Search (49 results, page 1 of 3)

  • × theme_ss:"Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus"
  1. Schneider, J.W.; Borlund, P.: ¬A bibliometric-based semiautomatic approach to identification of candidate thesaurus terms : parsing and filtering of noun phrases from citation contexts (2005) 0.13 
    0.12936863 = product of:
  0.19405293 = sum of:
    0.17030893 = weight(_text_:citation in 156) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.17030893 = score(doc=156,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.23479973 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.6892867 = idf(docFreq=1104, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050071523 = queryNorm
        0.725337 = fieldWeight in 156, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          4.6892867 = idf(docFreq=1104, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=156)
    0.023743998 = product of:
      0.047487997 = sum of:
        0.047487997 = weight(_text_:22 in 156) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.047487997 = score(doc=156,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17534193 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050071523 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 156, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=156)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    The present study investigates the ability of a bibliometric based semi-automatic method to select candidate thesaurus terms from citation contexts. The method consists of document co-citation analysis, citation context analysis, and noun phrase parsing. The investigation is carried out within the specialty area of periodontology. The results clearly demonstrate that the method is able to select important candidate thesaurus terms within the chosen specialty area.
    Date
    8. 3.2007 19:55:22
  2. Mooers, C.N.: ¬The indexing language of an information retrieval system (1985) 0.03 
    0.0292608 = product of:
  0.0877824 = sum of:
    0.0877824 = sum of:
      0.064038396 = weight(_text_:index in 3644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.064038396 = score(doc=3644,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.21880072 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050071523 = queryNorm
          0.2926791 = fieldWeight in 3644, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
            0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3644)
      0.023743998 = weight(_text_:22 in 3644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.023743998 = score(doc=3644,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17534193 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050071523 = queryNorm
          0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 3644, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3644)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Calvin Mooers' work toward the resolution of the problem of ambiguity in indexing went unrecognized for years. At the time he introduced the "descriptor" - a term with a very distinct meaning-indexers were, for the most part, taking index terms directly from the document, without either rationalizing them with context or normalizing them with some kind of classification. It is ironic that Mooers' term came to be attached to the popular but unsophisticated indexing methods which he was trying to root out. Simply expressed, what Mooers did was to take the dictionary definitions of terms and redefine them so clearly that they could not be used in any context except that provided by the new definition. He did, at great pains, construct such meanings for over four hundred words; disambiguation and specificity were sought after and found for these words. He proposed that all indexers adopt this method so that when the index supplied a term, it also supplied the exact meaning for that term as used in the indexed document. The same term used differently in another document would be defined differently and possibly renamed to avoid ambiguity. The disambiguation was achieved by using unabridged dictionaries and other sources of defining terminology. In practice, this tends to produce circularity in definition, that is, word A refers to word B which refers to word C which refers to word A. It was necessary, therefore, to break this chain by creating a new, definitive meaning for each word. Eventually, means such as those used by Austin (q.v.) for PRECIS achieved the same purpose, but by much more complex means than just creating a unique definition of each term. Mooers, however, was probably the first to realize how confusing undefined terminology could be. Early automatic indexers dealt with distinct disciplines and, as long as they did not stray beyond disciplinary boundaries, a quick and dirty keyword approach was satisfactory. The trouble came when attempts were made to make a combined index for two or more distinct disciplines. A number of processes have since been developed, mostly involving tagging of some kind or use of strings. Mooers' solution has rarely been considered seriously and probably would be extremely difficult to apply now because of so much interdisciplinarity. But for a specific, weIl defined field, it is still weIl worth considering. Mooers received training in mathematics and physics from the University of Minnesota and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. He was the founder of Zator Company, which developed and marketed a coded card information retrieval system, and of Rockford Research, Inc., which engages in research in information science. He is the inventor of the TRAC computer language.
    Footnote
    Original in: Information retrieval today: papers presented at an Institute conducted by the Library School and the Center for Continuation Study, University of Minnesota, Sept. 19-22, 1962. Ed. by Wesley Simonton. Minneapolis, Minn.: The Center, 1963. S.21-36.
