Search (89 results, page 1 of 5)

  • × language_ss:"nl"
  1. Voorbij, H.: ¬Een goede titel behoeft geen trefwoord, of toch wel? : een vergelijkend oderzoek titelwoorden - trefwoorden (1997) 0.15
    0.15022092 = product of:
      0.25036818 = sum of:
        0.024317201 = weight(_text_:of in 1446) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024317201 = score(doc=1446,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.07599624 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04859849 = queryNorm
            0.31997898 = fieldWeight in 1446, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1446)
        0.11777179 = weight(_text_:subject in 1446) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11777179 = score(doc=1446,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.17381717 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04859849 = queryNorm
            0.6775613 = fieldWeight in 1446, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1446)
        0.10827918 = product of:
          0.21655837 = sum of:
            0.21655837 = weight(_text_:headings in 1446) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.21655837 = score(doc=1446,freq=12.0), product of:
                0.23569997 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04859849 = queryNorm
                0.91878825 = fieldWeight in 1446, product of:
                  3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                    12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                  4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1446)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Abstract
    A recent survey at the Royal Library in the Netherlands showed that subject headings are more efficient than title keywords for retrieval purposes. 475 Dutch publications were selected at random and assigned subject headings. The study showed that subject headings provided additional useful information in 56% of titles. Subsequent searching of the library's online catalogue showed that 88% of titles were retrieved via subject headings against 57% through title keywords. Further precision may be achieved with the help of indexing staff, but at considerable cost
    Footnote
    Übers. d. Titels: A good title has no need of subject headings, or does it?: a comparative study of title keywords against subject headings
  2. Bergen, C. van; Mastenbroek, O.: Wat wil de gebruiker? : onderwerpsontsluiting bij de Universiteitsbibliotheek Utrecht (1995) 0.12
    0.11812597 = product of:
      0.1968766 = sum of:
        0.023487754 = weight(_text_:of in 1605) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023487754 = score(doc=1605,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.07599624 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04859849 = queryNorm
            0.3090647 = fieldWeight in 1605, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1605)
        0.12286908 = weight(_text_:subject in 1605) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12286908 = score(doc=1605,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.17381717 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04859849 = queryNorm
            0.7068869 = fieldWeight in 1605, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1605)
        0.05051976 = product of:
          0.10103952 = sum of:
            0.10103952 = weight(_text_:headings in 1605) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10103952 = score(doc=1605,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.23569997 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04859849 = queryNorm
                0.42867854 = fieldWeight in 1605, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1605)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Abstract
    A survey of catalogue use in 1993 at Utrecht University in the Netherlands showed considerable dissatisfaction with the online catalogue's subject search facilities. Of those who used subject searching 64% preferred subject headings against only 2% who chose classification schedules. Library users make little use of the existing facilities for assistance and leaflets which are available in the library. It has, therefore, been decided to provide a programme of instruction in library use and to move towards a unified system of subject access to the library's catalogue
    Footnote
    "What do users want? Subject access to collections at Utrecht University Library"
  3. Voorbij, H.: ¬De ontwikkeling van het onderwerpsontsluitingssysteem t.b.v. de Nederlandse Bibliografie (1981) 0.09
    0.092896685 = product of:
      0.1548278 = sum of:
        0.024317201 = weight(_text_:of in 908) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024317201 = score(doc=908,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.07599624 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04859849 = queryNorm
            0.31997898 = fieldWeight in 908, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=908)
        0.06799558 = weight(_text_:subject in 908) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06799558 = score(doc=908,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17381717 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04859849 = queryNorm
            0.3911902 = fieldWeight in 908, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=908)
        0.06251501 = product of:
          0.12503003 = sum of:
            0.12503003 = weight(_text_:headings in 908) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.12503003 = score(doc=908,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.23569997 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04859849 = queryNorm
                0.5304626 = fieldWeight in 908, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=908)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Abstract
    In May 80 the joint working parties on the Dutch National Bibliography and the Dutch National Bibliographical Centre published their final report containing proposals for a national bibliography in the Netherlands based on Brinkmann's catalogue of books. In view of the limited number of terms used in the subject index of Brinkmann's catalogue it was proposed to adopt the thesaurus of headings developed by the Netherlands Bibliotheek en Lektuur Centrum with the addition of UDC and SISO classification numbers to each entry. A test-run has identified a core of some 3.500 headings which will be input into the database to provide a subject index to the bibliography. The system will become operational on 1 Jan 81
  4. Zakrzewska, E.D.: GOO of UDC? : twee systemen voor inhoudelijke ontsluiting vergeleken (1997) 0.09
    0.08699966 = product of:
      0.14499943 = sum of:
        0.023487754 = weight(_text_:of in 520) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023487754 = score(doc=520,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.07599624 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04859849 = queryNorm
