. Appelrath, H.-J.: ¬Die Erweiterung von DB- und IR-Systemen zu Wissensbasierten Systemen (1985) 0.07
    0.07377756 = product of:
      0.14755511 = sum of:
        0.14755511 = product of:
          0.44266534 = sum of:
            0.44266534 = weight(_text_:db in 5182) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.44266534 = score(doc=5182,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.329642 = queryWeight, product of:
                  7.7650614 = idf(docFreq=50, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04245195 = queryNorm
                1.3428669 = fieldWeight in 5182, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  7.7650614 = idf(docFreq=50, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5182)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    In dieser Arbeit wird der Versuch unternommen, die beiden klassischen Typen von Informationssystemen, Datenbank (DB)- und Information Retrieval (IR)-Systeme, bezüglich ihrer Erweiterung zu Wissensbasierten Systemen zu diskutieren. Eine solche Diskussion kann unter sehr verschiedenen Blickwinkeln erfolgen, hier beschränkt auf den Aspekt, jeweils mit Bezug zu PROLOG möglicher Erweiterungen von DB- und IR-Systemen zu untersuchen. Ein grundlegendes Verständnis von DB- und IR-Systemen wird vorausgesetzt. Die Arbeit beschränkt sich auf kurze Darstellungen wissensbasierter Systeme in Kap.1 und von PROLOG in Kap.2. Darauf aufbauend wird in Kap.3 die Erweiterung von DB- und in Kap.4 die Erweiterung von IR-Systemen jeweils zu Wissensbasierten Systemen behandelt
  11. Luca, E.W. de; Dahlberg, I.: ¬Die Multilingual Lexical Linked Data Cloud : eine mögliche Zugangsoptimierung? (2014) 0.07
    0.06806501 = product of:
      0.13613002 = sum of:
        0.13613002 = product of:
          0.20419502 = sum of:
            0.16968511 = weight(_text_:db in 1736) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.16968511 = score(doc=1736,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.329642 = queryWeight, product of:
                  7.7650614 = idf(docFreq=50, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04245195 = queryNorm
                0.5147557 = fieldWeight in 1736, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  7.7650614 = idf(docFreq=50, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1736)
            0.03450992 = weight(_text_:22 in 1736) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03450992 = score(doc=1736,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1486595 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04245195 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1736, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1736)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Sehr viele Informationen sind bereits im Web verfügbar oder können aus isolierten strukturierten Datenspeichern wie Informationssystemen und sozialen Netzwerken gewonnen werden. Datenintegration durch Nachbearbeitung oder durch Suchmechanismen (z. B. D2R) ist deshalb wichtig, um Informationen allgemein verwendbar zu machen. Semantische Technologien ermöglichen die Verwendung definierter Verbindungen (typisierter Links), durch die ihre Beziehungen zueinander festgehalten werden, was Vorteile für jede Anwendung bietet, die das in Daten enthaltene Wissen wieder verwenden kann. Um ­eine semantische Daten-Landkarte herzustellen, benötigen wir Wissen über die einzelnen Daten und ihre Beziehung zu anderen Daten. Dieser Beitrag stellt unsere Arbeit zur Benutzung von Lexical Linked Data (LLD) durch ein Meta-Modell vor, das alle Ressourcen enthält und zudem die Möglichkeit bietet sie unter unterschiedlichen Gesichtspunkten aufzufinden. Wir verbinden damit bestehende Arbeiten über Wissensgebiete (basierend auf der Information Coding Classification) mit der Multilingual Lexical Linked Data Cloud (basierend auf der RDF/OWL-Repräsentation von EuroWordNet und den ähnlichen integrierten lexikalischen Ressourcen MultiWordNet, MEMODATA und die Hamburg Metapher DB).