  3. Brühl, B.: Thesauri und Klassifikationen : Naturwissenschaften - Technik - Wirtschaft (2005) 0.03 
    0.02896424 = product of:
  0.08689272 = sum of:
    0.08689272 = sum of:
      0.05975672 = weight(_text_:index in 3487) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.05975672 = score(doc=3487,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.21880072 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050071523 = queryNorm
          0.27311024 = fieldWeight in 3487, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3487)
      0.027136 = weight(_text_:22 in 3487) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.027136 = score(doc=3487,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17534193 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050071523 = queryNorm
          0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 3487, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3487)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Das Buch gibt einen umfassenden Überblick über vorhandene Thesauri und Klassifikationen. Es liefert detaillierte Beschreibungen zu mehr als 150 Klassifikationen und Thesauri aus Naturwissenschaften, Technik, Wirtschaft und Patentwesen. Da gegenwärtig eine aktuelle Zusammenstellung international verfügbarer Thesauri und Klassifikationen fehlt, schließt das vorliegende Buch diese Lücke und kann somit dazu beitragen, Doppelarbeit bei der Erstellung von Thesauri und Klassifikationen zu verhindern und den intellektuellen wie kostenintensiven Aufwand zu minimieren. Zusätzlich bietet dieses Nachschlagewerk mit einem umfangreichen Index den Informationsspezialisten Unterstützung bei der Formulierung präziser Rechercheanfragen, indem es Informationen über Vorhandensein, Aufbau und Verfügbarkeit der Thesauri und Klassifikationen bereitstellt, die für die Recherche genutzt werden können. Das Buch wendet sich an alle Information Professionals, die Dokumentationssprachen aufbauen und nutzen.
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Information: Wissenschaft & Praxis 56(2005) H.5/6, S.337 (W. Ratzek): "Bettina Brühl legt mit "Thesauri und Klassifikationen" ein Fleißarbeit vor. Das Buch mit seiner Auswahl von über 150 Klassifikationen und Thesauri aus Naturwissenschaft, Technik, Wirtschaft und Patenwesen macht es zu einem brauchbaren Nachschlagewerk, zumal auch ein umfassender Index nach Sachgebieten, nach Datenbanken und nach Klassifikationen und Thesauri angeboten wird. Nach einer 13-seitigen Einführung (Kapitel 1 und 2) folgt mit dem 3. Kapitel die "Darstellung von Klassifikationen und Thesauri", im wesentlichen aus den Beschreibungen der Hersteller zusammengestellt. Hier werden Dokumentationssprachen der Fachgebiete - Naturwissenschaften (3.1) und deren Spezialisierungen wie zum Beispiel "Biowissenschaften und Biotechnologie", "Chemie" oder "Umwelt und Ökonomie", aber auch "Mathematik und Informatik" (?) auf 189 Seiten vorgestellt, - Technik mit zum Beispiel "Fachordnung Technik", "Subject Categories (INIS/ ETDE) mit 17 Seiten verhältnismäßig knapp abgehandelt, - Wirtschaft mit "Branchen-Codes", "Product-Codes", "Länder-Codes"",Fachklas-sifikationen" und "Thesauri" ausführlich auf 57 Seiten präsentiert, - Patente und Normen mit zum Beispiel "Europäische Patentklassifikation" oder "International Patent Classification" auf 33 Seiten umrissen. Jedes Teilgebiet wird mit einer kurzen Beschreibung eingeleitet. Danach folgen die jeweiligen Beschreibungen mit den Merkmalen: "Anschrift des Erstellers", "Themen-gebiet(e)", "Sprache", "Verfügbarkeit", "An-wendung" und "Ouelle(n)". "Das Buch wendet sich an alle Information Professionals, die Dokumentationssprachen aufbauen und nutzen" heißt es in der Verlagsinformation. Zwar ist es nicht notwendig, die informationswissenschaftlichen Aspekte der Klassifikationen und Thesauri abzuhandeln, aber ein Hinweis auf die Bedeutung der Information und Dokumentation und/oder der Informationswissenschaft wäre schon angebracht, um in der Welt der Informations- und Wissenswirtschaft zu demonstrieren, welchen Beitrag unsere Profession leistet. Andernfalls bleibt das Blickfeld eingeschränkt und der Anschluss an neuere Entwicklungen ausgeblendet. Dieser Anknüpfungspunkt wäre beispielsweise durch einen Exkurs über Topic Map/Semantic Web gegeben. Der Verlag liefert mit der Herausgabe die ses Kompendiums einen nützlichen ersten Baustein zu einem umfassenden Verzeichnis von Thesauri und Klassifikationen."