            0.3090647 = fieldWeight in 520, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=520)
        0.09517398 = weight(_text_:subject in 520) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09517398 = score(doc=520,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.17381717 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04859849 = queryNorm
            0.5475522 = fieldWeight in 520, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=520)
        0.026337698 = product of:
          0.052675396 = sum of:
            0.052675396 = weight(_text_:22 in 520) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.052675396 = score(doc=520,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17018363 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04859849 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 520, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=520)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Abstract
    In the Netherlands the Gemeenschappelijke Onderwerps Ontsluiting (Standard Subject Indexing) schedules were developed for libraries using the national online catalogue. At Leiden University's Institute voor Oost-Europees Recht en Ruslandkunde use of both UDC and GOO schedules enabled a comparison to be made of the systems. A study of approx. 1.400 titles showed that GOO was more effective in retrieving relevant documents, whereas UDC was more suited for compiling subject bibliographies. The best of both schemes should be combined for optimal retrieval
    Footnote
    Übers. d. Titels: GOO or UDC?: 2 systems for subject indexing compared
    Source
    Informatie professional. 1(1997) no.3, S.19-22
  5. Stokmans, M.; Oomens, A.: Meer grasduinen door genreplaatsing? : genre- of alfabetische plaatsing: onderzoek naar verschillen in gebruikersgedrag (1997) 0.08
    0.082552694 = product of:
      0.13758782 = sum of:
        0.018382076 = weight(_text_:of in 883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018382076 = score(doc=883,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.07599624 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04859849 = queryNorm
            0.24188137 = fieldWeight in 883, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=883)
        0.09616026 = weight(_text_:subject in 883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09616026 = score(doc=883,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.17381717 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04859849 = queryNorm
            0.5532265 = fieldWeight in 883, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=883)
        0.023045486 = product of:
          0.04609097 = sum of:
            0.04609097 = weight(_text_:22 in 883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04609097 = score(doc=883,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17018363 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04859849 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 883, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=883)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Abstract
    As part of her doctoral dissertation at Brabant Catholic University in the Netherlands A. Oomens recently held a survey to determine the relative merits of author and subject arrangements for non fiction collections. Although users browsing through the collections were more likely to find material of interest via a subject arrangement, those looking for a particular title were best served by an author arrangement. All users interviewed preferred the arrangement with which they were familiar
    Footnote
    Übers. d. Titels: Subject arrangement assists browsing?: subject versus alphabetical arrangement: a study in differences in user behavious
    Source
    BibliotheekBlad. 1(1997) no.21, S.22-23
  6. Bruin, H. de: SISO in de aanbieding (1987) 0.08
    0.08191054 = product of:
      0.13651757 = sum of:
        0.024317201 = weight(_text_:of in 907) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024317201 = score(doc=907,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.07599624 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04859849 = queryNorm
            0.31997898 = fieldWeight in 907, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=907)
        0.06799558 = weight(_text_:subject in 907) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06799558 = score(doc=907,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17381717 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04859849 = queryNorm
            0.3911902 = fieldWeight in 907, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=907)
        0.04420479 = product of:
          0.08840958 = sum of:
            0.08840958 = weight(_text_:headings in 907) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08840958 = score(doc=907,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.23569997 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04859849 = queryNorm
                0.37509373 = fieldWeight in 907, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=907)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Abstract
    In the Netherlands dissatisfaction with the classification schedules and subject indexing headings assigned to records by the National Bibliographic Service has led librarians to re-arrange their collections in broad reader-interest categories. With the introduction of online public catalogues in libraries and their provision of multiple entry terms for each item, the problems of conflictions in shelf location are largely eliminated. The internal layout of each library may place constraints on such radical reorganisation. Howver, the merging of the children's and adults' sections can be useful in offering children a greater depth of knowledge. A further useful arrangement may be the combination of fiction and non-fiction collections in broad subject catalogues
  7. Voorbij, H.: Titelwoorden - trefwoorden : een vergelijkend onderzoek (1997) 0.07
    0.07382794 = product of:
      0.18456984 = sum of:
        0.09616026 = weight(_text_:subject in 3175) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09616026 = score(doc=3175,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17381717 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04859849 = queryNorm
            0.5532265 = fieldWeight in 3175, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3175)
        0.08840958 = product of:
          0.17681916 = sum of:
            0.17681916 = weight(_text_:headings in 3175) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.17681916 = score(doc=3175,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.23569997 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04859849 = queryNorm