    Date
    22. 9.2014 19:00:13
  12. Megner, K.: ¬Die deutsche Bibliographie (DB) und das Verzeichnis lieferbarer Bücher (VLB) als Printmedien, Online- und CD-ROM-Datenbanken : Vergleiche und Stichproben (1991) 0.07
    0.0666586 = product of:
      0.1333172 = sum of:
        0.1333172 = product of:
          0.3999516 = sum of:
            0.3999516 = weight(_text_:db in 8449) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.3999516 = score(doc=8449,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.329642 = queryWeight, product of:
                  7.7650614 = idf(docFreq=50, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04245195 = queryNorm
                1.2132908 = fieldWeight in 8449, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  7.7650614 = idf(docFreq=50, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=8449)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Object
    DB
  13. Maier, A.: ¬Ein deduktives Datenbanksystem : LILOG-DB (1991) 0.07
    0.06598865 = product of:
      0.1319773 = sum of:
        0.1319773 = product of:
          0.3959319 = sum of:
            0.3959319 = weight(_text_:db in 1116) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.3959319 = score(doc=1116,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.329642 = queryWeight, product of:
                  7.7650614 = idf(docFreq=50, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04245195 = queryNorm
                1.2010967 = fieldWeight in 1116, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  7.7650614 = idf(docFreq=50, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1116)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  14. Appelrath, H.-J.: ¬Die Erweiterung von DB- und IR- zu Wissensbasierten Systemen (1985) 0.07
    0.06598865 = product of:
      0.1319773 = sum of:
        0.1319773 = product of:
          0.3959319 = sum of:
            0.3959319 = weight(_text_:db in 471) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.3959319 = score(doc=471,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.329642 = queryWeight, product of:
                  7.7650614 = idf(docFreq=50, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04245195 = queryNorm
                1.2010967 = fieldWeight in 471, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  7.7650614 = idf(docFreq=50, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=471)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  15. Vogt, R.: Zwei Konzepte der Automatisierung von Nationalbibliographien : Deutsche Bibliographie und British National Bibliography (1979) 0.07
    0.06598865 = product of:
      0.1319773 = sum of:
        0.1319773 = product of:
          0.3959319 = sum of:
            0.3959319 = weight(_text_:db in 6179) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.3959319 = score(doc=6179,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.329642 = queryWeight, product of:
                  7.7650614 = idf(docFreq=50, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04245195 = queryNorm
                1.2010967 = fieldWeight in 6179, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  7.7650614 = idf(docFreq=50, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6179)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Object
    DB
  16. Perez, F.G.: DB/Textworks : una alternativa para crear un sistema automatizado de biblioteca (1997) 0.07
    0.06598865 = product of:
      0.1319773 = sum of:
        0.1319773 = product of:
          0.3959319 = sum of:
            0.3959319 = weight(_text_:db in 1598) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.3959319 = score(doc=1598,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.329642 = queryWeight, product of:
                  7.7650614 = idf(docFreq=50, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04245195 = queryNorm
                1.2010967 = fieldWeight in 1598, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  7.7650614 = idf(docFreq=50, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1598)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Account of the experience of the International Maize and Wheat Improvement Centre CIMMYT based in Mexico, which employs some 100 scientists and 600 support staff. To improve services the library updated its system using DB/Textworks, software which can manage large quantities of text including both data and images. The system is structured into modules for cataloguing, circulation, user information, serials, acquisition and suppliers. The chief advantages for medium sized libraries such as CIMMYT is its simplicity; tasks such as defining databases, creating reports, exchanging information so not require the intervention of computer experts
    Footnote
    Übers. d. Titels: DB/Textworks: an alternative for creating a computerised library system
    Object
    Inmagic DB/Textworks
  17. Ellingen, D.: Inmagic DB/TextWorks : a windows 'textbase' with images (1996) 0.07
    0.065311834 = product of:
      0.13062367 = sum of:
        0.13062367 = product of:
          0.39187098 = sum of:
            0.39187098 = weight(_text_:db in 4945) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.39187098 = score(doc=4945,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.329642 = queryWeight, product of:
                  7.7650614 = idf(docFreq=50, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04245195 = queryNorm
                1.1887774 = fieldWeight in 4945, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  7.7650614 = idf(docFreq=50, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4945)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    DB/TextWorks from Inmagic, Inc, is a Windows enabled textbase system which aims to combine the strengths of text retrieval systems, and field databases. Outlines reasons for switching to this product, and how it compares with Inmagic's DOS products. Explains how to install the system, reviews its features and reports on testing of the system