    Series
    Materialien zur Information und Dokumentation; Bd.22
  4. Thönssen, B.: Automatische Indexierung und Schnittstellen zu Thesauri (1988) 0.02 
    0.024898633 = product of:
  0.0746959 = sum of:
    0.0746959 = product of:
      0.1493918 = sum of:
        0.1493918 = weight(_text_:index in 30) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1493918 = score(doc=30,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.21880072 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050071523 = queryNorm
            0.6827756 = fieldWeight in 30, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=30)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Über eine Schnittstelle zwischen Programmen zur automatischen Indexierung (PRIMUS-IDX) und zur maschinellen Thesaurusverwaltung (INDEX) sollen große Textmengen schnell, kostengünstig und konsistent erschlossen und verbesserte Recherchemöglichkeiten geschaffen werden. Zielvorstellung ist ein Verfahren, das auf PCs ablauffähig ist und speziell deutschsprachige Texte bearbeiten kann
    Object
    INDEX
  5. Spiteri, L.F.: ¬The essential elements of faceted thesauri (1999) 0.02 
    0.024329849 = product of:
  0.072989546 = sum of:
    0.072989546 = weight(_text_:citation in 5362) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.072989546 = score(doc=5362,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.23479973 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.6892867 = idf(docFreq=1104, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050071523 = queryNorm
        0.31085873 = fieldWeight in 5362, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.6892867 = idf(docFreq=1104, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5362)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    The goal of this study is to evaluate, compare, and contrast how facet analysis is used to construct the systematic or faceted displays of a selection of information retrieval thesauri. More specifically, the study seeks to examine which principles of facet analysis are used in the thesauri, and the extent to which different thesauri apply these principles in the same way. A measuring instrument was designed for the purpose of evaluating the structure of faceted thesauri. This instrument was applied to fourteen faceted information retrieval thesauri. The study reveals that the thesauri do not share a common definition of what constitutes a facet. In some cases, the thesauri apply both enumerative-style classification and facet analysis to arrange their indexing terms. A number of the facets used in the thesauri are not homogeneous or mutually exclusive. The principle of synthesis is used in only 50% of the thesauri, and no one citation order is used consistently by the thesauri.
  6. Mandersloot, W.G.B.: Thesaurus control : the selection grouping and cross-referencing of terms for inclusion in a coordinate index world list (1970) 0.02 
    0.02112719 = product of:
  0.06338157 = sum of:
    0.06338157 = product of:
      0.12676314 = sum of:
        0.12676314 = weight(_text_:index in 1972) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12676314 = score(doc=1972,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21880072 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050071523 = queryNorm
            0.5793543 = fieldWeight in 1972, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1972)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  7. Röttsches, H.: Thesauruspflege im Verbund der Bibliotheken der obersten Bundesbehörden (1989) 0.02 
    0.015829332 = product of:
  0.047487997 = sum of:
    0.047487997 = product of:
      0.09497599 = sum of:
        0.09497599 = weight(_text_:22 in 4199) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09497599 = score(doc=4199,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17534193 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050071523 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4199, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4199)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Source
    Mitteilungen der Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Parlaments- und Behördenbibliotheken. 1989, H.67, S.1-22
  8. Wasen, S.: Entwicklung und Anwendung eines Telecom-Thesaurus (2001) 0.01 
    0.01493918 = product of:
  0.044817537 = sum of:
    0.044817537 = product of:
      0.089635074 = sum of:
        0.089635074 = weight(_text_:index in 5888) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.089635074 = score(doc=5888,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.21880072 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050071523 = queryNorm
            0.40966535 = fieldWeight in 5888, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5888)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Eutelis Consult ist eines der führenden Beratungsunternehmen auf dem Sektor der Telekommunikation und der Mehrwertdienste. Eutelis Consult erbringt national und international Beratungsdienstleistungen für Anbieter von Telekommunikations- und Mehrwertdiensten, für Netzbetreiber, Hersteller von Vermittlungssystemen und Endgeräten, Anwender und Nutzer von Telekommunikationsdiensten sowie öffentliche Auftraggeber. Weitere Beratungsschwerpunkte von Eutelis Consult konzentrieren sich auf die regulatorischen Rahmenbedingungen, Smartcardanwendungen, die Personalberatung sowie auf die Finanzierung junger Unternehmen in diesen Sektoren. Von der für das EUTELIS-interne Content Management verantwortlichen Abteilung wird aktuell ein Telecom Thesaurus erstellt, der der Indexierung aller internen Projektberichte und der dokumentierten externen Materialien dient. Grundlage ist ein Lotus Notes & Domino-basiertes internes Netz. Die Entstehungsgeschichte des Thesaurus, Experimente mit maschineller Generierung von Thesaurus-Relationen, maschineller Generierung von Thesaurus-Kandidaten und dem Einblick in den derzeitigen Stand mit dem Entwicklungstool IC INDEX 5.0 werden vermittelt
    Object
    Index-5.0
  9. Byrne, C.C.; McCracken, S.A.: ¬An adaptive thesaurus employing semantic distance, relational inheritance and nominal compound interpretation for linguistic support of information retrieval (1999) 0.01 
    0.013567999 = product of:
  0.040703997 = sum of:
    0.040703997 = product of:
      0.081407994 = sum of:
        0.081407994 = weight(_text_:22 in 4483) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.081407994 = score(doc=4483,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17534193 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050071523 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4483, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4483)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Date
    15. 3.2000 10:22:37
  10. Maniez, J.: ¬Des classifications aux thesaurus : du bon usage des facettes (1999) 0.01 
    0.013567999 = product of:
  0.040703997 = sum of:
    0.040703997 = product of:
      0.081407994 = sum of:
        0.081407994 = weight(_text_:22 in 6404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.081407994 = score(doc=6404,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17534193 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050071523 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6404, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6404)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:01:00
  11. Maniez, J.: ¬Du bon usage des facettes : des classifications aux thésaurus (1999) 0.01 
    0.013567999 = product of:
  0.040703997 = sum of:
    0.040703997 = product of:
      0.081407994 = sum of:
        0.081407994 = weight(_text_:22 in 3773) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.081407994 = score(doc=3773,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17534193 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050071523 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3773, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3773)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:01:00
  12. Qin, J.; Paling, S.: Converting a controlled vocabulary into an ontology : the case of GEM (2001) 0.01 
    0.013567999 = product of:
  0.040703997 = sum of:
    0.040703997 = product of:
      0.081407994 = sum of:
        0.081407994 = weight(_text_:22 in 3895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.081407994 = score(doc=3895,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17534193 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050071523 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3895, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3895)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Date
    24. 8.2005 19:20:22
  13. Skrubbeltrang, C.: Anvendelse af brugerassociationer ved tesauruskonstruktion (1993) 0.01 
    0.012324194 = product of:
  0.036972582 = sum of:
    0.036972582 = product of:
      0.073945165 = sum of:
        0.073945165 = weight(_text_:index in 7330) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.073945165 = score(doc=7330,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21880072 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050071523 = queryNorm
            0.33795667 = fieldWeight in 7330, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7330)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Examines how far automation cluster analysis and association testing are relevant methods for smaller libraries in construction of search thesauri. Using WORDSTAR, a simple form of cluster analysis was tested, with satisfactory results in that the index terms formed clusters of a suitable size. The association test was used to elicit from users' natural language terms which can be used in the search thesaurus as entrance vocabulary. The test showed that users associated very differently in relation to the same stimuli words, with low overlap with terms used in the system's indexing. The results confirmed the need for better feedback. Concludes that while neither method can be used alone, a search thesauri which combine terms from the indexes and from users can be a powerful tool
  14. Williamson, N.J.: Deriving a thesaurus from a restructured UDC (1996) 0.01 
    0.012324194 = product of:
  0.036972582 = sum of:
    0.036972582 = product of:
      0.073945165 = sum of:
        0.073945165 = weight(_text_:index in 5194) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.073945165 = score(doc=5194,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21880072 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050071523 = queryNorm
            0.33795667 = fieldWeight in 5194, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5194)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    The derivation of a thesaurus from a new schedule for UDC class 61 Medical Sciences which has been restructured into a faceted classification system using the framework provided by the Bliss Bibliographic Classification. The resulting thesaurus is intended to serve as a tool for indexing and searching but will also be the index to the 61 class itself. The background for the research is briefly described. The sources and methods used to select the descriptors and define their relationships are discussed. Problems are identified and some solutions proposed
  15. Gruber, A.: Vom Knüpfen feministischer Begriffsnetze : Ariadnes Faden & geschlechtersensible Normdaten (2022) 0.01 
    0.012324194 = product of:
  0.036972582 = sum of:
    0.036972582 = product of:
      0.073945165 = sum of:
        0.073945165 = weight(_text_:index in 577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.073945165 = score(doc=577,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21880072 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050071523 = queryNorm
            0.33795667 = fieldWeight in 577, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=577)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Feministische Thesauri sind Begriffsnetze der Frauen*- und Geschlechterforschung, die in der bibliothekarischen Praxis jene Lücken schließen, die konventionelle Normdateien bei der Sacherschließung relevanter Literatur hinterlassen. Mit thesaurA wurde Mitte der 1990er Jahren der erste kooperative frauen*spezifische Fachthesaurus Österreichs erstellt. Der SAR-Index der Ariadne, der Frauen*- und Geschlechterdokumentationsstelle der Österreichischen Nationalbibliothek (ÖNB), ist eine lokale Weiterentwicklung. Ein Wechsel des Bibliothekssystems an der ÖNB macht eine Migration des Vokabulars erforderlich. Der Beitrag beleuchtet das Migrationsprojekt im Kontext feministischer Beschlagwortung und entwickelt Überlegungen zu kooperativen Thesaurus-Projekten weiter, die unabhängig der fachlichen Ausrichtung Relevanz entfalten können.