                0.75018746 = fieldWeight in 3175, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3175)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Footnote
    Übers. d. Titels: Title words - subject headings: a comparative research
  8. Riesthuis, G.J.A.; Stuurman, P.: Tendenzen in de onderwerpsontsluiting : T.4: Onderwerpsontsluiting en on-line catalogi (1990) 0.07
    0.07283285 = product of:
      0.18208213 = sum of:
        0.13599116 = weight(_text_:subject in 211) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13599116 = score(doc=211,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17381717 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04859849 = queryNorm
            0.7823804 = fieldWeight in 211, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=211)
        0.04609097 = product of:
          0.09218194 = sum of:
            0.09218194 = weight(_text_:22 in 211) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09218194 = score(doc=211,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17018363 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04859849 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 211, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=211)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Footnote
    Übers. des Titels: Trends in subject indexing: subject indexing and online catalogues
    Source
    Open. 22(1990) no.10, S.326-330
  9. Jong, M. de: "Bij worm had ik een keer de politiek eraan hangen" : bibliotheek Amstelveen enthousiast over Kid's Catalog (1998) 0.07
    0.07187171 = product of:
      0.11978618 = sum of:
        0.009191038 = weight(_text_:of in 1631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009191038 = score(doc=1631,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07599624 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04859849 = queryNorm
            0.120940685 = fieldWeight in 1631, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1631)
        0.04808013 = weight(_text_:subject in 1631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04808013 = score(doc=1631,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17381717 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04859849 = queryNorm
            0.27661324 = fieldWeight in 1631, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1631)
        0.06251501 = product of:
          0.12503003 = sum of:
            0.12503003 = weight(_text_:headings in 1631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.12503003 = score(doc=1631,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.23569997 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04859849 = queryNorm
                0.5304626 = fieldWeight in 1631, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1631)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Abstract
    Amstelveen Public Library in the Netherlands introduced the online Kid's Catalog in 1997 to enable young users to access the library's catalogue. The system was developed in the United States and has been translated into Dutch for use in Amstelveen. The system enables users to access the catalogue through a menu of icons or by typing in author, title and subject headings. The system can recognise typing errors and offer corrected headings. The system is extremely popular both with children and adults
  10. Heiser, W.J.: Zoeken in de bibliografische ruimte : de bijzondere rol van de hierarchische classificaties bij geautomatiseerde onderwerpsontsluiting (1993) 0.07
    0.06887897 = product of:
      0.11479828 = sum of:
        0.02251335 = weight(_text_:of in 3121) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02251335 = score(doc=3121,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.07599624 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04859849 = queryNorm
            0.29624295 = fieldWeight in 3121, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3121)
        0.04808013 = weight(_text_:subject in 3121) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04808013 = score(doc=3121,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17381717 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04859849 = queryNorm
            0.27661324 = fieldWeight in 3121, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3121)
        0.04420479 = product of:
          0.08840958 = sum of:
            0.08840958 = weight(_text_:headings in 3121) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08840958 = score(doc=3121,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.23569997 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04859849 = queryNorm
                0.37509373 = fieldWeight in 3121, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3121)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Abstract
    The universal classification schemes developed in the 19th century are a direct response to the social changes of that era. However, the increasing use of automation in libraries has highlighted the need fir greater precision in hierarchical structures. A thesaurus of used and related headings can be employed to show the spatial relationship of semantic terms. The resulting search profile can be further enhanced by the addition of citation weighting. To assist users to define searches more accurately libraries using large general classification schemes should consider adding supplementary classification data to records
    Footnote
    Searching in the bibliographical space: the special function of hierarchical classifications in automated subject indexing
  11. Jong, J. de: Haalt het SISO het jaar 2000? : paneldiscussie moet oplossingen opleveren voor de problemen met het SISO (1994) 0.06
    0.06286451 = product of:
      0.10477418 = sum of:
        0.023487754 = weight(_text_:of in 901) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023487754 = score(doc=901,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.07599624 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04859849 = queryNorm
            0.3090647 = fieldWeight in 901, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=901)
        0.05494872 = weight(_text_:subject in 901) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05494872 = score(doc=901,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17381717 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04859849 = queryNorm
            0.31612942 = fieldWeight in 901, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=901)
        0.026337698 = product of:
          0.052675396 = sum of:
            0.052675396 = weight(_text_:22 in 901) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.052675396 = score(doc=901,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17018363 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04859849 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 901, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=901)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Abstract
    In the Netherlands the SISO general classification scheme is criticised by staff of small libraries as too user hostile, and by staff in larger libraries, as lacking detailed subject divisions. To answer such criticism the Nederlands Bibliotheek en Lektuur Centrum has set up a Committee to examine the future of SISO. The Committee has announced plans for the creation of a series of panel discussions to enable staff from all types of library to air their views
    Source
    Bibliotheek en samenleving. 22(1994) no.6, S.10-11
  12. Riesthuis, G.J.A.; Stuurman, P.: Tendenzen in de onderwerpsontsluiting : T.3: Gecontroleerde informatietalen (1990) 0.06
    0.056900498 = product of:
      0.14225124 = sum of:
        0.09616026 = weight(_text_:subject in 210) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09616026 = score(doc=210,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17381717 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04859849 = queryNorm
            0.5532265 = fieldWeight in 210, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=210)
        0.04609097 = product of:
          0.09218194 = sum of:
            0.09218194 = weight(_text_:22 in 210) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09218194 = score(doc=210,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17018363 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04859849 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 210, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=210)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Footnote
    Übers. des Titels: Trends in subject indexing: controlled information languages
    Source
    Open. 22(1990) no.1, S.11-15
  13. Minnigh, L.D.: Chaos in informatie, onderwerpsontsluiting en kennisoverdracht : de rol van de wetenschappelijke bibliotheek (1993) 0.05
    0.046472825 = product of:
      0.11618206 = sum of:
        0.021008085 = weight(_text_:of in 6606) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021008085 = score(doc=6606,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.07599624 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04859849 = queryNorm
            0.27643585 = fieldWeight in 6606, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6606)
        0.09517398 = weight(_text_:subject in 6606) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09517398 = score(doc=6606,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.17381717 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04859849 = queryNorm
            0.5475522 = fieldWeight in 6606, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6606)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Existing classification systems require constant expansion to accomodate new subject fields, while subject indexing techniques fail to display the relationship of subjects. Relational databases are currently being developed which will guide users through the differing levels of subjects, using the 'cartography of science'. Such developments will enable librarians to play a more interactive role in information retrieval and will have far-reaching consequences on the design of subject-indexing systems
  14. Huisman, F.W.: Gemeenschappelijke onderwerpsontsluiting (GOO) : een samenwerkingsproject in Pica-verband (1992) 0.04
    0.03967863 = product of:
      0.099196576 = sum of:
        0.015919344 = weight(_text_:of in 2334) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015919344 = score(doc=2334,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.07599624 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04859849 = queryNorm
            0.20947541 = fieldWeight in 2334, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2334)
        0.08327723 = weight(_text_:subject in 2334) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08327723 = score(doc=2334,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.17381717 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04859849 = queryNorm
            0.4791082 = fieldWeight in 2334, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2334)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    In the Netherlands, for historical reasons, there have been wide variations in subject indexing practice from library to library. With the creation of the Pica (Project for Integrated Catalogue Automation) catalogue network a start was made to create a subject classification suitable for all types of libraries. In 1985 a working party was formed with representatives from the Dutch university libraries and Royal Library. The working party has been responsible for the creation of the general subject classification which has been in use in the Royal Library, and Groningen, Leiden, Nijmegen, and Twente university libraries since Oct. 91. The system was designed for use in online public access catalogues but may also be used as a basis for collection assessment
  15. Timman, T.E.; Harte, T.J.M.: Gedeelde ontsluiting : kosten en baten van gezamenlijke catalogiseren door de ministeriebibliotheken (1993) 0.04
    0.037025675 = product of:
      0.09256419 = sum of:
        0.01485496 = weight(_text_:of in 6699) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01485496 = score(doc=6699,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.07599624 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04859849 = queryNorm
            0.19546966 = fieldWeight in 6699, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6699)
        0.07770923 = weight(_text_:subject in 6699) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07770923 = score(doc=6699,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17381717 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04859849 = queryNorm
            0.4470745 = fieldWeight in 6699, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6699)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    In an attempt to reduce administrative costs a survey was undertaken in 1992 of the opportunities for cooperation in governmant libraries in the Netherlands. The survey concentrated on shared cataloguing and subject indexing of periodical articles. The study showed that subject interests varied to much from library to make cooperation cost-effective. Moreover, as too few records were likely to be obtained from the Dutch online union catalogue it was decided that a cooperative network was not feasible
  16. Riesthuis, G.J.A.: Zoeken met woorden : hergebruik van onderwerpsontsluiting (1998) 0.04
    0.03657113 = product of:
      0.091427825 = sum of:
        0.022741921 = weight(_text_:of in 3154) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022741921 = score(doc=3154,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.07599624 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04859849 = queryNorm
            0.2992506 = fieldWeight in 3154, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3154)
        0.068685904 = weight(_text_:subject in 3154) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.068685904 = score(doc=3154,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17381717 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04859849 = queryNorm
            0.39516178 = fieldWeight in 3154, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3154)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Theory of information languages. Decomposition of UDC-notations
    Footnote
    Übers. d. Titels: Searching with words: re-use of subject indexing
  17. Verwer, R.: Waar is W.F. Hermans? : het bedrog van de OPC (1996) 0.03
    0.029603004 = product of:
      0.07400751 = sum of:
        0.023487754 = weight(_text_:of in 4919) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023487754 = score(doc=4919,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.07599624 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04859849 = queryNorm
            0.3090647 = fieldWeight in 4919, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4919)
        0.05051976 = product of:
          0.10103952 = sum of:
            0.10103952 = weight(_text_:headings in 4919) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10103952 = score(doc=4919,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.23569997 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04859849 = queryNorm
                0.42867854 = fieldWeight in 4919, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4919)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    A study of the online catalogues of major academic libraries and databases in the Netherlands shows considerable variation in the form of name used for the author W.F. Hermans. The problem lies with a lack of authority control in headings used in the Dutch national union Pica catalogue. Reactions from 2 cataloguers point to the difficulties in maintaining catalogues in the face of reduced funding and to the important role played by the Pica project in improving library services and reducing cataloguing backlogs
  18. Loosjes, T.P.; Tichelaar, P.A.; Goossens, J.; Stuurman, P.: Ontsluiting op onderwerp (1977) 0.03
    0.028958935 = product of:
      0.07239734 = sum of:
        0.024317201 = weight(_text_:of in 910) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024317201 = score(doc=910,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.07599624 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04859849 = queryNorm
            0.31997898 = fieldWeight in 910, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=910)
        0.04808013 = weight(_text_:subject in 910) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04808013 = score(doc=910,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17381717 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04859849 = queryNorm
            0.27661324 = fieldWeight in 910, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=910)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Retrieval techniques may be based on the full text of documents, or on descriptors selected from a thesaurus. The latter approach constitutes an attempt to bridge the gap between demand and documents, which causes problems if demand cannot be forecast. Building up a thesaurus involves choosing the method of collecting descriptors, choosing the actual descriptors and making the system easily accessible to users. Classification and a classified catalogue are essential to the organisation of knowledge. Rules for the formation of classes have developed out of natural systems of classification. Chain indexing greatly aids the formation of the subject index. UDC and DDC are used in most documentation centres in the Netherlands. Public libraries mostly use SISO, a Dutch universal classification system
  19. Haanen, E.: Specificiteit en consistentie : een kwantitatief oderzoek naar trefwoordtoekenning door UBA en UBN (1991) 0.03
    0.027921474 = product of:
      0.069803685 = sum of:
        0.01485496 = weight(_text_:of in 4778) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01485496 = score(doc=4778,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.07599624 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04859849 = queryNorm
            0.19546966 = fieldWeight in 4778, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4778)
        0.05494872 = weight(_text_:subject in 4778) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05494872 = score(doc=4778,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17381717 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04859849 = queryNorm
            0.31612942 = fieldWeight in 4778, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4778)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Online public access catalogues enable users to undertake subject searching by classification schedules, natural language, or controlled language terminology. In practice the 1st method is little used. Controlled language systems require indexers to index specifically and consistently. A comparative survey was made of indexing practices at Amsterdam and Mijmegen university libraries. On average Amsterdam assigned each document 3.5 index terms against 1.8 at Nijmegen. This discrepancy in indexing policy is the result of long-standing practices in each institution. Nijmegen has failed to utilise the advantages offered by online cataloges
  20. Hofstede, M.: Zoeken in PiCarta : de proef op de som (1998) 0.03
    0.027921474 = product of:
      0.069803685 = sum of:
        0.01485496 = weight(_text_:of in 4735) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01485496 = score(doc=4735,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.07599624 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04859849 = queryNorm
            0.19546966 = fieldWeight in 4735, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4735)
        0.05494872 = weight(_text_:subject in 4735) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05494872 = score(doc=4735,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17381717 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04859849 = queryNorm
            0.31612942 = fieldWeight in 4735, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4735)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    The proliferation of electronic databases and reduced library collections require researchers to be familiar with an increasing range of bibliographical resources. To assist users in searching multiple databases the PICA network in the Netherlands has developed PiCarta as a single information source. The servie enables users to access bibliographical databases and electronic journals using Boolean logic, fuzzy operators, and subject weighting. The system is, however, dependent upon indexing methods used in original sources

Years

Types

  • a 86
  • b 1
  • d 1
  • el 1
  • r 1
  • More… Less…