    Object
    Inmagic DB/TextWorks
  18. Tang, X.; Yang, C.C.; Song, M.: Understanding the evolution of multiple scientific research domains using a content and network approach (2013) 0.06
    0.062353414 = product of:
      0.12470683 = sum of:
        0.12470683 = product of:
          0.37412047 = sum of:
            0.37412047 = weight(_text_:db in 744) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.37412047 = score(doc=744,freq=14.0), product of:
                0.329642 = queryWeight, product of:
                  7.7650614 = idf(docFreq=50, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04245195 = queryNorm
                1.1349297 = fieldWeight in 744, product of:
                  3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                    14.0 = termFreq=14.0
                  7.7650614 = idf(docFreq=50, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=744)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Interdisciplinary research has been attracting more attention in recent decades. In this article, we compare the similarity between scientific research domains and quantifying the temporal similarities of domains. We narrowed our study to three research domains: information retrieval (IR), database (DB), and World Wide Web (W3), because the rapid development of the W3 domain substantially attracted research efforts from both IR and DB domains and introduced new research questions to these two areas. Most existing approaches either employed a content-based technique or a cocitation or coauthorship network-based technique to study the development trend of a research area. In this work, we proposed an effective way to quantify the similarities among different research domains by incorporating content similarity and coauthorship network similarity. Experimental results on DBLP (DataBase systems and Logic Programming) data related to IR, DB, and W3 domains showed that the W3 domain was getting closer to both IR and DB whereas the distance between IR and DB remained relatively constant. In addition, comparing to IR and W3 with the DB domain, the DB domain was more conservative and evolved relatively slower.
  19. De Luca, E.W.; Dahlberg, I.: Including knowledge domains from the ICC into the multilingual lexical linked data cloud (2014) 0.06
    0.060691528 = product of:
      0.121383056 = sum of:
        0.121383056 = product of:
          0.18207458 = sum of:
            0.14140424 = weight(_text_:db in 1493) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.14140424 = score(doc=1493,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.329642 = queryWeight, product of:
                  7.7650614 = idf(docFreq=50, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04245195 = queryNorm
                0.42896307 = fieldWeight in 1493, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  7.7650614 = idf(docFreq=50, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1493)
            0.040670328 = weight(_text_:22 in 1493) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.040670328 = score(doc=1493,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.1486595 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04245195 = queryNorm
                0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 1493, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1493)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    A lot of information that is already available on the Web, or retrieved from local information systems and social networks is structured in data silos that are not semantically related. Semantic technologies make it emerge that the use of typed links that directly express their relations are an advantage for every application that can reuse the incorporated knowledge about the data. For this reason, data integration, through reengineering (e.g. triplify), or querying (e.g. D2R) is an important task in order to make information available for everyone. Thus, in order to build a semantic map of the data, we need knowledge about data items itself and the relation between heterogeneous data items. In this paper, we present our work of providing Lexical Linked Data (LLD) through a meta-model that contains all the resources and gives the possibility to retrieve and navigate them from different perspectives. We combine the existing work done on knowledge domains (based on the Information Coding Classification) within the Multilingual Lexical Linked Data Cloud (based on the RDF/OWL EurowordNet and the related integrated lexical resources (MultiWordNet, EuroWordNet, MEMODATA Lexicon, Hamburg Methaphor DB).
    Date
    22. 9.2014 19:01:18
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  20. Blum, R.: ¬Die Deutsche Bibliographie : Rückblick und Ausblick (1966) 0.06
    0.056561705 = product of:
      0.11312341 = sum of:
        0.11312341 = product of:
          0.33937022 = sum of:
            0.33937022 = weight(_text_:db in 4946) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.33937022 = score(doc=4946,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.329642 = queryWeight, product of:
                  7.7650614 = idf(docFreq=50, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04245195 = queryNorm
                1.0295115 = fieldWeight in 4946, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  7.7650614 = idf(docFreq=50, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4946)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Object
    DB

Languages

Types

  • el 73
  • b 34
  • p 1
  • More… Less…

Themes