  16. Riege, U.: Thesaurus und Klassifikation Sozialwissenschaften : Entwicklung der elektronischen Versionen (1998) 0.01 
    0.011306668 = product of:
  0.03392 = sum of:
    0.03392 = product of:
      0.06784 = sum of:
        0.06784 = weight(_text_:22 in 4158) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06784 = score(doc=4158,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17534193 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050071523 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4158, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4158)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Source
    Information und Märkte: 50. Deutscher Dokumentartag 1998, Kongreß der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Dokumentation e.V. (DGD), Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, 22.-24. September 1998. Hrsg. von Marlies Ockenfeld u. Gerhard J. Mantwill
  17. Alkämper, H.: ¬Die Neugestaltung des Parlamentsthesaurus PARTHES (1998) 0.01 
    0.011306668 = product of:
  0.03392 = sum of:
    0.03392 = product of:
      0.06784 = sum of:
        0.06784 = weight(_text_:22 in 4162) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06784 = score(doc=4162,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17534193 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050071523 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4162, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4162)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Source
    Information und Märkte: 50. Deutscher Dokumentartag 1998, Kongreß der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Dokumentation e.V. (DGD), Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, 22.-24. September 1998. Hrsg. von Marlies Ockenfeld u. Gerhard J. Mantwill
  18. Schenkel, M.: Vom Leitkartenthesaurus zum Online-Bibliotheksthesaurus : Die Revision des Dokumentationssystems der Bibliothek des Deutschen Bundestages (1949-1998) (1998) 0.01 
    0.011306668 = product of:
  0.03392 = sum of:
    0.03392 = product of:
      0.06784 = sum of:
        0.06784 = weight(_text_:22 in 4163) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06784 = score(doc=4163,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17534193 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050071523 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4163, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4163)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Source
    Information und Märkte: 50. Deutscher Dokumentartag 1998, Kongreß der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Dokumentation e.V. (DGD), Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, 22.-24. September 1998. Hrsg. von Marlies Ockenfeld u. Gerhard J. Mantwill
  19. Velasco, M.: Algoritmo de filtrado multitermino para la obtencion de relaciones jerarquicas en la construction automatica de un tesauro de descriptores (1999) 0.01 
    0.011306668 = product of:
  0.03392 = sum of:
    0.03392 = product of:
      0.06784 = sum of:
        0.06784 = weight(_text_:22 in 348) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06784 = score(doc=348,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17534193 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050071523 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 348, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=348)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Source
    Revista Española de Documentaçion Cientifica. 22(1999) no.1, S.34-49
  20. Tudhope, D.; Hodge, G.: Terminology registries (2007) 0.01 
    0.011306668 = product of:
  0.03392 = sum of:
    0.03392 = product of:
      0.06784 = sum of:
        0.06784 = weight(_text_:22 in 539) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06784 = score(doc=539,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17534193 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050071523 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 539, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=539)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Date
    26.12.2011 13:22:07

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 32
  • d 11
  • f 4
  • dk 1
  • sp 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 41
  • m 4
  • el 3
  • x 2
  • n 1
  • s 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications