Search (7 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Tenopir, C."
  1. Wilson, C.S.; Tenopir, C.: Local citation analysis, publishing and reading patterns : using multiple methods to evaluate faculty use of an academic library's research collection (2008) 0.05
    0.045336 = product of:
      0.136008 = sum of:
        0.136008 = weight(_text_:citation in 1960) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.136008 = score(doc=1960,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.23479973 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6892867 = idf(docFreq=1104, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050071523 = queryNorm
            0.57925105 = fieldWeight in 1960, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              4.6892867 = idf(docFreq=1104, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1960)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    This study assessed the intermix of local citation analysis and survey of journal use and reading patterns for evaluating an academic library's research collection. Journal articles and their cited references from faculties at the University of New South Wales were downloaded from the Web of Science (WoS) and journal impact factors from the Journal Citation Reports. The survey of the University of New South Wales (UNSW) academic staff asked both reader-related and reading-related questions. Both methods showed that academics in medicine published more and had more coauthors per paper than academics in the other faculties; however, when correlated with the number of students and academic staff, science published more and engineering published in higher impact journals. When recalled numbers of articles published were compared to actual numbers, all faculties over-estimated their productivity by nearly two-fold. The distribution of cited serial references was highly skewed with over half of the titles cited only once. The survey results corresponded with U.S. university surveys with one exception: Engineering academics reported the highest number of article readings and read mostly for research related activities. Citation analysis data showed that the UNSW library provided the majority of journals in which researchers published and cited, mostly in electronic formats. However, the availability of non-journal cited sources was low. The joint methods provided both confirmatory and contradictory results and proved useful in evaluating library research collections.
    Theme
    Citation indexing
  2. Tenopir, C.; Ennis, L.: ¬The digital reference work of academic libraries (1998) 0.01
    0.01119303 = product of:
      0.03357909 = sum of:
        0.03357909 = product of:
          0.06715818 = sum of:
            0.06715818 = weight(_text_:22 in 5170) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06715818 = score(doc=5170,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.17534193 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050071523 = queryNorm
                0.38301262 = fieldWeight in 5170, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5170)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Online. 22(1998) no.4, S.22-28
  3. Tenopir, C.: Reference services from RLG (1995) 0.01
    0.009045334 = product of:
      0.027136 = sum of:
        0.027136 = product of:
          0.054272 = sum of:
            0.054272 = weight(_text_:22 in 2612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054272 = score(doc=2612,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17534193 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050071523 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2612, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2612)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    25.11.1995 19:22:01
  4. Tenopir, C.: Integrating electronic reference (1995) 0.01
    0.009045334 = product of:
      0.027136 = sum of:
        0.027136 = product of:
          0.054272 = sum of:
            0.054272 = weight(_text_:22 in 2616) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054272 = score(doc=2616,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17534193 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050071523 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2616, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2616)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    25.11.1995 19:22:01
  5. Sandusky, R.J.; Tenopir, C.: Finding and using journal-article components : impacts of disaggregation on teaching and research practice (2008) 0.01
    0.008802996 = product of:
      0.026408987 = sum of:
        0.026408987 = product of:
          0.052817974 = sum of:
            0.052817974 = weight(_text_:index in 1723) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.052817974 = score(doc=1723,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21880072 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050071523 = queryNorm
                0.24139762 = fieldWeight in 1723, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1723)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    This article reports the results of a study into the use of discrete journal-article components, particularly tables and figures extracted from published scientific journal articles, and their application to teaching and research. Sixty participants were introduced to and asked to perform searches in a journal-article component prototype that presents individual tables and figures as the items returned in the search results set. Multiple methods, including questionnaires, observations, and structured diaries, were used to collect data. The results are analyzed in the context of previous studies on the use of scientific journal articles and in terms of research on scientists' use of specific journal-article components to find information, assess its relevance, read, interpret, and disaggregate the information found, and reaggregate components into new forms of information. Results indicate that scientists believe searching for journal-article components has value in terms of (a) higher precision result sets, (b) better match between the granularity of the prototype's index and the granularity of the information sought for particular tasks, and (c) fit between journal-article component searching and the established teaching and research practices of scientists.
  6. Tenopir, C.; Neufang, R.: Electronic reference options : how they stack up in research libraries (1992) 0.01
    0.007914666 = product of:
      0.023743998 = sum of:
        0.023743998 = product of:
          0.047487997 = sum of:
            0.047487997 = weight(_text_:22 in 2343) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047487997 = score(doc=2343,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17534193 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050071523 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2343, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2343)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Online. 16(1992) no.2, S.22-28
  7. Allard, S.; Levine, K.J.; Tenopir, C.: Design engineers and technical professionals at work : observing information usage in the workplace (2009) 0.01
    0.005653334 = product of:
      0.01696 = sum of:
        0.01696 = product of:
          0.03392 = sum of:
            0.03392 = weight(_text_:22 in 2735) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03392 = score(doc=2735,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17534193 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050071523 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2735, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2735)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2009 12:43:37